Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

DrugReporter

Victims of the Drug War Are Forced to Resort to Bizarre Legal Defenses

By Kevin Carey, Washington Monthly. Posted August 15, 2008.


How black Baltimore drug dealers are using white supremacist legal theories to confound the Feds.
Advertisement

On November 16, 2005, Willie "Bo" Mitchell and three co-defendants -- Shelton "Little Rock" Harris, Shelly "Wayne" Martin, and Shawn Earl Gardner -- appeared for a hearing in the modern federal courthouse in downtown Baltimore, Maryland. The four African American men were facing federal charges of racketeering, weapons possession, drug dealing, and five counts of first-degree murder. For nearly two years the prosecutors had been methodically building their case, with the aim of putting the defendants to death. In Baltimore, which has a murder rate eight times higher than that of New York City, such cases are depressingly commonplace.

A few minutes after 10 a.m., United States District Court Judge Andre M. Davis took his seat and began his introductory remarks. Suddenly, the leader of the defendants, Willie Mitchell, a short, unremarkable looking twenty-eight-yearold with close-cropped hair, leapt from his chair, grabbed a microphone, and launched into a bizarre soliloquy.

"I am not a defendant," Mitchell declared. "I do not have attorneys." The court "lacks territorial jurisdiction over me," he argued, to the amazement of his lawyers. To support these contentions, he cited decades-old acts of Congress involving the abandonment of the gold standard and the creation of the Federal Reserve. Judge Davis, a Baltimore-born African American in his late fifties, tried to interrupt. "I object," Mitchell repeated robotically. Shelly Martin and Shelton Harris followed Mitchell to the microphone, giving the same speech verbatim. Their attorneys tried to intervene, but when Harris's lawyer leaned over to speak to him, Harris shoved him away.

Judge Davis ordered the three defendants to be removed from the court, and turned to Gardner, who had, until then, remained quiet. But Gardner, too, intoned the same strange speech. "I am Shawn Earl Gardner, live man, flesh and blood," he proclaimed. Every time the judge referred to him as "the defendant" or "Mr. Gardner," Gardner automatically interrupted: "My name is Shawn Earl Gardner, sir." Davis tried to explain to Gardner that his behavior was putting his chances of acquittal or leniency at risk. "Don't throw your life away," Davis pleaded. But Gardner wouldn't stop. Judge Davis concluded the hearing, determined to find out what was going on.

As it turned out, he wasn't alone. In the previous year, nearly twenty defendants in other Baltimore cases had begun adopting what lawyers in the federal courthouse came to call "the flesh-and-blood defense." The defense, such as it is, boils down to this: As officers of the court, all defense lawyers are really on the government's side, having sworn an oath to uphold a vast, century-old conspiracy to conceal the fact that most aspects of the federal government are illegitimate, including the courts, which have no constitutional authority to bring people to trial. The defendants also believed that a legal distinction could be drawn between their name as written on their indictment and their true identity as a "flesh and blood man."

Judge Davis and his law clerk pored over the case files, which led them to a series of strange Web sites. The fleshand- blood defense, they discovered, came from a place far from Baltimore, from people as different from Willie Mitchell as people could possibly be. Its antecedents stretched back decades, involving religious zealots, gun nuts, tax protestors, and violent separatists driven by theories that had fueled delusions of Aryan supremacy and race war in gun-loaded compounds in the wilds of Montana and Idaho. Although Mitchell and his peers didn't know it, they were inheriting the intellectual legacy of white supremacists who believe that America was irrevocably broken when the 14th Amendment provided equal rights to former slaves. It was the ideology that inspired the Oklahoma City bombing, the biggest act of domestic terrorism in the nation's history, and now, a decade later, it had somehow sprouted in the crime-ridden ghettos of Baltimore.

The series of events that led to the prosecution of Willie Mitchell et al are as convoluted, tragic and intermittently absurd as an episode of HBO's acclaimed Baltimore crime drama, The Wire. Mitchell and company came of age on the streets of West Baltimore, a few miles and a world away from the rejuvenated inner harbor and the tourist attractions near the federal courthouse. According to prosecutors, the group began selling drugs together as teenagers in the mid-1990s, driving up I-95 to New York City, buying half kilos of cocaine in upper Manhattan and cooking it into crack to sell back home. They added heroin to their repertoire a few years later, as well as robbing and killing other drug dealers. By 2002, they were firmly established in what passes as normal enterprise in a hollowed-out economy like Baltimore, where the drug trade often provides more opportunity than legitimate work and the bedrock institutions of family and school have crumbled. They had children out of wedlock with multiple women. They were occasionally arrested, although they never served much time. It was an insular culture where a ruthless prohibition against "snitching" to the police was often more powerful than any law. Even as cities like New York saw the murder rate decline dramatically, drug killings in Baltimore continued at a steady clip.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: white supremacists, baltimore, district court, legal theories

Kevin Carey is the research and policy manager of Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington, DC.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Here's an idea
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 18, 2008 2:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Legalize pot and other controlled substances, open free treatment centers so users can kick their addiction and ...

Nah! That won't work. The federal and state prison sytems will lose their funding.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here's an idea Posted by: Libsrule
Legalize ALL drugs!
Posted by: paula.c on Aug 18, 2008 4:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hard narcotics could be by prescription and medical supervision. Marijuana, over the counter. The drug dealers etc. would go belly-up in short order. There would be far reaching effects to the poppy growers in Afghanistan.

Remember how Prohibition got the Mafia started in this country.

Legalize, legalize, legalize.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Prohibition and the Mafia? Posted by: frankly1
Victims?
Posted by: European American on Aug 18, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real victims are the mothers trying to raise their children among that filth. It is the shop keeper robbed at gun point by some crack head. The victims are the tax payers that have a portion of their pay checks confiscated via threat of imprisonment to house, feed, and medicate those scum bags in prison.

Singapore has the right idea. Nguyen Tuong will not be smuggling drugs through their country again. Hopefully Willie "Bo" Mitchell, Shelton "Little Rock" Harris, Shelly "Wayne" Martin, and Shawn Earl Gardner will be joining Tuong, if not in a state sanctioned execution then by a sharpened tooth brush wielded by someone of their caliber in lock up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Victims? Posted by: rinthy
» RE: Victims? Posted by: chomsky
Money Machine
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 18, 2008 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL, todays court systems) on ALL levels is about one thing and one thing only, MONEY! Its a money making machine. Everything else including guilt or innocence is a moot point!

RD
Is your ISP watching you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

legalize all drugs
Posted by: cyr3n on Aug 18, 2008 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nanny state policies have clearly destroyed whole communities and now you have fatherless wastelands rife with drugs and violence. It pays more to be a drug runner than have a respectable career. This is not a black problem.. its an American problem and the drugs should be legalized to prevent further encouragement of youth pursuing a life of crime over no life at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prohibition
Posted by: kittybrat on Aug 18, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prohibition was a failed policy concerning alcohol, making rich men out of gangsters overnight, appealing to those who could make as much money in other jobs.
There was much violence and death.
Today is no different due to this drug prohibition. It's like trying to legislate morality. But this drug prohibition has lasted much longer and therefore has had a much greater impact on our communities.
These young men who find killing and intimidation a useful tool to further their illegal enterprise are not different from their mobster counterparts in the old days.
They wouldn't exist as such if there was no prohibition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great story -- It deserved a better headline
Posted by: just john on Aug 18, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, you could call every player in the Drug War a "victim" and have an element of truth, but these defendants would be more accurately described as soldiers or captains or even kingpins. It's not like these guys were helpless; they used the realities of the game to rise in power and kill others. So "victims" is not specific enough, as headlines go.

(Yeah, I've been watching Season Five of The Wire and have been taking the newsroom's banter to heart.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly . . . Posted by: Scientz
We can put them out of Business
Posted by: tgranger on Aug 18, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the world's most capitalistic society it's ironic that we have forgotten how to put someone out of business. You undercut their pricing structure to a level thats no longer worth it from the point of view of risk/reward! In this computerized world we could legalize and monitor the use of marijuana and cocaine with a "drug card" which is used to distribute the substances in the retail pharmacy envionment. Buy up all the supply at the level of the producer and distribute it directly to the consumer in the retail enviornment witha mark-up that can fund treatment centers and rehab programs. Most of the violence and mayhem comes from the middlemen in the drug market and we could just put them out of business. Too simple I guess!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aside from teh Drug Aspect
Posted by: EncinoM on Aug 18, 2008 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THis article outlines the dangers that those who spew forth consipracy theories endlessly on these pages pose.

To the John Birchers, The Anti-TAx, Anti-Feds, looking for the Rothschilds under your bed, while trying to prove the government did it, there are dangers when you allow this cancer to infect your reason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Aside from teh Drug Aspect Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Aside from teh Drug Aspect Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Aside from teh Drug Aspect Posted by: GuitarBill
Maybe the white-supremacists were right about a few things
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Aug 18, 2008 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As another poster pointed out the headline is pure Alternet. I wonder if the editors actually read the story.

It certainly is ironic that these men invoked the "flesh-and-blood" defense, given its origins among white supremacists. However, if one can manage to see through all the racist bullshit you may find some worthwhile concerns these groups have about the legitimacy of the Federal government. I believe that is what these desperate men did with their courtroom tactics.

If you read the U.S. Constitution it grants very few powers to the Federal government and trying people for murder is not one of them. The Federal government has grown dramatically since 1913. Some people think this is a good thing, some do not. I assure that the current crop of Democrats and Republicans both wholeheartedly support the continued concentration of power in the hands of a few.

The legal defense of these men may seem odd but the concept of an illegitimate court is something I'll go along with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I read the entire story and
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Aug 18, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
had quite a few laughs while I was thinking of who would be the best actors to play the various parts.
I learned long ago that life is so much easier to deal with when we have the ability and temperament to include humor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Casting this for TV Posted by: just john
Stephen
Posted by: Dream on Aug 18, 2008 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't care for the under tone of rediculessness threaded through the artical. With out a dought this is more an artical about murder (forbiden in an civilized group).
The Federal Government has vastly exceeded it's power. And to disreguard the purpose of the revolution to make us all sovereign (this country is a republic)and perpetuate the mob rule mantality is wrong. I am reminded of a quote from Edward Bernays's book Propaganda published in 1928 "The invisable government tends to be concentrated in the hands of the few because of the expense of manipulating the social machinery which controls the opinion and habits of the masses". For those who don't know, Berneys if the father of modern propaganda in the USA.
Our thinking has been manipulated away from what I call 'the living soul' which has rights given by the Divine to all people. (The 14th amendment is wrong because it did not recognise all races were inclusive in the body of the Consitution. Slavery was an abomination. Thus restoring the slave race to it's proper sovereignty not establishing a new class of people.)
What this artical also highlights is how prohibition put things in the hands of those who love money. Of cource bad things are going to happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hi everyone
Posted by: mingus455 on Aug 18, 2008 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i am mark

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are not Posted by: just john
NotJesus
Posted by: NotJesus on Aug 18, 2008 1:27 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Often times I get the sense, while reading these articles and their responses, that many/most people feel as if there is nothing they can do to combat our worthless government and many of its worthless laws. There is something you, the individual can do, it's called Jury Nullification.

ALL (NON-VIOLENT) DRUG CASES NEED TO BE NULLIFED! (The writers of "The Wire" referenced at the beginning of this article came to the same conclusion.)

The trick is getting yourself on the jury so that you can nullify these worthless laws. Refer to the Fully Informed Jury Association's website at http://www.fija.org for how to "truthfully" answer pre-trial jury questions and thereby get yourself assigned to one of these juries.

I see individuals complaining all the time that there is nothing they can do about these laws. There is something you can do; get yourself onto these juries and refuse to convict (ie, nullify the case). This is, in fact, one of the primary ways that alcohol laws/prohibition were thrown out back in the 20's.

Jury nullification; DO IT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes! Posted by: war_on_tara
son of a..
Posted by: Elmowilcox on Aug 20, 2008 3:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, that was an interesting and entirely disappointing read. At the least the title of the article should be changed. There is no conclusion to the article, no sum-up to support what the title proposes. And it's a slap in the face of real victims of the drug war to refer to these morons as victims, they are victimizers. A "dude" in jail for any serious length of time for a bag of pot is a victim.
I was waiting for the punchline the whole time, what injustice did the government exact on them? Where's the crisis or inequality here? The only point to this article was that some black guys invoked white supremacist arguments, and explaining the history of said arguments. I don't see why that took eight pages. I see no point to this otherwise interesting story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]