COMMENTS: 3
Why Is the Government Keeping Key Documents About the Bailout Under Wraps?
October 22, 2008 |
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.
Advertisement
The Washington Post first briefly noticed the redactions. Meanwhile, Bailoutsleuth, a site created by Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, has been tracking the redactions and flagging more examples.
The government’s justification for blacking out the monthly fees set in the publicly bid contract aren’t clear.
“It looks like a reflexive, ‘we don’t want to tell you,’” said Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists. “I just don’t see the rationale.”
Aftergood explained that the Freedom of Information Act allows the government to redact information for reasons including privacy and proprietary concerns, neither of which apparently applies in this case, he said.
A privacy exemption would allow the government to black out the names and salaries of specific Bank of New York Mellon employees, but not the bank’s fee. And a proprietary exemption applies while the contract is being competitively bid, a process that ended last week with the selection of the bank, the world's largest custodian of assets.
“If it were challenged, I believe they would eventually be compelled to reveal the information,” Aftergood said.
A Treasury spokesperson did not return our phone calls. But Treasury officials have previously told the Post that they will reveal the terms once other contracts related to the bailout have been negotiated.
The government released the redacted contract one day after a Treasury Department official touted the bailout plan’s transparency.
“Consistent with Congress' intent, we are committed to transparency and oversight in all aspects of the program,” said Neel Kashkari, the Treasury’s Interim Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability.
That same day, the Treasury compelled Bank of New York Mellon to take a $2 billion infusion of cash in exchange for preferred stock.
Government officials have called Bank of New York Mellon the “prime contractor” of the Treasury’s purchase program. Specifically, the bank will run the auctions used by the government to purchase distressed assets, then hold, track and value those securities. It also will keep track of executive compensation limits.
The bank beat out other big banks JPMorgan Chase and Northern Trust for the contract. In total, 70 firms vied for the deal.
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons agreement.
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
Comments are closed-
SECRECY?
Posted by: Bob Graham Las Vegas on Oct 23, 2008 12:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Posted by: Bob Graham Las Vegas on Oct 23, 2008 12:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can anyone call it a secret when we know this is the MO of the government? No surprise here. The presidents threats to the Senate are also an unknown, not a surprise, not a secret.What led up to all of this, buried information, no surprise, not a secret. The fact that WE THE PEOPLE allowed it to start and continue to allow it, is no surprise and not a secret. Until WE THE PEOPLE stand up to these tyrants in office and clean sweep them right on out of office we will get what we deserve, and it is NOT A SECRET.IT IS A CONSPIRACY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SECRECY?
Posted by: sslyon
» RE: SECRECY?
Posted by: sslyon
Alternet Comments:
» RE: SECRECY?
Posted by: sslyon
» RE: SECRECY?
Posted by: sslyon
Comments are closed-
SECRECY?
Posted by: Bob Graham Las Vegas on Oct 23, 2008 12:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Posted by: Bob Graham Las Vegas on Oct 23, 2008 12:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can anyone call it a secret when we know this is the MO of the government? No surprise here. The presidents threats to the Senate are also an unknown, not a surprise, not a secret.What led up to all of this, buried information, no surprise, not a secret. The fact that WE THE PEOPLE allowed it to start and continue to allow it, is no surprise and not a secret. Until WE THE PEOPLE stand up to these tyrants in office and clean sweep them right on out of office we will get what we deserve, and it is NOT A SECRET.IT IS A CONSPIRACY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SECRECY?
Posted by: sslyon
» RE: SECRECY?
Posted by: sslyon
PROGRESSIVE WIRE
Tax the Corporations and the Rich or Take Draconian Cuts -- the Decision Is Ours
Home Underwater? Walk Away from Geithner's Perverse 'Homeowner Relief' Plan
Fury at Wall St. Banks Fuels Public Action for Move Your Money Campaign




