COMMENTS: 38
More Evidence That Marijuana Prevents Cancer
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Drugs headlines via email.
Among the more interesting pieces of news that came out while I was on vacation the first half of August was a new study in the journal Cancer Prevention Research, which found that marijuana smokers have a lower risk of head and neck cancers than people who don’t smoke marijuana. Alas, this important research has been largely ignored by the news media.
While this type of study cannot conclusively prove cause and effect, the combination of this new study and existing research — which for decades has shown that cannabinoids are fairly potent anticancer drugs — raises a significant possibility that marijuana use is in fact protective against certain types of cancer.
A team of researchers from several major universities conducted what is known as a “case-control” study, comparing patients who had squamous cell carcinoma of the mouth, larynx, and pharynx with control patients matched for age, gender, and residence location who did not have cancer. By looking at matched groups with and without cancer, researchers hope to find patterns indicating risk or protective factors. In this case they focused on marijuana use, but also took into account known risk factors for this type of cancer, including tobacco and alcohol use.
After adjusting for those confounding factors, current marijuana users had a 48% reduced risk of head and neck cancer, and the reduction was statistically significant. Former users also had a lower risk, though it fell short of being significant. The investigators crunched the numbers several different ways — for example, by amount of marijuana used or the frequency of use — and the findings stayed the same nearly across the board, with moderate users showing the strongest and most consistent reduction in cancer risk.
The scientists write, “We found that moderate marijuana use was significantly associated with reduced risk HNSCC [head and neck squamous cell carcinoma]. The association was consistent across different measures of marijuana use (marijuana use status, duration, and frequency of use).”
Strikingly, among drinkers and cigarette smokers, those who also used marijuana reduced their cancer risk compared to those who only drank and smoked cigarettes. So marijuana may actually have been countering the known bad effects of booze and cigarettes.
Stay up to date with the latest Drugs headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: muledeer on Aug 21, 2009 10:14 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: muledeer
Posted by: TerryB
» RE: muledeer
Posted by: igotnews
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Aug 22, 2009 4:51 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Marijuana is less harmful than alcohol
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Aug 22, 2009 5:23 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are also comments, sorted by how the person voted. The comments against, No. Legalizing pot would create too many problems. are illuminating.
MSNBC has the racist, "Hell no! If they do, throw up a fence around them and give them back to Mexico." posted prominently on their results page. Wow, that is how they feel about California.
I was more impressed with the "This is a tired debate. It is initiated by potheads. Why do we dignify this with a debate at all?" and "This crap is so addictive and ruining lives. What's next? Legalizing child porn?" remarks.
This data is useful for people like me who actually want to counter the inane arguments. Now I know what we are working against.
I would hope the lawyers would take note too.
I don't like having my religion compared to child porn. That sounds like that person has a twisted idea of religion. What religion are they? I would like to know.
They are, in fact, persecuting my people. Potheads deserve civil rights.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Potheads deserve civil rights
Posted by: Obijuan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RevolutionNet on Aug 22, 2009 7:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A majority of Americans want Bush prosecuted and he remains at large.
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: txpeloton on Aug 22, 2009 9:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.greenpassion.org/f11/
granny-storm-crows-list-july-2009-a-13858/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» what an excellent list AND RESOURCE!
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aonghus36 on Aug 22, 2009 4:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: George Harrison
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: scottportraits on Aug 22, 2009 11:14 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the 'War on Cancer' in its 27th year, and after $105 billion spent to ensure us that "we will cure cancer in your lifetime"....one wonders why it is taking so long.
Maybe the declaration I heard so often as a child: "We want to cure cancer in your lifetime" really meant "We (the cynical medical-industrial complex) want to make as much money off you suckers with cancer in your lifetime", would be more blunt, terse, & truthful.
Besides our inability to accept the concept of CBD's (cannabinoids) as having tumor-inhibiting value, we are also faced with another question far afield from marijuana, THC, and CBD's.
Although we've spent $105 billion on cancer research from 1972 - 2008, we spent well over $100 billion in just a few short years fighting a war in Iraq over oil, real estate, and 9/11 revenge.
Surely you can see the irony and absurdity in all this !!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Please go to the National Cancer Institute's website
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: National Cancer Institute - what you don't know will kill you
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: National Cancer Institute - what you don't know will kill you
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Aug 23, 2009 6:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rand Paul if he agrees with his father Ron Paul is for legalization of MJ as well as drug reforms, stopping the WARS, taking control of the FED and $$$drain, and although not for Government give away programs I bet the common sense approach to social ills would be a lot better than the sham negotiations with insurance robbers going on TODAY.
I am a Progressive/Independent and the Ron Paul Family would not be considered Progressive.
Go Figure!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What a Difference a Day Makes...A Dark Horse Candidate??
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bikey on Aug 23, 2009 7:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Aug 23, 2009 7:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yeah, when they had us declare war on ourselves again, they knew they had us!
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Yeah, when they had us declare war on ourselves again, they knew they had us!
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: Yeah, when they had us declare war on ourselves again, they knew they had us!
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: raycushing on Aug 23, 2009 2:54 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Prohibition Causes Cancer
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Prohibition Causes Cancer
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Aug 23, 2009 7:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know why I am feeling so defensive. Maybe because I am a blogger and I fact check.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RumbleFish on Aug 24, 2009 2:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read 'The Emperor Wears No Clothes'
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Marijuana
Posted by: RumbleFish
» WORD!!!
Posted by: lupuslefou
» RE: Marijuana
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jtpatrick108 on Aug 25, 2009 10:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: crazy
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wetwe on Aug 26, 2009 7:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ewr erth
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jtpatrick108 on Aug 27, 2009 5:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: .
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sunrise1 on Sep 3, 2009 11:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
------------
nike air
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: muledeer on Aug 21, 2009 10:14 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: muledeer
Posted by: TerryB
» RE: muledeer
Posted by: igotnews
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Aug 22, 2009 4:51 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Marijuana is less harmful than alcohol
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Aug 22, 2009 5:23 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are also comments, sorted by how the person voted. The comments against, No. Legalizing pot would create too many problems. are illuminating.
MSNBC has the racist, "Hell no! If they do, throw up a fence around them and give them back to Mexico." posted prominently on their results page. Wow, that is how they feel about California.
I was more impressed with the "This is a tired debate. It is initiated by potheads. Why do we dignify this with a debate at all?" and "This crap is so addictive and ruining lives. What's next? Legalizing child porn?" remarks.
This data is useful for people like me who actually want to counter the inane arguments. Now I know what we are working against.
I would hope the lawyers would take note too.
I don't like having my religion compared to child porn. That sounds like that person has a twisted idea of religion. What religion are they? I would like to know.
They are, in fact, persecuting my people. Potheads deserve civil rights.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Potheads deserve civil rights
Posted by: Obijuan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RevolutionNet on Aug 22, 2009 7:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A majority of Americans want Bush prosecuted and he remains at large.
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: txpeloton on Aug 22, 2009 9:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.greenpassion.org/f11/
granny-storm-crows-list-july-2009-a-13858/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» what an excellent list AND RESOURCE!
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aonghus36 on Aug 22, 2009 4:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: George Harrison
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: scottportraits on Aug 22, 2009 11:14 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the 'War on Cancer' in its 27th year, and after $105 billion spent to ensure us that "we will cure cancer in your lifetime"....one wonders why it is taking so long.
Maybe the declaration I heard so often as a child: "We want to cure cancer in your lifetime" really meant "We (the cynical medical-industrial complex) want to make as much money off you suckers with cancer in your lifetime", would be more blunt, terse, & truthful.
Besides our inability to accept the concept of CBD's (cannabinoids) as having tumor-inhibiting value, we are also faced with another question far afield from marijuana, THC, and CBD's.
Although we've spent $105 billion on cancer research from 1972 - 2008, we spent well over $100 billion in just a few short years fighting a war in Iraq over oil, real estate, and 9/11 revenge.
Surely you can see the irony and absurdity in all this !!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Please go to the National Cancer Institute's website
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: National Cancer Institute - what you don't know will kill you
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: National Cancer Institute - what you don't know will kill you
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Aug 23, 2009 6:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rand Paul if he agrees with his father Ron Paul is for legalization of MJ as well as drug reforms, stopping the WARS, taking control of the FED and $$$drain, and although not for Government give away programs I bet the common sense approach to social ills would be a lot better than the sham negotiations with insurance robbers going on TODAY.
I am a Progressive/Independent and the Ron Paul Family would not be considered Progressive.
Go Figure!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What a Difference a Day Makes...A Dark Horse Candidate??
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bikey on Aug 23, 2009 7:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Aug 23, 2009 7:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yeah, when they had us declare war on ourselves again, they knew they had us!
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Yeah, when they had us declare war on ourselves again, they knew they had us!
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: Yeah, when they had us declare war on ourselves again, they knew they had us!
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: raycushing on Aug 23, 2009 2:54 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Prohibition Causes Cancer
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Prohibition Causes Cancer
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Aug 23, 2009 7:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know why I am feeling so defensive. Maybe because I am a blogger and I fact check.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RumbleFish on Aug 24, 2009 2:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read 'The Emperor Wears No Clothes'
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Marijuana
Posted by: RumbleFish
» WORD!!!
Posted by: lupuslefou
» RE: Marijuana
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jtpatrick108 on Aug 25, 2009 10:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: crazy
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wetwe on Aug 26, 2009 7:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ewr erth
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jtpatrick108 on Aug 27, 2009 5:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: .
Posted by: lesfrad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sunrise1 on Sep 3, 2009 11:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
------------
nike air
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
NYC Police Accused of 'Anal Assault' Over Marijuana Use
Do Employers Really Need to Give Drug Tests for Pot?
False Claims on Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Lead to Credibility Gap for Prosecutors




