ECONOMY  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 47

The Financial Crisis Pushes Europe to the Brink of Disaster

What is happening there will make things worse for us here.
March 12, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

KREMS, Austria -- Obsessed as we are about our own crumbling economy, it's hard for most Americans to see and appreciate the global nature of the crisis and how it is impacting, and will impact, others throughout the world. We don't recognize how many in other countries blame the fall of their own economies on a kind of "financial AIDS" born in the USA.

Protests are spreading through the European continent. Britain has put its own army on alert for fear of disruptions this summer by anarchists bent on class war with slogans like "burn a banker." Mass demonstrations show no sign of abating in France, Iceland, Ireland, Greece and other EU countries.

People here have politicized economic issues, perhaps because of a more thorough and diverse media environment, as well as an expectation that their governments have a duty to protect their people.

When I arrived in Vienna, Austria, for a film forum and festival at the Danube University, I was surprised to see merchandise and remainders marked down to flea-market prices in the usually pricey booths at an airport known for peddling luxury brands.

Some think the European Union and the euro zone may not survive the tremors. European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said on Friday: "The European Union is facing an unprecedented situation due to the economic crisis and needs to work at different levels to restore credit flows." He said the bloc's economy is expected to contract by 2 percent this year.

General Motors, with 32,000 jobs at risk, wants a bailout from European governments, too.

Eastern Europe is feeling the crunch the worst, with its currencies reeling. One such example is Hungary, which was once a model for how the free market can replace Soviet-bloc economics. Western Europe has so far declined to meet their requests for more bailouts.

There are also waves of protests under way in the east. Left publications report:

... thousands of demonstrators in Lithuania, Latvia and Bulgaria have attacked government buildings and called on their governments to resign as unemployment soars in Eastern Europe.

Experts predict a regional increase of 15 million to 18 million unemployed in the coming months, with no relief as jobs for immigrants disappear in Western Europe and the United States. 

Mike Whitney writes:

The global economy is decelerating at the fastest pace on record. Forty percent of global wealth has been wiped out. The banking system is insolvent, unemployment is soaring, tax revenues are falling, the markets are in shock, housing is crashing, deficits are soaring and consumer confidence is at its lowest point in history.

When you look at some of the numbers, you can see the time bombs that are ticking away. According to Ed Bonawitz, many countries are in deep shock: "Ireland's external debt, at $1.8 trillion, equals 900 percent of the country's $200 billion GDP. The United Kingdom's external debt of $10.5 trillion equals 456 percent of its $2.3 trillion GDP. Switzerland's external debt of $1.3 trillion equals 433 percent of its $300 billion GDP. Now that the credit markets are locked tight, renegotiating the terms of these loans is virtually impossible." U.S. banks are said to have a loan ratio of around 26-to-1, and European Banks have one that is around 60-to-1.

F. William Engdahl writes:

The problems in Eastern Europe, which are just now emerging with full force are, if you will, an indirect consequence of the libertine monetary policies of the Greenspan Fed from 2002 until 2006, the period where Wall Street's asset-backed securitization Ponzi scheme took off.

The riskiness of these Eastern European loans is now coming to light as the global economic recession in both east and west Europe is forcing Western banks to pull back, refusing to renew loans or 'rollover' the credits, leaving thousands of borrowers with unpayable loan debts. The dimension of the Eastern European emerging loan crisis pales anything yet realized …

According to my well-informed City of London sources, the new concerns over bank exposures to Eastern Europe will define the next wave of the global financial crisis, one they believe could be even more devastating than the U.S. subprime securitization collapse, which triggered the entire crisis of confidence.


Danny Schechter writes the News Dissector blog for Media Channel. His latest book is Plunder: Investigating Our Economic Calamity (Cosimo Books).
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: global, economy, eastern europe, western europe, financial crisis


Comments are closed-

That's why I warn others who think that leaving the country is the answer are wrong.
Posted by: LaughingModerateIndependent on Mar 12, 2009 12:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The system in Europe ain't any nicer and if you ain't rich enough, you're SOL there. And what about those "free" trade deals Europe keeps doing with the US? Still, I fail to see why Europe should worry about crumbling if the US is crumbling unless they got something to hide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "So it's a GOOD thing!" Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: "So it's a GOOD thing!" Posted by: maxpayne
» I fall for WF too. Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» P.S. Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

A Solution.
Posted by: Nodarse on Mar 12, 2009 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The one thing that all these bankrupt nations have in common is “FIAT” currency. That is, Money created out of thin air. All the billions and trillions mentioned in this article NEVER EXISTED in the first place.

I recommend solving this global problem in a manner similar to how it was created. Simply, pass a law that nullifies all debts owed to the Central Banks of the world. They created all this imaginary cash using our laws, so let’s eliminate this mess the same way.

Eliminate all debts worldwide, and start over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rule makers Posted by: Quasar
» Absolutely, but also... Posted by: jaynesian

Comments are closed-

Forgive all debts and start over
Posted by: metamind on Mar 12, 2009 4:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Capitalism is dead. Forgive all debts and start over. I agree.

Steve Moyer
http://stevemoyer.us
http://nodes.net/vfc/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Graduated Myopias
Posted by: talkville on Mar 12, 2009 4:49 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who entertains the notion that this is a national problem, especially after the zealous repetitions and frenzies of the 70's, 80's and 90's about "globalization", "free markets" and the rest, must be suffering from a severe case of myopia.

Anyone who still believes, contrary to all kinds of everyday evidence, that this is still a world that can be understood under the framework of the Westphalian paradigm is severely ideological or just plain blind.

The bourgeoisie, capital (productive and financial), is now assimilated above any particular country or region or area. Their interests are separate from the interests of any particular populations in their countries of origin.

They settle the distributions of the proceeds by means of little (very lucrative) Proxy Wars and Disturbances in this or that part of the world, using the lives and bodies of their populations for those purposes.

It's a world problem -- mainly for the bottom 80%. A "head-ache" for the top 20%

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Graduated Yakking? Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: Graduated Yakking? Posted by: Harris20
» Wikipedia, of course Posted by: LeftWright
» RE: Graduated Yakking? Posted by: talkville

Comments are closed-

A Jewish answer?
Posted by: floridahank on Mar 12, 2009 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time for us to adopt a form of behavior from the Jews to help with our crisis. We can’t
follow it as they did, but it’s time to do something drastic and effective in our nation of eoncomic crisis, corruption and waste.

The Sabbatical year and Jubilee year laws in the Bible demonstrate the nature of Israelite society as a communitarian, agricultural society. As the name suggests, the Sabbatical year is tied to the biblical concept of the Sabbath, the seventh day of the week and a time of rest. The Jubilee and Sabbatical years provided a form of regular debt release to stabilize social and economic gaps that naturally develop in society.

According to the Hebrew Bible, during the seventh year all land had to be left untilled and unplanted, and debts from close neighbors that had been unpaid during the previous six years were to be cancelled. These laws of land use and debt remission are not necessarily originally connected but appear to be grouped together under the single general category of the seventh/ Sabbatical year or Shemittah (Exodus 21:2-6, Exodus 23:10-11, Leviticus 25:1-7, 18-22, and Deuteronomy 15:1-11, 12-18) by the time the Bible was produced.

These laws demonstrate the biblical nature of societal obligations and a theocratic underpinning for the land and the society. They also represent the careful balance of social equality that is represented in economic terms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Jewish answer? Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: A Jewish answer? Posted by: symcokid
» RE: A Jewish answer? Posted by: Lascar
» RE: A Jewish answer?? Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: A Jewish answer?? Posted by: yellow

Comments are closed-

Liquidating the debt.
Posted by: chorton on Mar 12, 2009 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liquidating the debt, as Nodarse suggests, would work, but it won't be easy! It would allow the restarting of the economy, whether it is done by decree in a kind of mass scale bankruptcy, by ten million smaller bankruptcies and/or by hyperinflation.

However, every dollar of debt is a dollar of someone else's property, and even as that property is evaporating they are all trying desperately to hold onto and save it - or to transfer it into government bonds with the payments coming from the taxpayers. And the debt-owners are the same "best people" who control the government, the media and the armed services!

This article brings out one of the triad of strategies they will turn to: organized crime, which played a part in the rise of European fascism in the 20's and 30's. The other two are government repression and turning loose and financing a whole spectrum of "hate groups". In Germany, the NaZis represented the merger of all three of these strategies, with tragic consequences for the world.

The revolutionaries - the people - will be those defending our government and Constitution from our own crazed ruling class and its agents and looking for a legal framework for liquidating the debt.

If we fail, the alternative is "socialization" of the debt, and the evolution of a government of the rich acting as a giant tyrannical "juice racket", extracting money directly from a desperate and downtrodden people and paying it directly to the rich bond-holders or ladling it out in "no-bid contracts" to the corporations. This is already starting to happen, with Bush's wars and now the "bailouts".

The prospects for our species and planet if we lose would be bleak indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

You want a solution?
Posted by: undead on Mar 12, 2009 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tax 95 percent of the money away from the "rich."

Then give the money to society to compensate the USA for the mess they made of the economy and financial systems.

If the rich are so good at making money, they will make it back, and the people will get restitution for the incompetence and corrupt they made.

This is a fair solution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

And all this time I thought -----
Posted by: symcokid on Mar 12, 2009 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the fact that things were so bad here first was inevitably going to make things bad in other countries abroad. Bush apparently didn't realize it would be so all encompassing when he said, "We're all in this together", Christ, he apparently meant the whole G--Damn world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Declining Energy Resources means Complete Rethinnking of Economy
Posted by: edgar_michel on Mar 12, 2009 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, Thank you Danny for a great article.

For the last 200 years, the world economy, has had the prospect of unlimited energy resources to build their economies. Wall Street, a financial system that absolutely relies on this fact, only operates when economies can be grown by injecting additional energy resources into those economies. We are now beyond world peak oil and beyond the time when there are additional energy resources to inject into economies to pay for the interest on loans extended to grow those economies. So we are at a juncture where the entire system has to be re-worked to provide stability with the prospect of declining energy resources. That means we have to jettison Wall Street, not bail it out, if we are going to survive. The entire fractional reserve banking system is no longer tenable. We have to move to fee banking or at least perhaps a 50% fractional resereve banking system to slow growth to sustainable levels. See Wikipedia - Fractional-reserve banking

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

leveraged banks are the reason
Posted by: sharonsylvie on Mar 12, 2009 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in the U.S., banks could leverage themselves 20 to one. The SEC gave them permission to leverage up to 40 to one. But in Europe and elsewhere, banks were leveraging anywhere from 50 or 100 to one. There is no way this kind of crazy debt can be repaid. That's why Iceland is bankrupt and why several other countries, such as Austria, Ireland, and Great Britain, not to mention the Baltic states, are in such trouble. And that's also why AIG keeps getting rescued, but I doubt we have enough money to cover all the outstanding debts, and that's why the U.S. could also go down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

solution to this mess? Same as the 1929 mess:
Posted by: billwald on Mar 12, 2009 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WW3 will be the solution. Don't worry, the gold owned by the rich people will still be safe in Switzerland as it was in WW2 and WW1.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Another Thought
Posted by: edgar_michel on Mar 12, 2009 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fractional Reserve Banking and Leveraging are the vehicles through with current international financial leaders rose to power. So to change things now is kinda like closing the chicken house after all the chickens are gone. But we still have to pick up the pieces and go on. As in all times in history we have to learn from the mistakes and make policy that makes corruption more difficult, hopefully so difficult that it won't even be attempted again. But as Polybius observed in 160 B.C.E., The Strenght of your Constitution is what insulates you against corruption and the better it is written the longer your republic will last before corruption consumes you. But Polybius also observed that even govenment founded on the best of constitutions became corrupt and he surmised that even is own dear Rome would one day become corrupt as well even though the Roman Constitution was the best then yet devised. Julius Caesar marched into Rome in 56 B.C.E and declared himself emperor for life nullifying the constitution of Rome.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

tazdelaney
Posted by: tazdelaney on Mar 12, 2009 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
basically a good article, except... when the author goes into quoting mr. farrah of the 'counterterrorism blog' (a reliable source?)

as the international financier michel sindona wrote when dying (therefore untouchable), as the international illegal drug business boils down to one major pyramid cartel representing roughly 8% of world GDP; the only entities on earth which could possibly handle that cash-flow are the central banks & the world's largest governments working hand in glove between the cartels & the banks. the great senator frank church of the largely still-secreted 1970s hearings, used to call the viet/cambodia/laos conflicts which cost over 5 million lives, 'the golden triangle war,' after all. as mark twain said, "if you can't figure out why they're fighting a war; find out what the cash crop is."

drugwarI, aka Prohibition, showed the enormous revenue-stream to be had when a bottle of whiskey soared to $40 a gallon. prohibition required a constitutional amendment due to the 9th, 10th & 14th amendments; but we note that since 1933 when prohibition ended & prohibitionII began - no amendment, constitution just ignored while 33 million americans have been imprisoned, mostly along apartheid racial lines, similarly to germany's handling of 'undesirables.'

what we're really looking at is a merger of criminal organizations taking advantage of a situation created precisely for their benefit by criminal governments & banks. note that the word 'conspire' means 'to breathe with' & most conspiracies are just a matter of being in the same club & tacitly agreeing on 'the way things should be.' the conspirators reap trillions yearly while much of the human population is wrongly criminalized for simply seeking their life, liberty & pursuit of happiness.'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

How about research?
Posted by: justcrap on Mar 12, 2009 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Switzerland's external debt of $1.3 trillion equals 433 percent of its $300 billion GDP??

Where did you get that?

Switzerland's external debt equals 43% of the GDP and that means about 222Bil. in 2007.

http://www.bfs.admin.ch/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Perpetuating hysteria
Posted by: rigadimd on Mar 12, 2009 2:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading your new found dribble from other sources.
Specifically in reference to Latvia "thousands of demonstrators attacking government buildings."
Yes there were apprx. 10,000 peaceful protestors. After they disbursed a little over a hundred drunken hooligans went on a rampage destroying property and attacking police officers who tried to stop them.

I consider you grossly irresponsible for perpetuating incorrect information without checking your sources.



The Financial Crisis Pushes Europe to the Brink of Disaster
By Danny Schechter, AlterNet. Posted March 12, 2009.
There are also waves of protests under way in the east. Left publications report:

... thousands of demonstrators in Lithuania, Latvia and Bulgaria have attacked government buildings and called on their governments to resign as unemployment soars in Eastern Europe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Perpetuating hysteria Posted by: Harris20

Comments are closed-

It started long before now.
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Mar 12, 2009 4:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time passes so quickly. When was France's Sarkoszy elected? Anyway, for the past decade there has been a movement in europe, like the one here, to wipe out national pensions, health care and education. Unions had to bow to offshoring. Factories were shut down and re-opened in eastern europe. Sometimes the workers weren't even told in advance. They'd just show up for work and find the factory locked up. There have been uproars about trade agreements too. France wanted to favor its former colonies by buying their fruit, and the US had to tell them that such decisions were not allowed. wsws.org has followed it, which I used to read diligently before I discovered all the fun on Alternet. I remember that Chirac resisted some of the worst neo-con elements, but the minute Sarkoszy gained office he bent over and spread his cheeks for George Bush, apologized about Iraq, came across the pond for a visit, and has since been towing the neo-con line. Similar things were reported from Germany and elsewhere, but I seem to retain things about France better, probably because I lived there for a year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Honest people are always behind the curve.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Mar 12, 2009 4:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"If trends continue, there is likely to be more opportunities for the criminal class and more of a fusion between the supposedly legitimate business world and the supposedly illegitimate one."
. . . .

"If trends continue"? Wall Street is already there, fused up to its collective ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

the Rock
Posted by: akmuo on Mar 12, 2009 6:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
funny, where did you get the "thousands marching to protest the government" in Lithuania?
I have been scanning their news and nothing of the sort was reported...
There is fear of currency devaluation... up coming presidential elections and such.
...but no one is storming the government buildings
what else stinks here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Talk To Danny Schechter
Posted by: reportergary on Mar 12, 2009 7:06 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Danny Schechter will be my guest on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com Wednesday March 18 at 5 PM New York time to talk about the economic crisis in Europe.

Please go to my blog, http://www.garybaumgarten.com to link to the chat.

Thanks,

Gary

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I'll ask it again - Who are the counterparties???
Posted by: Exile65 on Mar 13, 2009 1:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another article about huge external debts and banks leveraged at eye-popping multiples (here, 60 to 1).

But this article, apart from its scare-mongering about organized crime and the collapse of society, does not say anything at all about the roots of the issue in Europe.

Debt always involves two parties. So, European banks (and consequently, nations) owe sums far exceeding their assets or GDP. To whom do they owe this money? Who are the lucky counterparties who will get all the taxpayer bailout money?

The EU has no subprime mortgage issue. Getting a mortgage in Europe involves strict controls over the homebuyer's income. So where do these massive debts and overleveraging come from? Buying US credit default swaps? The EU tends to have strong regulation in many areas. How did banks get the freedom to leverage 60-to-1? Where the heck did that come from, and when?

It is utterly absurd to think that European societies will let their middle classes collapse and organized crime take over, all to prop up some dodgy contracts. Contracts can be enforced only by the courts, and the courts can throw out bad contracts. And contracts that destroy the society are by definition bad. Why does this article contemplate the utter destruction of society but won't contemplate nullifying insane contracts? Why aren't these banks being reorganized/nationalized and their obligations cancelled?

Let's see an article about what is behind this issue, rather than sensationalism about riots and the mafia. When there is debt, someone is the counterparty. WHO ARE THE COUNTERPARTIES?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

That's why I warn others who think that leaving the country is the answer are wrong.
Posted by: LaughingModerateIndependent on Mar 12, 2009 12:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The system in Europe ain't any nicer and if you ain't rich enough, you're SOL there. And what about those "free" trade deals Europe keeps doing with the US? Still, I fail to see why Europe should worry about crumbling if the US is crumbling unless they got something to hide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "So it's a GOOD thing!" Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: "So it's a GOOD thing!" Posted by: maxpayne
» I fall for WF too. Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» P.S. Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

A Solution.
Posted by: Nodarse on Mar 12, 2009 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The one thing that all these bankrupt nations have in common is “FIAT” currency. That is, Money created out of thin air. All the billions and trillions mentioned in this article NEVER EXISTED in the first place.

I recommend solving this global problem in a manner similar to how it was created. Simply, pass a law that nullifies all debts owed to the Central Banks of the world. They created all this imaginary cash using our laws, so let’s eliminate this mess the same way.

Eliminate all debts worldwide, and start over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rule makers Posted by: Quasar
» Absolutely, but also... Posted by: jaynesian

Comments are closed-

Forgive all debts and start over
Posted by: metamind on Mar 12, 2009 4:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Capitalism is dead. Forgive all debts and start over. I agree.

Steve Moyer
http://stevemoyer.us
http://nodes.net/vfc/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Graduated Myopias
Posted by: talkville on Mar 12, 2009 4:49 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who entertains the notion that this is a national problem, especially after the zealous repetitions and frenzies of the 70's, 80's and 90's about "globalization", "free markets" and the rest, must be suffering from a severe case of myopia.

Anyone who still believes, contrary to all kinds of everyday evidence, that this is still a world that can be understood under the framework of the Westphalian paradigm is severely ideological or just plain blind.

The bourgeoisie, capital (productive and financial), is now assimilated above any particular country or region or area. Their interests are separate from the interests of any particular populations in their countries of origin.

They settle the distributions of the proceeds by means of little (very lucrative) Proxy Wars and Disturbances in this or that part of the world, using the lives and bodies of their populations for those purposes.

It's a world problem -- mainly for the bottom 80%. A "head-ache" for the top 20%

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Graduated Yakking? Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: Graduated Yakking? Posted by: Harris20
» Wikipedia, of course Posted by: LeftWright
» RE: Graduated Yakking? Posted by: talkville

Comments are closed-

A Jewish answer?
Posted by: floridahank on Mar 12, 2009 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time for us to adopt a form of behavior from the Jews to help with our crisis. We can’t
follow it as they did, but it’s time to do something drastic and effective in our nation of eoncomic crisis, corruption and waste.

The Sabbatical year and Jubilee year laws in the Bible demonstrate the nature of Israelite society as a communitarian, agricultural society. As the name suggests, the Sabbatical year is tied to the biblical concept of the Sabbath, the seventh day of the week and a time of rest. The Jubilee and Sabbatical years provided a form of regular debt release to stabilize social and economic gaps that naturally develop in society.

According to the Hebrew Bible, during the seventh year all land had to be left untilled and unplanted, and debts from close neighbors that had been unpaid during the previous six years were to be cancelled. These laws of land use and debt remission are not necessarily originally connected but appear to be grouped together under the single general category of the seventh/ Sabbatical year or Shemittah (Exodus 21:2-6, Exodus 23:10-11, Leviticus 25:1-7, 18-22, and Deuteronomy 15:1-11, 12-18) by the time the Bible was produced.

These laws demonstrate the biblical nature of societal obligations and a theocratic underpinning for the land and the society. They also represent the careful balance of social equality that is represented in economic terms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Jewish answer? Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: A Jewish answer? Posted by: symcokid
» RE: A Jewish answer? Posted by: Lascar
» RE: A Jewish answer?? Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: A Jewish answer?? Posted by: yellow

Comments are closed-

Liquidating the debt.
Posted by: chorton on Mar 12, 2009 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liquidating the debt, as Nodarse suggests, would work, but it won't be easy! It would allow the restarting of the economy, whether it is done by decree in a kind of mass scale bankruptcy, by ten million smaller bankruptcies and/or by hyperinflation.

However, every dollar of debt is a dollar of someone else's property, and even as that property is evaporating they are all trying desperately to hold onto and save it - or to transfer it into government bonds with the payments coming from the taxpayers. And the debt-owners are the same "best people" who control the government, the media and the armed services!

This article brings out one of the triad of strategies they will turn to: organized crime, which played a part in the rise of European fascism in the 20's and 30's. The other two are government repression and turning loose and financing a whole spectrum of "hate groups". In Germany, the NaZis represented the merger of all three of these strategies, with tragic consequences for the world.

The revolutionaries - the people - will be those defending our government and Constitution from our own crazed ruling class and its agents and looking for a legal framework for liquidating the debt.

If we fail, the alternative is "socialization" of the debt, and the evolution of a government of the rich acting as a giant tyrannical "juice racket", extracting money directly from a desperate and downtrodden people and paying it directly to the rich bond-holders or ladling it out in "no-bid contracts" to the corporations. This is already starting to happen, with Bush's wars and now the "bailouts".

The prospects for our species and planet if we lose would be bleak indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

You want a solution?
Posted by: undead on Mar 12, 2009 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tax 95 percent of the money away from the "rich."

Then give the money to society to compensate the USA for the mess they made of the economy and financial systems.

If the rich are so good at making money, they will make it back, and the people will get restitution for the incompetence and corrupt they made.

This is a fair solution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

And all this time I thought -----
Posted by: symcokid on Mar 12, 2009 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the fact that things were so bad here first was inevitably going to make things bad in other countries abroad. Bush apparently didn't realize it would be so all encompassing when he said, "We're all in this together", Christ, he apparently meant the whole G--Damn world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Declining Energy Resources means Complete Rethinnking of Economy
Posted by: edgar_michel on Mar 12, 2009 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, Thank you Danny for a great article.

For the last 200 years, the world economy, has had the prospect of unlimited energy resources to build their economies. Wall Street, a financial system that absolutely relies on this fact, only operates when economies can be grown by injecting additional energy resources into those economies. We are now beyond world peak oil and beyond the time when there are additional energy resources to inject into economies to pay for the interest on loans extended to grow those economies. So we are at a juncture where the entire system has to be re-worked to provide stability with the prospect of declining energy resources. That means we have to jettison Wall Street, not bail it out, if we are going to survive. The entire fractional reserve banking system is no longer tenable. We have to move to fee banking or at least perhaps a 50% fractional resereve banking system to slow growth to sustainable levels. See Wikipedia - Fractional-reserve banking

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

leveraged banks are the reason
Posted by: sharonsylvie on Mar 12, 2009 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in the U.S., banks could leverage themselves 20 to one. The SEC gave them permission to leverage up to 40 to one. But in Europe and elsewhere, banks were leveraging anywhere from 50 or 100 to one. There is no way this kind of crazy debt can be repaid. That's why Iceland is bankrupt and why several other countries, such as Austria, Ireland, and Great Britain, not to mention the Baltic states, are in such trouble. And that's also why AIG keeps getting rescued, but I doubt we have enough money to cover all the outstanding debts, and that's why the U.S. could also go down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

solution to this mess? Same as the 1929 mess:
Posted by: billwald on Mar 12, 2009 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WW3 will be the solution. Don't worry, the gold owned by the rich people will still be safe in Switzerland as it was in WW2 and WW1.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Another Thought
Posted by: edgar_michel on Mar 12, 2009 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fractional Reserve Banking and Leveraging are the vehicles through with current international financial leaders rose to power. So to change things now is kinda like closing the chicken house after all the chickens are gone. But we still have to pick up the pieces and go on. As in all times in history we have to learn from the mistakes and make policy that makes corruption more difficult, hopefully so difficult that it won't even be attempted again. But as Polybius observed in 160 B.C.E., The Strenght of your Constitution is what insulates you against corruption and the better it is written the longer your republic will last before corruption consumes you. But Polybius also observed that even govenment founded on the best of constitutions became corrupt and he surmised that even is own dear Rome would one day become corrupt as well even though the Roman Constitution was the best then yet devised. Julius Caesar marched into Rome in 56 B.C.E and declared himself emperor for life nullifying the constitution of Rome.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

tazdelaney
Posted by: tazdelaney on Mar 12, 2009 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
basically a good article, except... when the author goes into quoting mr. farrah of the 'counterterrorism blog' (a reliable source?)

as the international financier michel sindona wrote when dying (therefore untouchable), as the international illegal drug business boils down to one major pyramid cartel representing roughly 8% of world GDP; the only entities on earth which could possibly handle that cash-flow are the central banks & the world's largest governments working hand in glove between the cartels & the banks. the great senator frank church of the largely still-secreted 1970s hearings, used to call the viet/cambodia/laos conflicts which cost over 5 million lives, 'the golden triangle war,' after all. as mark twain said, "if you can't figure out why they're fighting a war; find out what the cash crop is."

drugwarI, aka Prohibition, showed the enormous revenue-stream to be had when a bottle of whiskey soared to $40 a gallon. prohibition required a constitutional amendment due to the 9th, 10th & 14th amendments; but we note that since 1933 when prohibition ended & prohibitionII began - no amendment, constitution just ignored while 33 million americans have been imprisoned, mostly along apartheid racial lines, similarly to germany's handling of 'undesirables.'

what we're really looking at is a merger of criminal organizations taking advantage of a situation created precisely for their benefit by criminal governments & banks. note that the word 'conspire' means 'to breathe with' & most conspiracies are just a matter of being in the same club & tacitly agreeing on 'the way things should be.' the conspirators reap trillions yearly while much of the human population is wrongly criminalized for simply seeking their life, liberty & pursuit of happiness.'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

How about research?
Posted by: justcrap on Mar 12, 2009 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Switzerland's external debt of $1.3 trillion equals 433 percent of its $300 billion GDP??

Where did you get that?

Switzerland's external debt equals 43% of the GDP and that means about 222Bil. in 2007.

http://www.bfs.admin.ch/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Perpetuating hysteria
Posted by: rigadimd on Mar 12, 2009 2:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading your new found dribble from other sources.
Specifically in reference to Latvia "thousands of demonstrators attacking government buildings."
Yes there were apprx. 10,000 peaceful protestors. After they disbursed a little over a hundred drunken hooligans went on a rampage destroying property and attacking police officers who tried to stop them.

I consider you grossly irresponsible for perpetuating incorrect information without checking your sources.



The Financial Crisis Pushes Europe to the Brink of Disaster
By Danny Schechter, AlterNet. Posted March 12, 2009.
There are also waves of protests under way in the east. Left publications report:

... thousands of demonstrators in Lithuania, Latvia and Bulgaria have attacked government buildings and called on their governments to resign as unemployment soars in Eastern Europe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Perpetuating hysteria Posted by: Harris20

Comments are closed-

It started long before now.
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Mar 12, 2009 4:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time passes so quickly. When was France's Sarkoszy elected? Anyway, for the past decade there has been a movement in europe, like the one here, to wipe out national pensions, health care and education. Unions had to bow to offshoring. Factories were shut down and re-opened in eastern europe. Sometimes the workers weren't even told in advance. They'd just show up for work and find the factory locked up. There have been uproars about trade agreements too. France wanted to favor its former colonies by buying their fruit, and the US had to tell them that such decisions were not allowed. wsws.org has followed it, which I used to read diligently before I discovered all the fun on Alternet. I remember that Chirac resisted some of the worst neo-con elements, but the minute Sarkoszy gained office he bent over and spread his cheeks for George Bush, apologized about Iraq, came across the pond for a visit, and has since been towing the neo-con line. Similar things were reported from Germany and elsewhere, but I seem to retain things about France better, probably because I lived there for a year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Honest people are always behind the curve.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Mar 12, 2009 4:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"If trends continue, there is likely to be more opportunities for the criminal class and more of a fusion between the supposedly legitimate business world and the supposedly illegitimate one."
. . . .

"If trends continue"? Wall Street is already there, fused up to its collective ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

the Rock
Posted by: akmuo on Mar 12, 2009 6:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
funny, where did you get the "thousands marching to protest the government" in Lithuania?
I have been scanning their news and nothing of the sort was reported...
There is fear of currency devaluation... up coming presidential elections and such.
...but no one is storming the government buildings
what else stinks here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Talk To Danny Schechter
Posted by: reportergary on Mar 12, 2009 7:06 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Danny Schechter will be my guest on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com Wednesday March 18 at 5 PM New York time to talk about the economic crisis in Europe.

Please go to my blog, http://www.garybaumgarten.com to link to the chat.

Thanks,

Gary

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I'll ask it again - Who are the counterparties???
Posted by: Exile65 on Mar 13, 2009 1:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another article about huge external debts and banks leveraged at eye-popping multiples (here, 60 to 1).

But this article, apart from its scare-mongering about organized crime and the collapse of society, does not say anything at all about the roots of the issue in Europe.

Debt always involves two parties. So, European banks (and consequently, nations) owe sums far exceeding their assets or GDP. To whom do they owe this money? Who are the lucky counterparties who will get all the taxpayer bailout money?

The EU has no subprime mortgage issue. Getting a mortgage in Europe involves strict controls over the homebuyer's income. So where do these massive debts and overleveraging come from? Buying US credit default swaps? The EU tends to have strong regulation in many areas. How did banks get the freedom to leverage 60-to-1? Where the heck did that come from, and when?

It is utterly absurd to think that European societies will let their middle classes collapse and organized crime take over, all to prop up some dodgy contracts. Contracts can be enforced only by the courts, and the courts can throw out bad contracts. And contracts that destroy the society are by definition bad. Why does this article contemplate the utter destruction of society but won't contemplate nullifying insane contracts? Why aren't these banks being reorganized/nationalized and their obligations cancelled?

Let's see an article about what is behind this issue, rather than sensationalism about riots and the mafia. When there is debt, someone is the counterparty. WHO ARE THE COUNTERPARTIES?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS