Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

America's Love-Hate Relationship with Drugs

By Bruce E. Levine, AlterNet. Posted January 9, 2008.


Many prescription drugs have effects similar to those of illegal drugs. But we still view some users as criminals -- the others as patients.
Advertisement

While Americans are inundated with coverage of the Democrats' quibbling over Barack Obama's use of marijuana and cocaine as a teenager, a truly important drug story continues to be neglected: The hypocrisy of Big Pharma, psychiatry officialdom, and justice institutions regarding mood-altering (psychotropic) drugs -- specifically the denial of the similarity between illegal and psychiatric drugs.

Author and science writer Michael Pollan observed the following about Americans' illegal-psychiatric drug hypocrisy: "Historians of the future will wonder how a people possessed of such a deep faith in the power of drugs also found themselves fighting a war against certain other drugs with not-dissimilar powers. ... We hate drugs. We love drugs. Or could it be that we hate the fact that we love drugs?"

When we recognize that psychotropic prescription drugs are chemically similar to illegal psychotropic drugs, and that all of these substances are used for similar purposes, we see two injustices. First, we see the classification of millions of Americans as criminals for using certain drugs, while millions of others, using essentially similar drugs for similar purposes, are seen as patients. Second, we see a denial of those societal realities that compel increasing numbers of Americans to use psychotropic drugs.

In the history of psychiatry, there has been a revolving door in which a "medication" becomes an "illegal drug" -- and visa versa. Sigmund Freud used cocaine as medication to treat his own and others' depression and despair. In the 1930s amphetamines were prescribed to treat depression; later amphetamines were prescribed for weight loss; while today amphetamines such as Adderall and Dexedrine are prescribed for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Alcohol was a recommended treatment for anxiety as late as the 1940s; and in the 1950s and early 1960s, psychiatrist Oscar Janiger treated the neuroses of Hollywood stars and other celebrities with LSD. Ecstasy was used in marital counseling during the 1980s, and today researchers are studying it as a possible treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder.

It is politically -- and economically -- incorrect for the corporate press, dependent on Big Pharma advertising revenue, to compare psychiatric drugs with illegal drugs. However, the psychiatry drug textbook A Primer of Drug Action notes that individuals who have used cocaine have difficulty distinguishing between the subjective effects of cocaine and dextroamphetamine (Dexedrine) when both are administered intravenously. The amphetamines Dexedrine and Adderall, besides being prescribed for ADHD, are used by many college kids, truck drivers, and others to pull all-nighters.

Both cocaine and amphetamines enhance the neurotransmitters norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine. The antidepressant Effexor enhances norepinephrine and serotonin, and the antidepressant Wellbutrin enhances dopamine; and it is not uncommon to be prescribed Effexor and Wellbutrin at the same time. Effexor in combination with Wellbutrin enhances the same neurotransmitters as cocaine (you won't likely feel the same, mainly due to the quicker impact and shorter half-life of cocaine). And selective serotonin reuptake inhibitiors (SSRIs) such as Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Celexa, Lexapro, and Luvox enhance the neurotransmitter serotonin. Ecstasy also enhances serotonin, although by a different mechanism (you won't likely feel the same using SSRIs as you would using Ecstasy in part because Ecstasy has a quicker, shorter-lasting pop).


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: cocaine, anti-depressants, depression, prescription drugs, drugs

Bruce E. Levine, Ph.D., is a clinical psychologist and author of Surviving America's Depression Epidemic: How to Find Morale, Energy, and Community in a World Gone Crazy (Chelsea Green, 2007).



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nice to see the truth being more widely recognized
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 9, 2008 1:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Note on this comment: "Ecstasy also enhances serotonin, although by a different mechanism (you won't likely feel the same using SSRIs as you would using Ecstasy in part because Ecstasy has a quicker, shorter-lasting pop)."

Actually, Ecstacy (mdma, or methylene - dioxy - methamphetamine) is more closely related to Adderall (dextroamphetamine) and Ritalin (methylphenidate) than to the SSRIs like Paxil and Prozac. (Knockoffs of Ritalin include Focalin and Metadate).

Even more ridiculous are the newly patented ADHD drugs like Vyanse That drug breaks down to release dextroamphetamine after it's been ingested.

Compare those to Desoxyn - pure methamphetamine. It's marketed as a '"subsititute for kids who have become tolerant to Ritalin".

It's meth - pure speed - crank, crystal meth, ice - the demon drug of rural America, subject of endless horror stories in the press - and they give it to little kids to keep them quiet. Unbelievable - but it's a multibillion-dollar market for Big Pharma, so politicians keep quiet about it.

Furthermore, the pharmaceutical drugs often have binders or slow-release agents - leading to the slower onset - which all drug users know can be defeated by grinding the drugs up and snorting them.

These amphetamine derivatives are largely indistinguishable in the actions. Pills sold on the street as Ecstacy may actually be methamphetamine, ritalin, adderall, or some combination thereof.

What does this mean? Giving a child Ritalin every day is really no different than giving a child Ecstacy every day - and that's a fact.

According to the FDA's MedWatch program, from 1990-1997 there were 160 Ritalin-related deaths, around 600 hospitalizations, and around 125 heart disorders reported (on a voluntary basis - so those are underestimates). Similar numbers of deaths have been reported for Ecstacy use - yet Ecstacy is demonized, while Ritalin is heavily promoted and marketed by pharmaceuticals and child psychiatrists.

How many people died from cannabis use in that same time period? Ah - zero reported deaths with cannabis as the primary cause That excludes cannabis-related deaths- such as driving while intoxicated (around 300 in ten years - far, far lower than drunken driving). How many people have died from tobacco and alcohol use in that period? In the U.S. alone, at least half a million a year. Viagra, for comparison, killed several thousand people.

Many law enforcement officials are now pushing to legalize, tax and regulate all drugs - because they know the Prohibition model only fosters violent crime and police corruption. For example, see LEAP - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition.

These are people who have seen the total failure to stop illegal drug traffic, even in police states like Soviet Russia and Stasi East Germany. There's only one way to deal with the issue - treat it as a public health issue, legalize, tax and regulate, and encourage moderation.

Who is against such a plan? Around five sectors: the pharmaceutical industry, the alcohol industry, the tobacco industry, the private prison industry, and a lot of seriously misguided and brainwashed members of the public, who actually believe all the lies about "The War on Drugs" disseminated by the DEA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree with some of your points but.. Posted by: meetmeineleusis
One major missed point.
Posted by: heid on Jan 9, 2008 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One significant point missed in this article is that the pharmaceutical drugs nearly always carry far more risks than those that come from nature. Those that are stolen from nature and twisted into a so-called "pure" form so that the full benefit is not realized, the balance of the original plant is lost, and the damage to the human body is enormous are the ones most pushed by Big Pharma and cost huge amounts of money, while the natural ones, which would be cheap if legal, are the safest. It's not true that these drugs are really the same. The natural ones have to be made illegal so that Big Pharma can make Big Bucks. Otherwise, who'd use the ones they sell?

Watch out, too, for the move to make nutrients illegal. It's right around the corner in the form of Codex Alimentarius and "harmonization" of international trade. Vitamins, herbs, and supplements are now on the verge of becoming illegal unless prescribed by doctors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» On the contrary..... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: On the contrary..... Posted by: daniel347x
» RE: On the contrary..... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: nutrients Posted by: jtellerelsberg
Follow the money
Posted by: Itsthewater on Jan 9, 2008 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The original "war on drugs"was a war on ethnic groups: opium for the Chinese; reefer for the Mexicans; Coke for the Blacks.
When Harry Anslinger lost his job (justification) post-Prohibition, the gummint approved funding for Reefer Madness in order to continue the relevance of that office.
The proximate issue at hand, as the author alludes to, is who is selling the product.

Mexican meth=Bad
Adderall=Therapeutic
Migraine meds from Big Pharma=Good
Cocaine=Bad
Easy, huh?

The ultimate issue is that it is impossible to lock down a patent on a naturally occurring substance. This is why aspirin (benign) gave way to Vioxx, Celebrex, Bextra (deadly).

The efficacy of herbal and herbal derived formulas that have been used for thousands of years by various cultures is unquestionable.

Willow bark for inflammation (aspirin)
Cannabis for depression, pain and social lubrication.
Coca for stamina and altitude sickness, depression.
Tobacco as an insecticide and mental toner.

All impossible to patent.

Add to this equation the many new problems that have arisen from polluting our environment and social patterns.

Do you work all the time, never communicate in a relaxed way with people who comprise your affinity group? You need Prozac, Efexor, Zoloft, Lexapro—not social change.

Are you continually inundated with diesel fumes, coal smoke, and industrial effluents like DDT and dioxin?
You need an asthma medication—not protection of your environment.

Can't sleep because of the above?
You need Ambien, Lunesta, etc.—not a good orgasm and some wine.

I susubscribe to the "thousands rule": if it has been used for 1000s of years, it is most likely OK. If it has been cooked up in a Pharma Phactory, not so much.

Salud! Hey-you got a smoke?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Follow the money Posted by: PJAW
» No smokes..... Posted by: mjabele
» Stuff and nonsense! Posted by: heid
» My last statement. Posted by: heid
» Arthralgia? Posted by: VannaLaRoche
Thanks Alternet.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 9, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The phoney "War On Drugs" is a perfect example and in fact the very beginning of a RIGGED market that is never free to begin with. The next time you approach a Wall Street ass-kissing "libertarian" or "conservative" nail them on their failures to uphold the true meaning of a free market. We progressives and liberals have to got to stop letting those motherfuckers from getting away with misnamed "free" markets/trade because none of it is free. The current crop of "conservatives" and "libertarians" are only in it to keep spoonfeeding the corporate elites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So What .... Posted by: gellero
The real drug dealer
Posted by: carbon-based on Jan 9, 2008 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real drug war in this country should be agains tthe big pharms and doc's pushing drugs as a cure for everything. The biggest drug problem in the country is abuse of prescription drugs, cough meds etc..

Maybe pharm execs should be locked up with other dealers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Christian Science Posted by: gellero
patsmart
Posted by: patsmart on Jan 9, 2008 12:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it interesting that all the little "committes for safe schools" etc. fighting the "WAR ON DRUGS" are funded at the top by drug and distillery giants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: patsmart Posted by: peacefullaim
I was on Paxil
Posted by: redceres on Jan 9, 2008 1:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . and now I'm not.

I tend to be anxious and over-stressed, a perfectionist, and a bit of a "dark-sider" when it comes to world view. I started taking Paxil in 1994 as part of the original drug studies and took it all the way through 2005. During that time, every time I tried to go off Paxil, I would get nauseous and snappy. I would go back on because I thought the Paxil made me feel better. When I started taking the drug again, I stabilized and didn't feel sick all the time.

In 2005, I got to the point where I couldn't afford it anymore--not if I was going to put aside money for my daughters' college education.

When I was trying to get off it, I was suicidal. Mind you, I have never been suicidal in my life or even really depressed--just a little tensed out. During my withdrawals, my daughters were scared of me because of my temper. I felt like I was going to die, and I couldn't sleep without the most horrible dreams.

But it went away.

I toughed it out for about two months before I started feeling better. Now, I can look back and honestly tell you I am better off. I am NEVER nauseous anymore, which is a real bonus after the thousands of dollars I spent while on that damned drug to figure out WHY I was nauseous and why I had no energy. My doctor--a stooge for the drug companies--never even suggested to me that it might be the Paxil.

He also never managed to find anything else wrong with me.

I can't say that I'm not anxious anymore--but I learned to tell people NO and to protect the sanctity of my own down time. I learned to tell corporate America that yes, I have a problem with stress, but the answer is NOT to take a drug and buy a bunch of crap to deal with the stress. It was to eliminate the sources of stress as best I can.

I am a control freak. That's who I am. I am also more in control WITHOUT the Paxil than I ever was with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I was on Paxil Posted by: heid
» RE: I was on Paxil Posted by: A. Servant
» RE: I was on Paxil Posted by: DianeJ
Drugs, Prisons, Prescriptions--all $$ from the same source
Posted by: seaseal on Jan 9, 2008 4:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Follow the money indeed.

We have more people in prison than any other country.

Why? Because the prisons are being privatized. Why? Because there's big money in running prisons. Why? Because we can put people in prison, for life, because of chemical substances that on the other side of the counter are sold as prescription drugs. Why? Because of the $$$.

Big pharma spends more on advertising and "outreach" than they do on research! Tell you anything?

Another major crime is the mental health system where people are prescribed drugs and if they refuse to take those drugs (usually because of the horrific effects called "side effects", they are dropped from the MH system, losing their housing, their incomes, and their support system.

How did we in America get this way?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hypocrisy 'R' Us in America
Posted by: gonzoskismet on Jan 9, 2008 5:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the cure to the 'War on Drugs' was money,
we would all be as clean as the Baby Jesus by now.
If anybody out there knows of a nation that is more in denial than this nation is, I want to here about it. This is why the Government wanted to get rid of the Mafia. So they could become the pushers. Anybody notice how the drugs of choice have changed over the years from the more optimistic 'up' drugs like LSD, mushrooms, mescaline and pot to drugs that are down and dead ends like smack and downs? Now, cough syrup has made a big comeback amongst young people. This is dread, man. Truly dread.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's about the fix
Posted by: shoplifter on Jan 9, 2008 7:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The big problem is a culture that promotes instant gratification - a junky FIX - over a change in lifestyle. A fix allows us to get on with our jobs and relationships and lives, albeit as robots or high as a kite.

Herbal supplements don't get you high (unless you are one of those crazy datura kids). It's a very subtle change but they do work. A lot of European countries will prescribe herbals before they do pharmas. Actually, Europe has a great system for this - in some countries, to get OTC medicine, you have to visit a pharmacy. You can't buy Tylenol where you buy your groceries. A small reminder that medicine is for treating illness, not to supplement daily life.

Isn't it more disturbing that so many people are preferring altered reality to reality?

The heroin problem in Afghanistan is understandable (what do you do when you lose all hope) - but it's freaky to see that it's also a huge problem in highly affluent countries.

There's something really wrong there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets speak up!
Posted by: garry minor on Jan 9, 2008 7:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way we are going to win this battle is by speaking up. Join NORML, LEAP, MAPS, MPP, a Cannabis Ministry or another organization and make your voice heard. I tried going it alone and only got ignored, hell, I still get ignored but at least I'm among friends at times. Having grown up in the 60's and 70's I can't believe the ignorance of the majority of Americans today. Even some old friends. This is not my Nation. Something bad happened!
But, we are going to win!
Kaneh bosm!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fibromyalgia
Posted by: liberalibrarian on Jan 10, 2008 10:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've had fibromyalgia for 11 years and have lived with constant body pain. Picture putting a clothspin on your finger and keeping it there--then picture that pain in all your muscles and faschia (ground substance). All the time. Cannibis is the only medication that instantly takes that away so that I can move, think, do yoga and sleep. Cymbalta just about killed me--other meds help but not much. Now there is "lyrica" (such a sweet name) and my doctor wants me to try it--trouble is-one of the possible side effects is stroke...hmmm the sad thing is--I can get lyrica easily and safely--can't say that for cannibis. So I'm considering it. That is a sad state of affairs. I think I'll be more vocal and join an organization or two. Let's clear this mess up for our children if we can't do it for ourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]