Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

Will Pot Ever Be Legal in This Schizoid Country?

By Steven Wishnia, AlterNet. Posted May 1, 2008.


Five signs that pot might become legal soon -- and five reasons why it probably won't.
Advertisement

Marijuana occupies a bizarrely paradoxical place in American culture. Its use is widespread, commonplace among the young and ubiquitous in popular culture. Yet it remains highly illegal, and talk of legalization is usually deemed political suicide.

Here are five signs that pot should be legal soon -- and five reasons why it probably won't.

1. Pot is indelibly a part of the cultural mainstream. The stoner comedy Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay grossed $14.6 million in its first weekend, making it the second most popular movie in the country. Most pro basketball players blaze, according to sources as diverse as the ganjaphile Mavericks player Josh Howard and the anti-drug ex-Knick Charles Oakley. And on April 20, thousands of revelers turned out at the University of Colorado and the University of California at Santa Cruz to celebrate the 4/20 herb holiday.

As of 2002, notes Keith Stroup, legal counsel with the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, 47 percent of American adults had smoked marijuana at some time in their lives, according to a CNN/Time poll. By today, he adds, "it is likely there are more living Americans who have smoked marijuana than who have not. Approximately 26 million Americans smoked marijuana just in the last year. All of these people know it did not cause them any real harm and that it did not keep them from having a successful life and career."

2. Increased medical acceptance. In February, the American College of Physicians, the second-largest medical organization in the country, urged the federal government to move cannabis out of Schedule I, the category for drugs with no legal medical use, "given marijuana's proven efficacy at treating certain symptoms and its relatively low toxicity." The group also strongly urged legal protections for doctors who prescribe cannabis and patients who use it.

Last year, more than 3,000 articles on cannabinoids were published in scientific journals. These have explored their possible uses for a host of ailments, from easing the pain of arthritis to inhibiting the growth of brain tumors.

The development of vaporization technology -- pricey devices that heat cannabis to a point where the THC can be inhaled, but don't incinerate the plant matter -- has eliminated one of the main reasons for doctors to be uncomfortable about the medical use of cannabis: that smoke contains toxic compounds. "Vaporization of THC offers the rapid onset of symptom relief without the negative effects from smoking," the ACP noted.

3. A federal decriminalization bill was introduced last month. HR 5843, sponsored by Reps. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Ron Paul, R-Tex., would eliminate federal penalties for possession of less than 100 grams or for the nonprofit transfer of less than one ounce between adults. The bill is the first decriminalization measure introduced in Congress since the early 1980s.

4. The state budget crunch. With the recession battering their treasuries, many states are taking a second look at the price of incarcerating thousands of drug prisoners. Legal cannabis would eliminate the costs of arresting, prosecuting and jailing cannabis users, growers and dealers, and could be a major new source of tax revenue -- especially in states like California, where it is estimated to be the most valuable cash crop. And cannabis farming could revive rural economies, whether by hemp production in the Great Plains or marijuana cultivation in Appalachia.

5. There are no rational arguments against legalizing cannabis under regulations similar to those for alcohol. I've been covering drug issues for almost 20 years (and smoking the green since? Well, I went to Woodstock when I was 14, you do the math), and I haven't heard any. The most common, the "gateway theory" and the idea that today's pot is so much stronger than Woodstock-era weed that it's essentially a different drug, are based on distortion and misinformation. They aren't even valid rebuttable presumptions like "abortion is murder," "the government should not interfere with the free market by regulating rents," or "the U.S. government had to depose Saddam Hussein by any means necessary." And the "send a message to the children" argument is akin to espousing the resurrection of Prohibition because legal alcohol encourages underage drinking.

****

On the other hand, I strongly doubt that cannabis will become legal in the near future, for the following reasons.

1. Pot smokers aren't well organized. According to government surveys, there are about 4 million to 5 million regular marijuana users -- roughly speaking, people who get high at least once a week. The three leading drug-law-reform groups would have a combined mailing list of 35,000 to 55,000 people, estimates NORML executive director Allen St. Pierre. NORML has about 15,000 dues-paying members, 55,000 email subscribers, and 420,000 friends on its Facebook page. The Marijuana Policy Project claims 24,000 members and 180,000 email subscribers. The Drug Policy Alliance has 26,000 members and more than 100,000 email subscribers.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: pot legalization

Steven Wishnia is the author of Exit 25 Utopia, The Cannabis Companion and Invincible Coney Island. He lives in New York.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Maybe it's just me, but...
Posted by: Miki on May 1, 2008 2:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...seems as if the MSM isn't the only media devoid of content, or maybe I need to stop smoking so much.




~Please fix this article Alternet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maybe it's just me, but... Posted by: chiefwanadubie
» RE: Maybe it's just me, but... Posted by: abbadon2007
Where's the story Alternet????
Posted by: lively56 on May 1, 2008 3:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aha, one to many tokes off old bong and forgot to post the story. hehehe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WTF over. Posted by: Hoot42
The position in the UK and Japan
Posted by: akai ringo on May 1, 2008 3:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had there been an article on which to comment, I intended to say something along the lines that while there is still considerable ambivalence in the UK regarding the harmful effects of smoking cannabis (=marijuana, =pot), the position now and what seems to be the likely position in the future is that in the vast majority of cases, police officers will turn a blind eye, or issue a caution if they are so inclined, to someone having a quiet smoke, but will have additional powers to act if the smoke seems to be linked to other criminal activity. If this is in fact the way things turn out, it seems to me to be an eminently sensible position. It could, I suppose, be roughly compared to the illegal brewing of alcohol in Japan, where I now live. It is technically illegal here to brew your own home^made beer or wine, but unless you go to great lengths to tell the authoities that you are committing an illegasl act, you are in practice entirely free to brew your own beer, wine or whatever. Are there points here from which the U.S. could learn?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The position in the UK Posted by: harryf200
» RE: The position in the UK Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: The position in the UK Posted by: harryf200
» RE: The position in the UK Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: The position in the UK Posted by: chiefwanadubie
» The Messenger dearherb Posted by: Herbert Levinson
mia
Posted by: wittler youth on May 1, 2008 4:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought it was my p.c.!..pot will never be leagal in my life time..or yours. think all the wars on drug$..laws make money..but never for the good guys.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mia Posted by: chronic420
It Difficult To Argue With This Article
Posted by: BlackbirdHighway on May 1, 2008 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I'll do it anyway. I disagree with every point listed here!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Disagree with every point how? Posted by: magiquarian1969
» You had to be there Posted by: mazel
Cannabis isn't completely harmless
Posted by: opmoc on May 1, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you smoke too much you forget to actually put the words down - and if you smoke even more the words you put down make absolutely no sense to anyone else.

It is also liable to make you go completely paranoid such that you think Ozzy Osbourne is not the devil but the Messiah.

I reckon all these lunatics in control are stoned out of their heads on something - and cannabis was probably the gateway drug - so the politicians should be banned

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Gay sex is the gateway drug... Posted by: HoboHomo
» Gateway, schmateway Posted by: mazel
» Definition of a Gateway drug Posted by: harryf200
» A better source... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: A better source... Posted by: Cooltruth
» HEY HARRY Posted by: mazel
» RE: HEY HARRY Posted by: HoboHomo
» Big Pharma HACK ! Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Big Pharma HACK ! Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Big Pharma HACK ! Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Big Pharma HACK ! Posted by: jroth420
» RE: Big Pharma HACK ! Posted by: maxpayne
» Dictionary.com Posted by: jroth420
» RE: Dictionary.com Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Dictionary.com Posted by: jroth420
» RE: Dictionary.com Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Big Pharma HACK ! Posted by: jroth420
» jroth420 = bornxeyed Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: jroth420 = bornxeyed Posted by: jroth420
» RE: jroth420 = bornxeyed Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: jroth420 = bornxeyed Posted by: jroth420
» RE: jroth420 = bornxeyed Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: jroth420 = bornxeyed Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: jroth420 = bornxeyed Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Cannabis isn't completely harmless Posted by: chiefwanadubie
dude
Posted by: HelperMonkey on May 1, 2008 4:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dave's not here, man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dude Posted by: bornxeyed
don't bogart that article
Posted by: valeriecole on May 1, 2008 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wow....thought I might be interested in this
subject...where's AlterNet...hello...you there?

Can you tell me where you last put this article? Sure would like to read it.

Did u forget? Hellooo? Anybody home?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: don't bogart that article Posted by: chiefwanadubie
It all makes sense now - its the search for inner peace
Posted by: opmoc on May 1, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Secret of Inner Peace

Could this be the answer? I am passing this on to you because it definitely worked for me and we all could use more calm in our lives.

By following the simple advice I heard on a Medical TV show, I have finally found inner peace.

A Doctor proclaimed the way to achieve inner peace is to finish all the things you have started.

So I looked around my house to see things I started and hadn't finished and, before leaving the house this morning I finished off a bottle of Merlot, a bottle of Shhhardonay, a bodle of Baileys, a butle of vocka, a pockage of Prunglies, tha mainder of bot Prozic and Valum scriptins, the res of the Chesescke an a box a chocolets.

Yu haf no idr who fukin gud I fel.

Peas sen dis orn to dem yu fee ar in ned ov inr pece.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Imagine Whirled Peas! Posted by: bornxeyed
Making more money keeping it illegal
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 1, 2008 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come on we know who blocks this legislation- the Pharms- who are making bank off the 'Anti depressant/ anti anxiety' meds. Really would you want to smoke or eat something natural and a long history of effectiveness and safety- Or jsut Pop a pill that has serious sideffects like thoughts of Suicide. This logic is insane- but Profitable.
Add to that the Profits from this ridiculous 'War on Drugs'. Not that we couldn't use such law enforcement to actually be part of real Homeland Security!
Well you Go Barney & Dennis!
And if teh actually accomplish stealing this Dem nomination FOR Hillary- I'll vote for Paul. Actually may consider it anyway- I am sick of these two antiquated parties running our Country in the Ground- Corp covert Operatives working as 'Public Servants' - Inc Whores fully indoctrinated into the Cheney & Co Agenda.
Hang in there Ron- we Might just get the chance to see these Criminals eat Crap in Nov!
I'm certainly open to REAL Change!And No Longer Loyal to a party who has screwed US for Decades, camoflagued in Blue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Dennis was my first choice!! Posted by: Purple Girl
» Insane but profitable Posted by: Cathyc
If you havent seen American Drug War...
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on May 1, 2008 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
watch it!

And to answer the question of when pot will be legalized.... probably when Ron Paul wins the presidency. (So, yeah, basically never.) There will have to be an economic collapse followed by a complete bankruptcy of the government. (It is already insolvent.) When they can no longer afford to run the prisons, they'll have to legalize.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cowardace, entrenched bureaucracy and enforced morality are the problem
Posted by: johnthetreehugger on May 1, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
y'all can blame big pharma if you want.

I believe pot to still illegal for three primary reasons:

1. Americans are political cowards - especially pot smokers. Americans have been trained to accept unjust authority and pot smokers have been trained to fear and hide from that same authority.

I'm sick of hearing medical or other lame rationales for legalizing pot. It should be legal because NO MAN OR GOV'T OR OTHER INSITUTION HAS ANY RIGHT TO TELL ME WHAT I CAN PUT IN MY BODY IN THE PRIVACY OF MY HOME (and especially if its natural and causes mellowness not violence)

This is the land of the free. No true free human being should tolerate the oppression that comes with pot laws (not to mention a host of other regulations that are anti-freedom).

2. The DEA, the FBI and all state and local law enforcement agencies and court apparatuses are making waaaay too much money (on the books and off) by keeping pot illegal. These authoritarian scum could care less if pot is safer than booze. They just don't want to lose a very lucrative source of funding. A good example is the fact that the DEA leans on Farm Bureau types whenever the issue of agricultural hemp comes to the fore and gets them to stop supporting it.

3. related to number one: We put up with too much enforced morality and let it infringe upon our freedom. Sorry, but your religion does not give you the right to tell me what I can put in my body. Especially if i don't share your religion.

then there are the hypocrites - you know, the legions of Republicans, Democrats, law and order types, Christians, business majors, ex-military personal, cops, lawyers, doctors, professors and other mostly normal American middle class professionals who are happy to toke once in a while, or even maintain mild or serious habits, but will deny it and hide it and NEVER, NEVER, stand up for legalization 'cause they are political cowards and/or authoritarians or they just don't care 'cause they'll never get caught and if they do, they can afford attorneys to make the possession charge go away.

So, until we, as a people, decide that we won't give blind obedience to entrenched bureaucracy, corrupt law enforcement, stupid morals and other infringements on our American and Human rights, pot will remain illegal and authoritarian scum will keep pushing us all around and continue to erode what's left of our liberty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Expert Opinion Please
Posted by: harryf200 on May 1, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have lots of people writing on these blogs, most claiming pot is harmless and some saying it isn't. My impression is that many of the writers here believe what they want to believe, will accept only the opinions that confirm their own views.

But I have yet to see anything written here by someone who knows more than laymen! Is there no one out there who will give an expert opinion, based on their own research? Please experts, tell us: Is the old style pot harmful or not? What about Skunk Weed? Is that harmless or can it cause loss of brain function and even mental illness as some researchers appear to claim?

Where are the real experts?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xpert Opinion Please Posted by: isnamthere
» RE: xpert Opinion Please Posted by: harryf200
» RE: xpert Opinion Please Posted by: Cooltruth
» pot smokers are experts Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: pot smokers are experts Posted by: Lauren
» RE: pot smokers are experts Posted by: jroth420
» RE: pot smokers are experts Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: pot smokers are experts Posted by: Lauren
» Studies Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: xpert Opinion Please Posted by: xxdr_zombiexx
» How about Dr Lester Grinspoon? Posted by: stellabloo
» How about Fiorello LaGuardia? Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: xpert Opinion Please Posted by: Lauren
» RE: xpert Opinion Please Posted by: jroth420
» All smoke is not equal Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: All smoke is not equal Posted by: Lauren
» RE: This guy is an expert! Posted by: jimidee
» I'm An Expert On My Own Liberty Posted by: left_libertarian
The only way itll ever be legal...
Posted by: kelethian on May 1, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is if we have a full-blown revolution. pure and simple. The special interests are at this point too entrenched to change anything by electing yet another one of their flunkies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In favor
Posted by: Bushmaster on May 1, 2008 5:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the majority of 25 years I smoked pot daily.

I do not do it anymore on a daily basis.

However every so often I like it, it helps with creativity, and it helps with insights into life, if taken every so often.

I'd like to see it legal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: In favor Posted by: riffraff2001
» RE: Amazing? Posted by: jimidee
» RE: Amazing? Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Amazing? Posted by: jimidee
» JEEBUS Dude Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: In favor Posted by: reverendnick
» RE: In favor of what exactly? Posted by: harryf200
» IDIOT! Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: IDIOT! Posted by: jroth420
» RE: IDIOT! Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: IDIOT! Posted by: jroth420
» Helps with creativity? Posted by: harryf200
» He told me it was BiPolar Posted by: meetmeineleusis
urg
Posted by: personalpolitical on May 1, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WOW, this is really important, like the most important issue out there! Screw global warming and Iraq and the economy and health care and education, the real problem is stoners aren't able to smoke their pot freely!

Give me a goddamn break, get a life people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: urg Posted by: riffraff2001
» UNWARRANTED SELF IMPORTANCE ALERT Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: urg Posted by: Safro
» RE: urg Posted by: Lauren
» RE: urg Posted by: Freethemind
» RE: urg Posted by: Lauren
» RE: urg Posted by: jroth420
Point In Favor Of Legalization
Posted by: Phred42 on May 1, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Legalizing smoking quality Hemp would remove the barriers and allow us to explore the INDUSTRIAL USES of the non-smokable type of Hemp - which are many, and the potential benefits to our Economy HUGE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» All those uses for hemp Posted by: xxdr_zombiexx
My take
Posted by: riffraff2001 on May 1, 2008 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pot should be legal. Not for the reason most of you think. For the same reason why I believe all drugs should be legal.