Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

Future Wars "to Be Fought with Mind Drugs"

By John Swaine, The Telegraph (UK). Posted August 18, 2008.


Future wars could see opponents attacking each other's minds, according to a report for the US military.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Landmines releasing brain-altering chemicals, scanners reading soldiers' minds and devices boosting eyesight and hearing could all one figure in arsenals, suggests the study.

Sophisticated drugs, designed for dementia patients but also allowing troops to stay awake and alert for several days are expected to be developed, according to the report. It is thought that some US soldiers a re already taking drugs prescribed for narcolepsy in an attempt to combat fatigue.

As well as those physically and mentally boosting one's own troops, substances could also be developed to deplete a n opponents' forces, it says.

"How can we disrupt the enemy's motivation to fight?" It asks. "Is there a way to make the enemy obey our commands?" Research shows that "drugs can be utilized to achieve abnormal, diseased, or disordered psychology" among one's enemy, it concludes.

Research is particularly encouraging in the area of functional neuroimaging, or understanding the relationships between brain activity and actions, the report says, raising hopes that scanners able to read the intentions or memories of soldiers could soon be developed.

Some military chiefs and law enforcement officials hope that a new generation of polygraphs, or lie detectors, which spot lie-telling by observing changes in brain activity, can be built.

"Pharmacological landmines," which release drugs to incapacitate soldiers upon their contact with them, could also be developed, according to the report's authors.

The report, which was commissioned by the Defense Intelligence Agency, contained the work of scientists asked to examine how better understanding of how the human mind works was likely to affect the development of technology.

It finds that "great progress has been made" in neuroscience over the last decade, and that continuing advances offered the prospect of a dramatic impact on military equipment and the way in which wars are fought.

It also explains that the concept of torture could be transformed in the future. "It is possible that some day there could be a technique developed to extract information from a prisoner that does not have any lasting side effects," it states. One technique being developed involves the delivery of electrical pulses into a suspect's brain and delay their ability to lie by interfering with its neurons.

Research into "distributed human-machine systems", including robots and military hardware controlled by an operator's mind, is another particular area for optimism among researchers, according to the report. It says significant progress has already been made and that prospects for use of the field are "limited only by the creative imagination."

Jonathan Moreno, a bioethicist and the author of 'Mind Wars: Brain Research and National Defense', said "It's too early to know which, if any, of these technologies is going to be practical. But it's important for us to get ahead of the curve. Soldiers are always on the cutting edge of new technologies."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: war, mind drugs

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Not a new idea
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 18, 2008 1:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The pentagon has been fascinated by the idea of using hallucinogens on "enemies" for a very long time. In a weird way it's "good" that they are thinking about non-lethal weapons. Here's some history.

From the text of THIS ARTICLE:

In the 1950s and 1960s, thousands of research participants were
administered hallucinogens in the context of basic clinical research or therapeutic clinical research, resulting in hundreds of publications (Grinspoon and Bakalar, 1979; Grob, et al., 1998; Strassman, 2001; Nichols, 2004). During this time, the United States Army investigated classical hallucinogens as incapacitating agents in soldiers, and the United States Central Intelligence Agency conducted clandestine research investigating classical hallucinogens as interrogation agents in which civilians were administered hallucinogens without knowledge or consent. Eventually, both groups ceased to focus on classical hallucinogens in favour of non-classical ‘hallucinogens’ such as the synthetic anticholinergic compound quinuclidinyl benzilate (BZ), which showed greater promise as a warfare agent than LSD because its effects were marked by greater immobility, delirium, amnesia and duration (Lee and Shlain, 1992).

See also MK-ULTRA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Something To THINK about...
Posted by: QQOblivion on Aug 19, 2008 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And how long before mind-control is used on the civilian populations of nations? (Of course, this is already the case as far as propaganda is concerned. But I am talking about direct mind-control via some technology.)

Some mind-control researchers, with good intentions, may be motivated to do their research so as to help humanity find an alternative to deadly war.

But I will go out on a limb and say, controlling the minds of the masses is actually MUCH WORSE than war! For war is only the SECOND worst thing that has ever been conceived of by mankind. War kills the body. But mind-control kills the soul itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

demotivate them?
Posted by: davesilvan on Aug 19, 2008 1:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"How can we disrupt the enemy's motivation to fight?"

Cover the fields with cannabis smoke. :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mike
Posted by: okiedokey on Aug 20, 2008 12:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As we creep ever closer to George Orwell's "1984" I am more and more fearful. Experimentation with mind altering drugs by the military has strong implications for both enemy combatant and our own civilian populations. Will there come a time when necessary revolution is no longer a possibility because of consciousness altering drugs? Ever greater control of thought will destroy individuality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"And how long before mind-control is used on the civilian populations of nations?"
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Aug 22, 2008 10:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What prompts the optimism or whatever it is that makes people think that THIS isn't happening now, including against our own population, or that THIS blog isn't being monitored and spied on, etc? And how long before mind-control is used on the civilian populations of nations?

It's all a done deal, and the only effective opposition remaining is genuine opposition, not "Gee, I don't think I agree with this..." 'opposition'.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FUTURE Wars?
Posted by: ranchero42 on Aug 25, 2008 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please PROVE I'm not hallucinating all of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement