COMMENTS: 82
Jim Hightower on Pot -- Sharing His Thoughts on Pot, That Is
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Drugs headlines via email.
Here's more from the MPP; its quick FAQ --
Marijuana: Myths vs. Reality
Myth: There is no scientific evidence proving marijuana's therapeutic qualities.
Reality: In a White House-commissioned 1999 report, the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine declared that "nausea, appetite loss, pain, and anxiety are all afflictions of wasting and all can be mitigated by marijuana."
Myth: Marijuana's potential health benefits are insignificant compared to the damage caused by smoking the drug.
Reality: Marijuana need not be administered by smoking: It can be taken in food, tea, or through a smokeless vaporizer. Furthermore, a 2006 study by a leading pulmonologist, Dr. Donald Tashkin, found that even regular and heavy smoking of marijuana does not lead to lung cancer.
Myth: Allowing the medical use of marijuana will send the wrong message to children and lead to more youths using the drug.
Reality: In the 10 medical marijuana states that have before-and-after data, studies have unanimously shown that not only has youth use of marijuana not gone up overall, it actually has declined since medical marijuana became legal.
Myth: Marijuana is a gateway drug to harder substances, and therefore medical marijuana use will lead to dangerous drug use.
Reality: In science, the distinction between cause and correlation is a crucial one. A White House-commissioned study by the Institute of Medicine found that marijuana "does not appear to be a gateway drug to the extent that it is the cause or even that it is the most significant predictor of serious drug abuse; that is, care must be taken not to attribute cause to association." Moreover, claims about marijuana being a gateway make no sense in the context of medical marijuana: Patients often use marijuana instead of highly addictive prescription medicines like morphine and Oxycontin. Medical marijuana is a safe alternative for patients whose other options are not as reliable or effective.
Myth: Supporting medical marijuana is politically risky.
Reality: Across the country and with increasing frequency, public opinion polls show that support for medical marijuana is popular and steadily rising -- and cuts across demographic and party lines. A 2004 AARP poll showed that 72% of seniors support medical marijuana, and a 2005 Gallup poll found that 78% of Americans support "making marijuana legally available for doctors to prescribe in order to reduce pain and suffering." Compassion and relief from suffering are nonpartisan issues that all legislators can -- and should -- support.
Stay up to date with the latest Drugs headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Crazy H on Jul 14, 2008 1:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's why we've got ... (cue fanfare) ... The Pharmaceuticals Industry!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sending the wrong message?what wrong message??
Posted by: donl51
» RE: Sending the wrong message?what wrong message??
Posted by: kiel
» RE: Sending the wrong message?what wrong message??
Posted by: tirebiter
» RE: Sending the wrong message
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 15, 2008 12:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have a marijuana if you can.
Tom Degan
Goshen, NT
The Arrogance of Being Karl (Rove, that is!)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: POT SHOTS
Posted by: soulrebeljc
» RE: POT SHOTS
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: POT SHOTS correction
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: POT SHOTS correction
Posted by: willymack
» Harry you have your head on backwards!
Posted by: donl51
» How do you "have a marijuana"?
Posted by: Leadlip
» RE: How do you "have a marijuana"?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: How do you "have a marijuana"?
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: How do you "have a marijuana"?
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gazooks on Jul 15, 2008 3:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the worth to the reduction of stress related toxins clinically shown as precursors to a wide range of debilitating physical conditions?
I submit that the enduring popularity of Mary is her capacity to smooth the furrowed brow with a benign attitude conducive to good humor, friendliness and aesthetic appreciation.
These days, it's an especially welcome reprieve from the stupor inducing idiocy of our cultural contradictions and propensity to violence.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: colinmeister on Jul 15, 2008 3:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Making pot legal would save smokers from having to associate with criminals, and lessen the chance that the criminals would be able to sell them other drugs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gateway drug?
Posted by: socialpsych
» RE: Gateway drug?
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Gateway drug?..not hardly!
Posted by: donl51
» RE: Gateway drug?
Posted by: pizzmoe
» RE: Gateway drug?
Posted by: fencewalker
» RE: Gateway drug?
Posted by: chivakenevil_666
Comments are closed-
Posted by: socialpsych on Jul 15, 2008 3:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why did the media do this? Distraction. Putting the spotlight on the people and their "misbehavior" takes the focus off the military-industrial crooks and the financial services thieves (which, if memory serves, included John McCain in the '80s!).
Distract 'em and snow 'em! A tried and true strategy.
Source: Dearing, J. W., and Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Propaganda value of anti-pot message
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 15, 2008 3:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
True activists are very sober people they get more done and have more credibility..
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ba
Posted by: soulrebeljc
» RE: ba
Posted by: sunnywater
» RE: ba
Posted by: somegirl
» RE: ba
Posted by: Lauren
» Hella SQUARE, man.
Posted by: Coleman
» RE: ba
Posted by: Jack Canuck
» RE: ba
Posted by: picklebarrela55
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Skelly on Jul 15, 2008 4:12 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What?
I like this song, who does this?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jmmartin on Jul 15, 2008 5:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Anecdotal But Factual
Posted by: Jack Canuck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Jul 15, 2008 6:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gee... do ya think so?
That is a rhetorical question. The point of the question is to help you remind yourself just how bad things have gotten... so bad to the point that a medicinal herb with spiritual properties is attacked and vilified.
The Lie is so big that we are compelled to keep searching and searching for some plausible explanation for the vilification of pot. Surely there is something bad about pot! Something so bad that it requires us to spend billions building a police state to fight the evil scourge of devil weed.
But you won't find it. You won't find a logical rational justification for the attacks on this poor herb. What you will find is that the world really is controlled by an occult ruling class that is trying to enslave humanity... and pot is one tool that can help people see these occult rulers for what they are. Like those glasses from the movie "They Live". They Live was a cheesy movie. But they got one thing right. The ruling class has declared war on our consciousness. They want to destroy it, they want to dumb us down to the point where our consciousness shuts down completely. And they want the technology to strip it from us completely. And they are well on their way to getting it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: a logical rational justification
Posted by: solrev
» RE: a logical rational justification
Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Simple Reality Check
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 15, 2008 6:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Industrial Hemp is what they're really afraid of. Hence, the "pot" frame.
Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Industrial Hemp is what they're really afraid of. Hence, the "pot" frame.
Posted by: Blacktiger
» RE: Industrial Hemp is what they're really afraid of. Hence, the "pot" frame.
Posted by: annavan1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ATH on Jul 15, 2008 7:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marijuana has almost no toxicity, especially if it is consumed via smokeless vaporization, which burns it at a temperature that only releases the beneficial cannabinoids, but none of the toxins, such as those found in cigarette smoke.
Legalizing marijuana for responsible adult consumers would provide revenue in taxes, stop the jailing and imprisonment of otherwise law abiding citizens (costing taxpayers multi-millions each year, plus losing the tax revenues and economic stimulus from these consumers),and make it harder for minors to get ahold of pot-after all, drug dealers do not card. Legalizing marijuana would remove many drug dealers, and the violence and harder drugs they bring to our streets.
People who do not like marijuana are not going to start smoking it just because it is legal. I also believe, if it were legalized, minors would be less likely to be attracted to it, because it would no longer be as taboo. Politicians believe their ads about "just saying no" and "this is your brain on drugs" deter minors from experimenting with pot, but studies have shown that these ads actually increase minors' desires to try pot...really, it's common sense: the quickest way to get a minor to do something is to tell them that, whatever they do, don't do this!
The horror stories and other misinformation that has been fed to minors through these anti-drug ads also undermines their credibility; because when the minor tries pot, and finds that he has no desire to attempt to fly, or to rape or kill anyone, and does not lose his or her mind..well, they realize they've been lied to. Then, they assume everything they've heard about drugs is probably false, so they try something harder--only this time, it truly is a dangerous drug. Our own "Drug Czar" said that "marijuana was more dangerous than heroin."!!! Can you believe that?
The reason marijuana remains illegal is due to the lobbying efforts of the Pharmasuetical Corporations, the Oil Companies, the Alcohol industry, and agencies like the DEA. Think how many people make their living from "busting" American citizens for pot. We have more people behind bars than any other nation, and 80% of those in jail or prison are there due to drug charges.
How can the government tell you what you can and can not put in one's own body? Especially when it is an all-natural, chemically unchanged, PLANT! Now, you could say, well, cocaine and heroin come from plants, too. This is true, but the difference is, those drugs are drastically changed through chemical processes, making them much stronger, and changing their character. Whereas pot is only made stronger through farming techniques.
And the newest argument that pot must be kept illegal because it has grown so much more potent, is absurd. It is easy to tell the diference between averege pot and high potency pot, and just as one doesn't drink whisky like beer, one doesn't smoke high-potency pot the same as average pot.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Legalize it? -Summarize it.
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
» RE: Legalize it? -Summarize it.
Posted by: ATH
» RE: Legalize it!
Posted by: Wacre
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jul 15, 2008 7:10 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» CHEERS...
Posted by: cami0
» RE: The reason: is treason
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The reason: is treason
Posted by: chiefwanadubie
» RE: The reason: is treason
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The reason: is treason
Posted by: ATH
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aussidawg on Jul 15, 2008 9:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Marijuana laws are absurd!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Marijuana laws are absurd!
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Marijuana laws are absurd!
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: harryf200 on Jul 15, 2008 9:59 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Puhleeeeeze....
Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Puhleeeeeze....
Posted by: raiders757
» RE: Puhleeeeeze....
Posted by: picket
Comments are closed-
Posted by: raiders757 on Jul 15, 2008 10:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets also not forget that it's not just big oil, and pharmaceutical companies that benifit from this war on drugs, it's also large corporate labs and insurance companies as well. We have bought into, and allowed, corporate america to spread drug testing so far and wide, that it makes billions of dollars yearly for test laboratories. Insurance companies get kick backs from these billions, by pressuring small, and big business alike, to implement drug testing, or face higher rates. They do so with bullshit propaganda, worded so perfect, the right and left wing sheep can't help but buy into it.
Even though drugs are illegal, and a place of business can make a good case for prescreening and post screening it's imployees, drug testing is a discriminatory process. Not everyone who smokes pot, or does a line on the weekend, is a drug addict. A lot of these people are good workers being held out of better jobs for the sake of bullshit propaganda and greed.
Can you not see the irony in the fact that someone who likes to puff on a little weed from time to time, can't get a job at the local Anheuser Busch Brewery?
How about Stanley Steamer, Wal-Mart, and Target. These places do a drug test on their employees in my area. Stanley Steamer even says it on the local TV adds. Is this not pathetic? Is this truely helping our economy?
The answer is no. Well, unless your one of those making billions off of drug testing. The truth is, 99% of all drug testing is payed for by the tax payer, and the consumer. It's free money for those involved, yet it holds families back, and keeps many decent people from having better jobs.
The war on drugs goes a lot deeper that we all think. It's holding all of us back, and causing black market crime to rise. It has created a hydra, and when each head is cut off, several more grow in it's place. It's time to decriminalize all drugs, and come up with a new plan. It takes a lot less money to educate and help those in need, than to fight the problem. It's time to put this sham to an end.
Sorry to rant.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: aiders757
Posted by: ATH
Comments are closed-
Posted by: keyboardtek on Jul 15, 2008 11:01 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now if medical grade pot becomes available for "stress reduction" therapy, a long term study of health issues could be practical.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: keyboardtek
Posted by: Socioecologist
» RE: keyboardtek
Posted by: LeeAnnG
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mclemens on Jul 15, 2008 11:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seen in this light, it is telling that the modern “War on Drugs” was spearheaded by Nixon, who with Mundt was a key-player in HUAC and attempted to revive “Sedition-Act” style legalized thought control through the McCarran Act.
One really has to wonder how much of the criminalization of drugs is really an attempt to clamp down on people thinking and acting in ways believed by the craven martinets of social hygiene to be unorthodox (hence, alien and potentially seditious). If you want to preserve things the way they are, you have to be adamant in preventing Legalized Spiritual Discovery.
Pounds-shillings-pence is much more conducive to a serene and unruffled status quo.
I’d further propose as many potheads out there as can muster the incentive gather and nurture those seeds and plant them in the most wide-ranging and diverse settings possible. The same thing should be done with poppy seeds, still available at any supermarket (Yes, a sizeable amount of these baking delicacies are still fertile, and yes, they come from the same plant that has been cultivated for millennia for its opium). Just throw ‘em out the car window every quarter mile onto any arable soil on your next vacation.
With a few thousand dedicated and persistent Johnny Potseeds out there spreading Mother Nature’s bounty, extermination attempts would become increasingly less cost-effective, and the increased ubiquity and access to Her blessings would render interdiction and control ever more patently absurd.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We need a Johnny Potseed Army to counter an oppressive society
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: We need a Johnny Potseed Army to counter an oppressive society
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Grocery-store bought poppy seeds are "90% viable"
Posted by: mclemens
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dkm on Jul 15, 2008 2:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drhibbart on Jul 15, 2008 2:12 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: macdon1 on Jul 15, 2008 10:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: California Compassionate Use Law
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picklebarrela55 on Jul 15, 2008 10:44 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: orionsan on Jul 15, 2008 11:36 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How are we going to fill all those private prisons
Posted by: chiefwanadubie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ranchero42 on Jul 16, 2008 1:44 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: staicnoise on Jul 19, 2008 5:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
How Many Mexican Drug War Deaths Can We Attribute to U.S. Pot Laws?
GOP and Dems Agree: Crack/Powder Cocaine Disparity Unjust and Needs Reform
Why Thousands Are Turning to a Psychedelic Plant from Africa for Release from Severe Addictions




