COMMENTS: 14
Let's Cut Out the Banks and Finance American Innovation
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.
Just this morning, I heard that my favorite union printing press had closed its doors. Last night, I heard that Olsson's, the great book/music place in Washington, D.C., closed all five of its stores last month. There are times when I work at my Vox Pop café in Manhattan and wait one hour for a single customer to walk in. Consumer spending is going steadily down. Unemployment is around 6.5 percent, and that's just the "official" rate.
I don't want to lose my company. I've worked so hard to build it over five years. I've been an entrepreneur since I started my first company at age 25. Along the way, I've seen how companies can grow, change the world, have an effect. I have seen how value is created.
Most of us have heard how great microfinance programs have been for poor, enterprising people -- many of them previously disempowered women -- in villages across the developing world. Why not try something like that here?
What if we had a big, grassroots, community-focused "green venture capital fund" in every town in America? What if there was new money available to all the creative souls out there yearning to quit their lousy job, or get out of the army of the unemployed and start a company that did something in the public interest?
We could do this. We could create a U.S. Social Ventures Administration -- a fund that that backed companies that offered a nice financial return on investment, but also a serious social return to the public.
Let's face it: As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama's $700 billion bailout was a mistake. Sure, it was a mistake made under pressure. But alongside John McCain and President Bush, he voted for a financial fiasco that no one believes in now, even Bush's own Treasury secretary.
Well, I'm well outside the circle of the "center-right" economists on whom Obama is leaning for advice. Robert Reich recently claimed, "we don't need visionaries," but I beg to differ. What if you took a hybrid of progressive social values, environmentalism, American hustle and the magic of the marketplace? (Yep, this is a hybrid sure to piss off everybody! Or it just might work…)
Instead of thinking about government handouts, let's reframe the argument: What if the U.S. federal government started thinking of itself as an investor, instead of as a reluctant donor? Instead of a handout, the USG should expect a return (either social or financial) on whatever money it puts into a venture. So, a new program should be started, the U.S. Social Ventures Administration (USSVA).
President-elect Obama recently said: "We'll put people back to work rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, modernizing schools that are failing our children, and building wind farms and solar panels; fuel-efficient cars and the alternative energy technologies that can free us from our dependence on foreign oil and keep our economy competitive in the years ahead."
That's great, but what's the plan for execution? And how can he get everyone on board? What if the execution of this vision was designed in a way that fired up both the working class and Wall Street? Well, I've worked at Kinko's, and I've worked on Wall Street; there is a way to do this.
The USSVA would advance a whole new way to think about finance. It would take the best of free-market economics and principled government planning. USSVA would fund new ventures in the public interest, like the infrastructure and green energy projects Obama promised. But USSVA could eventually be expanded to include new-media companies, to enrich our democracy through new technology and a freer exchange of ideas and information. We could use USSVA to reindustrialize the USA, and retool our plants and factories. We could use USSVA to rejuvenate American agriculture, to move away from pesticide-laden crops and get away from genetically modified factory farming. All of which would boost employment and put the whole U.S. economy on steroids, so to speak.
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Last Chance on Dec 12, 2008 5:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The smart thing to do is -->
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» RE: The smart thing to do is -->
Posted by: Alternativepowerguy
» RE: Sorry I have to disagree unless you are talking about REdevelopment
Posted by: Alternativepowerguy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: boing007 on Dec 12, 2008 9:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Dec 12, 2008 10:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get busy. And while you're at it, throw a bone or two to us lowers... I know a whole sub-class of fiction writers who could do with some microfinancing. Hollywood is a closed shop and a poor fit for the future of creative work. Indies are the deal, but indies need cash. The owning class are the only ones with cash.
It's all you, dude. All you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zrants on Dec 12, 2008 11:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wrote this on my blog and sent it to California Congresspeople, April 23 2008. Good to see other people are thinking along these lines. - zrants
"We have seen the results of corporate tax credits and research grants. Huge corporate profits and not a lot of positive change. We are told it will take years for the car manufacturers to deliver fuel efficient cars, and for the gas companies to replace the old fuel distribution system.
We need faster solutions and we need a better return on our tax dollars. It’s time to change the way the government finances research and development. Rather than giving away the money as tax credits and grants to oil companies and car manufacturers, the government should participate as owner/operators and investors. Use the income from profits to pay down the debt, or keep prices down for the consumers.
