ECONOMY  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 43

Who Can You Trust in America?

Madoff's fall has planted the seeds of suspicion. We now doubt those we have done business with for years. The presumption of trust is gone.
December 19, 2008  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

The news of Bernard Madoff's $50 billion fraud has hit the investor/401(k) class as nothing else -- not the fall of Lehman Brothers, not the death of Bear Stearns, nor the string of insolvency announcements of one household name after another. Madoff is the blow that did it.

Lesser explosions connected with Madoff are expected. His story that for decades he ran his gigantic fraud by himself is unbelievable. One man alone could not have done the work of inventing and cranking out thousands of statements every month, not to mention keeping track of the comings and goings of billions of dollars. Madoff has confederates.

That Madoff took some of the members of the centimillionaire club to the cleaners is not what caused the shock. It is the damage done to so many smaller investor/savers, so many pension funds, so many charities. You do not have to be one of Madoff's victims to be affected. Madoff, his own businesses aside, was a major figure in the world of investments, of stocks and bonds and securities and exchanges. If the former chairman of Nasdaq is a crook, whom do you trust?

Madoff has sown the seeds of suspicion everywhere. He has caused us to doubt men and women with whom we have done business with for years. There is no way of knowing if someone is a con artist. The presumption of trust is gone.

Business depends on trust, trust of all kinds. Trust that when you place an order with a broker he or she will get you the best price, trust that your investment or retirement adviser is not getting an under-the-table kickback to put your old age money into a shoddy annuity.

Trust is the indispensable element in all businesses. Contractors depend on subcontractors to get the job done when they say they will; retailers depend on distributors to deliver on time; lawyers are trusted to meet filing deadlines, steel fabricators are expected to get gigantic trusses to the building site exactly when they are needed. Doctors are expected to put patients' interests above money considerations; parts manufacturers are relied on to deliver on time to the factory. Business runs on trust, and Bernard Madoff has busted it.

So the Wall Street Journal says to its readers, "Could your investment manager be another Bernard Madoff?... if someone like Mr. Madoff can be accused of running a $50 billion Ponzi scheme, can investors anywhere sleep easy? Ordinarily, when you are picking an investment manager or financial planner, you're given some common-sense advice. Avoid managers who are unknown, or unregulated, or come without good referrals, or haven't been in the industry long. But none of this would have saved you from Mr. Madoff. 'This guy had oodles of referrals, at the highest levels,' notes Duane Thompson, a managing director at the Financial Planning Association in Washington. 'He was [former] chairman of Nasdaq. He'd been in business since 1960. "

Fear, confusion and mistrust have been amplified by the absence of government supervision, regulation or policing. The Securities and Exchange Commission admits it did not do its job.

With the closing down of the old-time pension system, millions of employees were forced into 401(k)s requiring knowledge of finance, bonds, stocks, weird-sounding investments and tax law. They have had to make investment decisions effecting their future with no government protection against misrepresentation, legal traps laid for them and the small print obfuscation financial institutions practice on their customers. The result is the heart-wrenching situation for millions who fear that they will be living out the last decades of their lives counting their food stamps and hunting for bargains in the used clothing bins.

The Madoff swindle puts the spotlight on the collapse of the 401(k) retirement plan. The United States is the only advanced nation without a complete retirement system.

For 401(k)s to have worked, a bull market or at least a flat market was necessary. It was an unreliable gamble from the git-go, an arrangement that would fall to pieces when next the market crashed.

Madoff and the crash underline the powerlessness of the millions. As a matter of principle, the Republicans defended the unregulated lawlessness that enabled a Madoff to run his swindles. As for the Democrats, sometime in the Clinton era they sold their party to Wall Street and now they have Chuck Schumer to make sure it stays sold.

It remains for President-elect Obama to void the deal and break his party free to help those who have nowhere else to look


submit to reddit
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: economy, madoff
 
Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

It's not that the SEC did not do its job . .
Posted by: pete ess on Dec 19, 2008 1:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Securities and Exchange Commission actively colluded in robbing Joe Everyman of his money.
Anyone who thinks they were simply asleep at the wheel is dreaming!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» True, pete Posted by: pelican beak
» JP Morgan is a major short seller Posted by: ReallyBearish

Comments are closed-

Nevertheless, STILL push your son to be an investment advisor
Posted by: pete ess on Dec 19, 2008 1:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
because Bernie The Thief Madoff will still retire as rich as Croesus, HIS money safe, unlike yours.
Only the uber-rich will argue "but he lost millions". Excuse me, I bet he will still have WAY more than the negative amount the trusty pensioners will be left with.
And he'll be out of jail in no time to enjoy his loot.
Remember: There's honour among thieves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

See: They've put him under "Mansion Arrest"
Posted by: pete ess on Dec 19, 2008 2:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Poor Bernie will be rapped on the knuckles. He'll take the full rap, letting his fellow gang members off scot-free. He'll even back the SEC, saying "How could they know".
What's the bet?

Please film the front and back doors of Bernie's mansion - and tap his phones (Bush says its OK).
He's going to have some VERY interesting callers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Another Even Bigger Ponzi?
Posted by: GatoPreto on Dec 19, 2008 3:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NY Post reported Robert Rubin was involved in a similar scheme to the tune of $115 billion last week, what's up with that?

Why is there no more mention of this anywhere? Could it be because Rubin almost got tapped by Obama to be his Treasury Sec? Could it be that we've all been in-tranced by the chant of 'change' and 'hope'?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ponzi Scheme Street Posted by: jon B

Comments are closed-

Trust
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Dec 19, 2008 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a good article. It hits many key points in a straightforward way. Discussions of finance tend to get overcomplicated, but this doesn't.

One key dilemma it brings out is not just that you don't know who to trust, but that you have to trust somebody at some point...but you can't. If you stick your money in the bank or under the mattress, inflation and taxes will eat it up.

To be honest, I don't know very much about this guy's story. But I suspect he was a bit of a guru, and I know that you should never trust gurus in investing or any other area of expertise. So I'm not sure this is a pure example of not knowing who to trust. Even so, I think the article's point is fair that the economy is at a point where it doesn't seem to matter, and nobody's money is safe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Who can we trust? how about Mason, Atlas, and Ball.
Posted by: yale on Dec 19, 2008 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jars that is. The lids and rings need some attention so they wont rust when buried.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Idiot! Posted by: edgeofnowhere
» RE: Idiot! Posted by: yale

Comments are closed-

rfields
Posted by: democraticcritique.us on Dec 19, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A political economy premised on the reward of unregulated selfishness could never have come to any other resolution than moral corruption. Such was obvious from the first publication of the "Wealth of Nations." The "invisible hand" was always the invisible thief!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Trust no one. Might as well be an economic vigilante like Paul Kersey without the guns.
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 19, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Worked for me and my wife these past 8 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

villager
Posted by: villager1 on Dec 19, 2008 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am afraid the answer is that you cannot trust anyone at all! Every single word in any language in the world that indicated remotely some feeling of caring, giving or appreciation has been replaced by the one word which will detroy us all, and that word is GREED and we all know it but won't talk about it!The only reason for mankind to exist is for self gratification and glory! One guy told me that he judges folks purely by the car that they drive - that puts drug lords at the top of the heap for adoration where I come from!

I sincerely wonder if I have ever heard anyone say something that they really meant or simply and very expeditiously used words to deceive, so as to attain their own ends. Think about that and then tell me why I never trust anyone - I can't even trust myself since I am 69 years old
and am a secret smoker! Anyone who has secrets cannot be trusted and we all have secrets, don't we?
Remember to proceed with caution and that things are seldom if ever, what they seem to be!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Inflict pain. Attach all
Posted by: weathered on Dec 19, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the direct and collateral assests on and off-shore.

As long as the criminals install another criminal to act as the US Attorney General in the Dept.of Justice. Trust will go the way of the Edsel.

Mukasey should be disbarred.

Arrest Silverstein/Bushcon and heal or stay stuck in the myths, manipulations and Lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Bravest Man In The World
Posted by: Last Chance on Dec 19, 2008 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our President-Elect Barack Obama has great courage to try to save this madhouse of a nation from its suicidal greed and corruption. But will he dare to tell the people the terrible truth: that to save our planet, we must stop our ever-expanding capital investments, that instead we must shrink our economy and reduce our population, close down the coal-fired power plants and ground the jet planes? I will be astonished if he even mentions anything like that, since he has pledged to grow the economy to get this country moving again. But to grow the economy and save the environment is impossible since it is the growing economy itself that is destroying the environment. Does Obama understand this? I wonder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Greatest Shill in the World Posted by: edgeofnowhere
» Reality Has Caught Up To Us. Posted by: Last Chance

Comments are closed-

Like all of the departments....
Posted by: QuestionAuthority on Dec 19, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like all the departments that Bush didn't like, he staffed the SEC with his cronies and true-believers, then slashed its budget well into the bone to ensure that it could not do its job, even if someone there wanted to do so.

It's a planned, epic failure because BushCo wanted us all to believe that business can police itself and needs no external regulation. "Trust us," he said, as he and his cronies plunged their hands deep into our retirement accounts and wallets.

As a result, by the time this economic nightmare ends, I expect to be like many others in my early 50's: left without enough to retire on, not beacsue I didn't plan, but because it was stolen in a corrupt system. I now expect to work until I die to extend what I have left to retire on.

There is a warm spot near the fires of Hell for people like George W. Bush and his cronies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RE: Trust
Posted by: archives@uwyo.edu on Dec 19, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Force and fraud (the levers of power). Trust no one very much in money (force) or media (fraud). Why does anyone need "trust" anyway. It is just the fruit of laziness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Buyer beware! If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 19, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The presumption of trust is gone.

Trust is earned; verification is an essential ingredient.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

remember the S&Ls?
Posted by: Levon on Dec 19, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew back then that the next swindle was in the making and that to put my money in a 401 was asking to be ripped off. and you can bet the they are already planning the next swindle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Don't listen to the Nation.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Dec 19, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This rag has supported Mr. Obama with the mantra of he is "better" than McCain or "Give him a chance."

The writers at The Nation are clueless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

"Trust" is not an element of capitalism
Posted by: grindermonkey on Dec 19, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has no more relevance to finance than it does to marriage or mortgages. Capitalism depends upon accurate, regulated reporting not some Judeo Christian, ten commandment rubbish. This mess is why church and state should be absolutely separated. Hopefully this will occur on Jan 20. So why should we be talking about putting Bush and his cronies in jail when we know that they would corrupt the prison system?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

TOO BAD, IT WASN'T ALWAYS LIKE THIS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Dec 19, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder what Arthur Leavitt would say. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Doing the Fk's IN!
Posted by: mcyclemama on Dec 19, 2008 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why hasn't someone that has been totally fucked by the likes of a/holes such as this, who has lost everything they had or ever will have, asassinated these people, one by one, randomly?
It sure wouldn't bother me any, although I personally know this is against the law and would NEVER do something like that myself. Just goes to show that the middle and lower classes have massive amounts of morallity as opposed to these rich, money grubbing fuckers that are controlling our banks, Wall Street, and our government these days.
These jerkoffs should be made to know the feeling that at any time of any day, and anywhere, they could be the target of a sniper with nothing in his life left to lose because they have had it all stolen from them and this individual has no way left to replenish what was stolen from him (or her). Do you think that perhaps it would make some of these m/f's change their money grubbing methods somewhat? What is needed is a few martyrs. After all, this country was founded on a principle of overthrowing tyranny was it not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Instead of putting
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Dec 19, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
your money into a 401k or anything else that relies on trusting the "system," pay off your house.

Put your money into real things.

At least that's what I would do if I had any money!

Granny's crazy videos = Go get a chuckle!

Luv,
Granny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Smart People Know Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Smart People Know Posted by: Grandma Crabby

Comments are closed-

The presumption of trust is gone.
Posted by: Dixie Dawg on Dec 19, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let the record show, "Buyer beware", as cynical as that sounds, has been the watch word and hallmark of the smart consumer/customer for longer than any of us care to admit.

Like it or not, " to good to be true", and " read the fine print" are worthy guides.

As one stock broker told me once upon a time a long time ago,
" where there is money, larsoney will not be far behind."

Each generation has their Madoff. Mine was Billie Sol Estes. Even with Shrub, T Boone, and Oscar Wyatt, Billie Sol is considered " Texas most famous flim-flam man. And, he was and he is still a lot more colorful than any of these twits.

Merry Christmas

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama isn't the answer
Posted by: praedor on Dec 19, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He may alter the fringe around the edges but to count on Obama to untie the Democraps from Wall Street is a stretch.

Two words: No way. They (the Dems) are in too deep with the criminal enterprise that is US finance and corporations. The Friedman Religion that prays to the "Free Market" is a fundamentalist religion that has roots too deep in both criminal organizations (Democraps and Rethuglicans) to EVER be dropped in favor of a more human, and humane, system.

Don't count on Obama to fix this, he will instead try to apply bandaids. The only fix is for the whole thing to die so that something new and, if we are diligent and watchful and ACTIVE, better can come along.

The framework for the new and better is simple: mixed economy with heavy regulation to control the inevitable evil done by capitalistic (greed) tendencies. Socialized medicine, socialized retirement, a MUCH more equitable arrangement between labor and management, and profit only after social responsibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Was it ever there?
Posted by: YogiBear on Dec 19, 2008 9:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no way of knowing if someone is a con artist. The presumption of trust is gone.

Anyways, it's only a matter of time before the people who refused to invest with this guy because they knew it to be a scheme, come out. People who got in early are also the ones you're not hearing from, because they made their pile. It should have been obvious this guy was scammeing, but people are willing to look the other way -- "good" people especially -- so long as it increases their bottom line.

Had a ponzi case out my way where the scammer was a seminary student. Like 70 percent of his investors came from Christian message boards. To them, he was doing God's work. When the SEC got him, they werre the bad guys, doing the devil's work. Furthermor, no one ever questioned the "legit" software behind the scheme, which generated computerized hits on websites. Even if it weren;'t a pyramid deal, none of theose folks ever stopped to think maybe it was dishonest or unChristian to make money by running software to make pretend visits to websites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Madoff was small fry
Posted by: PaulD on Dec 19, 2008 11:44 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like Ponzi schemes? You'll love Social Security.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Madoff was small fry Posted by: theou
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS