Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

10 Million Americans Busted for Pot: Enough is Enough

By Paul Armentano, AlterNet. Posted October 1, 2007.


Since 1990, over 10.4 million Americans have been busted for pot. When will we recognize it's time to stand up to the war on harmless pot smoking?

What would cops do without weed? For one thing, they'd sure spend a lot less time arresting and processing petty pot violators. How much time? For starters, however long it took to bust the estimated 739,000 Americans arrested for minor pot possession in 2006.

That's according to the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, which reported last week that a record 829,625 Americans were arrested for violating marijuana laws last year. Of those arrested, 89 percent of those were charged with simple pot possession -- the highest annual total ever recorded and nearly three times the number of citizens busted 15 years ago.

Yet to hear local law enforcement spin it, busting small-time potheads isn't their priority. The record number of busts, they claim, is simply a reflection that record numbers of Americans are now smoking pot.

But don't tell Drug Czar John Walters that. After all, the czar just claimed earlier this month -- at a press conference announcing the release of the federal Office of Applied Studies (OAS) 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health -- that pot use has been declining for the better part of the past five years.

Predictably, both the cops and the drug czar are playing fast and loose with the facts. Yes, in fact more Americans are now admittedly consuming pot today than in 1991 (so much for the past 15 years of the so-called "war on drugs"), but this increase is hardly proportional to the dramatic spike in overall pot arrests.

As for Walter's comments, while the survey did indeed report a minor decline in adolescents' self-reported use of pot, it further reported a minor uptick in the total number of Americans who report using marijuana regularly, from 14.6 million in 2005 to 14.8 million in 2006.

Of course, a less than 2 percent increase in pot users from '05 to '06 doesn't explain why pot arrests jumped more than five percent from a then-record 786,545 to today's total. Or why the overall number of annual pot arrests has gone up every consecutive year but two for the past 16 years.

Perhaps the explanation is two-fold. It's plausible that the federal government is -- and always has -- greatly underestimated the number of Americans who use pot. (Does anyone really believe that cops are busting -- on average -- five percent of all pot smokers each year?) It's also plausible that an outgrowth of the ever-growing number of cops on the street (and citizens' increasing number of interactions with them) is inevitably leading to more and more pot arrests. However, regardless of the explanation, it seems remiss for police and politicians not to acknowledge this growing trend and its burdensome fiscal and perhaps even cultural implications.

The bottom line: Since 1990 over 10.4 million Americans -- predominantly young people under age 30 -- have been busted for pot. Thousands have been disenfranchised, tens of thousands have been unnecessarily sent to "drug treatment," hundreds of thousands have lost their eligibility for student aid, and perhaps an entire generation (or two) has been alienated to believe that the police are an instrument of their oppression rather than their protection. These are the tangible results of the government's stepped up war on pot -- results that go beyond the FBI's record numbers, and it's high time that politicians and the general public began taking notice.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: drug war, pot smoking, marijauna possession

Paul Armentano is the senior policy analyst for the NORML Foundation in Washington, D.C.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Where Would They Smoke It If It WERE Legal?
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 1, 2007 12:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The anti-smoking Brownshirts have not only pushed smokers outside, they have just about made it illegal anywhere. I'm sure they would use the same ordinances against pot.

Even down here in Red State America (Arkansas) one cannot even legally smoke anywhere on the campus of any hospital, nursing home, clinic, etc. I didn't say outside, or 50 feet from the door- I said nowhere.

We live in very intolerant times if you are out of the mainstream.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wait a minute... Posted by: jparsons
» RE: Wait a minute... Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Depends on how you look at it. Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: It's a freakin' carcinogen, stupid! Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Wait a minute... Posted by: mercianomad
» RE: Wait a minute... Posted by: donl51
» lol Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: My, my, people are getting het up.... Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: I don't even smoke, why would I care Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» I'm not sure, why do you? Posted by: jparsons
» Apples and Oranges Posted by: jimidee
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?
Posted by: vox persona on Oct 1, 2007 12:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A buzz is a buzz, it's all vodka in concept. The reasons a country supposedly based in liberty would criminalize so many millions of citizens comes down to power, control and big money. Power and big money are one and the same these days anyway. Big pharma and the beer/ liquor industry contribute too much to our 'lawmakers' to ever allow the competition, so it comes down to the state sanctioned buzz, you can drink this or pop that pill, but if you smoke that flower then we'll put you in a cage. Gimme a break.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nonsense Posted by: oregonox
» RE: Please get it right ... Posted by: jimidee
» RE: Please get it right ... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Please get it right ... Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Please get it right ... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Please get it right ... Posted by: VannaLaRoche
It's business 101
Posted by: chomsky on Oct 1, 2007 2:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is made illegal, is made rare.
What is made rare is made expensive.
Dealers rejoice...
In other news, a US plane (N987SA) full of cocaine crashed in mexico... same plane allegedly (german) used for trips to Guantanamo... Strange coincidence...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The War on YOU
Posted by: Michael Boldin on Oct 1, 2007 3:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war on drugs is set on a principle that's totally repugnant to the ideals of a free society.

It's based on the idea that you do not have ownership over your own body; that you don’t have the right to decide what you’ll do with your body, with your property and with your life.

The position of the drug warriors is that you should be in jail if you decide to do something with your body that THEY don’t approve of. (but, of course, it's never the other way around)

Ending the drug war will help addicts, will end the black market in drugs, will help improve our economy and will make our streets safer!

That's my rant on the subject. If you'd like, read this article for more:

"7 Ways to Make Your Neighborhood Safer" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Right On Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
What? Congress notice something important to the People?!
Posted by: DaBear on Oct 1, 2007 3:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...it's high time that politicians . . . began taking notice.

You mean kinda like how Congress should be taking notice of the 80% of the public that want the US military out of Iraq right now? You mean, kinda like how Congress should be taking notice of the 80% of the public that wants universal single payer healthcare now?

Fat lotta luck we'll have to get them to notice anything the middling or working classes want or need. They're all aristocrats and they don't give a flying frack what we want, think, or need.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 100% in agreement Posted by: mizipi
» RE: 100% in agreement Posted by: Lauren
Pot's not like it was when I was a kid, here in the UK.
Posted by: BigRon on Oct 1, 2007 4:47 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Making it illegal also drove cultivation not just underground, but indoors. The bulk of the UK's weed seems to be hydroponically cultivated, and it's the most profitable drug on the market: you grow it yourself, close to where you're going to sell it - no middlemen, you keep ALL the profit!

In my youth I both smoked this stuff AND inhaled, but it's nowhere CLOSE to being the same stuff - what was comparatively safe to use a couple of decades back is no longer safe. Decades of selective breeding and hydroponic cultivation have changed a friendly dog into an unpredictable pitbull. It's the difference between weak beer and rotgut whiskey. There's just too much evidence linking excessive cannabis use and severe psychiatric illness to take risks.

Let's live in the real world: Nostalgia's not what it used to be.. and neither is cannabis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So don't smoke as much silly! Posted by: garry minor
» Nonsense ... Posted by: BenCaxton12
Grow up
Posted by: PJT on Oct 1, 2007 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You all are a pathetic bunch of losers.

As a former pot smoker and alcohol drinker I can say that the best thing I ever did for myself was stop smoking pot and drinking alcohol.

Part of your argument seems to be, since so many people are breaking the law and screwing up their lives as a result of the consequences, the laws should be done away with. Actually, I agree with some of that argument. People who smoke dope and drink are perfectly capable of screwing up their lives without any intervention from the criminal justice system. No need for laws criminalizing the behavior.

However, don't start arguing next that people who drive stoned should not pay consequences in lost licenses, fines and jail time. The only way to drive is cold sober-- period. Also, don't try to tell me that I can't kick a dope smoking employee out on his ass when I catch him. I want awake, alert employees. Also, don't tell me I can't ask the city to cut the pothead's lawn for him and have his house painted for him-- at his expense, instead of having to wait for him to die until the mess he is wallowing in gets cleaned up. Also, dont tell me that I can't toss his burglarizing, vandalizing worthless spawn in jail for THEIR crimes, which they commit while he and mom are nodding. Also, PLEASE don't ask me to pay the medical bills of the helpless and hopeless dope heads who are making themselves sick through bad diet and no exercise. Also, please don't ask me to give them a nickel in public assistance because they are too screwed up to hold a job. Let them starve.

I agree: let them smoke dope if they want to. In fact, let's sell the dope to them at the liquor store, just like hard liquor. I also agree, however, that the dope heads should take responsibility for their self indulgence in every way. I do not want to subsidize their squalid lives. I do not want to pay one cent to support them. To hell with them. P J Tramdack

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» There is no worse bigot... Posted by: colinmeister
» RE: Grow up Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: Grow up Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Grow up.. and remove your head Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: Grow up Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Grow up Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Grow Dope! Posted by: jimidee
» RE: Grow up Posted by: oregonox
» RE: Grow up Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: Grow up Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Grow up Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Grow up Posted by: joepantoliano
» RE: Grow up Posted by: saltillosuzy
» RE: Grow up Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Grow up Posted by: lepidopteryx
» TAKE IT A STEP FURTHER Posted by: gellero
» RE: Grow up Posted by: barn
» RE: Grow up Posted by: 3rdI
Won't solve anything
Posted by: Axiom69 on Oct 1, 2007 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Legalization of marijuana won't change a thing. Think about it like this. If it became legal the FDA would regulate it for THC content, herbicides, additives etc. This would add to the cost. Plus, there would be the required permits to grow it. There would also be required permits to sell it. The anti-smoking cancer organizations would require a piece of the action for "education". Then of course Uncle Sam would tax the living hell out of it like cigarettes and alcohol. It would be so expensive that unregulated or untaxed (read: illegal) growers and sellers would pop up. Noone would buy the weak government approved pot. They would all buy the illegal stuff. Just like they're doing now. Cops would arrest them for it... Just like they're doing now. Back to square one.
The reason this hasn't happened with cigarettes or alcohol is this. I cannot grow a tobacco plant and make it taste like a marlboro. I cannot distill spirits and make it taste like Jack Daniels. If I could do either, guess what? I'd be doing it and selling my "Tax free" marlboros and JD and getting rich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Won't solve anything Posted by: Intellect
» RE: Won't solve anything Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: Won't solve anything Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Ignorance must be bliss Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Ignorance must be bliss Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: Ignorance must be bliss Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Ignorance must be bliss Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Ignorance must be bliss Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: Ignorance must be bliss Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Ignorance must be bliss Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Ignorance must be bliss Posted by: Lauren
US OBESSION WITH POT IS BIZARRE
Posted by: drricklippin on Oct 1, 2007 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good points made here by Paul Armentano-thanks AlterNet

What I can't believe is how long this craziness about THC has persisted?

All cultures since the dawn of humanity have used mind altering substances - the most common, I guess, are caffeine, alcohol and tobacco. (Don't believe the bull about caffeine and alcohol being good for your body. While I personally use both in moderation I know they are drugs - not food!)

But the waste of resources chasing after THC users is truly bizarre.

The real drug pushers of the 21st century are the big pharmaceutical companies(Big PhRMA )whose CEOs should be indicted and jailed for killing people daily Instead we lock up the poor pot smokers.

Dr. Rick Lippin
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: US OBESSION WITH POT IS BIZARRE Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: US OBESSION WITH POT IS BIZARRE Posted by: lepidopteryx
» ANOTHER MORONIC STATEMENT Posted by: gellero
» RE: ANOTHER MORONIC STATEMENT Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: ANOTHER MORONIC STATEMENT Posted by: david_m_silverman
Enough is enough
Posted by: ReverendMarkCom on Oct 1, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
End the war on drugs! It is paid for by citizens and the money goes to politicians and non-violent "criminals" eat up tax dollars keeping them in jail and processing them in the legal system. The War on Drugs is a failure.

Can I get a witness?

Rev. Mark J. Seydel

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Enough is enough Posted by: ronw1224
» Exodus 30:23,.... Posted by: garry minor
The vested interests of Big OIL/COTTON/CHEMICAL/ PAPER/FOOD/MILITARY/COAL is what started this war.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 1, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way to end the war is to SHUT DOWN these vested interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MORONIC STATEMENT #2 Posted by: gellero
» RE: MORONIC STATEMENT #2 Posted by: Lauren
» RE:To gellero Posted by: garry minor
» RE: To gellero Posted by: 3rdI
Green party
Posted by: Ambrose Pare on Oct 1, 2007 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Up in Canada the only party trying to legalize a plant?! is the Green Party. Oddly enough, they have won seats, and the MSM refuses to allow them in leaders debates and so on.
Every year there support grows by 2-3%, they are up to 10% or so now, which is pretty good.

So soon, when its legalized in Canada, you Americans can come up and visit us Canadians, and we'll roll you a joint as fat as a cigar!

Seems stupid that we are refused the right to grow or smoke a plant...I mean, thats like making it illegal to eat or grow carrots!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Green party Posted by: solrev
» RE: Green party Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Green party Posted by: Ambrose Pare
artist
Posted by: eye438 on Oct 1, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me the government is into controlling people's lives even more so now. It is not the business of the government to make law as to what a person can or cannot do to their body. When it eveolves to crime such as assault, felony or murder this would be a crime. Marijuana is an herb that grows freely. How many events such as domestic violence and dui leading to death as a result of alcohol use have occured? Our prisons are loaded with drug dealers and users making no room for the real threats such as child rapists and murderers who typically go free on bail. The priorities in our system have gone awry. Not to mention people with money such as oj and phil spector who buy their way out of murder, its all disgusting. This has been said many times over but it seems we as a people here like to talk and really achieve very little in action as our civil rights are being eroded daily.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marijuiana laws are politcal and generational tool of Fascism..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Oct 1, 2007 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Marijuana laws are a political tool to exclude the most educated and progressive generation this nation ever produced perhaps from participation in the government and national best interest..

It's has prevented so many with great ideas and solutions from contributing to our once great nation as they threatened the fascist swine like David Rockefeller and the other fascist groups like the Council on Foreign Relations et al, Bilberbergers etc. from enslaving us and reducing us to indebted serfs as they have all but finally accomplished..

The fear or someone saying hey he smokes pot or just some stupid minor bust on his record has allowed the fascists to maintain their strangle hold on our nation..

The Marijuana leaf is rather like the Star of David, Jews were forced to wear in Nazi Germany and Europe..!

These laws were designed and inflicted to exclude the best most honest and optimistic from taking part in our Republic..!

Simple as that..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Omar Khyamm
Posted by: mnascimento on Oct 1, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Be this vine the growth of God, who dare
Blaspheme the twisted tendril as a snare?
A blessing, we should use it, should we not?
And if a curse, why then, who set it there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The "gateway" argument
Posted by: defrag on Oct 1, 2007 9:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I notice an eerie similarity between the drug warriors' longtime hysterical argument that pot is the "gateway" to hard drugs, and lately the new charges that pot causes brain damage, impotence, etc.... and certain feminists' increasingly incoherent anti-porn crusade, in which porn is now the gateway to war, of all things.

Criminalizing other people's harmless behavior based on one's own puritanical views seems always to require raising the stakes (to borrow a term from somewhat illegal poker).

It would be an interesting sociological experiment if, for a five-year period, we could legalize pot and criminalize porn, and see what happens!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tyranny of the Majority
Posted by: allusiv on Oct 1, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alcohol kills a year = 20,000
Marijuana kills a year = 0

Alcohol is legal, Marijuana is not.

Equality under the law? Or injustice?

* Statistics from National Center for Health Statistics. Alcohol deaths exclude accidents and homicides. 2003.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LeeEmmett
Posted by: LeeEmmett on Oct 1, 2007 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can anyone tell me what is so wrong about getting high at the end of the day in my own home?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ooooh, AND... Posted by: mjglow
» RE: LeeEmmett Posted by: Lauren
Cultural ideas change slowly.....Do seriou