Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

The Federal War on Medical Marijuana Becomes a War on Children

By Dan Bernath, AlterNet. Posted September 25, 2007.


Why risk provoking the American public's outrage by escalating its war on medical marijuana patients?
Advertisement

Automatic weapons. Check. Helicopters. Check. Dogs. Check. Bulletproof vests. Check.

You may not buy the government's characterization of its campaign against medical marijuana patients as a "war on drugs," but increasingly violent, militaristic tactics in recent months offer a troubling glimpse into the federal law enforcement community's mentality: To them, this is war.

Raids on medical marijuana dispensaries throughout California on July 17 by federal Drug Enforcement Administration agents, often with local law enforcement officers in tow, seemed designed to send a clear signal that the feds were deliberately escalating their war on medical marijuana patients.

The enemy, then, are people like Ronnie Naulls, a Riverside medical marijuana patient who owned two of the dispensaries raided that day.

A church-going family man who used medical marijuana to ease chronic pain from injuries sustained in a 2001 car accident, Naulls already had two successful businesses -- one as an IT consultant and another as a real estate property manager -- when he established the Healing Nations Collective to save fellow Corona patients the hours-long drive to Los Angeles for medicine.

By all accounts, Naulls ran his collectives with exemplary scrupulousness. He maintained strict dress codes and professional standards for all employees. He paid state taxes on the dispensaries -- amounting to several hundred thousand dollars a year -- even when loose tax regulations allowed other dispensary owners to slip through the cracks. Profits from the dispensaries went to local and national cancer organizations.

Nevertheless, at 5:50 a.m., July 17, Naulls' home and businesses were invaded by DEA agents armed with shotguns, automatic rifles -- even helicopters. They seized everything he owned: his businesses, his property, all of his accounts.

But that wasn't the worst of it. County child protective services came along on the raid and took Naulls' three daughters, aged 1 to 5, and charged him and his wife with child endangerment. They weren't even accused of breaking any state laws.

When Naulls spoke to his children in their foster home, the oldest said, "Daddy, we're ready to come home now. We promise to be good."

Of course they were too young to understand that they were victims of the strong-arm tactics of drug warriors whose goal was probably to make Naulls regret helping fellow patients receive their medicine in a safe, compassionate environment. Who cares if that means ruining a family financially, imprisoning the parents and traumatizing the children?

Federal drug warriors have shown no sign of letting up since then, as dispensary raids have continued steadily in California and Oregon. The DEA has even found creative ways to open new fronts in its war by threatening to go after landlords who lease property to licensed dispensaries.

But why now? Why risk provoking the American public's outrage by escalating its war on medical marijuana patients? Here's one possible explanation: They're losing, and they know it.

While federal law enforcement agencies are busy wasting time and money harassing innocent citizens like Naulls and his family, the rest of the country shows increasing impatience with the government's bullying tactics.

In fact, thanks in large part to the efforts of MPP's Granite Staters for Medical Marijuana, every single Democratic presidential candidate has come out against federal intrusion in medical marijuana states. Two Republican candidates, Texas Rep. Ron Paul and Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo, have also voiced strong support for the rights of states to establish medical marijuana laws.

These candidates understand that the vast majority of Americans oppose the federal government's war on medical marijuana patients.

Then again, if the late comedian Bill Hicks was right when he said a war means two armies fighting each other, then this was never really a war, anyway. After all, the ranks of suffering Americans, though large, are hardly an imposing threat to the well-equipped federal forces bent on their destruction.

Instead of calling it a war, perhaps there's a more accurate phrase to describe what we've witnessed from federal law enforcement this summer. How does "pogrom on medical marijuana patients" sound?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: medical marijuana, marijuana, legalization

Dan Bernath is the Marijuana Policy Project's assistant director of communications, www.mpp.org.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Just sad...
Posted by: Eat Politicians on Sep 25, 2007 1:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do these people sleep at night? Hauling elderly people with various health issues and the heroes whom help them into jail? Are they just completely heartless or do extreme profits for a bloated and out-of-control pharma industry mean more than basic human compassion?

It's just sad...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Worse Posted by: ssegallmd
» RE: Just sad... Posted by: donl51
Truly sickening and disheartening
Posted by: vox persona on Sep 25, 2007 1:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it weren't for my philosophy of pure karma (for actions as well as intentions), I would wish every lawmaker who endorses strict laws against medical marijuana to themselves contract an ailment which only pot can alleviate. The argument being the 'slippery slope' 'camel's nose under the tent' bromide, where exactly do we presently stand in the founders' concept of 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness', when they've created a system where they can stick you in a cage if you smoke a fliower? Beware whenever they declare a war on a noun. How did our 'war on poverty' work out? What have we gotten for our 'war on terrorism', when in its holy name we are spending $3,000 per second every second of the year in Iraq, which ended up only creating a recruiting tool for more terrorism? As for medical pot, you know big pharma would never let their puppet legislators let that be, and that goes for legalization in general. It's all vodka in concept, meaning whether someone snorts, smokes or drinks, it is all just a way of modifying one's consciousness. Really, what's the difference? You can either catch a buzz or not, to pick and choose is hypocritical and unconstitutional. Alcohol is one of the biggest killers of any substance, all 'mood enhancers' should receive the same treatment, the law coming into effect as soon as one gets behind the wheel, or is in a position where others' lives are at stake. But to go to the extreme of breaking up families over a medical remedy is authoritarianism run amuck. So much for the will of the people, more like the will of the drug companies who own the lawmakers who then say (with their legislation) 'we will decide the appropriate way for you to alter your consciousness'. Give me a break.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The slippery slope
Posted by: Camilla Cracchiolo on Sep 25, 2007 2:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "Slippery Slope" argument is so much B.S. I'm a nurse. In my day I have handed out many opiates, including morphine by direct I.V. injection. Yet, this hasn't made heroin more available or made groups demand its legalization. In fact, I suspect the legal availability of opiates for pain has led to *less* heroin use. Imagine the country for a minute if, (as actually happens in many third world countries) cancer patients, heart attack victims, etc. could not legally obtain opiates for pain. There would be a hell of a lot of people buying heroin on the streets because they couldn't stand seeing their loved ones screaming in pain as they die!

And it's a real crock that marijuana is classified as having no medical benefits! I've worked in emergency rooms where LIQUID COCAINE was available for ophthalmic emergencies (it's old, but still remains one of the best eye anesthetics). COCAINE is classified as having medical uses but marijuana isn't??? Give me a break....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The slippery slope Posted by: richholland
» RE: The slippery slope Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The slippery slope Posted by: nikolai
Medical usage
Posted by: HereticChick on Sep 25, 2007 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm here with ya on that issue. I too worked in the ER where we used liquid cocaine for massive nose bleeds. But the only legal marijuana you can get is Marinol?? Does that crap even work?? Puhlease! The gov't is losing it's grip on the war and the only way they can retaliate is to destroy these poor pot growers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Medical usage Posted by: donl51
» RE: Medical usage Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Medical usage Posted by: TheProphet
» RE: Medical usage Posted by: oldmaninhisunderwear
» RE: Medical usage Posted by: donl51
The WOD has been SEVERELY DAMAGING America's youth for 70 years !
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 25, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, even a few conservatives are actually stepping up to the plate to denounce this LOSING "War On Drugs" BULLSHIT but where the FUCK are the liberals when you need them ? My cousin even sent a letter to her representative Pelosi asking for the need to legalize Industrial non-THC Hemp and Pelosi gives a FUCKED up reply BULLSHITTING that America will "lose the war on drugs" if that's done ! With fake "liberals" like Pelosi, Reid, Hoyer, LIEberNAZI, etc ... you won't need the GOP at this rate !

