DRUGS  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 1

Obama Makes a Good First Step on Medical Marijuana -- Here's What He Should Do Next

Install new leadership at the DEA, push for a change in the classification of marijuana, allow research projects to continue and more.
February 9, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Drugs headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

On Feb. 5, the Obama administration quietly but firmly broke with more than a decade of federal policy on medical marijuana, signaling an end to the federal war on state medical marijuana laws. The question now is, what next?

In response to questions about a series of Drug Enforcement Administration raids on medical marijuana collectives in Los Angeles, White House spokesman Nick Shapiro told the Washington Times, "The president believes that federal resources should not be used to circumvent state laws, and as he continues to appoint senior leadership to fill out the ranks of the federal government, he expects them to review their policies with that in mind."

The low-key language may obscure what a sea change this represents. Ever since California voters passed the first modern medical marijuana law in 1996, official policy has been to use federal resources to attack these laws in every way possible.

Clinton administration efforts to bar doctors from recommending marijuana were shot down by the courts, but the Bush administration raided dispensaries and sometimes arrested medical marijuana patients and providers. Owners of buildings where medical marijuana dispensaries operate legally under state law have been threatened with seizure of their property.

Now there are 13 medical marijuana states, comprising one-quarter of the U.S. population. Support has been wide and bipartisan, from Montana to Rhode Island. Most importantly, a series of scientific studies published since 2007 have verified that marijuana is a safe, effective treatment for a variety of serious and painful medical conditions.

That represents both a challenge and an opportunity for a president who has committed his administration to "ensuring that facts and evidence are never twisted or obscured by politics or ideology" and "listening to what our scientists have to say. Even when it's inconvenient." The medical marijuana issue begs for that principle to be put into practice.

The first imperative is to install new leadership at the DEA -- leadership that will follow Obama's command to stop interfering with state medical marijuana laws and, just as important, stop obstructing science. The DEA has moved to block a medical marijuana research facility at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, despite the fact that its own administrative law judge recommended that the project be allowed to proceed.

The reasons given by acting DEA administrator Michele Leonhart -- a Bush holdover -- were transparently phony: an ideological opposition to medical marijuana dressed up in pseudoscientific language. This is precisely the sort of nonsense Obama has pledged to end.

But stopping the raids, cleaning out the obstructionists at the DEA and letting the University of Massachusetts effort (and other worthy research projects) go forward should be just the start. The federal law that classifies marijuana as having no recognized use in medicine and as unsafe for use even under physician supervision is scientifically laughable. The American College of Physicians, the American Public Health Association and the American Nurses Association are just a few of the organizations that have urged that this unscientific policy be rethought.

Here's a step the administration could take quickly, without Congress getting involved: Under a program begun in the late 1970s and supervised by the FDA, the federal government supplies medical marijuana to a handful of patients. President George H.W. Bush closed new enrollment into the program, called an IND (Investigational New Drug), back in 1992.

By reopening the IND, President Obama could help suffering patients in states that don't have medical marijuana laws, while maintaining tight FDA supervision to prevent abuse. The program could obtain data from these patients that would add greatly to our body of knowledge about medical marijuana.

If science is truly to triumph over ideology, medical marijuana is the perfect place to start.


Aaron Houston is director of government relations for the Marijuana Policy Project.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Drugs headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: barack obama, medical marijuana, dea, pot raids


Comments are closed-

MARIJUANA IS AN HERB, HERB, NOT A DRUG
Posted by: Dennis St. John on Feb 10, 2009 2:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Canadians legally grow hundreds of acres of hemp (non-THC) that provides millions of dollars worth of products. Hemp burns without polluting. Hemp makes clothing that wears far better than cotton. Paper can be made from hemp far more cheaply than wood. Car bodies have been made from hemp that are lighter than aluminum and stronger than steel. Etcetera. The infantile attitudes in this country toward marijuana precludes these valuable products.

As to high-THC ganja, the medicinal benefits are long past proven.

Billions are wasted inforcing laws against marijuana, and billions more are forfeited from potential profits. It's a fool's game. To include marijuana in the same category as deadly chemicals like cocaine and heroin is the height of ignorance.

Marijuana laws were first instituted during the depression as a way to preclude Mexicans (whose use of Marijuana is cultural, like the Hawaiians) from crossing the border and taking jobs away from white folks (as if whites would perform the stoop labor of braceros). Well, that sure as hell worked!

Not all marijuana is the same. Many years ago, when I was a young man living in the Florida Keys as an avid sailor, I kept five kinds on hand, varying in intensity from shop pot (you could work happily with power tools without cutting your fingers off--you got high but not stoned) up to two-toke (two puffs and all you could do was sit around like a dazed goat and listen to music--you were paralyzed stoned). Every so often, smugglers would jettison bales at sea when in danger of getting busted. These washed up on shore and were always a great find and reason to party. Seaweed, we called it. Usually from Columbia, it was primo.

Imagine commercially packaging marijuana like cigarettes with the same varying intensity. Liquor is legal, but it is illegal to work while drunk. The same rational laws could be applied to Mary Jane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

MARIJUANA IS AN HERB, HERB, NOT A DRUG
Posted by: Dennis St. John on Feb 10, 2009 2:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Canadians legally grow hundreds of acres of hemp (non-THC) that provides millions of dollars worth of products. Hemp burns without polluting. Hemp makes clothing that wears far better than cotton. Paper can be made from hemp far more cheaply than wood. Car bodies have been made from hemp that are lighter than aluminum and stronger than steel. Etcetera. The infantile attitudes in this country toward marijuana precludes these valuable products.

As to high-THC ganja, the medicinal benefits are long past proven.

Billions are wasted inforcing laws against marijuana, and billions more are forfeited from potential profits. It's a fool's game. To include marijuana in the same category as deadly chemicals like cocaine and heroin is the height of ignorance.

Marijuana laws were first instituted during the depression as a way to preclude Mexicans (whose use of Marijuana is cultural, like the Hawaiians) from crossing the border and taking jobs away from white folks (as if whites would perform the stoop labor of braceros). Well, that sure as hell worked!

Not all marijuana is the same. Many years ago, when I was a young man living in the Florida Keys as an avid sailor, I kept five kinds on hand, varying in intensity from shop pot (you could work happily with power tools without cutting your fingers off--you got high but not stoned) up to two-toke (two puffs and all you could do was sit around like a dazed goat and listen to music--you were paralyzed stoned). Every so often, smugglers would jettison bales at sea when in danger of getting busted. These washed up on shore and were always a great find and reason to party. Seaweed, we called it. Usually from Columbia, it was primo.

Imagine commercially packaging marijuana like cigarettes with the same varying intensity. Liquor is legal, but it is illegal to work while drunk. The same rational laws could be applied to Mary Jane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS