COMMENTS: 79
Sanjay Gupta: What the Next Surgeon General Doesn't Know About Pot
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Drugs headlines via email.
If Dr. Sanjay Gupta is picked for the post of surgeon general, he would become the nation's leading medical advocate. His experience in the media would be beneficial in bringing the Surgeon General's office back to the prominence it held when C. Everett Koop was successfully battling tobacco smoking.
But is Gupta ready to deliver the Obama administration's promised end to the politicization of science and medicine? More specifically, will Gupta toe the federal line that cannabis is lacking in any medical value, or will he recognize what 13 states and the past 12 years of research prove -- that cannabis is a beneficial medicine for some people and an intoxicant far less harmful than alcohol for others?
In 2002, Gupta was more than willing to echo the outrageous claims that smoking pot would lead to psychosis, depression and schizophrenia:
But the three studies you are talking about talk specifically about schizophrenia and depression, and the fact that marijuana use earlier in life actually may lead to an increased -- 30 percent increase -- in schizophrenia later in life.
Depression, also a very big diagnosis -- roughly 18.8 million in this country have it. Again, they looked this time at 1,600 high school students and followed them over about seven years. This is in Australia, not in the United States. But they actually found that all of these boys and girls, particularly girls, were more vulnerable to the symptoms of depression later on in life, again if they were frequent or even daily marijuana users.
I hope that the next surgeon general has been following the research on cannabis and mental health since 2002. This year, Dr. Mikkel Arendt of Aarhus University in Risskov, Denmark, said that people treated for a so-called cannabis-induced psychosis "…would have developed schizophrenia whether or not they used cannabis."
I hope that Gupta has kept up with the journal Schizophrenia Research and the research published there last year by the London's Institute of Psychiatry, which found no statistically significant "differences in symptomatology between schizophrenic patients who were or were not cannabis users," found no "evidence that cannabis users with schizophrenia were more likely to have a family member with the disorder" and that these findings "argue against a distinct schizophrenic-like psychosis caused by cannabis," authors concluded.
Regarding depression, in 2006, researchers at Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore found "that the associations observed between marijuana use and subsequent depression status may be attributable not to continued marijuana use, per se, but to third (common) factors associated with both the decision to use marijuana and to depression." In fact, the year prior, researchers at USC had found among cannabis smokers, "those who used once per week or less had less depressed mood, more positive affect and fewer somatic (physical) complaints than non-users," and that "[d]aily users [also] reported less depressed mood and more positive affect than non-users."
Or we could just ask the incoming surgeon general to apply some common sense. If smoking cannabis is a strong predictor of future depression or schizophrenia, then shouldn't there be a spike in the reporting of those conditions around 1978, when 37 percent of high school seniors reported past-month cannabis use, and a decline in depression and schizophrenia around 1992, when the modern low of 12 percent was reported? Instead, what we find is that about 1 percent of the population develops schizophrenia, and that figure stays relatively steady even as cannabis use rises and falls.
In 2006, Gupta was penning the article "Why I Would Vote No on Pot" for Time magazine as Colorado and Nevada had non-medical-cannabis-regulation ballot measures pending. It doesn't seem like he's been following the past two decades of research:
I'm constantly amazed that after all these years -- and all the wars on drugs and all the public-service announcements -- nearly 15 million Americans still use marijuana at least once a month.
Stay up to date with the latest Drugs headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: georgekat on Jan 8, 2009 2:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.naturalnews.com/025267.html
As this article points out, Marcia Angell would make a wonderful Surgeon General. She is former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine and author of several books, in which she delineates the corruption of the pharmaceutical industry.
Of course, Obama feels he has to offer "pay-back" for all that money he received from the industry.
But really why pick a celebrity?
Someone entirely lacking gravitas.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: But really why pick a celebrity?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Do we need another spokesman for Big Pharma in the White House?
Posted by: Gomeraman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: americansheep on Jan 8, 2009 3:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gupta's Reckless Reporting
Posted by: sunnywater
» RE: Gupta's Reckless Reporting
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Gupta's Reckless Reporting
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Gupta's Reckless Reporting
Posted by: WillieD
Comments are closed-
Posted by: losingmyliberties on Jan 8, 2009 4:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: unfreeinus
Posted by: thesbrian
» RE: unfreeinus
Posted by: losingmyliberties
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProfBob on Jan 8, 2009 5:05 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2. Being fat soluble the negative effects are duration linked, not dose linked as in many drugs. This might also affect driving for a long period after the last use.
3. Wherever marijuana is the best medicine for the illness, it is a strong reason for its use, but other palliatives seem equally effective without the intoxicating effects.
4. The THC dosage in 1978 that the high schoolers were smoking was usually in the 0.5 to 1.0%. The doses now are far higher, often in the 5 to 12% range. This might have different effects on the user.
5. Much more research is needed. Just as aspirin can reduce a headache or prevent a heart attack, it can also cause serious gastric bleeding. Few medicines are all good or all bad.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Driving with pot
Posted by: thesbrian
» RE: Driving with pot
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: mtnprivy
» you're no prof bob...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» scientifically inaccurate
Posted by: inverse_agonist
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: Juven
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: DrDon
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: Istig Kite
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: WillieD
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Jan 8, 2009 5:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that Gupta is an excellent communicator. But big questions are-
-What does he really stand for?
-What are his core values?
-What are his priorities?
It seems that he reports on anything and everything? And seems very tied to much of what is wrong with US Organized Medicine and those who profiteer from it by daily headline?"
The fundamental criteria for Surgeon General is have the moral fiber and backbone to fight for science and values based public health for all American's (That IS the job!)
Gupta is not the change we need?
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
ralippin@aol.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: GUPTA IS NOT THE CHANGE WE NEED
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: GUPTA IS NOT THE CHANGE WE NEED
Posted by: welliot
» Dr. Rick Lippin for Surgeon General!!!
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: newsound on Jan 8, 2009 6:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Erin on Jan 8, 2009 6:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not just a marijuana problem
Posted by: donl51
» RE: Not just a marijuana problem....donI51
Posted by: Basenjis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 8, 2009 7:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Jan 8, 2009 7:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A++++ qualification for Gupta.... he is more a politician than most the "fast talker"..."to influence or persuade by fluent,and usually deceptive or tricky talk."
Shame on Obama OR the team, WHATEVER. Gupta is not for us !!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gupta's a "FAST TALKER".......
Posted by: Lauren
» Gupta vs Michael Moore, is what turned me off this talking head
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Naty on Jan 8, 2009 7:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2.)There's truth to the fat solubility premise in my experience (in addition there is objective research to support this). I am extremely skinny so my tolerance does not build up quickly, yay! I do not believe marijuana impairs driving ability. True, if you are say, IQ 80 (borderline) and smoke a joint before driving then you are probably being really dumb. But if you're decently intelligent then pot will not impair your driving ability. I have never received a ticket for anything (once a received a ticket for the parking meter) and can't tell you how many times I've driven stoned and even right after smoking. I am 22 and drive a lot.
3.) The intoxicating effects is part of the medicine! Many homo sapiens have an innate desire to alter their consciousness.
4.) Actually the stronger the weed the better because:
-one needs to inhale less (less damage to the lungs)
-one needs less energy to produce the THC (it is more concentrated)
-it is easier to control the dose when each hit is strong and definitive
5.) I think marijuana has received more research then some pharmaceuticals. But that is only conjecture!
I am a philosophy major who smoked 1/8oz of marijuana per week last semester. I received an A in logic and wrote many assignments while high (I wrote a film analysis paper and got an A+ less than 24 hours after smoking). It was my best semester at school yet and I believe it was because I had the money and accesability to finally smoke regularly. It helps me to concentrate and stay happy! I am prone to massive depression and refuse all psychiatric medications, I have been recommended lithium for bipolar disorder by a psychiatrist I saw, I have racing thoughts. Marijuana helps me deal with my brain... helps slow the thoughts down.
Marijuana helps with my creativity... I have learned so much about music while high. It's like the music is suddenly stretched and I can visualize how the component parts fit together. It is almost painful at times how the music flows not just through my mind but through my body and reverberates through each cell while high (no, I'm not writing this while high... haha, haven't smoked in a while).
I love reading while high. In fact my favorite activities are reading, listening to music, watching intelligent movies, and taking nature walks while high. Lately I read politics while high because marijuana helps suspend disbelief and denial. So much of what is happening today is so unbelievable that it's difficult to believe and accept, marijuana helps me to overcome this barrier of denial. Highly productive activities!! Productive in the sense that I develop as a person both intellectually and emotionally.
continued....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: In response to Prof. Bob and more
Posted by: Juven
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Naty on Jan 8, 2009 7:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I even go jogging outside while high. I learn a lot about the movements in my body and find that HOW one runs is just as important as HOW MUCH one runs. My posture improves and I have this urgency to run smoothly and gracefully. I also get these urges while high to stretch out and get rid of tension. I have done total yoga workouts while high and the transformation in my soul after these sessions is phenomenal. I LOOK relaxed and FEEL compassion afterwards.
SO NOT POT DOES NOT MAKE ME INTO A LAZY, APATHETIC MEMBER OF SOCIETY. In fact quite the opposite is true.
When I read something difficult (especially philosophical stuff) I oftentimes smoke a little bit and walla! I understand it. And no it's not some metacognitive trick of thinking I understand the text, I truly do! When I return to the text later while not high I still understand it. By helping me appreciate from where the writer is coming from it allows me to "unlock" the author's approach and intention. The same with both music and film.
And no I'm not high right now :) I am a 22 year old female that does not look like a pothead at all. I eat extremely well, take care of myself, my family, and friends, and I REALLY REALLY care about life and have incorporated marijuana as a spiritual, intellectual, emotional, and artistic aid. I do not know why I have such a good relationship with this plant, even I am surprised! I am infinitely less nihilistic than most of the other postmodernist hedonists that make up a significant portion of western society.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Naty
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Naty
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: WillieD
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Istig Kite
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Istig Kite
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: The stereotypical Stoner Dude - just like blackface 'comedy'.
Posted by: Lauren
» Took and passed my MENSA test high also
Posted by: UnEasyOne
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Duncable
» RE: ..... you smoke pot daily, me too. I said it was my religion but they refused to listen.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: ..... you smoke pot daily, me too. I said it was my religion but they refused to listen.
Posted by: Duncable
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: finch
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Jan 8, 2009 7:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Corporate-State, as consolidated over the last 40 years, wants to teach us, to in-Doctrinate us in the "right way of being good little boys and girls"-- according to a very particular and self-designated 'divinely ordained' Order and Belief System.
Gupta will serve that System, not the people -- free citizens of a free country.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Scientist?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Scientist?
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sunlakedude on Jan 8, 2009 7:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: GUPTA
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: GUPTA
Posted by: sunlakedude
» RE: GUPTA
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: soulrebeljc on Jan 8, 2009 9:19 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So start demanding that those who run for elected office represent what most of the public knows - pot is not harmful, in fact the laws prohibiting pot are far more detrimental in terms of lost productivity (workers in jail), destruction of family, government expenditures, etc ad nauseum. In fact, the laws themselves, in perspective, are criminal.
We are locking up from 400,000 to 700,000 for nonviolent drug offenses. There is undoubtedly racial profiling which compounds the negative effects on minorities, and particularly the poor who cannot afford a lawyer, pay their 'you done wrong' tax. I got busted for pot (1.3 grams!) in 96, paid my $500 for a lawyer, and got a 6month probation and a sealed record - because I was a white upper middle class college kid with no priors. Doubt that wouldhave happened if I was a poor hispanic kid working at Jiffy Lube. It's all bullshit. We should demand better from "the greatest country on earth."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's ethnic cleansing, is what it is.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: It's ethnic cleansing, is what it is??
Posted by: bizeeb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sonofloud on Jan 8, 2009 10:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He'll fit in just fine with Obama.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xvictor on Jan 8, 2009 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jan 8, 2009 11:47 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Habaro on Jan 8, 2009 12:05 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Oops.
Posted by: Habaro
» RE: Forest through the trees
Posted by: finch
» RE: Forest through the trees
Posted by: Habaro
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sonofloud on Jan 8, 2009 12:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., urged Democrats to sign onto a letter to President-elect Barack Obama urging him not to nominate Gupta, who is CNN's chief medical correspondent.
"It is not in the best interests of the nation to have someone like this who lacks the requisite experience needed to oversee the federal agency that provides crucial health care assistance to some of the poorest and most underserved communities in America," Conyers wrote in a letter released Thursday.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: from the AP site.....Conyers opposes Gupta
Posted by: Basenjis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pacto on Jan 8, 2009 2:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Jan 8, 2009 2:32 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Stupid Choice
Posted by: peace'nbeach
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jan 10, 2009 9:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those of you that have been smoking Obama for the past year, you are about to wake up to the worst hang over you ever had.
HOPE I am wrong in the future, but the man has not yet made a REAL progressive move since elected.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TimLong on Jan 11, 2009 7:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gupta
Posted by: markw4786
Comments are closed-
Posted by: markw4786 on Jan 12, 2009 4:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peace'nbeach on Jan 13, 2009 10:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There MUST be severe restrictions as to what an anchor/host may "say" during their employment whilst on-the-air, otherwise we would be hearing things quite differently than what is "reported".
I recall some of the comments made on-the-air during the 9/11 government exercise that were NEVER said or referred to AGAIN. The CEO's evidently did not get the memo out soon enough.
But since then, the past 7+ years of Bushco has had little serious criticism...........
I'm sorry...what was the question??
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: seattle420lover on Jan 13, 2009 3:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here's an example,
The first is that marijuana isn't really very good for you. True, there are health benefits for some patients. Several recent studies, including a new one from the Scripps Research Institute, show that THC, the chemical in marijuana responsible for the high, can help slow the progress of Alzheimer's disease. ( In fact, it seems to block the formation of disease-causing plaques better than several mainstream drugs. ) Other studies have shown THC to be a very effective antinausea treatment for people--cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, for example--for whom conventional medications aren't working. And medical cannabis has shown promise relieving pain in patients with multiple sclerosis and reducing intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients.
RIGHT THERE HE HAS CONTRADICTED HIM SELF!
(this issue means a whole lot to me because I am dealing with the after affects of a STROKE)
I have the info on two studies that he hasn't been keeping track of:
MARIJUANA IS VERY GOOD AT PREVENTING ALZHEIMERS!
and
it is very good for people who have suffered strokes!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: georgekat on Jan 8, 2009 2:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.naturalnews.com/025267.html
As this article points out, Marcia Angell would make a wonderful Surgeon General. She is former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine and author of several books, in which she delineates the corruption of the pharmaceutical industry.
Of course, Obama feels he has to offer "pay-back" for all that money he received from the industry.
But really why pick a celebrity?
Someone entirely lacking gravitas.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: But really why pick a celebrity?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Do we need another spokesman for Big Pharma in the White House?
Posted by: Gomeraman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: americansheep on Jan 8, 2009 3:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gupta's Reckless Reporting
Posted by: sunnywater
» RE: Gupta's Reckless Reporting
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Gupta's Reckless Reporting
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Gupta's Reckless Reporting
Posted by: WillieD
Comments are closed-
Posted by: losingmyliberties on Jan 8, 2009 4:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: unfreeinus
Posted by: thesbrian
» RE: unfreeinus
Posted by: losingmyliberties
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProfBob on Jan 8, 2009 5:05 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2. Being fat soluble the negative effects are duration linked, not dose linked as in many drugs. This might also affect driving for a long period after the last use.
3. Wherever marijuana is the best medicine for the illness, it is a strong reason for its use, but other palliatives seem equally effective without the intoxicating effects.
4. The THC dosage in 1978 that the high schoolers were smoking was usually in the 0.5 to 1.0%. The doses now are far higher, often in the 5 to 12% range. This might have different effects on the user.
5. Much more research is needed. Just as aspirin can reduce a headache or prevent a heart attack, it can also cause serious gastric bleeding. Few medicines are all good or all bad.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Driving with pot
Posted by: thesbrian
» RE: Driving with pot
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: mtnprivy
» you're no prof bob...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» scientifically inaccurate
Posted by: inverse_agonist
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: Juven
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: DrDon
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: Istig Kite
» RE: Prof Bob
Posted by: WillieD
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Jan 8, 2009 5:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that Gupta is an excellent communicator. But big questions are-
-What does he really stand for?
-What are his core values?
-What are his priorities?
It seems that he reports on anything and everything? And seems very tied to much of what is wrong with US Organized Medicine and those who profiteer from it by daily headline?"
The fundamental criteria for Surgeon General is have the moral fiber and backbone to fight for science and values based public health for all American's (That IS the job!)
Gupta is not the change we need?
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
ralippin@aol.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: GUPTA IS NOT THE CHANGE WE NEED
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: GUPTA IS NOT THE CHANGE WE NEED
Posted by: welliot
» Dr. Rick Lippin for Surgeon General!!!
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: newsound on Jan 8, 2009 6:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Erin on Jan 8, 2009 6:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not just a marijuana problem
Posted by: donl51
» RE: Not just a marijuana problem....donI51
Posted by: Basenjis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 8, 2009 7:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Jan 8, 2009 7:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A++++ qualification for Gupta.... he is more a politician than most the "fast talker"..."to influence or persuade by fluent,and usually deceptive or tricky talk."
Shame on Obama OR the team, WHATEVER. Gupta is not for us !!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gupta's a "FAST TALKER".......
Posted by: Lauren
» Gupta vs Michael Moore, is what turned me off this talking head
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Naty on Jan 8, 2009 7:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2.)There's truth to the fat solubility premise in my experience (in addition there is objective research to support this). I am extremely skinny so my tolerance does not build up quickly, yay! I do not believe marijuana impairs driving ability. True, if you are say, IQ 80 (borderline) and smoke a joint before driving then you are probably being really dumb. But if you're decently intelligent then pot will not impair your driving ability. I have never received a ticket for anything (once a received a ticket for the parking meter) and can't tell you how many times I've driven stoned and even right after smoking. I am 22 and drive a lot.
3.) The intoxicating effects is part of the medicine! Many homo sapiens have an innate desire to alter their consciousness.
4.) Actually the stronger the weed the better because:
-one needs to inhale less (less damage to the lungs)
-one needs less energy to produce the THC (it is more concentrated)
-it is easier to control the dose when each hit is strong and definitive
5.) I think marijuana has received more research then some pharmaceuticals. But that is only conjecture!
I am a philosophy major who smoked 1/8oz of marijuana per week last semester. I received an A in logic and wrote many assignments while high (I wrote a film analysis paper and got an A+ less than 24 hours after smoking). It was my best semester at school yet and I believe it was because I had the money and accesability to finally smoke regularly. It helps me to concentrate and stay happy! I am prone to massive depression and refuse all psychiatric medications, I have been recommended lithium for bipolar disorder by a psychiatrist I saw, I have racing thoughts. Marijuana helps me deal with my brain... helps slow the thoughts down.
Marijuana helps with my creativity... I have learned so much about music while high. It's like the music is suddenly stretched and I can visualize how the component parts fit together. It is almost painful at times how the music flows not just through my mind but through my body and reverberates through each cell while high (no, I'm not writing this while high... haha, haven't smoked in a while).
I love reading while high. In fact my favorite activities are reading, listening to music, watching intelligent movies, and taking nature walks while high. Lately I read politics while high because marijuana helps suspend disbelief and denial. So much of what is happening today is so unbelievable that it's difficult to believe and accept, marijuana helps me to overcome this barrier of denial. Highly productive activities!! Productive in the sense that I develop as a person both intellectually and emotionally.
continued....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: In response to Prof. Bob and more
Posted by: Juven
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Naty on Jan 8, 2009 7:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I even go jogging outside while high. I learn a lot about the movements in my body and find that HOW one runs is just as important as HOW MUCH one runs. My posture improves and I have this urgency to run smoothly and gracefully. I also get these urges while high to stretch out and get rid of tension. I have done total yoga workouts while high and the transformation in my soul after these sessions is phenomenal. I LOOK relaxed and FEEL compassion afterwards.
SO NOT POT DOES NOT MAKE ME INTO A LAZY, APATHETIC MEMBER OF SOCIETY. In fact quite the opposite is true.
When I read something difficult (especially philosophical stuff) I oftentimes smoke a little bit and walla! I understand it. And no it's not some metacognitive trick of thinking I understand the text, I truly do! When I return to the text later while not high I still understand it. By helping me appreciate from where the writer is coming from it allows me to "unlock" the author's approach and intention. The same with both music and film.
And no I'm not high right now :) I am a 22 year old female that does not look like a pothead at all. I eat extremely well, take care of myself, my family, and friends, and I REALLY REALLY care about life and have incorporated marijuana as a spiritual, intellectual, emotional, and artistic aid. I do not know why I have such a good relationship with this plant, even I am surprised! I am infinitely less nihilistic than most of the other postmodernist hedonists that make up a significant portion of western society.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Naty
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Naty
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: WillieD
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Istig Kite
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Istig Kite
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: The stereotypical Stoner Dude - just like blackface 'comedy'.
Posted by: Lauren
» Took and passed my MENSA test high also
Posted by: UnEasyOne
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: Duncable
» RE: ..... you smoke pot daily, me too. I said it was my religion but they refused to listen.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: ..... you smoke pot daily, me too. I said it was my religion but they refused to listen.
Posted by: Duncable
» RE: .....continued
Posted by: finch
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Jan 8, 2009 7:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Corporate-State, as consolidated over the last 40 years, wants to teach us, to in-Doctrinate us in the "right way of being good little boys and girls"-- according to a very particular and self-designated 'divinely ordained' Order and Belief System.
Gupta will serve that System, not the people -- free citizens of a free country.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Scientist?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Scientist?
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sunlakedude on Jan 8, 2009 7:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: GUPTA
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: GUPTA
Posted by: sunlakedude
» RE: GUPTA
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: soulrebeljc on Jan 8, 2009 9:19 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So start demanding that those who run for elected office represent what most of the public knows - pot is not harmful, in fact the laws prohibiting pot are far more detrimental in terms of lost productivity (workers in jail), destruction of family, government expenditures, etc ad nauseum. In fact, the laws themselves, in perspective, are criminal.
We are locking up from 400,000 to 700,000 for nonviolent drug offenses. There is undoubtedly racial profiling which compounds the negative effects on minorities, and particularly the poor who cannot afford a lawyer, pay their 'you done wrong' tax. I got busted for pot (1.3 grams!) in 96, paid my $500 for a lawyer, and got a 6month probation and a sealed record - because I was a white upper middle class college kid with no priors. Doubt that wouldhave happened if I was a poor hispanic kid working at Jiffy Lube. It's all bullshit. We should demand better from "the greatest country on earth."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's ethnic cleansing, is what it is.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: It's ethnic cleansing, is what it is??
Posted by: bizeeb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sonofloud on Jan 8, 2009 10:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He'll fit in just fine with Obama.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xvictor on Jan 8, 2009 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jan 8, 2009 11:47 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Habaro on Jan 8, 2009 12:05 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Oops.
Posted by: Habaro
» RE: Forest through the trees
Posted by: finch
» RE: Forest through the trees
Posted by: Habaro
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sonofloud on Jan 8, 2009 12:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., urged Democrats to sign onto a letter to President-elect Barack Obama urging him not to nominate Gupta, who is CNN's chief medical correspondent.
"It is not in the best interests of the nation to have someone like this who lacks the requisite experience needed to oversee the federal agency that provides crucial health care assistance to some of the poorest and most underserved communities in America," Conyers wrote in a letter released Thursday.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: from the AP site.....Conyers opposes Gupta
Posted by: Basenjis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pacto on Jan 8, 2009 2:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Jan 8, 2009 2:32 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Stupid Choice
Posted by: peace'nbeach
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jan 10, 2009 9:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those of you that have been smoking Obama for the past year, you are about to wake up to the worst hang over you ever had.
HOPE I am wrong in the future, but the man has not yet made a REAL progressive move since elected.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TimLong on Jan 11, 2009 7:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gupta
Posted by: markw4786
Comments are closed-
Posted by: markw4786 on Jan 12, 2009 4:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peace'nbeach on Jan 13, 2009 10:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There MUST be severe restrictions as to what an anchor/host may "say" during their employment whilst on-the-air, otherwise we would be hearing things quite differently than what is "reported".
I recall some of the comments made on-the-air during the 9/11 government exercise that were NEVER said or referred to AGAIN. The CEO's evidently did not get the memo out soon enough.
But since then, the past 7+ years of Bushco has had little serious criticism...........
I'm sorry...what was the question??
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: seattle420lover on Jan 13, 2009 3:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here's an example,
The first is that marijuana isn't really very good for you. True, there are health benefits for some patients. Several recent studies, including a new one from the Scripps Research Institute, show that THC, the chemical in marijuana responsible for the high, can help slow the progress of Alzheimer's disease. ( In fact, it seems to block the formation of disease-causing plaques better than several mainstream drugs. ) Other studies have shown THC to be a very effective antinausea treatment for people--cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, for example--for whom conventional medications aren't working. And medical cannabis has shown promise relieving pain in patients with multiple sclerosis and reducing intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients.
RIGHT THERE HE HAS CONTRADICTED HIM SELF!
(this issue means a whole lot to me because I am dealing with the after affects of a STROKE)
I have the info on two studies that he hasn't been keeping track of:
MARIJUANA IS VERY GOOD AT PREVENTING ALZHEIMERS!
and
it is very good for people who have suffered strokes!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
NYC Police Accused of 'Anal Assault' Over Marijuana Use
Do Employers Really Need to Give Drug Tests for Pot?
False Claims on Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Lead to Credibility Gap for Prosecutors