By the way, Ron Paul has been fighting to legalize hemp. Other than Kucinich, name me one single Democrat in the House let alone the Senate ready to give this a chance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» good point about dems... Posted by: vasumurti
» Ron Paul Posted by: littlemanintheboat
» RE: on Paul Posted by: Lauren
» RE: on Paul Posted by: TagsNOLA
The side effect of pot smoking is a pacified society
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Sep 25, 2007 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Gov't knew long ago back in the 20's that hemp (marijuana's true name) made folks peaceable. How you ask? The Women's Temperance league. They were responsible for not just aiding alchohol prohibition BUT they also were very successful in getting city,county and state judges to order abusive,drunken husbands onto 'Hasish Therapt' to chill them out. Totally contrary to Hearst's 'yellow journalism' statements that pot crazed balcks and mexicans were comming over the borders and into your neighborhoods to rape and kill young white women. Old school propaganda.
Hemp is the safest most theraputically active substance know to man. There is no drug maker that can say that,truthfully. Every ad on TV tells you the side effects are often worse than the symptom you're trying to get rid of for even just a simple allergy drug.
A war based society such as ours,knows all too well that you're not going to have a strong killing machine if the members are stoned. There has never been a fist fight at any pot party I was ever at. The same is true for medical hemp. They know we humans will offer some to our friends and family the have illnesses that hemp could help with. As such there's every chance that our teenagers will find and try some. The result is often teens that are more peaceful less apt to fighting,and not easily fooled by slick propagandas used by the Gov't to get the society amped up for war.
Understand this clearly. Our Gov't and big business make piles of money off of the manufacture,sales and use of weapons of war. Peace is the last thing they want. But if they went into pot production,they'd make about the same money.
Plus the future generations will be less apt to finding the graves of the warmongers and pissing on them.
The intolerance of Medical Hemp is indicitive of the intolerance the Gov't has for true freedom and Liberty for it's people. It's time to toss out these worn out shoes and have another hit....of FREE AIR!
Think Outside the System
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pogrom?
Posted by: TagsNOLA on Sep 25, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good! Let's call it that. And let's get on with it! But lets bypass the medical marijuana dens and go for the real perps. The pro-drug lobby has managed to neutralize the left who should be in the vanguard of the war on drugs. Some of the largest banks in the country, including First Boston and Continental Illinois, were caught red handed wittingly laundering drug money (read "blood money"). In the case of First Boston, they got away with a 1/2 million dollar slap on the wrist, less than 1 day's interest on their ill-gotten gain. Then Federal DA William Weld bragged that the 1/2 mil fine was the biggest in US history up to that time, which tells us not that Weld was being tough on drugs. DOJ is in on the scam. They're protecting the worst of the drug perpetrators, the financial institutions who are making the lion's share of the profit. These medical marijuana busts are nothing but a smoke screen to make the public believe the government is really serious about stemming the drug trade. (Yes, Virginia, Marijuana IS part of the drug trade.) If the government were really serious, they'd sieze all the assets of one or two of the bigger banks and jail all their officers and board members for life. But, of course we know that's not going to happen. There are those in the establishment, like George Soros, who want drugs legalized. I'm sure he's figured out an angle where the then legalized drug trade would line his pockets with still more filthy lucre. Many years ago I read an article about opium dens in Southeast Asia. Over there, they called doing opium "taming the tiger." One opium addicted victim explained, "when I am taming the tiger, I don't feel hungry." The fact that some on the left are pushing for legalization of marijuana is simply evidence that, on this particular issue, they've been coopted or neutralized by folks who want to keep those of us in the general population, anesthetized, dull and stupid.
TagsNOLA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pogrom? Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Pogrom? Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: Pogrom? Posted by: Lauren
Terrorism in the United States
Posted by: philcresta on Sep 25, 2007 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The word for it is terrorism, the us goverment has no excuse for the treatment of its people. Believe me this wouldnt of been okay to guys like george washington, thomas jefferson, they would have called for a revolt and a march on washington and the current goverment ripped out of there and one that represents the people will then be in place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Terrorism in the United States Posted by: abbadon2007
Don't you get it yet? They've got the system rigged!
Posted by: TheProphet on Sep 25, 2007 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The very people who bring you the 'war on terror' also bring you the 'war on drugs'; and they are responsible for bringing you both the war and the drugs. Get it?

The CIA has long been a drug pusher. Read the late (assassinated) Gary Webb's book Dark Alliance. The Bush crime family has been drug dealing since the opium trade wars with China. And Sr. was head of the CIA.

They are only interested in power and money. And by providing you the drugs you want while making it illegal to use them they've created a system that protects the mega producers while punishing the users -- just look at our prison system today!

By keeping mj illegal they are certain to keep control over the population, over you and me. Caught with mj and you can be incarcerated like many other hundreds of thousands have been.

The criminals are running the government; and sadly, there appears to be no end in sight to their rule. Unfortunately, Hillary or Obama will be more of the same 'corporate' and 'elitest' rule, also known as 'fascism'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the profits and victums of the "war on drugs"
Posted by: Julie007 on Sep 25, 2007 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
several posting have mentioned profits from the war on drugs, they may be loosing the drug war, but the profits in the DOJ asset forfeiture program are in the billions. The local police departments all across the country are sitting on large hordes of money from properties sold not only through criminal but civil asset forfeiture. In most cases, 80 percent of the people with their properties seized and sold never even committed a crime, were just associated with someone that did or was accused of a crime. Only in a drug crime can someone be charged and convicted on just heresay. There is no oversight what-so-ever as to the large amount of corruption of local, state, and federal government agencies as to where all that money goes.
I wonder how many children in america have ended up homeless because of civil forfeiture, and the "war on drugs"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pricing an asset . . . nothing more, nothing less
Posted by: MAD on Sep 25, 2007 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you start viewing the war on drugs(tm) as a means of pricing extremely desirable commodities for maximum profit rather than a medical, or even social convention, it becomes clear why they [so-called illicit drugs] remains illegal. It's also becomes quite apparent why smack, coke, X, acid, etc. also remain illegal.

Drugs are big, no, huge business. Opiates and alkaloids alone account for anywhere between $500 billion to $1 trillion in annual sales globally. Keeping drugs illegal is the only method of maintaining soaring prices (even in times of outright depression) and maximizing profits for the central bankers and Fortune 500 corps that must NECESSARILY launder such sizable amount of money. Can't launder $50 billion at the local 7-Eleven, now can ya? Anyone notice how Opium production has increased to record highs in Afghanistan AFTER the US invaded? Coincidence? I doubt it. Production had fallen to record lows during the reign of the Taliban.

Anyone who believes that a country which allows millions of children to go without health insurance yet proclaims itself the anointed defender of your children against the spectacularly malevolent joint is full of shit and a goddamn hypocrite to boot. They don't care if your baby dies from a treatable disease but they spend billions, which would ironically pay for health insurance and treatment should your child become dependent, maintaining artificially inflated prices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Village residents are complaining that the PD are...
Posted by: picket on Sep 25, 2007 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not investigating break-ins or assaults on local people. There is no time for that because it is the time of year when the DRUG TASK FORCE is lining up their roster for the annual Drug Bust. Huge profits for the injustice system !!!!!
This is the 'gossip' around town....LEO's are walking the woods and if they find more that 5 Cannabis plants in a patch they dig a trench and wait for the POT CRIMINALS to show up. Helicopters fly low looking for backyard gardens.

Money spent is no object to our Legislators....and apparently average taxpayers do not care. The FBI reported 9/24/07 in 2006 had the largest total number of arrests for Cannabis ever recorded by the FBI [829,625].... 89% for simple possession only.

Most of us will be long dead and society will be paying the price for the bad public policy and unjust laws put upon the citizens of the USA.

http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7370

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

COINTELPRO finds cannabis to be very useful when it comes to harrassing activists
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 25, 2007 12:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's also very useful in getting uppity kids kicked out of college. Get busted with a joint, lose all your financial aid.

It was spelled out back in 1968 by FBI COINTLEPRO undercover agents: "Be alert for the opportunity to have activists arrested on drug charges. Immediately inform local authorities if you have knowledge of a 'drug party', and strongly encourage them to take action."

as well as "Activists on student campuses should be closely monitored, and efforts should be made to separate them from their schools, using any means available. Anonyous letters describing their activities can be sent to university officials, for example."

There's also the drug asset seizure laws, which pad the budgets of local DAs, sherrifs and city police forces.

There's also the racism factor, which means that minorities are regularly targeted by DAs and police for possessing tiny amounts of cannabis.

COINTELPRO never ended, despite all the Congressional hearings, and is still active today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

its all about power
Posted by: sidguppy on Sep 25, 2007 1:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this isn't about the drugs themselves; it'as about power.
it's about fascism, building police state and showing those who think they can get away with civil disobedience who's in charge

ever since the '60's the Us government (and most EU governments follow slavishly) started a war on culture. the "flowerpower culture' where people of all colors and types mixed, where people started to think independedly.

the 'system' of war-economics and the military industrial complex won't stand for that, hence the demise of that culture in the '70's and the replacement of popular drugs from that era (weed, hashies, musgrooms, acid) by other drugs (speed,amphetamines, cocaine, heroine, crack, meth, crystal, pcp)....it's all about control.

don't you wonder why it's so much harder to come by any drug of the first group (none of wich is addicting) and much easier to get those of the second group (ALL of wich are addicting!)

people who can think for themselves and act on that are a direct threat for the government (any government) and also for the coorporatist elites that pull the strings of that government.
and they can and will use their stormtroopers (aka SWAT, police etc) to repress any independant thinking or civil disobedience, even if those are helping the sick, the poor, the different.
it never was about the "grass" itself; it was and will be about who's in control, who will rule the sheeple, the slaves.

these people who tear apart families and send in attack dogs and gunship helicopters on a family with 5 year olds have no ethics, no consience. they act drunk on their own power and damn the consequences.......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LeaveUsAlone
Posted by: LeaveMeAlone on Sep 25, 2007 1:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The drug warriors are conducting a holy war. Any lie, any act of viciousness is justified. They really believe in what they're doing. A hundred years from now it will seem like the witch trials seem to us now. There is no hope as long as the religious right holds power. All we can do is hide and wait. Wait until the bible thumpers are driven from political power. Wait until the majority of the people in this country see them for what they are: power mad tyrants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LeaveUsAlone Posted by: Lauren
» RE: LeaveUsAlone Posted by: mlang52
» RE: LeaveUsAlone Posted by: LeaveMeAlone
A country only a sadist could love
Posted by: ssegallmd on Sep 25, 2007 1:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What kind of monsters are Americans that so many are willing to do this kind of thing to their own? And why would somebody pledge allegiance to other people that would do that to them?

I think that this experiment in democracy is over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not once--ever--has marijuana proven to be harmful.
Posted by: american on Sep 25, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Indeed it is beneficial. It is another one of God's humble, useful little gifts to the world. Great for chilling out. Great for making paper. Great for relieving pain. Great for oils. Great for rope, clothes and almost any other type of textile one can imagine. It is also great for conservation. It requires no pesticides or fertilizers. It is light on water. There are prescription drugs that are outlandishly harmful to mind and body that are allowed—allowed!! —onto the market for their ostensible benefits. They draw tremendous resources from the earth directly and indirectly in the form of energy required to make them. The pharmaceutical industry is allowed to toss out research that does not show benefits. Once approved, the industry uses the drugs for a broad range of ailments that often fall far outside the reason for the drugs creation. The big hurdle of "safety" has been passed and when the under funded and corrupted FDA gets newfound drug use trials pushed in front of them, they just about go ahead and approve. The substances cause heart attacks, still born babies, depression, suicide, auto and machine accidents, hormone disruptions, premature aging, brain damage and a massive quantity of other atrocious side effects. Let us not forget prescription drugs' deleterious effect on the environment. From the clinical research industry's love of plastic and throwing things away to the quantities of drugs that wind up in streams, rivers and oceans, wreaking havoc on the sensory systems of animals. Also, how about the insane cost of the stuff and how the industry corrupts the political process? These are "side effects" we can definitely do without. The western world fell in love with the pill with the introduction of penicillin, the naturally occurring, living fungus that cured bacterial diseases. Naturally occurring, but nonetheless a "drug" that had to go through an isolation, standardization and refining process. The pharmaceutical industries' myth has ridden the wave of penicillin's justifiable fame to a fortune in billions and billions of our mostly well-wasted dollars and psyches. Maybe what the feds do not like about marijuana is that it helps a person see how absurd things are. Lie the article points out, however, the game is up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Funny...I don't FEEL corrected?
Posted by: chronicreform on Sep 25, 2007 2:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For another sad story about how an Arizona Courts Judiciary incarcerated a Blind Viet-Nam era veteran:go to www.geocities.com and search for chronicreform/index all small case+one word. Respectfully Submitted chronicreform

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pogrom Is Right
Posted by: woody, tokin' librul on Sep 25, 2007 4:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There were almost 900,000 pot busts last year.
More than ALL OTHER BUSTS COMBINED.
THE foremost opponent of legalized marijuana in California is the Prison Guards' union: without pot busts, there's not as much need for Guards. There's never gonna be a better example of the synergy of the corporate state.
As in ALL USer 'wars,' it's the Bidness that matters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sobriety
Posted by: Lycas7x on Sep 25, 2007 9:23 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I stopped smoking marijuana about 8 months ago. I have been off the alcohol for years. I wouldn't have quit, except its illegal. I just got tired of fighting the system. I went down a couple times for simple possession and paraphenallia.

My life is emotional pain. I tappered off the stuff too. Life is just too damn difficult even if your not terminal ill. Lets give these people a little comfort in their final hour. I'm not in favor of medical marijuana. They should just let everybody smoke it, but I'll stay off it now unless I'm going thru KEMO or get AIDS. I just feel free. I can work anywhere(almost, I got a record). I use to teach. What a joke. There isn't one blasted thing these right wingers need to transmit to the next generation. There is nothing worth saving! They'll blame everything on the liberal... watch.

I can't defend anybody that wants to use recreationally. These people want you to experience the full brunt of this world they have created(We all read this liberal media) I believe we have our work cut out for us. We cant do anything high on crack or behind bars... or sitting at our computers after work.

Love your family, careers and wives. Stay married to the same woman if you bother to do so. Don't go to a church that doesn't feed you or tells you who to sleep with. Think twice about nascar and football, you might as well be drunk. Give dope to your sick parents. The governments not going to do it.

I actually use to fear communism, our gov't doing all the things we were afraid of in 1984 and animal farm (orwell)Be weary of your worst fears. Freedom is not a forced solution. That's hardly safe. What are they protecting us from?

Education is the answer to the drug problem. The govenment thinks were all stupid and rich. Who can afford anything? You need to make a life for yourself and find your own happiness doing what you enjoy. Think about it, who really cares about drugs anyway? Cant they focus on healthcare? The gov't could be paying for these places.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

medical marijuana info
Posted by: jhalp on Sep 26, 2007 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
check out www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org for info on the pros and cons of medical marijuana.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHY DOES THIS NOT SURPRISE ME?
Posted by: nikolai on Sep 26, 2007 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The gov't is AGAINST the people, not for. Here in Arizona the people TWICE have voted thru a medical MJ initiative. THe first time it was gutted by our own legislators, and the second time the feds threatened TO JAIL any doctor who prescibed it, even though the patient had to have a debilitating disease and a prescription from TWO doctors. I wouldn't be so upset if the feds were mostly going after the really big dealers who move tons of the stuff, as there's a lot of corruption and big players who are real bad people involved in heavy MJ trafficking, but the feds are downright DISHONEST and CORRUPT in their "ENFORCEMENT" like this article, and also in things such as reporting that they destroy 100,000 tons of pot per year, when 90% of the stuff they destroy is just midwestern ditchweed so they can get and keep their funding, and so that they can have many, many policemen on the payroll to maintain their stranglehold on the rest of us and protect their jobs. Clinton should have cut back the DEA when he cut back the military; he would've been doing the US a BIG favor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When the punishment is the crime
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Sep 26, 2007 1:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had a friend who got stopped by the police for having one of his turn signals out. It just so happened that the police had a drug sniffing dog with him, and my friend had a small amount of marijuana in his car. He got a misdemeaner citation. But he also lost his college financing. This guy was in his early 30s and had been working at a low paying job. He'd gone back to school to try to get an education and a better job.

After he was busted, my friend left town, got his old job back and gave up on his chance to finish college.

There are many reasons why marijuana and hemp are illegal in this country. It's pretty simplistic to attribute it to just rightwing religious notions, or just a way for the police to make money, or just the drug companies or those that might be harmed by the use of hemp for clothing and other products. It's undoubtedly all of these reasons, along with some we can't even conceive of.

Because of the complexity of the problem, it's even harder to change the system. The drug war and the consequences of it have harmed far more people than the use of marijuana ever could. It is a mind-altering substance that is no more harmful than alcohol or tobacco - in fact, from everything I've read, it's far less harmful.

So smoking a joint in the privacy of your home is considered to be a dangerous activity by our government and moral overseers, but spending years of your life in prison is a beneficial experience. Rationality is obviously not one of the factors involved.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad pot laws federal OR state
Posted by: nikolai on Sep 26, 2007 3:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm from Arizona and here's another tidbit. In Arizona if an adult (18 yrs of age) is caught selling pot (2 joints or more) within 200 feet of a school, it's A 5 YEAR MINIMUM SENTENCE IN THE STATE PRISON, NO EXCEPTIONS, PRIORS OR NOT. Let's take a look at this, shall we? You are a good kid who just turned 18, never been in trouble with the law, just starting college, making decent grades, and you smoke a little pot now and then. Well, you have a little extra pot but being a poor student, no extra cash. A buddy a year younger than you who is 17 asks you to stop by the local high school and sell him a couple of joints. Heck, this is business as usual between you and your buddies (I know it was when I was 18) and it just so happens you are the seller this particular time around. So anyway, you go to your 17 year old buddy's school and sell him 2 or 3 joints, but you are spotted, busted, and convicted. You go to Arizona State Prison for 5 years and come out a criminal, mad at the fuc*ing world, and in the meantime a rapist or child molester is set free because they need the prison space for the more "serious career criminals" (like 18 yr old wet-behind-the-ears never-been-in-trouble CHILDREN). Smart drug law huh? Not only that, some of my neighbors actually thought this was a good law until I asked them, "What if it were YOUR kid going to prison for 5 YEARS?" That got them thinking for about 5 seconds, then one said, "Well I'll just make sure MY kid DOESN'T smoke pot!" And another said, "I KNOW my kid will never smoke pot!" After I quit laughing I just smiled and said, "Well you better hope to god they don't, at least not in Arizona!" I don't mind admitting I enjoyed seeing the stunned, stupid looks on their faces...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sacramento Ca Police to Gangs:It's Open Season on Compassionate Use Patients
Posted by: macdon1 on Oct 13, 2007 3:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is a direct quote from Sacramento CA police detectives: You people (compassionate use patients) are just drug addicts and there is no such thing as medical marijuana. You deserve everything you get, even if you are killed. It is your own fault for attracting attacks."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]