Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

No Prison for Gore III?

By Margaret Dooley, AlterNet. Posted July 26, 2007.


Al Gore III, the 24-year-old son of the former vice president, is facing more than three years in prison for simple drug possession following his arrest in Southern California earlier this month.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Al Gore III, the 24-year-old son of the former vice-president, is facing more than three years in prison for simple drug possession following his arrest in Southern California earlier this month. Is he going to get special treatment? I hope not.

I hope Gore receives exactly what most nonviolent, low-level drug offenders in California do -- a chance at treatment instead of a record. Proposition 36, passed by 61 percent of voters in 2000, offers community-based treatment instead of incarceration to over 36,000 people each year. The Orange County district attorney will determine Gore's eligibility for the program in the next couple of weeks.

It is a tragedy when anyone enters the criminal justice system -- rather than the healthcare system -- because of their drug use. That's why a majority of California voters approved Proposition 36, changing state law so that people can address their drug problems without adding the trauma and stigma of incarceration.

Over 36,000 people -- famous and not -- benefit from Proposition 36 each year. Robert Downey Jr. is a Proposition 36 graduate. So is Alec Baldwin's brother Daniel, who told Larry King just last week that Proposition 36 intervened in his 18-year cocaine addiction and allowed him to access the treatment he needed to enter long-term recovery. He is now taking it one day at a time.

His story is similar to that of Rudy Mendez, a not-so-famous resident of San Diego, who entered Proposition 36 to treat his long-term addiction to heroin. He's now been sober for five years. Cynthia McDonald, another not-famous Proposition 36 grad from Southern California, thanks the law for her recovery from years of addiction to methamphetamine. She has been sober for nearly four years.

Daniel Baldwin, Rudy Mendez, Cynthia McDonald and thousands more Proposition 36 grads are now spokespeople for recovery, working with others to spread the news that "Recovery Happens!" and that one way to get there is Proposition 36. The positive impact they have had on the lives around them prove that, while addiction is not contagious, recovery can be.

Gore's arrest and Baldwin's interview come just as the California Senate considers cutting funding for Proposition 36 treatment in exchange for hefty tax breaks for large corporations. Squeezing the budget of this life-saving and cost-effective program is a slap in the face of California voters, and, worse, a direct assault on the quality of treatment that the state can provide Proposition 36 participants next year, perhaps including Gore.

In just six years, over 70,000 Californians have graduated from Proposition 36 treatment, and taxpayers have saved $1.8 billion. Gore could be one of 12,000 more people expected to graduate next year. If so, perhaps he'll become another spokesperson for treatment and alternatives to incarceration -- and be able to explain to Sacramento politicians just how outrageous it is to starve a program that saves money, reduces jail and prison overcrowding, and improves the lives of tens of thousands of real people each year.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: incarceration, al gore iii, drug offenders, drug possession, prop 36

Margaret Dooley is the Drug Policy Alliance's Prop. 36 coordinator.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This brings up the compassion, health and human rights issues in America for all citizens
Posted by: Lector on Jul 26, 2007 12:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is Gore going to get special treatment in the courts? He shouldn’t. But that depends on his connections and if he is not on his “third strike”. He should get special treatment in the health care system though. Apples and oranges maybe, but over three years for a nonviolent crime is ridiculous after witnessing the results of Scooter Libby’s trial. Did Libby’s punishment (pardon) fit a far graver crime? Of course not. And his fine was paid for by a support-Libby-fund with money left over which he may get to pocket in the end. The law in America is an hypocrisy controlled by such abominable sleazes like Gonzales, a nightmare for the majority of Americans who have to wrestle with the criminal justice system who also commit nonviolent crimes .

Lightfoot

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lucky he was in California
Posted by: Urstrly on Jul 26, 2007 3:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hats off to California for injecting some treatment into their drug policy. I'm not sure how much time he'd get in New York under our draconian Rockefeller drug laws, but our prisons are full.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lucky he was in California Posted by: Beagle17
Rich gone wild!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jul 26, 2007 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets see..Gore was carrying 140 pills of Vicodin alone, along with "dozens" of the other medications - and travelling over 100MPH in his Prius. (very "green " of him for sure)

That along with his various other "run in's" with the law involving DUI, and drug possession as noted below suggests that he should get the same treatment that Brittney, and Lohan and Richie received. I wonder though if he were a poor black person would he be thrown in jail. Because he's Gores son and rich, he'll be sent to that beautiful rehab center "Promises".

Some Background
In August 2000, he was ticketed for going 97 mph in a 55-mph zone in North Carolina, and had his driving privileges suspended.

Two years later, he was cited for DUI in Virginia. He eventually pleaded guilty and was sentenced to one year's probation.

And in December 2003, Gore was arrested for marijuana possession in Maryland after he was pulled over for driving with his headlights off. He was sentenced to drug counseling in that case.


no doubt he's as out of control as many young wealthy people with little on their minds except how to party.. He shouldn't get special treatment, but he will..rehab is a given but rarely works the first, second or third time. Jail time is useless, unless he intended to distribute all those pills!!! Maybe he can room with Brittney and co..party on!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» or, use the Libby Defense Posted by: bryanhurst
» Hey, with a record like that... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: ich gone wild! Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: ich gone wild! Posted by: jontv
» RE: ich gone wild! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: ich gone wild! Posted by: jontv
» RE: ich gone wild! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: ich gone wild! Posted by: herdless
Rich gone wild? How about BUSH gone wild?
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jul 26, 2007 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As usual Conservasaurus has different standards for Repukes. We have a president who is a murderer, who is responsible for the deaths of thousands in Iraq and New Orleans, but that is just fine, isn't it? You damned hypocrit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And nevermind Bush's DUI.... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: And nevermind Bush's DUI.... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Use the Internet Posted by: mizipi
» Reptile Dysfunction Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: eptile Dysfunction Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: eptile Dysfunction Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: eptile Dysfunction Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: eptile Dysfunction Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: eptile Dysfunction Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: eptile Dysfunction Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: eptile Dysfunction Posted by: LMNOP
» Rich people Posted by: mizipi
» RE: ich people Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Is ALTERNET sleeping??? Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Is ALTERNET sleeping??? Posted by: mizipi
» RE: ich people Posted by: mizipi
marijuana should be legal
Posted by: vasumurti on Jul 26, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sympathize with Al Gore III.

Former Green Party political activist Jeanne Besanceney (of the San Francisco Vegetarian Society) has written about the negative effect a flesh-centered diet has on our health, and that beginning in childhood, most Americans are "hooked on sugar, caffeine, alcohol...cigarettes."

Dr. John MacDougall similarly advocates a strictly vegan diet with no oils, sugar, salt, caffeine, alcohol or tobacco in The MacDougall Plan (1983). I've been drug, alcohol, and caffeine free, except chocolate :) for 16 years now.

But just as there are millions of Americans who don't drink, but who don't have a problem with other people drinking, or with alcohol being legal, so I also don't have a problem with people around me using mild forms of intoxication, such as alcohol, caffeine, tobacco AND marijuana.

Over 400,000 marijuana arrests are made annually, costing the nation billions of dollars in police and court time and prison space.

Richard Posner, Chicago's chief federal appeals judge, and one of the nation's leading legal scholars, says marijuana should be legalized as a way of reducing crime. "It is nonsense that we should be devoting so many law enforcement resources to marijuana," said Posner.

"I am skeptical that a society that is so tolerant of alcohol and cigarettes should come down so hard on marijuana use and send people to prison for life without parole...Only decriminalization is a sure route to a lower crime rate. It is sad that it appears so far below the horizon of political feasibility."

Prostitution was legal in ancient India for the same reason the Prohibition of alcohol failed in the United States.

Commenting on Srimad Bhagavatam 1.11.19, A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami writes:

"By tricks of chance, one may be obliged to adopt a profession which is not very adorable in society...even in those days, about five thousand years ago, there were prostitutes in a city like Dwarka...This means that prostitutes are necessary citizens for the proper upkeep of society.

"The government opens wine shops, but this does not mean that the government encourages the drinking of wine. The idea is that there is a class of men who will drink at any cost, and it has been experienced that prohibition in great cities encouraged illicit smuggling of wine.

"Similarly, men who are not satisfied at home require such concessions...It is better that prostitutes be available in the marketplace so that the sanctity of society can be maintained."

Again, I sympathize with Al Gore III.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Common sense and logic Posted by: mizipi
The drug war and your "self-ownership"
Posted by: Michael Boldin on Jul 26, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The War on Drugs is absolutely repugnant to the ideals of a free society. It's based on something that I consider to be just horrible - that you don't own your own body - that you are too dumb to make decisions about what you'll smoke, eat or drink.

Instead, the politicians who thrive off this - make these decisions for you.

But, prohibition doesn't work. Didn't this country learn that from alcohol?? It drives up prices, doesn't end usage, and creates black markets, criminal elements and violence.

The best way to deal with drugs is to end this insane "war" on your personal freedom. now.

If you'd like to read more:

"7 Ways to Make Your Neighborhood Safer" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We were wondering...... Posted by: mizipi
» RE: We were wondering...... Posted by: Conservasaurus
Treatment is good...
Posted by: g on Jul 26, 2007 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... when it comes to drug addiction. But I don't want Gore III, or anyone else, speeding at 100mph on the street. I don't care if he's driving a Prius or an Escalade or a pickup truck. By all means give him treatment, sounds like he needs to be forced into it (it's not like mom and dad cannot afford it), but do what you gotta do to keep him off the frickin' street.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1 Year on Skid Row Wothout Access to Money
Posted by: edgar_michel on Jul 26, 2007 12:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A poor black person would be doing the three years. Not because the criminal justice systems believes that three years in prison would rehabilitate this poor black person, but because that would mean three years of $45,000 per year to house this poor black person. This is the sad fact and the reality of our corrupt system and the reason we have laws that place these people into lifetime monitoring schemes. Call it pork, or call it earmarks, but the sad fact is that our criminalization of non-violent offenses against the rest of the people of our society who have to remain sober 24/7 just to survive, just lines of pockets of our criminal justice administrators. I think that one year on skid row for someone who burdens the rest of us with his or her drug habit would teach them more about the final end of their course of action than any other treatment.

Having said that however, treatment should always be preferred to jail, because jail is just a revolving door designed to enrich the jailer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Treatment:
Posted by: dougo on Jul 26, 2007 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is the route which should be taken for all non-violent drug offenders. Gore Jr. deserves to have the treatment option rather than jail and a criminal record. I don't believe drug use is an offense which deserves incarceration, and neither did the voters of California. The drug war is a scam perpetrated on us starting with the drug laws of the 1920's and progressing to the mandatory sentencing of today. Wrong-headed and destructive to society as a whole. A victim-less crime in so many cases. The policies of most businesses prohibit the hiring of people with felony convictions, which leads to their return to crime such as the selling of drugs and then the return to prison. Enough of this insanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmm, Al Gore jr vs. Jenna or Baby Barbara....
Posted by: jaby on Jul 26, 2007 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this were Jenna or Baby Barbara Bush we were talking about, there wouldn't be any calls for compassion here on this website, only derision for their families.

Not that I am a fan of Shrub or his henchmen, just thought I would point that out. I also think that rehab would be the logical thing to do in these situations, so it is not as if I oppose the California laws regarding this. Again, just pointing out what would happen if the shoe was on the other foot.

Oh, one more thing...being in possession of 124 vicoden in your car suggests intent to distribute. It's not like they were at his house, they were in his car with him. Why would one carry around 124 vicoden? Because one is going to give them away/sell them. Or maybe he is just an idiot. Something rehab cannot cure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OT...kind of...
Posted by: picket on Jul 26, 2007 2:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but speaking of justice for the rich vs the poor, or justice for non violent crimes.

I am still reeling from watching PBS program Prison Town... Susanville, California...a program about four families , on TV this week.
One family passing through on way to work in another state, with hungry children and NO $$$$$$$$. The father stole bread, tuna, mac and cheese, .....OK $40 worth of food from a store. How much time did the young man get in Calif State Prison??????

16 MONTHS...........the wife also got arrested and the children were put in foster care for a time. The program followed them through the man finishing parole and getting out of the GOD FORSAKEN PLACE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OT...kind of... Posted by: zyxwvut
It was a felony arrest
Posted by: YogiBear on Jul 26, 2007 4:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Simple drug possession"
"low-level drug offenders"

Now, I'm all for legalizing drugs, but lets be honest when reporting the facts of the case. The number of prescription Vicadins Gore was carrying implies he was a dealer, which carries a far heavier penalty than personal use.

"The Orange Country District Attorney's office said in a statement Mr Gore had been charged with two felony counts of possessing a controlled substance and two misdemeanor counts of possessing a drug without a prescription.

He also faces an additional misdemeanor count of marijuana possession as well as a traffic offense for speeding."

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/
0,21985,22109459-5005961,00.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No prison for drug usage, ever.....
Posted by: blitzmesser on Jul 26, 2007 8:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" Ihope Gore receives exactly what most nonviolent, low-level drug offenders in California do -- a chance at treatment instead of a record."
Exactly.
In my book: no one should go to prison for drug usage, or whatever you call it. Drug usage is personal and has nothing to do with the government, which should have no role, whatsoever, interfering with our choices.
If we are not violating any persons, property, or animal, , there should be no crime mentioned.
Prisons are for rapists, murderes, etc. (Including rapist clergy)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If the young Gore was
Posted by: SamFox on Jul 26, 2007 9:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
home no bust. If he was not speeding, no bust.

He's lucky reckless endangerment was not on the list of charges. And even more fortunate that he did not have a longer chance to kill some one. The police may have saved more than one life.

Plus he had fairly dangerous drugs with him. When was the last time a MJ smoker was busted for speeding? I don't mean a dealer selling criminal (gang member, mob, ect.) who pushes other drugs as well as MJ, but a regular citizen who likes to toke up. Few MJ users endanger people's lives on the freeway. Usually MJ users drive too slow, if they drive at all.

Gore should do some time, but for the way he was driving. I agree that the drug war should be ended. I am an activist to that end. But when consumers take it to the streets at 100 mph, they have entered the public arena. No one has the right to get high & drive that way. I believe in moderation & responsibility. Young Al showed neither or he would not have been arrested.

If we are not responsible, wise & prudent, the RE legalize movement will be be badly hampered by us who fight for the lost, stupid, draconian, $$ wasting drug war to end. We will be our own worst enemies.

SamFox

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no prison
Posted by: donl51 on Jul 27, 2007 4:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doesn't matter who he is,rich,poor,any color we're very fast becomming a prison state,too many laws,for too many stupid reasons and for the most part we're doing it to ourselves,for the drugs[ we're talking the real bad ones ,you know !the ones that are legal? he needs help ,not a new boyfriend named Bubba! In America prison is the answer to all problems,we used to have places for those that needed mental help,of course their really wasn't enough money in it then and they attracted society's cruelest 'helpers' so they were closed down and all those inturned joined the ranks already keeping warm on the grids! Yep! we're the richest nation on the planet ,we've the best society to live in [if you hold your ears ,close your eyes and mouth ] you'll be just fine! as for punishment prison is harsh,but no answer to anything, just look at how many return, the system helps no-one but themselves,lots of money! our system does as much as it can to get you back in the system,and its targetted,! listen to some of todays commercials concerning schools ''the legal and law system is fast becomming your best choice for a high paying career,learn to spy on your neighbors,your friends in the name of the law!how to become a police officer,we need as many as we can get .....[we need good ones not just anykind!] You put the worst offenders in prison,murderers,armed robbers,rapists,......speeders? take away their licence,impound their car charge for it, I'm no doctor i don't know how to help those w/drug problems,or alcohol for that matter,pot doesn't cause all those problems but stupid is stupid ,you just don't put the sick and stupid in prison!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

who really cares?
Posted by: donl51 on Aug 15, 2007 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah thats what i said ,who really cares?if he gets off good!,you ever sit and read all the horror stories of how our low life judicial system treats those who even touch pot?i have! do every day even been in the system its disgusting,you're worse than murderers ,armed robbers,pedifiles,hell probably even serial killers,we can initially thank Nixon and Reagan for this then we can thank those ball-less dimwits 'we the people' elected into office who do little get great perks and lots of vacation,then theirs the judges and prosecuters,their are a few good ones out there but not enough to mean anything,then theres the appointee defence lawyers [thankfully i could afford a 'real' lawyer] appointed lawyers are even less than useless i've seen them in action ,ask anyone serving 50 years for one joint,then theirs the police,they're the worst,most joined because they can drive fast ,carry a gun and bust heads legally,these were generally the ones who were real low scorers in high school they had two choices if they missed getting drafted be a cop or be a crook,in lots of cases,they're found to be both,then we have the elitist...''State Trooper''...these guys shit ice cream,i've met these first hand up close and personel,primo liars especially those on special task forces these are the GESTAPO of our ''to protect and serve types...thankfully we have LEAP,these folks are the good part of the american legal system!I thank them,but WHY?do these people have to be so harsh on mostly good hard working law abiding citizens because they prefer to smoke something utterly harmless instead of getting drunk and stupid or on tobacco and end up ....dead! and its fucking legal so don't get mad at who doesn't pay get mad at who makes this what it is ...we're talking greedy slimeballs big business like hearst ,big pharmas [pik one],dirty officials[they run the country! ] lotta people to hate !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement