ECONOMY  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 7

Let's Bail Out America's Tattered Safety Net

With the economic meltdown, more and more households are falling toward the social safety net.
January 29, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

Even before the financial crisis and the recession, a substantial proportion of working families were not making it in America. In 2007, 20% of the population in a family with a breadwinner -- that's 41 million people -- did not have enough income, including any Food Stamps, Medicaid, housing and child care subsidies, or other public support they received, to pay their basic living expenses.

The good news for this bottom 20%: in the current crisis, their plight of working hard but not making enough to pay the bills is becoming much more common, so the pressure to address this problem should be growing too. The bad news, of course, is the recession itself. The hardships these families face are growing by the day. More and more households are falling toward the social safety net.

And what about that safety net? In the 1990s, the Clinton administration ended "welfare as we know it," but at the same time promised work supports as low-wage workers moved up the ladder. Since then, employment rates for poor and low-income mothers have indeed soared, and so has the demand for affordable housing and child care assistance. But funding for them has not, with long waiting lists for both. As a result, by the early 2000s, these government work supports helped only 10% of the population in working families that couldn't meet their basic needs to actually meet them. Despite expansions in the Earned Income Tax Credit and public health insurance for children in the 1990s, the public support programs for low-income families provide inadequate help,and even that to only a fraction of those who need it. And for workers who lose their jobs, only about a third of all unemployed workers receive unemployment benefits today.

The safety net is not only tattered; it is nearly obsolete.

Rising unemployment is beginning to take its toll, as are draconian state budget cuts. Congress and President Obama appear ready to enact a large stimulus package to spur the economy and create jobs. Their focus so far is mostly on infrastructure, on "rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, modernizing schools ... building wind farms and solar panels," as Obama has said.

But bridge repair and even green jobs are not enough. Our physical infrastructure needs work, but so does our social infrastructure. And it's not just the safety net. Quality care for children and long-term care for disabled and elderly people are in short supply -- and unaffordably expensive for many families. Moreover, women are disproportionately employed in these sectors, many at low wages that barely enable them to support their own families. In contrast, the construction and green-energy jobs that often pay decent wages with benefits are overwhelmingly filled by men.

So let's enact a bold recovery plan that promotes employment but also reconstructs the safety net and jumpstarts the process of upgrading our social infrastructure. Here are four suggestions:

First, provide federal funding to states to prevent reductions in essential services. Now is not the time to reduce public health investments, stop transportation projects, cut higher education or lay off K–12 and early-education teachers.

Second, recreate our housing infrastructure. In exchange for buying up bad loans, secure foreclosed properties and develop an affordable housing stock.

Third, expand help for families who are struggling to pay for care for children and elders. Doing so will not only help the families struggling to care for their loved ones. It will also provide the job-creation stimulus for women workers that bridge-repair funding will provide for men.

Fourth, replace our outdated and arbitrary poverty measure with a realistic measure of what it takes to afford basic needs and participate fully in society. This measure should be used to gauge whether the eventual economic recovery is reaching all Americans.

Economic recovery will require bold, public action. Such action isn't limited to reforming our financial system or to traditional stimulus spending. It also means upgrading our social infrastructure in ways that ensure our economy works for all.


Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: economy, obama, social safety net, stimulus, financial crisis


Comments are closed-

The Social Safety Net is most important in the Stimulus Package. It's rates of return are highest!!
Posted by: yellow on Jan 29, 2009 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rates of return on investment in entitlement programs like food and energy assistance, unemployment insurance and other forms of relief has the greatest and quickest stimulus effect on the economy. It also creates the greatest number of jobs. According to a CEPR study the investment of one billion dollars in food assistance would produce 150 billion in GDP growth and 1 million jobs. Compare this to $1 billion corporate tax cut which yields only $30 billion in GDP growth and 200,000 jobs. Even a $1 billion investment in individual tax rebates for everyone would yield $129 billion in additional GDP growth and only 860,000 jobs. It is quite clear that spending on entitlement programs and public investment in infrastructure and services has the biggest economic stimulus given the spending and employment multiplier effects.

Yet Tax cuts are a full third of the package. The rest is to bail out states and localities and then to fund entitlement spending and public investment. But it is far from enough. We need much more public investment in shovel ready projects to boost employment and stimulate economic growth. The time is now when interest rates remain low. Such spending will not cause inflation. No investment will come at a time when economic instability and stagnation prevents those in the private sector from assuming the risk. The public sector must take the reigns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Just Add Medicare for All ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 29, 2009 8:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A program that can't be taken away at a moments notice, a true commitment to the people of this country. It seems we are a very rich country when it comes to war, but when it comes to taking care of the very people that keep this country going they can't afford it, like Medicare for All or, we have to cut SSI or some other program.

All the other G7 countries have made the commitment of single payer health care to their citizens, why can't the richest country on earth?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Democrats 2012 Re-Election Stimulus Package ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 29, 2009 9:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over 60% of the vaunted "Stimulus Package" won't even take effect for over 18 months ... just prior to and just in time for the 2012 elections. All the help, temporary help, for states could be passed without the tax cuts and these "shovel ready" boondoggles.

What we need from this government is a permanent commitment, not a patch-work of political temporary fixes. The economic model of 70% consumption based on debt and trade deficits is finished, kaput. We must work towards a new economic model, towards sustainability. What we are getting is a vain and dangerous attempt at resurrecting a failed idea, growth via conspicuous consumption.

We need Medicare for All ! Medicare for All can be implemented within weeks of the Bills passage and almost completely phased in within a year ... This helps the under and uninsured, business, state and local government, decreases bankruptcies ( 50% of all bankruptcies are all or in part due to medical bills ), and makes our products more competitive at home and abroad.

Don't be fooled, the Stimulus is too little too late unless you are running for office in 2012.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Whose Safety Net?
Posted by: DHFabian on Jan 31, 2009 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as we don't help those in deep poverty, who are effectively fenced out of the job market (and therefore of no worth), Americans will be happy with any measures that strengthen a social safety net.

America's poor aren't currently one of the top 10 popular subjects. Still, it does surprise me that even the progressive media has ignored the impact that mandatory "workfare" has had on suppressing wages, crushing unions and weakening workers' rights and protections. It was former President Clinton's greatest gift to corporations, providing local labor at Third World wages, with the guarantee that this group would never complain (since losing their jobs can result in social services taking their children into "indefinite custody" on the grounds of "failure to adequately provide").

Of course, this is a sound-bite culture, and there is no time to discuss how policies that harm one segment of the population inevitably "trickle up". Also, we've decided that poverty is merely a life-style choice; if you don't like being poor, just get a job (or two or three), work hard, and play by all the rules!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

reverse the perspective
Posted by: lewb on Feb 2, 2009 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of the social agencies to treat those in need,to scaling back paperwork designed to frustrate and make people feel like they are not trustworthy. I have had occasion to fill out the voluminous paperwork related to such programs as food stamps, fuel assistance and healthcare. It is easier for a bank to fill out paperwork for a bailout than to get food stamps. The system is getting overwhelmed,it needs to streamline it's paperwork and get people the help they need.Why should we be treated as being suspects for fraud and have to prove our innocence before we receive help. What happened to compassion and the assumption of innocent till proven otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

The Social Safety Net is most important in the Stimulus Package. It's rates of return are highest!!
Posted by: yellow on Jan 29, 2009 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rates of return on investment in entitlement programs like food and energy assistance, unemployment insurance and other forms of relief has the greatest and quickest stimulus effect on the economy. It also creates the greatest number of jobs. According to a CEPR study the investment of one billion dollars in food assistance would produce 150 billion in GDP growth and 1 million jobs. Compare this to $1 billion corporate tax cut which yields only $30 billion in GDP growth and 200,000 jobs. Even a $1 billion investment in individual tax rebates for everyone would yield $129 billion in additional GDP growth and only 860,000 jobs. It is quite clear that spending on entitlement programs and public investment in infrastructure and services has the biggest economic stimulus given the spending and employment multiplier effects.

Yet Tax cuts are a full third of the package. The rest is to bail out states and localities and then to fund entitlement spending and public investment. But it is far from enough. We need much more public investment in shovel ready projects to boost employment and stimulate economic growth. The time is now when interest rates remain low. Such spending will not cause inflation. No investment will come at a time when economic instability and stagnation prevents those in the private sector from assuming the risk. The public sector must take the reigns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Just Add Medicare for All ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 29, 2009 8:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A program that can't be taken away at a moments notice, a true commitment to the people of this country. It seems we are a very rich country when it comes to war, but when it comes to taking care of the very people that keep this country going they can't afford it, like Medicare for All or, we have to cut SSI or some other program.

All the other G7 countries have made the commitment of single payer health care to their citizens, why can't the richest country on earth?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Democrats 2012 Re-Election Stimulus Package ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 29, 2009 9:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over 60% of the vaunted "Stimulus Package" won't even take effect for over 18 months ... just prior to and just in time for the 2012 elections. All the help, temporary help, for states could be passed without the tax cuts and these "shovel ready" boondoggles.

What we need from this government is a permanent commitment, not a patch-work of political temporary fixes. The economic model of 70% consumption based on debt and trade deficits is finished, kaput. We must work towards a new economic model, towards sustainability. What we are getting is a vain and dangerous attempt at resurrecting a failed idea, growth via conspicuous consumption.

We need Medicare for All ! Medicare for All can be implemented within weeks of the Bills passage and almost completely phased in within a year ... This helps the under and uninsured, business, state and local government, decreases bankruptcies ( 50% of all bankruptcies are all or in part due to medical bills ), and makes our products more competitive at home and abroad.

Don't be fooled, the Stimulus is too little too late unless you are running for office in 2012.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Whose Safety Net?
Posted by: DHFabian on Jan 31, 2009 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as we don't help those in deep poverty, who are effectively fenced out of the job market (and therefore of no worth), Americans will be happy with any measures that strengthen a social safety net.

America's poor aren't currently one of the top 10 popular subjects. Still, it does surprise me that even the progressive media has ignored the impact that mandatory "workfare" has had on suppressing wages, crushing unions and weakening workers' rights and protections. It was former President Clinton's greatest gift to corporations, providing local labor at Third World wages, with the guarantee that this group would never complain (since losing their jobs can result in social services taking their children into "indefinite custody" on the grounds of "failure to adequately provide").

Of course, this is a sound-bite culture, and there is no time to discuss how policies that harm one segment of the population inevitably "trickle up". Also, we've decided that poverty is merely a life-style choice; if you don't like being poor, just get a job (or two or three), work hard, and play by all the rules!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

reverse the perspective
Posted by: lewb on Feb 2, 2009 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of the social agencies to treat those in need,to scaling back paperwork designed to frustrate and make people feel like they are not trustworthy. I have had occasion to fill out the voluminous paperwork related to such programs as food stamps, fuel assistance and healthcare. It is easier for a bank to fill out paperwork for a bailout than to get food stamps. The system is getting overwhelmed,it needs to streamline it's paperwork and get people the help they need.Why should we be treated as being suspects for fraud and have to prove our innocence before we receive help. What happened to compassion and the assumption of innocent till proven otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS