COMMENTS: 160
Pot vs. Booze: A Former Police Chief's Take
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Drugs headlines via email.
As 5:00 p.m. rolls around my interior clock starts chiming. I'll have an ice-cold, bone-dry martini, thank you. Jalapeno olives and a twist. If the occasion calls for it (temperatures in the twenties, a hot political debate on the tube) I may substitute two fingers of Kentucky sour mash. Four-twenty? Doesn't resonate. But with the Waldos of the world just having celebrated up their favorite day of the year, it's not a bad time to consider, yet again, the pluses and minuses of alcohol vs. cannabis.
First, a disclaimer: I am a member of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, but I don't officially represent the organization in this forum. That said, I can't very well check my affiliation, or beliefs, at the keyboard when I sit down to blog. We at LEAP are current and former cops and other criminal justice practitioners who have witnessed firsthand the futility and manifold injustices of the drug war. Our professional experiences have led us to conclude that the more dangerous an illicit substance -- from crack to krank -- the greater the justification for its legalization, regulation, and control. It is the prohibition of drugs that leads inexorably to high rates of death, disease, crime, and addiction.
Back to booze vs. pot. How do the effects of these two drugs stack up against specific health and public safety factors?
Alcohol-related traffic accidents claim approximately 14,000 lives each year, down significantly from 20 or 30 years ago (attributed to improved education and enforcement). Figures for THC-related traffic fatalities are elusive, especially since alcohol is almost always present in the blood as well, and since the numbers of "marijuana-only" traffic fatalities are so small. But evidence from studies, including laboratory simulations, feeds the stereotype that those under the influence of canniboids tend to (1) be more aware of their impaired psychomotor skills, and (2) drive well below the speed limit. Those under the influence of alcohol are much more likely to be clueless or defiant about their condition, and to speed up and drive recklessly.
Hundreds of alcohol overdose deaths occur annually. There has never been a single recorded marijuana OD fatality.
According to the American Public Health Association, excessive alcohol consumption is the third leading cause of death in this country. APHA pegs the negative economic impact of extreme drinking at $150 billion a year.
There have been no documented cases of lung cancer in a marijuana-only smoker, nor has pot been scientifically linked to any type of cancer. (Don't trust an advocate's take on this? Try the fair and balanced coverage over at Fox.) Alcohol abuse contributes to a multitude of long-term negative health consequences, notably cirrhosis of the liver and a variety of cancers.
While a small quantity, taken daily, is being touted for its salutary health effects, alcohol is one of the worst drugs one can take for pain management, marijuana one of the best.
Alcohol contributes to acts of violence; marijuana reduces aggression. In approximately three million cases of reported violent crimes last year, the offender had been drinking. This is particularly true in cases of domestic violence, sexual assault, and date rape. Marijuana use, in and of itself, is absent from both crime reports and the scientific literature. There is simply no link to be made.
Over the past four years I've asked police officers throughout the U.S. (and in Canada) two questions. When's the last time you had to fight someone under the influence of marijuana? (I'm talking marijuana only, not pot plus a six-pack or a fifth of tequila.) My colleagues pause, they reflect. Their eyes widen as they realize that in their five or fifteen or thirty years on the job they have never had to fight a marijuana user. I then ask: When's the last time you had to fight a drunk? They look at their watches.
All of which begs the question. If one of these two drugs is implicated in dire health effects, high mortality rates, and physical violence -- and the other is not -- what are we to make of our nation's marijuana laws? Or alcohol laws, for that matter.
Anybody out there want to launch a campaign for the re-prohibition of alcohol? Didn't think so. The answer, of course, is responsible drinking. Marijuana smokers, for their part, have already shown (apart from that little matter known as the law) greater responsibility in their choice of drugs than those of us who choose alcohol.
Stay up to date with the latest Drugs headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cordas on Apr 22, 2009 12:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Is it really so simple??? - You betcha!
Posted by: neilemac
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 22, 2009 12:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Furthermore, about 150,000 deaths a year are attributable to alcohol, and none to marijuana.
I tried pot as an adolescent and didn't like it. But for those who do, as long as they don't drive cars or operate machinery under the influence, to me it's a personal choice and not a matter for government regulation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: An Emergency Physician's Perspective
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: An Emergency Physician's Perspective
Posted by: CosimoRondo
» gateway to tobacco
Posted by: susanh
» RE: gateway to tobacco
Posted by: Lara1967
» RE: gateway to tobacco
Posted by: linecrosser
» RE: gateway to tobacco
Posted by: 32flavors
Comments are closed-
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Apr 22, 2009 2:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And we're (usually) more fun!
Posted by: samba
» RE: And we're (usually) more fun!
Posted by: techcafe
» RE: And we're (usually) more fun!
Posted by: mikeblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: linecrosser on Apr 22, 2009 2:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» snap
Posted by: cordas
» RE: snap
Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: Stoners tend to make better team members. Drunks are difficult and dangerous
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Stoners tend to make better team members. Drunks are difficult and dangerous
Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: Stoners tend to make better team members. Drunks are difficult and dangerous
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Put me in office as the first person to run on legalizing marijuana. Lauren Unruh
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: My experience
Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: My experience
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: My experience
Posted by: samba
» RE: My experience
Posted by: Sparks56
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sparks56 on Apr 22, 2009 3:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope we hear more from law-enforcement rank and file about the insanity of drug laws and marijuana laws in particular.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Poll
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Re:Poll
Posted by: samba
» All smoke in not equal.
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Poll
Posted by: inanaturallight
» RE: Poll
Posted by: mrmystery
» RE: Poll
Posted by: Sparks56
» Teaching my kids
Posted by: linecrosser
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kracke on Kauai on Apr 22, 2009 3:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I will give you a life line
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Time for legalization
Posted by: Potbelly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aislinnluv on Apr 22, 2009 4:39 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: in my salad days
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» not worth the risk
Posted by: techcafe
» RE: not worth the risk
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: in my salad days
Posted by: bornxeyed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eeuropean2000 on Apr 22, 2009 5:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Likewise ...
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: Lauren Unruh, running for office
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» moldy
Posted by: Bud
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ratskii on Apr 22, 2009 5:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've found that when I've been stoned and driving I do have trouble focusing on the right things and dealing with some of the complexities of traffic. Granted, I am aware of my limitation and do try to adjust for it. I also try to do that if I've been drinking and driving.
One question that is probably not easily answerable: Would full legalization of marijuana reduce drinking? From their lobbying efforts, I get the feeling that the alcohol industry believes it would.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: My own experience
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: My own experience
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: My own experience - You damn right it will..
Posted by: Bud
» RE: My own experience - You damn right it will..
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: My own experience - ditto
Posted by: techcafe
» RE: My own experience - ditto
Posted by: NotJesus
» hippie goofball
Posted by: techcafe
» RE: My own experience
Posted by: rimchamp77
» RE: My own experience
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: My own experience
Posted by: bornxeyed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kenhymes on Apr 22, 2009 5:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point is that while we make the case for legalization, we must also unpack these unhealthy relationships, and bring understanding of them into a broader public view, otherwise we are going to be stick in the same loop for many years to come.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: pyhrric defeat
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenferret on Apr 22, 2009 6:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tell Obama and your elected representatives that it's time to legalize and regulate marijuana.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Tell Obama: end prohibition and legalize marijuana
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: henderson on Apr 22, 2009 6:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When their friends who were on alcohol came in, they were loud, agressive, and sometimes threw up before they got to the bathroom!
I always said I'd take grass over booze any day.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I've known this for years...
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: I've known this for years...
Posted by: tvaspen
» RE: I've known this for years...
Posted by: bornxeyed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Apr 22, 2009 7:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many gun crimes have been committed by stoners while having ONLY toked up vs.
drunks with guns?
I was a stoner wh also drank for most of my life.
I've been C & S for 26 years(May 1st).
When I drank, I was an abusive, rude, loud asshole.
When I was stoned WITHOUT any alcohol, I was mellow, friendly, funny and, as I was told, was good to be around.
So, what are the figures about stoners/guns vs. drunks/guns?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I can offer imput to this one
Posted by: thealltheone
» beer swilling trophy hunters
Posted by: techcafe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: elsuno on Apr 22, 2009 8:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: elsuno
Posted by: Basenjis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mrmystery on Apr 22, 2009 8:15 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this article is poorly written and reads more like a case to make alcohol illegal rather than to legalize weed.
I used to smoke a ton of reefer, but wouldn't really like it if my children began smoking weed because I know how lazy it makes people. I don't want my children to be lazy. I also want my children to be able to have dreams regularly which doesn't seem to happen when you're always stoned. I don't know what's right or wrong, but I think there's a lot of propaganda being written on both sides of this issue. I don't believe that weed is a "gateway" drug as some would like me to believe. But, I also don't believe that weed is completely harmless, which others would like me to believe.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Not so
Posted by: Karina
» RE: Not so
Posted by: mrmystery
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: mrmystery
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: mrmystery
» Cannabis achievers!!
Posted by: Tom Tele
» Let's try a thought experiment...
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Let's try a thought experiment...
Posted by: techcafe
» RE: Let's try a thought experiment...
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: most stoners...
Posted by: Bud
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: techcafe
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: mrmystery
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol - that's bullshit
Posted by: techcafe
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol - that's bullshit
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: mrmystery
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: tvaspen
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: mrmystery
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: tvaspen
» RE: I do not drink! not everyone mixed the two!
Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: Lara1967
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: mrmystery
» RE: most stoners drink alcohol and smoke weed at the same time
Posted by: tvaspen
» Native Americans?
Posted by: bornxeyed
» alcohol abuse is the same for everyone
Posted by: techcafe
» RE: alcohol abuse is the same for everyone
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: alcohol abuse is the same for everyone
Posted by: techcafe
» This is your asshole on drugs....
Posted by: bornxeyed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bud on Apr 22, 2009 8:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the first thing I did was to go to the LEAP website and join and make a donation. It wasn't much but it was the only thing I could think of doing that would settle my anger over such an ignorant statement. And this Latham guy thinks he's going to get re-elected? I lived in Iowa for 45 years and they may be semi-conservative but Iowans DONT LIKE BULLSHIT and they know how it smells.(No pun intended but hog poop is worse)
Mr. Norm Stamper, thank you for your work. We all want to be friends with OUR police again someday!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 'Pothead' is the new 'nigger'
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: 'Pothead' is natural
Posted by: Lara1967
» Now that's just mean!
Posted by: bornxeyed
» I worked for Stamper
Posted by: billwald
» RE: I worked for Stamper
Posted by: Bud
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nen on Apr 22, 2009 8:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't toke, personally, cause I never really had the interest. But I do enjoy walking through somewhere and smelling sweet, herby-smelling pot. It's actually a lovely scent. Kind of like incense. It makes me kind of sad when people screw it up with extra crap.
Haven't we learned anything from cigarette companies that stuff formaldehyde and crap in their smokes? I've smelled pure dried tobacco plant being burned (at a First Nations ceremony) and it smells quite nice! But being in an enclosed space with cigarette smoke will cause my throat to close and me to faint. Well folks, it's fairly safe for me to say it's not the plant, but the extra crap that I'm allergic to. I don't wanna see that sort of stuff done to sweet Mary Jane. Be it by a big corporation, or a cheap dealer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Manure Toking
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WYGunston on Apr 22, 2009 9:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Interesting point!
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: It's time to BULLDOZE Washington !!
Posted by: peskyfly1
» RE: It's time to BULLDOZE Washington !!
Posted by: earthman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mrmystery on Apr 22, 2009 9:19 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: hypothetically speaking...
Posted by: tvaspen
» RE: hypothetically speaking...
Posted by: mrmystery
» RE: hypothetically speaking...
Posted by: tvaspen
» RE: hypothetically speaking...
Posted by: mrmystery
» RE: hypothetically speaking...
Posted by: tvaspen
» Thetically speaking...
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Thetically speaking...
Posted by: hughesrg
» RE: the spectre of "pushers in the playground"
Posted by: stellabloo
» Another odd point...
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: hypothetically speaking...
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: just an observation
Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: hypothetically speaking...
Posted by: Lara1967
» RE: hypothetically speaking...
Posted by: techcafe
» based on FACTS,or same old BS ?
Posted by: hardwroc
» non-hypothetically speaking...
Posted by: bornxeyed
» Can't imagine why it would matter, but if it does, I'll start...
Posted by: jparsons
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tvaspen on Apr 22, 2009 9:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Had a job interview yesterday.....
Posted by: Bud
» RE: Had a job interview yesterday.....
Posted by: Tom Tele
» RE: Had a job interview yesterday.....
Posted by: tvaspen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stellabloo on Apr 22, 2009 9:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marijuana, according to the Merck Index - the pharmaceutical reference standard for the medical establishment - is non-tetragenic. NON-TETRAGENIC, people. It does not cross the placental barrier until late during pregnancy and is not known to cause birth defects.
In addition, Dr. Melanie Deher has extensively studied the use of marijuana by Jamaican women and its effect on their children. The abstract is posted on the US government site:
Five-year follow-up of rural Jamaican children whose mothers used marijuana during pregnancy.
But in an interesting article on a medical marijuana site, Dreher talks about how her research has been virtually ignored, as have all other findings that contradict official policies.
DREHER'S JAMAICAN PREGNANCY STUDY - More Suppression of Marijuana Research
Marijuana has been a part of human culture for thousands of years. The original version of 1001 Arabian Nights, for example, is scattered with references to Sinbad regaling the Sultan with his adventures while they consume enough hash to "stone a small elephant". At the turn of the last century there were 600 hash houses in NY alone and Lydia Pinkham's Vegetable (as in marijuana) Tonic for Feminine Complaint was the #1 ladies' drug of choice. This was not what the prohibitions were railing against in the 1920's. It took only a generation saturated with yellow journalism for our culture to forget everything we ever knew about marijuana. We have become guinea pigs of the corporation, perfect consumer rats. Enquiring minds need to question EVERYTHING.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Alcohol damages the next generation too
Posted by: Bud
» RE: I smoked
Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: Alcohol damages the next generation too
Posted by: Karina
» Yep
Posted by: TerryW4
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NYmediator on Apr 22, 2009 9:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two theories, both probably true. First Brian on last Sunday's Family Guy hit on William Hearst's fear that hemp would replace wood as the main source of paper products and Hearst had a controlling interest in lumber-paper production.
The second was that pot was the drug of choice for Mexicans in the US southwest and to get to them, you criminalize their main source of personal recreation. Pot was also used by other minorities in the US and was associated with jazz culture.
Other theories:
There was also the recently liberated (from prohibition) booze lobby in the mid-30s that didn't need any sudden competition. Having lost the battle to prohibit alcohol, the bluenoses saw one thing they could criminalize that was not yet in wide mainstream usage.
In short, it was a perfect storm of self-interested powerful people who used the power of film to carry along public opinion. And yet, they still allowed hemp to be grown for use in WW2.
OK, now on the lighter side (and speaking of Family Guy):
http://tinyurl.com/cpc4fv
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ab390 on Apr 22, 2009 10:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Tele on Apr 22, 2009 10:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WyrdSister on Apr 22, 2009 11:58 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peace
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: edddd on Apr 22, 2009 1:48 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If 1% can't behave, enforce their bad
Posted by: hardwroc
» RE: If 1% can't behave, enforce their bad
Posted by: Will Miller
» RE: If pot is so great
Posted by: dobbie606
» RE: If pot is so great
Posted by: hughesrg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: context on Apr 22, 2009 4:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: yanaar
Posted by: germinator
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billdake@sbcglobal.net on Apr 22, 2009 6:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
15 years later I tried pot and liked the fact that I am more aware of my condition and exercise better judgement. That trip in the Buick would never have happened on grass. Thank God no one was killed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Will Miller on Apr 22, 2009 10:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the response from the stoners it sounds like I should have taken the joint and skipped the booze.
BTW, the gateway drug is a cigarette. Teaches the youth that adults aren't serious about the prohibition against their smoking so it goes with the flow that booze, marijuana, and harder drugs can follow with virtual impunity.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hot damn . . .
Posted by: hughesrg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 1rufus1 on Apr 23, 2009 12:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jaguarxjs on Apr 23, 2009 7:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the other hand I'm a very friendly drunk.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pot Makes Me Angry - which is bizarre, b/c pot makes most others peaceable
Posted by: techcafe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aahpat on Apr 23, 2009 2:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Saturday, May 2, 2009
Meet at Broad St. and South St. at 3:30 - 4:00pm
March towards Headhouse Square at 4:20pm
Arrive at Headhouse Square by 5:20pm
Speeches - done by 6:30pm
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tahnilw19 on Apr 23, 2009 2:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree 100% with every word written here.
Because you’re absolutely right!
Now I too am going to further look into becoming apart of NORML!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: orwellturns on Apr 26, 2009 3:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do believe though that people that are working with machinery or flying the plane I'm on, or manning a nuclear plant, should not be under ANY substances that affects their motor or mental skills.
Keeping drugs illegal makes HUGE profits for the producers, pushers, criminal justice conglomerates for them to let us legalize and control abuse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: addict on May 1, 2009 3:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FiddleMan on May 6, 2009 11:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tobacco -435,000
Poor Diet and Physical Inactivity - 365,000
Alcohol - 85,000
Microbial Agents - 75,000
Toxic Agents - 55,000
Motor Vehicle Crashes -26,347
Adverse Reactions to Prescription Drugs -32,000
Suicide - 30,622
Incidents Involving Firearms - 29,000
Homicide - 20,308
Sexual Behaviors - 20,000
All Illicit Drug Use, Direct and Indirect - 17,000
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Such As Aspirin - 7,600
Marijuana - 0
(This Table and all Table Sources are found at: Drug War Facts)
Alcohol and Tobacco:
Total Alcohol and Tobacco Deaths per Year (U.S. Only): 520,000 deaths – over one-half million dead Americans.
“All Illicit Drug Use, Direct and Indirect” Deaths per Year (U.S. Only): 17,000 deaths
All Illicit Drug Use, Direct and Indirect (yes, this would include Methamphetamines, Cocaine, Crack, Heroin, etc. - all hard drugs and soft drugs - all illegal drugs) deaths compared to the annual deaths caused just by Alcohol and Tobacco. 17,000 (All illegal drugs) / 520,000 (Alcohol & Tobacco) = 0.03269. This means that all illegal drug use put together is less than 03.27% as harmful as Alcohol and Tobacco use. Wow!
Deaths per year caused by the two legal drugs, Alcohol and Tobacco, are over 30 times more than all illegal drugs combined! Even with 30 times the total number of hard drug users in the U.S. the death rate would still be lower than the annual U.S. Alcohol and Tobacco death rate!
Now let’s look at just the deaths due to Alcohol: 85,000 deaths. 17,000 (All illegal drugs) / 85,000 (Alcohol) = 0.2. This means that all illegal drug use combined is only 20% as harmful as Alcohol use. So - Alcohol accounts for 5 times more deaths per year than all illegal drugs combined! Wow again! - Put that in your beer mug and drink it! So when you hear a Drug Warrior say that “Legalizing Cannabis sends the Wrong Message to our children” – “The Message” that they are really telling our children is that (when the children reach legal age) they will NOT be allowed to use a safe recreational drug like Cannabis but they Will be allowed to use Alcohol as a recreational drug, even though legal alcohol kills 5 times more people per year than Methamphetamines, Cocaine, Crack, Heroin and all of the worst illegal drugs combined! But - Alcohol is Legal, therefore it is ok! –Duh!
Now let’s look at Cannabis.
For those who do not know, Cannabis is the genus name for the very common plant that Harry Anslinger called “Marijuana”, so that he could confuse/trick the public into thinking that Cannabis was some new type of dangerous drug as well as to use racism in quest for criminalization back in the 30’s. (I refuse to use Harry Anslinger’s derogatory terminology)
Total Cannabis Deaths throughout All of Recorded History (Worldwide): 0!!!. Usage of Cannabis (Marijuana) has never killed anybody –ever!
Hmm, we can’t even get a percentage of Cannabis Deaths (0) compared to Alcohol and Tobacco Deaths (85,000) since Cannabis has never ever killed anybody can we?
So - Alcohol and Tobacco kill over a half million Americans in one year and Cannabis has never killed anybody (in the whole world – ever), yet we allow the U.S. Government to support the Alcohol and Tobacco industry while they arrest us, put us in cages and steal our homes/cars/money for using Cannabis - a safe alternative to Alcohol?
The Pharmaceutical Industry also “pushes” many extremely deadly poisons that could easily be replaced by Cannabis and Cannabis Derived Drugs. “Adverse Reactions to Prescription Drugs” kill around twice as many people per year as “All Illicit Drug Use Combined” – and Cannabis use has never killed anyone!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FiddleMan on May 6, 2009 11:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Terrorism is, most simply, policy intended to intimidate or cause terror. It is more commonly understood as an act which (1) is intended to create fear (terror), (2) is perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a materialistic goal or a lone attack), and (3) deliberately targets (or disregards the safety of) non-combatants. (Wikipedia)
Therefore, the U.S. DEA, who break into peoples homes, incarcerate people for exercising their Constitutional Freedom to use Cannabis as a safe alternative to Alcohol (or even as medicine), revoke student aids, separate families, cost people their jobs, take their driving privileges, take their homes, take their right to vote, and
kill family pets, are indeed Terrorists!
The U.S. - with 5% of the world’s population - cages 25% of the world’s population caged population. Notice that I didn’t say 25% of the world’s criminals. Many of the people who are kept in cages should not be. Many people who are forced to live in cages and suffer the brutality of the American Prison System are otherwise law abiding citizens who have simply exercised their Constitutional Right of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
It is up to us – “We the People” to change this horrible condition that has been inflicted upon us by our own government! We need to join together and force our government to allow us the freedoms that our forefathers promised us in the Constitution. We need our government to dismantle the U.S. supported and funded American Terrorism Group also known as the U.S. DEA. We the People are PAYING for our own Terrorization! We support this horror with our own taxes! We want to support the U.S. with our taxes, but we do NOT want to fund government-supported American Terrorist Groups such as the DEA.
There are a multitude of other great reasons to Legalize Cannabis…
A few of the list headings are:
Medical
Fiber
Nutrition
Chemical
Ecological
Recreational
Taxation
There are many items under each of these headings - I don't have the space here to list them!
Cannabis must be legalized to make all of this happen. Legalization is also mandatory to properly regulate Cannabis. Once Cannabis is legal, and purchasing it is made legal, then controls can be put into place so that only adults can purchase it (like Alcohol today). If a product is illegal, then it must be purchased by illegal means and therefore can not be regulated.
Inform Yourself! There are many internet sites that can help you to educate yourself on this topic.
Please support the Legalization of Cannabis!
Please don’t hide – come out of the closet – we need you!
Be Active – Be Vocal – do not let the terrorists win – We Can Do This!
Legalize Cannabis Now!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Are U.S. Pot Laws The Root Cause of Mexican Drug Violence?
GOP and Dems Agree: Crack/Powder Cocaine Disparity Unjust and Needs Reform
Why Thousands Are Turning to a Psychedelic Plant from Africa for Release from Severe Addictions




