Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

DrugReporter

Finally, Congress Starts Moving on Reforming Pot Prohibition

By Allen St. Pierre, NORML. Posted August 1, 2008.


Congress is for the first time in a generation (1978) taking a serious look at reforming components of cannabis prohibition laws.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On July 30 something rather historic on a number of counts occurred in the nation's capital. Firstly, Congress is for the first time in a generation (1978) taking a serious look at reforming components of cannabis prohibition laws. In today's Congress, the support of the Congressional Black Caucus is pivotal to passing any substantive cannabis law reform. So I was so very heartened that Reps. Barbara Lee (D-CA) and William Lacy Clay (D-MO) joined us on this very hot and oppressively humid day in DC, along with the always jocose Barney Frank (D-MA), the bill's primary sponsor (along with Rep. Ron Paul, R-TX).

Second, the media attending the press conference on HR 5843, a bill that would decriminalize marijuana possession and use for responsible adults, fairly captured the event's narrative, i.e., 'it makes no sense to treat cannabis consumers like criminals' and 'why not start controlling cannabis in the same way society (and government agencies) already control alcohol products?' with no double entendre or goofy 'stoner stupidisms'. You can view a CNN video of the press conference here. Also, you can check out some YouTube footage here of my opening remarks.

Bill Piper from the Drug Policy Alliance spoke about the collateral effects that happen to citizens arrested for minor amounts of cannabis including, but not limited to: loss of student loans; denial to public housing, food stamps and job training; and denial of entry into the military and some government service jobs.

Rob Kampia from the Marijuana Policy Project discussed the broader implications of the federal government passing decriminalization legislation and how it could affect state efforts to reform cannabis laws, notably this November's decriminalization initiative on the ballot in Massachusetts.

As has been noted by others who attended today's press conference, there was a certain air of desperation coming from the part of the government who is responsible for supposedly 'controlling' currently illicit drugs. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP)chief propagandist David Murray attended the press conference, making himself available for questions afterwards and handing out his latest anti-cannabis handywork, and he seemed absolutely befuddled that anyone on the face of the planet could possibly compare cannabis and alcohol policies, and that there is no such thing as the responsible use of cannabis. Period. Even for medical purposes with a physician's recommendation. Period.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: congress, marijuana, barney frank, pot prohibition

Allen St. Pierre is the executive director of NORML.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
go see HAROLD AND KUMAR ESCAPE FROM GUANTANAMO BAY
Posted by: caru on Aug 3, 2008 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqvPDRuIlDw

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Informative interview
Posted by: aristopus on Aug 3, 2008 5:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dr. Lester Grinspoon, in this charming interview, remembers sharing a jay with Carl Sagan, Terence McKenna, and Allen Grinsberg.
All great intellectuals and great Americans.


http://www.rabble.ca/rpn/podcast.php?id=lop

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Informative interview Posted by: donl51
» RE: Informative interview Posted by: fkuechmann
cynical observation
Posted by: mnascimento on Aug 4, 2008 3:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After all the people who have been persecuted, and all the lives destroyed. Congress may exercise common sense.

I can't help thinking this legislation is being advanced because some big corporation sees dollar signs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cynical observation Posted by: Lauren
» RE: cynical observation Posted by: donl51
History of MJ Prohibition Video
Posted by: sfpearce on Aug 4, 2008 4:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The story behind the marijuana prohibition is fascinating. You can watch a five part series on this topic here or here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Changing the law
Posted by: surfreality on Aug 5, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is a good start. What needs to follow is a change in enforcement culture.

Recently Alternet published a story about the DEA busting a medical marijuana clinic in Culver City with the assistance of the local PD. Further, this happened the same day that a Federal Appeals Court ruled that Federal law did NOT trump state law in this arena. Cops do what they want to do... Where's the Culver City PD respect for the law?

In NYC, if one is apprehended with less than 25 grams of cannabis the NYPD is supposed to issue the offender with a "Desk Appearance Ticket"; unless the contraband is in "public view". In that case the violation becomes a misdemeanor and then the NYPD will arrest said suspect and put them through the system. In practice what the NYPD does is before they frisk a suspect, they will ask them if they have anything on them that they would like to tell the cops about and they will assure the suspect that "things will go easier for you if you come clean now". Then when the marijuana is produced and in "public view" they arrest the suspect. The NYPD would obviously rather arrest people for the crime of marijuana possession than issue DATs. This is their culture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Changing the law Posted by: xxdr_zombiexx
» RE: Changing the law Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Changing the law Posted by: donl51
Smart People believe Dumb Propaganda
Posted by: xxdr_zombiexx on Aug 5, 2008 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when it's blasted at them incessantly over the tv with the facsde of credibility lent by "the government".

Christopher HItchens believed, unreasonably, that waterboarding was not torture. He ended up paying to be tortured and decided it was indeed torture.

I poke huge fun at this in Smoke on the Waterboard

It is similarly unreasonable to still believe a A WORD this government says about the Herb. It's also not sufficient to complain that folks like me are "misrepresenting reality" by proclaiming everything the government says about pot is a lie.

Every single assertion you can attribute to the US Federal Government about marijuana is pathetic propaganda.

It has been reduced to an emotional issue wherein facts don't really matter anyway because the people who need to know the facts the most have their heads filled with USDA reefer mad bullshit.

The GOP has controlled this conversation for 3 generations and it's time their framing was exposed, smashed and replaced with intelligent framing.

IF you believe what the government says about marijuana, you don't have all the possible and best info.

Period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stunning
Posted by: samunstoppable on Aug 5, 2008 3:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been hoping for many years that this day would come soon. Congress is finally starting to open its ears and eyes for the first time in over a quarter of a century! The reform of cannabis laws has been a long time coming, but I knew the path was opened when a state like Texas (my home state) was willing to make slight adjustments to its own marijuana regulation policies last fall. This gives me hope for a future where I can enjoy myself without worries of police cuffing me and taking me to jail for who-knows-how-long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stunning Posted by: Lauren
Scott M. Burns
Posted by: Lauren on Aug 9, 2008 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Deputy Director White House Office of National Drug Control Policy statement to the commonwealth, Oct 12, 2004.

I have not been to a state where law enforcement say that the marijuana problem is so far out of hand with our children that in some instances they're throwing their hands in the air. And I would assume that is one of the reasons that the Marijuana Policy Project is here in Alaska. There may be some in the room. I have run into them in Arizona and in Nevada and in Ohio and in Missouri. And they didn't come to Alaska by accident. They're smart people.

As the governor mentioned, George Sorros, who owns half of Argentina and Peter Sperling (ph) and John Lewis, who are of Progressive Insurance and the University of Phoenix money, put all their money together. It's called the Marijuana Policy Project, and then they target the states. And I'm told they have polling and anecdotal support, sometimes focus groups to try and determine where they can make a difference in legalizing drugs in their country.

And to their credit they will tell you that is their ultimate goal. It's not about medical marijuana or marijuana, it's about legalizing drugs in the United States. And they're entitled to their opinion. In American we can all stand up and be heard.



His office mate, Bertha Madras, is she their blogger?

Dr. Madras promoted implementation of screening and brief intervention procedures (SBI) in healthcare centers throughout our nation, as a public health response to reducing substance abuse and its adverse medical and social consequences.

Working closely with several medical organizations, she gained strong support for SBI programs and dissemination. Simultaneously, she encouraged the American Medical Association CPT® board to approve new procedural reimbursable codes for widespread substance abuse screening and brief interventions (SBI) in healthcare settings. New codes were adopted in 2007.

She has promoted effective forms of prevention and deterrence, including screening in schools, in the work place, and educating the public on science-based adverse consequences of drugs. She has been a forceful advocate of expanding treatment access, via Access to Recovery and Drug Court programs.



I wonder if she had anything to do with the phone call I got from Kaiser to see if my son was living with me. She has a lot in common with that woman on the FCC, back ground in 'mental health' or torture?

I think I am closing in on the group who implemented my torture. I think she might be one of them. What religion are the people working in this office?

I would like to ask these people about the surveillance, argument, etc they have put me through. I don't believe they haven't seen my questions and arguments. Their refusal to address those issues is a religious persecution.

They got together with their other racist friends and devised a complicated torture regime just for me. Ellen Tauscher over at the NSA was also involved.

I told everybody I was going to win the drug war, they couldn't have that, it doesn't fit their ideology. Their religious ideology against my religion.

That is a very serious crime in America, it is conspiracy to commit torture based on religion. That is more than a hate crime, it is an act of genocide, ethnic cleansing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You legalize it, I'll try it
Posted by: blogbooks on Aug 9, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until then, sadly, I am forced to obey the laws as they are written due to employment considerations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Joseph Califano, drug warrior on Washington Journal C-span today
Posted by: Lauren on Aug 14, 2008 1:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Joseph Califano, National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, tells us (in his racist and ignorant way) how people who smoke weed around children are actually guilty of child abuse.

The guy is a creep, IMO. One of those big white guys who enjoys putting other people down.

Now he is telling us if you wait until after 21 to try drugs you won't get 'addicted', he's plugging a parent's power box for us to share our experiences. Parent Power

Now he is getting ragged by a patient about medical marijuana. What an ignorant pig. Dude, the thing that destroys the most people in the 'war on drugs' is law enforcement, not 'addiction'. The more money we pour into drug enforcement, the deadlier it gets.

He works with Kaiser, oh great.

C-span 2 Boring presentation of blame the parent. Does it occur to him he could say the same things about all other drugs. Are parents who drink or use over the counter or prescription drugs in front of their children also child abusers?

This is outrageous. He is trying to justify his salary by bashing my people again. I am so sick of this ignorant propaganda against my religion and church THC Ministry.

As I pointed out yesterday, the experience of marijuana can change dysfunctional relationships. What is really disturbing about this is the definition of the problem of marijuana is 100% based on the opinions of others. You know, those dysfunctional relationships.

That is too much power to give to others. It really boils down to if it bugs people to see you get enlightened or a religious perception they don't share, they can toss you in jail.

He had no comment on kids thinking alcohol was more party fun than pot. No comment on that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]