Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

Synthetic Pot as a Military Weapon? Meet the Man Who Ran the Secret Program

By Martin A. Lee, AlterNet. Posted July 19, 2008.


Dr. James Ketchum tested a potent form of synthetic marijuana on soldiers to develop a secret weapon in the '60s. Now he's telling the tale.
Advertisement

It was billed as a panel discussion on "the global shift in human consciousness." A half-dozen speakers had assembled inside the Heebie Jeebie Healers tent at Burning Man, the annual post-hippie celebration in Black Rock, Nev., where 50,000 stalwarts braved intense dust storms and flash floods last August. Among the notables who spoke at the early evening forum was Dr. Alexander "Sasha" Shulgin, the Bay Area-based psychochemical genius much beloved among the Burners, who synthesized Ecstasy and 200 other psychoactive drugs and tested each one on himself during his unique, offbeat career.

Sitting on the panel next to Shulgin was an unlikely expositor. Dr. James S. Ketchum, a retired U.S. Army colonel, told the audience, "When Sasha was trying to open minds with chemicals to achieve greater awareness, I was busy trying to subdue people."

Ketchum was referring to his work at Edgewood Arsenal, headquarters of the U.S. Army Chemical Corps, in the 1960s, when America's national security strategists were high on the prospect of developing a nonlethal incapacitating agent, a so-called humane weapon, that could knock people out without necessarily killing anyone. Top military officers hyped the notion of "war without death," conjuring visions of aircraft swooping over enemy territory releasing clouds of "madness gas" that would disorient the bad guys and dissolve their will to resist, while U.S. soldiers moved in and took over.

Ketchum was into weapons of mass elation, not weapons of mass destruction. He oversaw a secret research program that tested an array of mind-bending drugs on American GIs, including an exceptionally potent form of synthetic marijuana. (Most of these drugs had no medical names, just numbers supplied by the Army.) "Paradoxical as it may seem," Ketchum asserted, "one can use chemical weapons to spare lives, rather than extinguish them."

Some of the Burners were perplexed. Was this guy cool or creepy?

Shulgin, a critic of chemical mind-meddling by the military, was wary when he first met Ketchum at a 1993 event honoring the 50th anniversary of the discovery of LSD. But Ketchum is not your typical military bulldozer type. An intelligent, gracious man with a disarming sense of humor, in his own way he has always been a free spirit. He and his wife, Judy, who currently reside in Santa Rosa, became close friends with Sasha and his formidable partner, Ann. They stayed in frequent contact and occasionally socialized together. When the Shulgins invited them to Burning Man, the Ketchums joined the caravan of RVs driving to the desert.

"I'm kind of a Sasha worshipper," Ketchum, who reads neuropharmacology textbooks during his leisure hours, confessed. Tall and lanky, the colonel, now 76, is one of the few people who can actually understand what Shulgin, six years his senior, is talking about when he lectures on the molecular subtleties of psychedelic drugs, waving his arms furiously like a mad scientist. Shulgin took Ketchum under his wing and welcomed him into the fold.

Shulgin wrote the foreword to Ketchum's self-published memoir, Chemical Warfare: Secrets Almost Forgotten, which lifts the veil on the Army's little-known drug experiments and illuminates a hidden chapter of marijuana history. A graduate of Cornell Medical College, Ketchum describes how he was assigned as a staff psychiatrist to Edgewood Arsenal, located 25 miles northeast of Baltimore, in 1961.

"There was no doubt in my mind that working in this strange atmosphere was just the sort of thing that would satisfy my appetite for novelty," Ketchum wrote. Soon he became chief of clinical research at the Army's hub for chemical warfare studies. Although the Geneva Convention had banned the use of chemical weapons, Washington never agreed to this provision, and the U.S. government poured money into the search for a nonlethal incapacitant.

Red Oil

The U.S. Army Chemical Corp's marijuana research began several years before Ketchum joined the team at Edgewood. In 1952, the Shell Development Corporation was contracted by the Army to examine "synthetic cannabis derivatives" for their incapacitating properties. Additional studies into possible military uses of marijuana began two years later at the University of Michigan medical school, where a group of scientists led by Dr. Edward F. Domino, professor of pharmacology, tested a drug called "EA 1476" -- otherwise known as "Red Oil" -- on dogs and monkeys at the behest of the U.S. Army. Made through a process of chemical extraction and distillation, Red Oil, akin to hash oil, packed a mightier punch than the natural plant.

Army scientists found that this concentrated cannabis derivative produced effects unlike anything they had previously seen. "The dog gets a peculiar reaction. He crawls under the table, stays away from the dark, leaps out at imaginary objects and, as far as one can interpret, may be having hallucinations," one report stated. "It would appear even to the untrained observer that this dog is not normal. He suddenly jumps out, even without any stimulus, and barks, and then crawls back under the table."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: james ketchum, shulgin, synthetic marijuana

Martin A. Lee is the author of Acid Dreams: The Complete Social History of LSD: The CIA, the Sixties, and Beyond. He is writing a social history of marijuana. A version of this article originally appeared in Cannabis Culture.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The American military is a threat to mankind
Posted by: coldham on Jul 19, 2008 4:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no good outcome having a military like the US military. It's time to stop funding their insanities and their potentials to kill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» missed the point, boyo's Posted by: Dankhank
» RE: missed the point, boyo's Posted by: fanny666
» RE: missed the point, boyo's Posted by: greenknight
quakergirl
Posted by: quakergirl on Jul 19, 2008 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The army has also tested vaccines with viruses aa well as radiation on our soldiers- why do you think so many are inexplicably sick?

Some just die with no apparent reason. What do you think Gulf War syndrome is? It is more evil government actions against the American people. Will it ever end? What will they pull next?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: quakergirl Posted by: jallegro
» RE: quakergirl Posted by: Lauren
» RE: quakergirl Posted by: willymack
Red Oil is not needed to make dogs high, nor dogfaces either.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jul 19, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I personally do not like Marijuana, now I have another reason to dislike it. As a weapon used on me it would be one of terror because I see CIA, DEA, FBI, and NSA agents under every bed and passing through the walls with warrants and microphones!

No doubt the dog in that test saw the same things I generally do, being born in the year of the Dog as I was (1946). Some of you may think this is funny, but remember these same programs produced LSD 60 a hallucinogenic compound so powerful one exposure could burn the neocortex permanently altering someone’s personality and make them unfit for survival in society un assisted.

There is also a chemical agent out there in the arsenal that destroys the body’s ability to produce the brain chemical serotonin. Although intelligence is not effected or the ability to problem solve, the person no longer has control of any of their baser desires. They act on impulse, they are no longer able to control any emotion that is stronger than simple lust. All inhibitions disappear in a welter of bizarre behaviors more closely resembling rabies infection than anything else.

There is a law that allows for testing of these chemicals by the D.O.D. it has tested this substance in many states. There are entire school districts that have children who must be medicated to function normally because of these tests. Most of them have graduated since many of the tests were done prior to 2000. Here is a copy of some of the document in title 50 that allows for this testing.

TITLE 50—WAR AND RATIONAL DEFENSE

§ 1520. Use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents by Department of Defense; accounting to Congressional committees with re¬spect to experiments and studies; notification of local civilian officials
(a) No*" later than thirty days after final ap¬proval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be con¬ducted by the Department of Defense, whether directly or under contract, involving the use of human subjects for the testing of chemical or biological agents, the Secretary of Defense shall supply the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives with a full accounting of such plans for such experiment or study, and such experiment or study may then be conducted only after the ex¬piration of the thirty-day period beginning on the date such accounting is received by such committees.
(b)(1) The Secretary of Defense may not con¬duct any test or experiment involving the use of any chemical or biological agent on civilian populations unless local civilian officials in the area in which the test or experiment is to be conducted are notified in advance of such test or experiment, and such test or experiment may then be conducted only after the expira¬tion of the thirty-day period beginning on the date of such notification.
(2) Paragraph (1) shall apply to tests and ex¬periments conducted by Department of Defense personnel and tests and experiments conducted on behalf of the Department of Defense by contractors.
(Pub. L. 95-79, title VIII, § 808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334; Pub. L. 97-375, title II, § 203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1822.)
CODIFICATION
Section was not enacted as part of Pub. L. 91-121, title IV, § 409. Nov. 19, 1969, 83 Stat. 209, which com-
AMENDMENTS
1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97-375 struck out par. (1) which directed the Secretary of Defense to supply not later than Oct. 1 of each year the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House with a full accounting of all experiments and studies conducted by the Department of Defense in the preceding twelve month period, whether directly or under contract, which involved the use of human subjects for the test¬ing of chemical or biological agents, and designated par. (2) as subsec. (a).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Onward Christian Soldiers, Marching As To War
Posted by: PaulK on Jul 19, 2008 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One consistent poster likes to note that the Gospels and Old Testament were full of cannabis oil references. This would make such a strange admixture of war and religion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Imagine! Posted by: garry minor
» yes, imagine Posted by: Dankhank
LOL
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jul 19, 2008 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who wants synthetic pot when you can have the REAL thing! LOL. Nothing like a good hit of Jamaican weed!

JT
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

beyond treason
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jul 19, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am always amazed, when the government acts as they are exempt from their own laws!!! While the government inflicts "ZERO" tolerance upon the citizens, they have no restraints what so ever!!! I was an unwitting participant, in the electric koolaid acid test in 1969, at the ripe age of 10, when the government wanted to see what would happen if they dosed the future leaders of America, and gave the boy scouts L.S.D.!!! We don't have the right to dose ourselves, but the government can dose us ... anytime they wish!!! In 1984, I lived in St Louis Missouri, that year the drug dealers were pushing two toke Hawaiian pot, but little did we know that it was laced with a germ (yuppie flu)c.f.i.d.d.s, chronic fatigue and immune dysfunction disorder!!! I was told the story when I was diagnosed with it in 1990, at Stihl regional hospital, in Jefferson City Missouri!!! I have been disabled since 1984, by the hands of my own government, yet I've been labeled a criminal, and the government is exempt, from blame and persecution!!! If the government tested as many people for aids and herpes... as they do for marijuana, they would be no more, but since they created these diseases also, for population control also, they have no intentions of getting rid of them!!! As we speak, the state of Missouri is growing millions of acres of seedless marijuana, for medical and research purposes, yet arresting their competition any chance that they get!!! The war against drugs is beyond treason, and the whole government is guilty!!! It's time to turn our troops against Washington, if we truly are at war against terrorism!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: beyond treason Posted by: maxfactor
ba
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 19, 2008 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US govt including the military CIA and the whole security complex is evil incarnate. If you want to see the devil walking alive on planet Earth, there he is. And these are the criminal experiments we heard about!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a perversion of something so natural and safe...!
Posted by: TJColatrella on Jul 19, 2008 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It figures God creates this special plant with so many uses for mankind that grows anywhere for free, and the Army has to synthesis and pervert it...so they can use it for evil purposes and control and charge someday big money for something the world used regularly for thousands of years...for free..

Hemp industrialized Hemp is the number one bio mass plant on Earth...we could run all of our energy needs off of it if we planted it on only 6% of our contiguous 48 states...all energy...

But as a replacement for Oil it is so easy and we can get bio diesel and ethanol from it much higher yields than corn or sugar cane...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

logic
Posted by: logic on Jul 19, 2008 1:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recent studies of the brain have shown that the frontal lobes, the part of the brain that controls aggression, only grows larger in women. Natures way of insuring that mothers don't eat their young.When you have only men in any camp, military or government,you have no ability to nurture or govern the well being of the group or society.Aggression destroys reason.If you want to be nurtured or governed by those who will see to your best interests, nature dictates that women must be in charge. If you continue to empower those who are incapable by the basic laws of nature then please shut up and stop acting so surprised at the outcome.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of aluminum hats Neuroreceptors and delusional Paranoiacs.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jul 19, 2008 7:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, this paranoiac would rather err on the side of caution. Incidentally that Title50 law is not rescinded it is stopped in its original form and re written elsewhere with language changes for one thing you cannot obtain the Title 50 documents on line I know, I have tried. If you are curious or industrious enough you may peruse the Complete Volume of Title 50 entries that are not flagged for “Assisted Viewing Only” in your Senators or Representatives home offices within your State.
To view documents that may affect public safety or National Security you must be accompanied by an officer of Home land Security, a Federal Marshall, the Senator himself by appointment only, or in the presence of his office Secretary. Oh, I assure you the law in one for m or another is still in place. It has only been nine years since I had a reason to use the Senators copy, and that only because my local librarian on Bainbridge Island told me our Title catalogues were incomplete and why.
So if you know that this law has been rescinded it is because you have your own copy, unlikely, or you work in an office of the Government that has its own complete set The fact is you have no way to demonstrate that you have “objected too much” to partially and faultily paraphrase Shakespeare. What’s the matter did I strike a little too close to the mark? As for tin hats and Neuroreceptors >See continued article under the same heading.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of tin hats Neurocecptors and delusional paranoiacs.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jul 19, 2008 7:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neurotransmission

A receptor is a structure on the surface of, or inside, a cell. If on a nerve cell (neuron), it is often called a neuroreceptor. Receptors exist to receive signals from particular chemicals, and when they receive these signals they generally exert some sort of change on the function of the cell. Some receptors are present inside the cell and are called intracellular receptors; many receptors for steroids (testosterone, estrogen, etc.) are intracellular.
Since this chapter is about neuropharmacology, the focus will be on neuroreceptors, usually referred to herein simply as receptors. Neuroreceptors exist on the surface of (or, more rarely, inside) nerve cells and respond to chemicals called neurotransmitters. Some neurotransmitters also act on cells other than nerve cells; for example, acetylcholine activates receptors on muscle cells, telling them to contract.
Neurotransmitters fit into receptors like keys into a lock, and do not, in general, fit into any other receptor. Thus we have acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter, and acetylcholine receptors. Some receptors (called ion channel receptors) when activated will stimulate or depress the membrane potential (and thus the nerve cell's activity); others (metabotropic receptors) will induce changes in in the characteristics of the cell. Some ion channel receptors (calcium channels) can do both.
Generally speaking, a receptor on a nerve cell is positioned so that it can receive signals from another nerve cell. Dendrites of course have receptors, but receptors can also exist on the cell body, on axons, or on synaptic boutons. The "interface" between the two nerve cells is called a synapse.
The ion channel neuroreceptors typically operate very quickly, and act (and look) somewhat like an iris shutter in a camera. The neurotransmitter (for example, acetylcholine) binds to a specific area on the channel, which (due to electrostatic forces) causes the channel to snap open. Specific ions then leak into and out of the nerve cell, changing its electrical potential. Different channels allow different ions to pass; some ions (like sodium) excite the nerve cell, others (like potassium and chloride) inhibit it. Once the neurotransmitter leaves the receptor, the channel snaps shut, having done its work. These are the receptors involved in fast signal transmission, and in conveying skeletal muscle impulses.
The metabotropic receptors have a modulatory role. Some of them increase or decrease the number of other types of receptors. Some cause changes in genetic expression in the cell. Some (called autoreceptors) inhibit the release of their own matching neurotransmitter, a process called negative feedback. A thermostat is an example of a negative feedback system -- the hotter it gets, the less the furnace is on. Generally, these slower domain receptors operate by second messengers (which function as messengers within the cell) such as G-proteins.
Any given neurotransmitter will probably be associated with several different receptors. For example, serotonin (5HT) activates at least twelve receptor subtypes (5HT1A, 5HT1B, 5HT1D, 5HT1E, 5HT1F, 5HT2A, 5HT2C, 5HT3, 5HT4, 5HT5, 5HT6, and 5HT7)! There are several subtypes (instead of just one) because each receptor subtype is involved in a different process on a different type of neuron.
Drugs act on the brain by affecting neurotransmission in some way or another. Some drugs stimulate receptors, some block them; some will change the way that neurotransmitters are secreted, degraded, or recycled. To a great degree, drugs work only because they affect existing neurotransmitter systems; in spite of the popular belief that getting high equates to frying brain cells, drugs that make you high do so simply by mimicking, blocking, or otherwise affecting neurotransmission. (Article continues under same title)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of tin hats Neuroreceptors and delusional paranoiacs.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jul 19, 2008 7:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drugs which mimic, block, or otherwise affect activity of a given neurotransmitter will not affect all receptor subtypes equally. For example, LSD operates at 5HT2A and 5HT2C receptors; buspirone operates at 5HT1A receptors. Consequently, they have very different effects; LSD is psychedelic, whereas buspirone is an anti-anxiety drug.
Different substances may bind to the same receptor but affect it differently. An agonist is a substance which binds to the receptor and activates it. A partial agonist is an agonist which does not activate the receptor fully. An antagonist binds to the receptor and prevents it from operating.
One interesting property of partial agonists is that they tend to "normalize" receptor activity levels. In the presence of a low amount of neurotransmitter, the partial agonist will increase receptor function. In the presence of a high amount of neurotransmitter, however, the partial agonist will limit receptor activity; in fact, many antagonists may really be partial agonists. It is still being debated as to whether LSD is a 5HT2C antagonist or a partial agonist.
Antagonists may bind to the same place where the neurotransmitter binds, thus "competing" with the neurotransmitter - these are called competitive antagonists. Or they may bind to a separate place on the receptor complex, so that even if the neurotransmitter reaches its binding site, the receptor won't activate. These are called noncompetitive antagonists. Note that in either case, the binding of the drug is only temporary; if it were permanent (thus effectively destroying the receptor) it would be irreversible antagonism.
The important difference between a competitive and a noncompetitive antagonist is this. If you block receptors with a competitive antagonist, these receptors can still be activated by neurotransmitters if enough neurotransmitter is secreted. If you block a receptor with a noncompetitive antagonist, however, no amount of neurotransmitter will activate that receptor (until the noncompetitive antagonist goes away).
A rather whimsical analogy can be made between neurotransmitter functioning and toilets. In this case, the toilet is the receptor, you are the neurotransmitter, activating it by pushing the flush handle. If your little brother comes up and flushes the toilet for you, he's is an agonist. If he temporarily sticks the handle halfway down, he's a partial agonist. If he holds the handle up so it won't flush, he's a competitive antagonist. If he plugs up the toilet with toilet paper, he's a noncompetitive antagonist. If he breaks the toilet handle off completely, he's an irreversible antagonist.
The biogenic amine neurotransmitters (so called because they are in a chemical class called amines) include acetylcholine, noradrenaline, dopamine, serotonin (5HT), and histamine. They are derived from amino acids (choline, tyrosine, tyrosine, tryptophan, and histidine respectively), generally have a modulatory role, and are the common targets of recreational drugs. For example: LSD, DMT, and psilocybin target 5HT receptors; amphetamine causes a release of dopamine and noradrenaline; cocaine blocks the reuptake of dopamine (thus keeping it active longer); MDMA causes a release of 5HT and dopamine; etc. A mostly complete list of recreational drugs and their neuroreceptor activity is given in Section 15.2.
The neuropeptide neurotransmitters include a whole slew of peptides (chains of amino acids), such as neuropeptide Y, angiotensin, endorphins, substance P, and so on. The only recreational drugs targeting neuropeptide receptors are the opiates, which target the mu, kappa, and delta opioid receptors. Opioid receptors are (obviously) involved in pain and behavioural reinforcement. Vasopressin, a nootropic ("Smart Drug") is also a peptide neurotransmitter. (One more entry just to be sure if you think I am still hatbound.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of tin hats Neuroreceptors and delusional paranoiacs.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jul 19, 2008 7:24 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The amino acid neurotransmitters include GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid), glutamate, and aspartate. Receptors for these neuro transmitters include the GABA receptors (which come in two main flavors) for GABA, and the NMDA, AMPA (formerly quisqualate), kainate, and metabotropic receptors (all of which respond to glutamate and aspartate). The GABA receptor is the target of benzodiazepines like diazepam (ValiumTM), barbiturates, and alcohol; the NMDA receptor is targeted by PCP, ketamine, alcohol, and DXM.

And then there are those receptors that don't really fit in anywhere else. The anandamine receptor is the recently-identified target for the THC in marijuana. The adenosine receptor, which tends to inhibit nerve activity, is blocked by caffeine (by which it exerts its stimulant effect). The sigma receptor was originally classified as an opioid receptor, but is now thought to be separate. Gamma-hydroxybutyrate, GHB, seems to target a specific receptor as well.

Each receptor can have more than one binding site (a place where a drug can bind to, generally affecting the activity of the receptor). For example, the NMDA channel/receptor complex has seven (glutamate, glycine, magnesium ion, zinc ion, PCP open channel site, polyamine site, and phosphorylation site). Most have fewer than this; the NMDA channel is an extremely complicated receptor.

Voltage Dependent Ion Channels are similar to the fast-domain, shutter-like receptors, except that they are opened by voltage potentials across the cell membrane. They usually transmit signals along nerve fibers, or cause the end of an axon to release its neurotransmitter. Sodium, potassium, calcium, and chloride (Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Cl-) are the usual ions in question. Tetrodotoxin, the active ingredient in "zombie powder", is a sodium channel blocker. The NMDA receptor has some features of a voltage dependent ion channel.

This is why I did not choose to attempt an in depth analysis of my whys and wherefores. Bombarding people with this kind of crap is counterproductive. However my horse feathers got ruffled by allusions to mental inadequacy and inaccuracy. I may be erring on the side of caution the argument goes on about whether LSD is Seratonergic or Thanatos. Again I choose to err on the side of caution thanks. My brain is weak enough without using helpful dismantling agents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can't we just keep Cannabis to healthy uses instead of misusing it for wars?
Posted by: jwverez on Jul 20, 2008 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From my experience, I would suggest giving these people things such as hemp protein powder, hemp cereal, and hemp seed oil. It is better to let the body digest Cannabis in its non-THC form rather than going overboard and smoking it. My health improved a great deal.

P.S.: Every time I fill up my gasoline tank, I inject 10 drops of hempseed oil. Surprisingly, my mileage went up by 4 MPG !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'dose' DC
Posted by: nor cal surfer on Jul 20, 2008 10:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
maybe those criminals might just lay down and let us take our country back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you "ON"?
Posted by: Cybershaman on Jul 21, 2008 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this would make a good advertising campaign before the election.
It refers to the 60's cry to 'turn on', and it would be a hidden rallying cry to those who have opened up their minds. It can be expanded into "Are you "ON", or are you just on autopilot?" for those who aren't old enough to remember the reference.
Imagine if all the people who have turned themselves 'on' would band together to reboot the social changes we began in that decade and have been so successfully reversed by the forces of oppression.
I feel an underground movement coming on ... oh wait ... that's just my IBS. ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fdawei
Posted by: fdawei on Jul 21, 2008 8:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This should come as no surprise. In the 1950's, the insidious CIA struck a deal with the devil at McGill University's Allen Memorial Hospital in Montreal, Canada. Dr. Ewan Cameron, head of the Hospital was coerced, or paid or both to conduct experiments that have left innumerable "volunteer" subjects to altered minds. Search Slate for an in depth report. The Birth of Soft Torture. http://www.slate.com/id/2130301/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

another great interview with Ketchum
Posted by: thebonobo on Jul 24, 2008 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
found on 10 Zen Monkeys

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some history on US Military using hallucinogens as a weapon
Posted by: fanny666 on Jul 27, 2008 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a perverse way, it's sort of a GOOD thing that they are experimenting with non-lethal weapons.

Here is a section that I cut and paste from the recent Journal of Psychopharmocology. This specific article is about classic hallucinogens, a class which does not include marijuana or ecstasy (MDMA).

(Quote)
In the 1950s and 1960s, thousands of research participants were
administered hallucinogens in the context of basic clinical research or therapeutic clinical research, resulting in hundreds of publications (Grinspoon and Bakalar, 1979; Grob, et al., 1998; Strassman, 2001; Nichols, 2004). During this time, the United States Army investigated classical hallucinogens as incapacitating agents in soldiers, and the United States Central Intelligence Agency conducted clandestine research investigating classical hallucinogens as interrogation agents in which civilians were administered hallucinogens without knowledge or consent. Eventually, both groups ceased to focus on classical hallucinogens in favour of non-classical ‘hallucinogens’ such as the synthetic anticholinergic compound quinuclidinyl benzilate (BZ), which showed greater promise as a warfare agent than LSD because its effects were marked by greater immobility, delirium, amnesia and duration (Lee and Shlain, 1992). Very early academic research on classical hallucinogens was designed without considering the powerful influences of set (psychological state) and setting (environment) (Malitz, et al., 1960; Rinkel, et al., 1960; Hollister, 1961; Rümmele and Gnirss, 1961; Leuner, 1962). Subsequent research, which included more preparation and interpersonal support during the period of drug action, found fewer adverse psychological reactions, such as panic reactions and paranoid episodes, and increased reports of positively valued experiences (Chwelos, et al., 1959; Leary, 1964; Leary, et al., 1963, 1964; Metzner, et al., 1965; Pahnke, 1969)

(end of Quote)

MK-ULTRA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A. Samsel , retired consultant Arthur D. Little ,Inc.
Posted by: samsel3 on Aug 3, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Correction: Felix Granchelli actually discovered the THC synthesis working together with Harry Pars. I can recall the pilot plant program where thousands of gallons of THC were produced and sent to the Military during the seventies...Some of the material was stolen on a regular basis. Sugar pills were impregnated with the material and marketed to the drug culture.......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Father and Mother of Medical Marijuana
Posted by: jeffreytaos on Aug 13, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although Dr. Todd Mikuria is indeed one of the true fathers of the medical marijuana movement, I would like to mention a few more names; Ed Rosenthal, Publisher, Jack Herer, Writer, Dennis Peron, Retired, Vietnam War Era Veteran, Mary Rathbun (Brownie Mary), Waitress, 15 year Veteran of San Francisco Ward 86, Hazel Rodgers, Retired Artist and Teacher, John Entwistle, Patient Advocate, Dixie Romero, M.S. patient, Elvy Musica, Glaucoma Patient, the list goes on. In the end, the names that appear on the first ballot petition for Proposition 215 in California may be informative to researchers wandering, where did all this begin. Well, for some people, it has been a lifetime cause of devotion to help others and for others, they were around at the right time and the right place. Jack Herer while initially against marijuana for medicine was concerned medical marijuana could hurt the legalization movement. He believed marijuana as a harmless substance should just be legal, and he documented it's history in the book "The Emperor Wears No Clothes". When volunteers appeared in everyone of California counties to fight for medical marijuana, Jack joined the campaign and worked full time to gather signatures, donated his own money, and hosted campaign volunteers every day. Other people did the same, fighting day and night for