COMMENTS: 8
Pot Policy at the Federal Level: Time To Get To Work!
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Drugs headlines via email.
We've had our celebrations; now the real work begins.
In Massachusetts, where 65 percent of voters mandated an end to minor marijuana possession arrests, police and pundits are already calling on lawmakers to amend -- or even repeal -- the new law. Therefore, if you reside in Massachusetts, it is critical that you contact your state elected officials, as well as Democrat Gov. Deval Patrick and Attorney General Martha Coakley, and demand that they fully implement the will of 1,938,366 registered voters of the commonwealth of Massachusetts who voted "yes" on 2.
As for the rest of us, now is the time to make your voice heard federally. The election of Barack Obama, coupled with Democrat control of both the House and the Senate, presents a unique and critical opportunity for federal marijuana law reform. Voters on Election Day demonstrated overwhelmingly that they favor political reform in this country, and that reform includes new directions in marijuana policy.
Obama's transition team has established a website, http://change.gov/page/s/ofthepeople, asking for "our ideas" and "help" to "solve the biggest challenges facing our country." Unfortunately, neither the 'war on drugs' nor 'marijuana' appears on the "the agenda."
It's up to us -- the cannabis community -- to make it part of the agenda.
Please contact the Office of President Elect Obama and demand that our next President engages in a national dialogue on marijuana policy. Below are three suggested ways Obama can take immediate, practical steps to reform America's antiquated and punitive pot laws:
1. President Obama must uphold his campaign promise to cease the federal arrest and prosecution of (state) law-abiding medical cannabis patients and dispensaries by appointing leaders at the US Drug Enforcement Administration, the US Department of Justice, and the US Attorney General's office who will respect the will of the voters in the thirteen states that have legalized the physician-supervised use of medicinal marijuana.
2. President Obama should use the power of the bully pulpit to reframe the drug policy debate from one of criminal policy to one of public health. Obama can stimulate this change by appointing directors to the Office of National Drug Control Policy who possess professional backgrounds in public health, addiction, and treatment rather than in law enforcement.
3. President Obama should follow up on statements he made earlier in his career in favor of the decriminalization of marijuana by adults by calling for the creation of a bi-partisan Presidential Commission to review the budgetary, social, and health costs associated with federal marijuana prohibition, and to make progressive recommendations for future policy changes.
On Election Day, voters in Massachusetts, Michigan, and throughout the country gave President Elect Obama and the incoming Congress a mandate to end the Bush drug war doctrine. Now let's get down to business to assure that our message is implemented.
Stay up to date with the latest Drugs headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: michaeld3668 on Nov 7, 2008 4:05 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Michael - try these
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Michael
Posted by: AllenAllen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hhabilis on Nov 8, 2008 4:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Step 3
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Josephus on Nov 9, 2008 8:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He promised to respond to me after reading the letter. Here's his response:
"Thank you for contacting me regarding the Federal gov's classification of marijuana as a Schedule I drug. I appreciate hearing from you."
"I'm sure you are aware that your views on this matter are shared by many within Illinois and across the country. I am certainly familiar with the arguments that legalizing marijuana or re-scheduling it under the Controlled Substances Act would make the drug more "controlled" or safer, and that it may curb the violence associated with the sale of an illegal substance. I also realize that many physicians believe that medicinal marijuana can be helpful to some patients."
"I understand why some point to growing acceptance of this position as an argument against its Schedule I status, which classifies it as a drug with high potential for abuse and no accepted medical treatment in the U.S. However, I am skeptical of your prediction that a legislative change could be accomplished without significant oppositiion or in a "quiet" manner. There is virtually no discussion of this issue in Congress, and there was no clamor after the Supreme Court's decision that the Federal gov. can override state laws permitting the use of medical marijuana. I suspect that any effort to change the status quo would run into stiff opposition with a good portion of both chambers."
Thank you again. Please stay in touch.
Sincerely,
Barack Obama"
In other words he can't take a leadership position on the drug war, even if he feels it's needed, because of too much opposition.
To me that's not leadership.
Nevertheless, I'm glad he's my senator and soon to be President and I fully support him. Maybe in the future he'll change his position.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AllenAllen on Nov 9, 2008 8:08 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: President CAN'T change it!
Posted by: Josephus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: michaeld3668 on Nov 7, 2008 4:05 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Michael - try these
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Michael
Posted by: AllenAllen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hhabilis on Nov 8, 2008 4:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Step 3
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Josephus on Nov 9, 2008 8:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He promised to respond to me after reading the letter. Here's his response:
"Thank you for contacting me regarding the Federal gov's classification of marijuana as a Schedule I drug. I appreciate hearing from you."
"I'm sure you are aware that your views on this matter are shared by many within Illinois and across the country. I am certainly familiar with the arguments that legalizing marijuana or re-scheduling it under the Controlled Substances Act would make the drug more "controlled" or safer, and that it may curb the violence associated with the sale of an illegal substance. I also realize that many physicians believe that medicinal marijuana can be helpful to some patients."
"I understand why some point to growing acceptance of this position as an argument against its Schedule I status, which classifies it as a drug with high potential for abuse and no accepted medical treatment in the U.S. However, I am skeptical of your prediction that a legislative change could be accomplished without significant oppositiion or in a "quiet" manner. There is virtually no discussion of this issue in Congress, and there was no clamor after the Supreme Court's decision that the Federal gov. can override state laws permitting the use of medical marijuana. I suspect that any effort to change the status quo would run into stiff opposition with a good portion of both chambers."
Thank you again. Please stay in touch.
Sincerely,
Barack Obama"
In other words he can't take a leadership position on the drug war, even if he feels it's needed, because of too much opposition.
To me that's not leadership.
Nevertheless, I'm glad he's my senator and soon to be President and I fully support him. Maybe in the future he'll change his position.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AllenAllen on Nov 9, 2008 8:08 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: President CAN'T change it!
Posted by: Josephus
NYC Police Accused of 'Anal Assault' Over Marijuana Use
Do Employers Really Need to Give Drug Tests for Pot?
False Claims on Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Lead to Credibility Gap for Prosecutors




