COMMENTS: 25
America, Intoxicated: Conference Tackles Disasters of the Drug War
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Drugs headlines via email.
It's quite likely that her murder would have gone with little, if any, notice had it not been for the fact that she was a 92-year-old black woman shot to death when Atlanta narcotics officers burst through her door using a "no-knock warrant." The officers had the wrong house. When Johnston scrambled for an old gun stashed in her house to try to save her life from people she assumed were trying to rob or hurt her, she fired one shot and missed. The plain clothed officers fired back, over and over again. Johnston died in the blast of gunfire, in which several officers were wounded in what is euphemistically referred by the U.S. military as "friendly fire."
Johnston's death at the hands of overzealous narcotics officers shocked Atlanta and then made national headlines when the officers involved were exposed for having planted drugs in her house in an outrageous attempt to try to cover up their deadly blunder.
Last month, on the anniversary of Johnston's death, Atlanta Police Chief Richard Pennington proudly announced that his department now had "the best-trained narcotics unit in the Southeast," having doubled its ranks and instituted new rules. No-knock warrants were still acceptable but only if they were "approved by a major" and if officers wore uniforms.
Akin to the expansion of the Atlanta narcotics unit in the wake of a disgrace like this one, the drug war keeps expanding its reach. As of year-end 2006, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) reported that American jails and prisons held a record-breaking 2,258,983 men and women, and that one in 31 adults are now under some form of correctional supervision. Analysis of the report, released last week by The Sentencing Project revealed that, since 1980, there has been a 1,200 percent increase in the number of people incarcerated for the possession or sale of illicit substances, from 41,100 to at least 532,400 today. At nearly double the rate of men, the number of women in prison has increased by 812 percent in that same time period. In October, the Marijuana Policy Project also reported that marijuana arrests exceeded nearly 830,000 in the same year, resulting in one pot-related arrest every 38 seconds.
What mainstream news coverage of the record-setting incarceration rates existed all but faded within a few days after the BJS report, but at the International Drug Policy Reform Conference, held last week in New Orleans, the numbers remained front-and-center. Organized by the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA), the conference brought 1,200 participants together from across the world to discuss the international ripple effects of relentlessly aggressive drug policies.
AlterNet was honored with an Edward M. Brecher Award for Achievement in the Field of Journalism for its coverage on drug war policies in the United States and other parts of the world. Accepting the award on behalf of AlterNet was executive director Don Hazen, who noted that individual, drug war-related stories are attracting upwards of 100,000 readers.
Among dozens of other topics on the worldwide social and economic repercussions of the drug war, panelists addressed President Bush's latest proposed funding package of $1.4 billion in drug war "aid" to Mexico, now awaiting congressional approval. Panelists and attendees arrived in New Orleans from across the United States, the Netherlands, Poland, Columbia, Bolivia, Argentina, Hungary, Brazil, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, but the gravity of police abuse and corruption related to racism and the drug war brought in local reformers as well. From needle exchange to the bleak history of Louisiana's jails, prisons and juvenile detention facilities, participants emphasized that New Orleans, and the state as a whole, has consistently grown more regressive in policing and drug-related arrests of low-income residents.
African-American residents have, by far, fared the worst in pre- and post-Katrina New Orleans. Evidence of such is hardly anecdotal, backed by last week's Justice Policy Institute (JPI) report, "The Vortex: The Concentrated Racial Impact of Drug Imprisonment and the Characteristics of Punitive Counties." JPI's extensive research into regional drug use and arrest disparities uncovered that Orleans County (in which New Orleans is located) had the third-highest rate of sentencing for drug offenses, followed closely by Louisiana's Jefferson County. Respectively, the two counties incarcerated African-Americans at four and nine times the rate of Euro-Americans.
The local situation mirrors a disturbing, national phenomenon that has resulted in nearly one million black men and women doing time in American jails and prisons. (African-American juveniles, and youth of color in general, are also heavily overrepresented in detention facilities.) Because many states do not report the number of Native Americans, Alaska Natives, Asian/Pacific Islanders -- and many others assign incorrect ethnicities to Latinos and Native Americans in particular, national figures are difficult to ascertain. (Of the states that do keep these statistics, Alaska, South Dakota, Montana and Washington are known to lock up Native Americans at up to four times their demographic representation, largely on drug-related sentences.)
Although the disproportionate incarceration of African-Americans and other people of color has long since been a matter of grave consequence, previous DPA conferences have been noticeably devoid of significant participation by both former prisoners, low-income community members and people of color, something that the organization has worked diligently to remedy through collaborative outreach campaigns. The efforts appeared to have made a significant difference in both attendance and the presentation of workshops and large-scale plenaries, including "Black America: The Debate Within," which centered on the absence of most civil rights leaders organizations in the pursuit of meaningful criminal justice reform.
"If [mainstream civil rights organizations] were to come here, they would see what's possible and what kind of constituents they truly have. There is such tremendous energy, drive and passion here," said DPA Executive Director Ethan Nadelmann at the close of the conference. "People feel the suffering in their communities, and they recognize that drug policy reform is one of the key ways to go about changing what they are seeing and experiencing."
Stay up to date with the latest Drugs headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Dec 11, 2007 3:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He and his colleagues at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, BC set up a secure and spacious environment where rats could spontaneously play, mate, nurse their young and generally live comfortable lives. The rats could choose between plain water and water adulterated with an opiate. They chose the plain water. Why? Because no creature needs to take the edge off happiness. Even when sugar was added to the opiate-laced water, the rats preferred the plain water.
So all the money spent on fighting a phoney war on drugs should have been spent on making people's lives better. This is isn't quite accidental, folks. There is a whole class of people who are very happy to misdirect money (into their own pockets).
You can download a very through presentation to the Canadian Parliament by entering Bruce K Alexander into its search engine. (If you print it out, you'll get ten pages in very small type!)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» TRUE!
Posted by: jimidee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Dec 11, 2007 6:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This so called "war on drugs" is yet another great american tragedy.It is clearly a war on race and poverty.
The middle class and rich have their drugs supplied by Big PhRMA. The poor have to get them elsewhere.
I would like to hear more from the presidential candidates on this issue.
Where are they?
Dr. Rick Lippin
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: War on Drugs is a War on Race and the Poor
Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: Ron Paul would seek to end the Federal War on Drugs
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Ron Paul would seek to end the Federal War on Drugs
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: skingk on Dec 11, 2007 6:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.leap.cc/cms/index.php
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Dec 11, 2007 6:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy..." John 10.10
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: war_on_tara on Dec 11, 2007 7:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» agree... alternet covers this subject very well
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: James W. Harris on Dec 11, 2007 8:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
* * * * *
Three Major Party Presidential Candidates Oppose War on Drugs
No less than three major-party U.S. presidential candidates have now come out
publicly against the disastrous War on Drugs.
You already know about libertarian Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), of course. And perhaps
you knew about Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH).
Now joining them in opposition to the Drug War is former Alaska U.S. Senator
Mike Gravel, a Democrat.
In a May interview with the Iowa Independent newspaper, Gravel was asked if he
thought marijuana, cocaine and methamphetamine should be legal.
Responded Gavel:
"When are we are going to learn? We went through the Depression and we realized
how we created all the gangsters and the violence.
"When FDR came in he wiped out Prohibition. We need to wipe out this whole War
on Drugs.
"We spend $50 billion to $70 billion a year. We create criminals that aren't
criminals. We destabilize foreign countries.
"With respect to marijuana, Doug, I'll tell you what: Go get yourself a fifth
of scotch or a fifth of gin and chug-a-lug it down and you'll find you lose
your senses a lot faster than you would smoking some marijuana."
"We need to legalize the regulation of drugs. The drug problem is a public
health problem. It's not a criminal problem. We make it a criminal problem
because we treat people like criminals. You take a drug addict, you throw him
in jail, you leave him there, and he learns the criminal trade so that when he
gets out you have recidivism."
Gavel's Web site elaborates his position. While far from libertarian, he
advocates dramatic drug law reforms. From his site:
"The United States incarcerates more people and at a higher rate than any other
peacetime nation in the world. According to the federal Bureau of Justice
Statistics the number of U.S. residents behind bars has now reached more than
2.3 million.
"We are losing an entire generation of young men and women to our prisons. Our
nation's ineffective and wasteful 'war on drugs' plays a major role in this."
Gavel's Web site goes on to call for:
* A greater emphasis on rehabilitation and prevention.
* Decriminalization of minor drug offenses
* The elimination of mandatory minimum sentencing laws.
* Increasing the availability of substance abuse treatment and prevention,
including mandatory treatment of addicts as an alternative to imprisonment.
(Source for article:
http://stopthedrugwar.org/ )
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Where do the presidential candidates stand?THANKS
Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: The Frontrunners Will Never Favor Legalization, Don't Vote for Them
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Where do the presidential candidates stand? THANKS
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Dec 11, 2007 8:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now a gang of thugs can smash in your door shouting "police" and you don't know whether to defend yourself or not - whether you are innocent or not. I believe a Federal Judge was shot some years back when he decided to defend himself. He had no drugs.
It amuses me when I hear the NRA talking about their second amendment rights. If you have no right to protect our home and family when your door is smashed in, the second amendment is a dead letter, simply an excuse to spread firearms indiscriminately hither and yon.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If you really think about it...
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drblack on Dec 11, 2007 3:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
$5000 makes 400lbs of Heroin , which has a street value in the USA of $58,000,000.
Even if 99% of drugs are seized at the border it is still profitable.
When drugs were completely legal in 1900 they were freely available, today when some drugs are completely illegal they are still freely available.
The War On Some Drugs has had zero effect on drug supply but it has made drugs extremely expensive.
Before there was Drug Prohibition there were no violent drug gangs, people who choses not to use drugs were not effected by the drug use of people they didn't know. Today you may be shot by cops or drug gangs or desperate users ; innocent people die because drugs are illegal.
Any activity that is made illegal will be much more dangerous than if it were legal.
The War On Some Drugs has made evil people very rich and powerful, it has robbed people of their Freedom and it has turned the police departments into ineffective and corrupt organizations.
The War On Some Drugs is the Greatest failure in Domestic policy the USA has ever seen.
The War On Some Drugs has done absolutely nothing positive and has created so many negatives that I would need to write a book to list them all.
Only those ignorant of the actual effects of drugs or self righteous moralists could still support this failed policy.
For A safer Saner world END DRUG PROHIBITION NOW!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Dec 11, 2007 4:50 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish I could think of his name, he lives in British Columbia and sells hemp seeds and, of course, sends them through the mail as thousands of Heritage Seed Clubs do everyday.
Many in the Medical Marijuana community have come to his defense, as he runs a coffee shop where some people exchange knowledge of their experience of acquiring medical marijuana.
Hopefully, Bush Lap-dog, Prime Minister Stephan Harper, will listen to his constituents and not let the US delineate our policy and invade our country for their desperate attempt to find a new win in the specious War on Drugs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: USA *TRIES* to prosecute Canadian selling seeds.
Posted by: famouspipeliner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Dec 11, 2007 6:08 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Senator John Kerry's 1988 U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations report on Contra drug links, which was released on April 13, 1989, concluded that "senior U.S. policy makers were not immune to the idea that drug money was a perfect solution to the Contras' funding problems."[34] The Kerry Committee report further stated that members of the U.S. State Department "who provided support for the Contras were involved in drug trafficking...and elements of the Contras themselves knowingly received financial and material assistance from drug traffickers."[35] Kerry was suspicious of North's connection with Manuel Noriega, Panama's drug baron. According to the National Security Archive, Oliver North had been in contact with Noriega and had met him personally...
...The Wall Street Journal reported on January 29, 1997 [41] on activities at the Mena, Arkansas airport allegedly involved then-governor Bill Clinton in a coverup of illegal drug-trading activity. The Wall Street Journal article goes on to state:
At the center of the web of speculation spun around Mena are a few undisputed facts: One of the most successful drug informants in U.S. history, smuggler Barry Seal, based his air operation at Mena. At the height of his career he was importing as much as 1,000 pounds of cocaine per month, and had a personal fortune estimated at more than $50 million. After becoming an informant for the Drug Enforcement Administration, he worked at least once with the CIA, in a Sandinista drug sting. He was gunned down by Colombian hit men in Baton Rouge, La., in 1986; eight months later, one of his planes—with an Arkansas pilot at the wheel and Eugene Hasenfus in the cargo bay—was shot down over Nicaragua with a load of Contra supplies...
...In 1998, CIA Inspector General Frederick Hitz published a two-volume report...
..described how 50 contras and contra-related entities involved in the drug trade had been protected from law enforcement activity by the Reagan-Bush administration, and documented a cover-up of evidence relating to these activities. The report also showed that Oliver North and the NSC were aware of these activities.
...A report later that same year by the Justice Department Inspector General Michael Bromwich also came to similar conclusions.
Drugs are illegal because powerful rich men in the political, national security, and intelligence sectors of government realized they could fund operations off the books without using taxpayer money.
This started under Reagan's watch and Bush and Clinton both appear to be involved at the time, shocking that they would get establishment support for the Presidency and go on to become Presidents.
By keeping drugs illegal and artificially inflating the prices they can use drug sales to illegally, against the will of the Congress, buy arms, bribe people, and fund operations with the proceeds of the drug sales.
The War on Drugs has absolutely nothing to do with "Just Say No"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Very true
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: victoria794 on Dec 12, 2007 6:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sjeng on Dec 14, 2007 4:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: angelofdeath on Dec 15, 2007 2:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Released in March 2002 by the congressional Committee on Government Reform, “Justice Undone: Clemency Decisions in the Clinton White House” details Hugh Rodham’s involvement in the Vignali affair, as well as the long business history Vignali once shared with George Torres.
The report takes to task top L.A. elected officials, including county Supervisor Gloria Molina, then–state Senator Richard Polanco, then–state Assemblyman Antonio Villaraigosa and U.S. Representative Xavier Becerra, among others, for lobbying on behalf of Vignali Jr., in light of his drug conviction and the fact that DEA agents long suspected Vignali Sr. to be involved in drug trafficking — along with Torres. While a member of the California state Assembly, Villaraigosa wrote the first letter on Vignali’s behalf on May 24, 1996.
Saying Hillary Rodham Clinton was a leader who offered a new path, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa today formally endorsed the New York senator and former first lady in her race to become president of the United States.
Villaraigosa will also serve as one of the four national chairs of Clinton’s campaign for the Democratic nomination for president, it was announced.
At a televised news conference from the UCLA campus in Westwood, Villaraigosa praised Clinton’s approach to domestic issues, particularly education, and her pledge to help end the war in Iraq. The pair earlier toured the preschool at UCLA’s Krieger Center. — La Times
http://mayorvillaraigosasdemons.blogspot.com/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Dec 11, 2007 3:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He and his colleagues at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, BC set up a secure and spacious environment where rats could spontaneously play, mate, nurse their young and generally live comfortable lives. The rats could choose between plain water and water adulterated with an opiate. They chose the plain water. Why? Because no creature needs to take the edge off happiness. Even when sugar was added to the opiate-laced water, the rats preferred the plain water.
So all the money spent on fighting a phoney war on drugs should have been spent on making people's lives better. This is isn't quite accidental, folks. There is a whole class of people who are very happy to misdirect money (into their own pockets).
You can download a very through presentation to the Canadian Parliament by entering Bruce K Alexander into its search engine. (If you print it out, you'll get ten pages in very small type!)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» TRUE!
Posted by: jimidee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Dec 11, 2007 6:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This so called "war on drugs" is yet another great american tragedy.It is clearly a war on race and poverty.
The middle class and rich have their drugs supplied by Big PhRMA. The poor have to get them elsewhere.
I would like to hear more from the presidential candidates on this issue.
Where are they?
Dr. Rick Lippin
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: War on Drugs is a War on Race and the Poor
Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: Ron Paul would seek to end the Federal War on Drugs
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Ron Paul would seek to end the Federal War on Drugs
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: skingk on Dec 11, 2007 6:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.leap.cc/cms/index.php
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Dec 11, 2007 6:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy..." John 10.10
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: war_on_tara on Dec 11, 2007 7:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» agree... alternet covers this subject very well
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: James W. Harris on Dec 11, 2007 8:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
* * * * *
Three Major Party Presidential Candidates Oppose War on Drugs
No less than three major-party U.S. presidential candidates have now come out
publicly against the disastrous War on Drugs.
You already know about libertarian Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), of course. And perhaps
you knew about Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH).
Now joining them in opposition to the Drug War is former Alaska U.S. Senator
Mike Gravel, a Democrat.
In a May interview with the Iowa Independent newspaper, Gravel was asked if he
thought marijuana, cocaine and methamphetamine should be legal.
Responded Gavel:
"When are we are going to learn? We went through the Depression and we realized
how we created all the gangsters and the violence.
"When FDR came in he wiped out Prohibition. We need to wipe out this whole War
on Drugs.
"We spend $50 billion to $70 billion a year. We create criminals that aren't
criminals. We destabilize foreign countries.
"With respect to marijuana, Doug, I'll tell you what: Go get yourself a fifth
of scotch or a fifth of gin and chug-a-lug it down and you'll find you lose
your senses a lot faster than you would smoking some marijuana."
"We need to legalize the regulation of drugs. The drug problem is a public
health problem. It's not a criminal problem. We make it a criminal problem
because we treat people like criminals. You take a drug addict, you throw him
in jail, you leave him there, and he learns the criminal trade so that when he
gets out you have recidivism."
Gavel's Web site elaborates his position. While far from libertarian, he
advocates dramatic drug law reforms. From his site:
"The United States incarcerates more people and at a higher rate than any other
peacetime nation in the world. According to the federal Bureau of Justice
Statistics the number of U.S. residents behind bars has now reached more than
2.3 million.
"We are losing an entire generation of young men and women to our prisons. Our
nation's ineffective and wasteful 'war on drugs' plays a major role in this."
Gavel's Web site goes on to call for:
* A greater emphasis on rehabilitation and prevention.
* Decriminalization of minor drug offenses
* The elimination of mandatory minimum sentencing laws.
* Increasing the availability of substance abuse treatment and prevention,
including mandatory treatment of addicts as an alternative to imprisonment.
(Source for article:
http://stopthedrugwar.org/ )
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Where do the presidential candidates stand?THANKS
Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: The Frontrunners Will Never Favor Legalization, Don't Vote for Them
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Where do the presidential candidates stand? THANKS
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Dec 11, 2007 8:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now a gang of thugs can smash in your door shouting "police" and you don't know whether to defend yourself or not - whether you are innocent or not. I believe a Federal Judge was shot some years back when he decided to defend himself. He had no drugs.
It amuses me when I hear the NRA talking about their second amendment rights. If you have no right to protect our home and family when your door is smashed in, the second amendment is a dead letter, simply an excuse to spread firearms indiscriminately hither and yon.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If you really think about it...
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drblack on Dec 11, 2007 3:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
$5000 makes 400lbs of Heroin , which has a street value in the USA of $58,000,000.
Even if 99% of drugs are seized at the border it is still profitable.
When drugs were completely legal in 1900 they were freely available, today when some drugs are completely illegal they are still freely available.
The War On Some Drugs has had zero effect on drug supply but it has made drugs extremely expensive.
Before there was Drug Prohibition there were no violent drug gangs, people who choses not to use drugs were not effected by the drug use of people they didn't know. Today you may be shot by cops or drug gangs or desperate users ; innocent people die because drugs are illegal.
Any activity that is made illegal will be much more dangerous than if it were legal.
The War On Some Drugs has made evil people very rich and powerful, it has robbed people of their Freedom and it has turned the police departments into ineffective and corrupt organizations.
The War On Some Drugs is the Greatest failure in Domestic policy the USA has ever seen.
The War On Some Drugs has done absolutely nothing positive and has created so many negatives that I would need to write a book to list them all.
Only those ignorant of the actual effects of drugs or self righteous moralists could still support this failed policy.
For A safer Saner world END DRUG PROHIBITION NOW!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Dec 11, 2007 4:50 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish I could think of his name, he lives in British Columbia and sells hemp seeds and, of course, sends them through the mail as thousands of Heritage Seed Clubs do everyday.
Many in the Medical Marijuana community have come to his defense, as he runs a coffee shop where some people exchange knowledge of their experience of acquiring medical marijuana.
Hopefully, Bush Lap-dog, Prime Minister Stephan Harper, will listen to his constituents and not let the US delineate our policy and invade our country for their desperate attempt to find a new win in the specious War on Drugs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: USA *TRIES* to prosecute Canadian selling seeds.
Posted by: famouspipeliner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Dec 11, 2007 6:08 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Senator John Kerry's 1988 U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations report on Contra drug links, which was released on April 13, 1989, concluded that "senior U.S. policy makers were not immune to the idea that drug money was a perfect solution to the Contras' funding problems."[34] The Kerry Committee report further stated that members of the U.S. State Department "who provided support for the Contras were involved in drug trafficking...and elements of the Contras themselves knowingly received financial and material assistance from drug traffickers."[35] Kerry was suspicious of North's connection with Manuel Noriega, Panama's drug baron. According to the National Security Archive, Oliver North had been in contact with Noriega and had met him personally...
...The Wall Street Journal reported on January 29, 1997 [41] on activities at the Mena, Arkansas airport allegedly involved then-governor Bill Clinton in a coverup of illegal drug-trading activity. The Wall Street Journal article goes on to state:
At the center of the web of speculation spun around Mena are a few undisputed facts: One of the most successful drug informants in U.S. history, smuggler Barry Seal, based his air operation at Mena. At the height of his career he was importing as much as 1,000 pounds of cocaine per month, and had a personal fortune estimated at more than $50 million. After becoming an informant for the Drug Enforcement Administration, he worked at least once with the CIA, in a Sandinista drug sting. He was gunned down by Colombian hit men in Baton Rouge, La., in 1986; eight months later, one of his planes—with an Arkansas pilot at the wheel and Eugene Hasenfus in the cargo bay—was shot down over Nicaragua with a load of Contra supplies...
...In 1998, CIA Inspector General Frederick Hitz published a two-volume report...
..described how 50 contras and contra-related entities involved in the drug trade had been protected from law enforcement activity by the Reagan-Bush administration, and documented a cover-up of evidence relating to these activities. The report also showed that Oliver North and the NSC were aware of these activities.
...A report later that same year by the Justice Department Inspector General Michael Bromwich also came to similar conclusions.
Drugs are illegal because powerful rich men in the political, national security, and intelligence sectors of government realized they could fund operations off the books without using taxpayer money.
This started under Reagan's watch and Bush and Clinton both appear to be involved at the time, shocking that they would get establishment support for the Presidency and go on to become Presidents.
By keeping drugs illegal and artificially inflating the prices they can use drug sales to illegally, against the will of the Congress, buy arms, bribe people, and fund operations with the proceeds of the drug sales.
The War on Drugs has absolutely nothing to do with "Just Say No"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Very true
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: victoria794 on Dec 12, 2007 6:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sjeng on Dec 14, 2007 4:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: angelofdeath on Dec 15, 2007 2:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Released in March 2002 by the congressional Committee on Government Reform, “Justice Undone: Clemency Decisions in the Clinton White House” details Hugh Rodham’s involvement in the Vignali affair, as well as the long business history Vignali once shared with George Torres.
The report takes to task top L.A. elected officials, including county Supervisor Gloria Molina, then–state Senator Richard Polanco, then–state Assemblyman Antonio Villaraigosa and U.S. Representative Xavier Becerra, among others, for lobbying on behalf of Vignali Jr., in light of his drug conviction and the fact that DEA agents long suspected Vignali Sr. to be involved in drug trafficking — along with Torres. While a member of the California state Assembly, Villaraigosa wrote the first letter on Vignali’s behalf on May 24, 1996.
Saying Hillary Rodham Clinton was a leader who offered a new path, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa today formally endorsed the New York senator and former first lady in her race to become president of the United States.
Villaraigosa will also serve as one of the four national chairs of Clinton’s campaign for the Democratic nomination for president, it was announced.
At a televised news conference from the UCLA campus in Westwood, Villaraigosa praised Clinton’s approach to domestic issues, particularly education, and her pledge to help end the war in Iraq. The pair earlier toured the preschool at UCLA’s Krieger Center. — La Times
http://mayorvillaraigosasdemons.blogspot.com/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
NYC Police Accused of 'Anal Assault' Over Marijuana Use
Do Employers Really Need to Give Drug Tests for Pot?
False Claims on Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Lead to Credibility Gap for Prosecutors




