COMMENTS: 17
An Ex-Smuggler's Perspective on Solving Drug Violence
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Drugs headlines via email.
I was one of the "masterminds" behind the importation and sale of approximately 75 tons of pot from Southeast Asia to the U.S. in 1986 and 1987. It was the culmination of a 20-year career as a drug smuggler, a deal that netted in excess of $180 million wholesale. And the only thing the government got out of those drug hauls was the sales tax from the cash my gang spent. There were, of course, some financial forfeitures once my gang was finally rounded up some years later. However, had rational minds prevailed over the past 70-plus years, the U.S. government would have reaped huge benefits from organizations like ours.
But no. Rather than accept the fact that some 30 million Americans cannot possibly be criminals, our society has squandered almost a trillion dollars in a futile effort to stop drug use.
We're hearing a lot about drug-related violence in Mexico these days. But listening to the news recently, I heard of a police sweep in Toronto--where I live some months out of the year. The operation involved more than 1,000 police officers and netted, among other things, a vast quantity of firearms, including loaded AK-47s, sawed-off shotguns and 34 handguns, none of which were obtained legally. These weapons came from the United States and were smuggled north. Here is how it works (I know firsthand): Canadian gangs grow pot in apartment buildings, putting everyone who lives there in danger. Once harvested, the pot is traded to U.S. gangs for cocaine and guns. America's arcane drug laws provide the currency for these gangs to exist.
South of the border, it's even worse. Some analysts say Mexico is on the slipperiest of slopes toward becoming a failed state, and illegal drugs are playing a huge part. Drug traffickers are able to operate only because they have currency. Take away the currency, you take away the drug traffickers.
In my days in that business, guns were nowhere to be found. Now, however, I cannot imagine anyone being in the trade without a gun. It has to stop, but how?
Steve Lopez, a Los Angeles Times columnist, recently wrote, "I'm sitting in Costa Mesa with a silver-haired gent who once ran for Congress as a Republican and used to lock up drug dealers as a federal prosecutor, a man who served as an Orange County [California] judge for 25 years. And what are we talking about? He's begging me to tell you we need to legalize drugs in America."
A judge is saying this. Say it ain't true, baby, but it is. And he's not the only one saying it. Former Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper (in whose jurisdiction I was sentenced to 10 years in prison) says the same thing. That's why he is involved with Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, a group of former and current police officers, government agents and other law-enforcement agents who oppose the war on drugs.
According to LEAP, "After nearly four decades of fueling the U.S. policy of a war on drugs with over a trillion tax dollars and 37 million arrests for non-violent drug offenses, our confined population has quadrupled, making building prisons the fastest growing industry in the United States." More than 2.3 million U.S. citizens are in jail, and every year we arrest 1.9 million more, guaranteeing prisons will be busting at their seams. Every year, the war on drugs will cost U.S. taxpayers another $69 billion.
While the U.S. has only 5 percent of the world's population, it has 25 percent of the world's known prison population. This startling number is due to one major factor: our arcane drug laws. It is time we stopped treating a medical condition with law enforcement.
Ultimately, does the fact that people smoke pot make them criminals? Is the struggling heroin addict a criminal? If he is, it is only because we are not treating the root of the problem.
It is time to legalize marijuana. The tax revenue generated could then be used to help addicts. I work with these folks every day, in one way or another, and not one of them wants to live the way they do, but they don't know how to stop. They need help, not punishment.
Back in the 1920s, America saw one of the most violent organized criminal elements in history. Who can forget the tommy guns, the blood on the street and names like Luciano and Capone? Well, they exist today, it's just that the names have been changed to Escobar and Huerta Rios. As LEAP so succinctly puts it: Alcohol prohibition, drug prohibition, same problem, same solution.
Stay up to date with the latest Drugs headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NotJesus on Apr 16, 2009 1:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Uninformed,
2. Just plain stupid, or
3. A politician (the all of the above answer)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ds1st Piss off you witless moron!
Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: Supporters of the War on (Some) Drugs fall into three categories
Posted by: marsmath
» RE: Supporters of the War on (Some) Drugs fall into three categories
Posted by: Malkavian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ds1st on Apr 16, 2009 9:57 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To correct the PROBLEM after some time period a STRONG MAN will EMERGE and take CONTROL. HE will become the LEADER of the UNITED STATES. To ELEMINATE DRUG OFFERNDERS they will be KILLED.
So if DRUGS are LEGALIZED I look forward to the FINAL OUTCOME.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Get Help
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» Prohibition already causes instability, dumba$$
Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» RE: LEGALIZED DRUGS will usher in an era of INSTABILITY.
Posted by: robert.noll
» ds1st is a "Drug War Profiteer"
Posted by: marsmath
» RE: LEGALIZED DRUGS will usher in an era of INSTABILITY.
Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: LEGALIZED DRUGS will usher in an era of INSTABILITY.
Posted by: Malkavian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jstepp590 on Apr 17, 2009 1:19 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Crack, meth, heroin and other addictive drugs should NOT be made legal and available because of the severe harm caused to both society and the individual. These are also rated as severely damaging on the British system. I would vote against their legalization every time no matter what.
A drugs physical addiction level should be a heavy determiner in my opinion.
If we could move most of the DEA into regulatory position instead of criminal I believe we would be on the right track. There have been numerous studies that have said that if marijuana alone was legalized then the drug cartels and gangs would drastically shrink or disappear as there are not enough users to make their massive profits off the other drugs. Apparently marijuana is over 80% of their business.
If we would legalize the raw coca leaf as a supplement pill for our elderly we would eliminate the cocaine cartels. The raw leaf isn't addictive the way refined cocaine is and would help our elderly deal with the aches and pains of aging, thereby improving their quality of life (while being less expensive than pharma pain killers). It would destroy the economics of cocaine production. It would turn our huge elderly population, usually considered a handicap, into a advantage.
I am open to quality ideas and debate about our drug policies, and I'm very open to using legalization to solve most of the problem. However, there are some lines I and other will not cross so pick your fights carefully please.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: some drugs
Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: some drugs
Posted by: HillbillyRob
» Duhhhhh RE: some drugs
Posted by: paganpat
» RE: some drugs
Posted by: Malkavian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NotJesus on Apr 16, 2009 1:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Uninformed,
2. Just plain stupid, or
3. A politician (the all of the above answer)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ds1st Piss off you witless moron!
Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: Supporters of the War on (Some) Drugs fall into three categories
Posted by: marsmath
» RE: Supporters of the War on (Some) Drugs fall into three categories
Posted by: Malkavian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ds1st on Apr 16, 2009 9:57 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To correct the PROBLEM after some time period a STRONG MAN will EMERGE and take CONTROL. HE will become the LEADER of the UNITED STATES. To ELEMINATE DRUG OFFERNDERS they will be KILLED.
So if DRUGS are LEGALIZED I look forward to the FINAL OUTCOME.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Get Help
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» Prohibition already causes instability, dumba$$
Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» RE: LEGALIZED DRUGS will usher in an era of INSTABILITY.
Posted by: robert.noll
» ds1st is a "Drug War Profiteer"
Posted by: marsmath
» RE: LEGALIZED DRUGS will usher in an era of INSTABILITY.
Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: LEGALIZED DRUGS will usher in an era of INSTABILITY.
Posted by: Malkavian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jstepp590 on Apr 17, 2009 1:19 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Crack, meth, heroin and other addictive drugs should NOT be made legal and available because of the severe harm caused to both society and the individual. These are also rated as severely damaging on the British system. I would vote against their legalization every time no matter what.
A drugs physical addiction level should be a heavy determiner in my opinion.
If we could move most of the DEA into regulatory position instead of criminal I believe we would be on the right track. There have been numerous studies that have said that if marijuana alone was legalized then the drug cartels and gangs would drastically shrink or disappear as there are not enough users to make their massive profits off the other drugs. Apparently marijuana is over 80% of their business.
If we would legalize the raw coca leaf as a supplement pill for our elderly we would eliminate the cocaine cartels. The raw leaf isn't addictive the way refined cocaine is and would help our elderly deal with the aches and pains of aging, thereby improving their quality of life (while being less expensive than pharma pain killers). It would destroy the economics of cocaine production. It would turn our huge elderly population, usually considered a handicap, into a advantage.
I am open to quality ideas and debate about our drug policies, and I'm very open to using legalization to solve most of the problem. However, there are some lines I and other will not cross so pick your fights carefully please.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: some drugs
Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: some drugs
Posted by: HillbillyRob
» Duhhhhh RE: some drugs
Posted by: paganpat
» RE: some drugs
Posted by: Malkavian
NYC Police Accused of 'Anal Assault' Over Marijuana Use
Do Employers Really Need to Give Drug Tests for Pot?
False Claims on Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Lead to Credibility Gap for Prosecutors