Invest in specific areas of production. If the car manufacturers need money to retool to produce energy-efficient cars, the government can participate as a partner, pay for the retooling and be reimbursed as cars are sold.
Many local governments are producing limited amounts of fuel for their own transit needs. These programs can be expanded to serve the public as well. Diesel engines can run on other fuels. Delivering alternative fuels to trucks should be a top priority since so much of the economy depends on trucks for delivery.
http://zrants.wordpress.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Dec 12, 2008 11:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We're all working-class, and could all be investing class.
Posted by: amacd
» [Cont] We're all working-class, and could all be investing class.
Posted by: amacd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Dec 12, 2008 11:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 12, 2008 12:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2. I'm looking for $6,500 to build a far more efficient algae bioreactor. Goal: $3/gallon biodiesel now, heading for $1.50.
3. I'm looking for an architectural firm. Goal: integrated sustainable solar components for maybe 80% less. Very LEED, very cheap.
4. I'm looking to cut NASA's carbon footprint (and their per-mission energy costs) by 50% across the board.
5. I'm looking to develop 2 cent per kwh nonphotovoltaic solar electricity.
6. I'm looking to flatten the cost of mass transit. I'm aiming for factor-of-10 improvements.
What makes you think I'm the only inventor out here?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Dear Government, please work with me on six different energy efficiency companies
Posted by: Alternativepowerguy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Last Chance on Dec 12, 2008 5:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The smart thing to do is -->
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» RE: The smart thing to do is -->
Posted by: Alternativepowerguy
» RE: Sorry I have to disagree unless you are talking about REdevelopment
Posted by: Alternativepowerguy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: boing007 on Dec 12, 2008 9:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Dec 12, 2008 10:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get busy. And while you're at it, throw a bone or two to us lowers... I know a whole sub-class of fiction writers who could do with some microfinancing. Hollywood is a closed shop and a poor fit for the future of creative work. Indies are the deal, but indies need cash. The owning class are the only ones with cash.
It's all you, dude. All you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zrants on Dec 12, 2008 11:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wrote this on my blog and sent it to California Congresspeople, April 23 2008. Good to see other people are thinking along these lines. - zrants
"We have seen the results of corporate tax credits and research grants. Huge corporate profits and not a lot of positive change. We are told it will take years for the car manufacturers to deliver fuel efficient cars, and for the gas companies to replace the old fuel distribution system.
We need faster solutions and we need a better return on our tax dollars. It’s time to change the way the government finances research and development. Rather than giving away the money as tax credits and grants to oil companies and car manufacturers, the government should participate as owner/operators and investors. Use the income from profits to pay down the debt, or keep prices down for the consumers.
Invest in specific areas of production. If the car manufacturers need money to retool to produce energy-efficient cars, the government can participate as a partner, pay for the retooling and be reimbursed as cars are sold.
Many local governments are producing limited amounts of fuel for their own transit needs. These programs can be expanded to serve the public as well. Diesel engines can run on other fuels. Delivering alternative fuels to trucks should be a top priority since so much of the economy depends on trucks for delivery.
http://zrants.wordpress.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Dec 12, 2008 11:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We're all working-class, and could all be investing class.
Posted by: amacd
» [Cont] We're all working-class, and could all be investing class.
Posted by: amacd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Dec 12, 2008 11:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 12, 2008 12:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2. I'm looking for $6,500 to build a far more efficient algae bioreactor. Goal: $3/gallon biodiesel now, heading for $1.50.
3. I'm looking for an architectural firm. Goal: integrated sustainable solar components for maybe 80% less. Very LEED, very cheap.
4. I'm looking to cut NASA's carbon footprint (and their per-mission energy costs) by 50% across the board.
5. I'm looking to develop 2 cent per kwh nonphotovoltaic solar electricity.
6. I'm looking to flatten the cost of mass transit. I'm aiming for factor-of-10 improvements.
What makes you think I'm the only inventor out here?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Dear Government, please work with me on six different energy efficiency companies
Posted by: Alternativepowerguy
Tax the Corporations and the Rich or Take Draconian Cuts -- the Decision Is Ours
Home Underwater? Walk Away from Geithner's Perverse 'Homeowner Relief' Plan
Fury at Wall St. Banks Fuels Public Action for Move Your Money Campaign




