Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

DrugReporter

Documents Reveal: Cops Planted Pot on 92-Year Old Woman They Killed in Botched Drug Raid

By Rhonda Cook, Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Posted April 30, 2007.


Atlanta resident Kathryn Johnston's death has finally been exposed to be a case of police coverup in clear example of the insanity of the war on drugs.
Advertisement

According to federal documents released this week, these are the events that led to Kathryn Johnston's death and the steps the officers took to cover their tracks.

Three narcotics agents were trolling the streets near the Bluffs in northwest Atlanta, a known market for drugs, midday on the Tuesday before Thanksgiving.

Eventually they set their sights on some apartments on Lanier Street, usually fertile when narcotics agents are looking for arrests and seizures.

Gregg Junnier and another narcotics officer went inside the apartments around 2 p.m. while Jason Smith checked the woods. Smith found dozens of bags of marijuana -- in baggies that were clear, blue or various other colors and packaged to sell. With no one connected to the pot, Smith stashed the bags in the trunk of the patrol car. A use was found for Smith's stash 90 minutes later: A phone tip led the three officers to a man in a "gold-colored jacket" who might be dealing. The man, identified as X in the documents but known as Fabian Sheats, spotted the cops and put something in his mouth. They found no drugs on Sheats, but came up with a use for the pot they found earlier.

They wanted information or they would arrest Sheats for dealing.

While Junnier called for a drug-sniffing dog, Smith planted some bags under a rock, which the K-9 unit found.

But if Sheats gave them something, he could walk.

Sheats pointed out 933 Neal St., the home of 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston. That, he claimed, is where he spotted a kilogram of cocaine when he was there to buy crack from a man named "Sam."

They needed someone to go inside, but Sheats would not do for their purposes because he was not a certified confidential informant.

So about 5:05 p.m. they reached out by telephone to Alex White to make an undercover buy for them. They had experience with White and he had proved to be a reliable snitch.

But White had no transportation and could not help.

Still, Smith, Junnier and the other officer, Arthur Tesler, according to the state's case, ran with the information. They fabricated all the right answers to persuade a magistrate to give them a no-knock search warrant.

By 6 p.m., they had the legal document they needed to break into Kathryn Johnston's house, and within 40 minutes they were prying off the burglar bars and using a ram to burst through the elderly woman's front door. It took about two minutes to get inside, which gave Johnston time to retrieve her rusty .38 revolver.

Tesler was at the back door when Junnier, Smith and the other narcotics officers crashed through the front.

Johnston got off one shot, the bullet missing her target and hitting a porch roof. The three narcotics officers answered with 39 bullets.

Five or six bullets hit the terrified woman. Authorities never figured out who fired the fatal bullet, the one that hit Johnston in the chest. Some pieces of the other bullets -- friendly fire -- hit Junnier and two other cops.

The officers handcuffed the mortally wounded woman and searched the house.

There was no Sam.

There were no drugs.

There were no cameras that the officers had claimed was the reason for the no-knock warrant.

Just Johnston, handcuffed and bleeding on her living room floor.

That is when the officers took it to another level. Three baggies of marijuana were retrieved from the trunk of the car and planted in Johnston's basement. The rest of the pot from the trunk was dropped down a sewage drain and disappeared.

The three began getting their stories straight.

The next day, one of them, allegedly Tesler, completed the required incident report in which he wrote that the officers went to the house because their informant had bought crack at the Neal Street address. And Smith turned in two bags of crack to support that claim.

They plotted how they would cover up the lie.

They tried to line up one of their regular informants, Alex White, the reliable snitch with the unreliable transportation.

The officers' story would be that they met with White at an abandoned carwash Nov. 21 and gave him $50 to make the buy from Neal Street.

To add credibility to their story, they actually paid White his usual $30 fee for information and explained to him how he was to say the scenario played out if asked. An unidentified store owner kicked in another $100 to entice White to go along with the play.

The three cops spoke several times, assuring each other of the story they would tell.

But Junnier was the first to break.

On Dec. 11, three weeks after the shooting, Junnier told the FBI it was all a lie.

Note: Junnier will face 10 years and one month and Smith 12 years and seven months. No sentencing date was immediately set, and the sentences are contingent on the men cooperating with the government. Arthur Tesler, also on administrative leave, was charged with violation of oath by a public officer, making false statements and false imprisonment under color of legal process. His attorney, William McKenney, said Tesler expects to go to trial.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: war on drugs, botched drug raid


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Send the bastards to Guantanamo.
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Apr 30, 2007 12:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or better still, Iraq. It's better than they deserve.

I hope that poor old lady has family that will sue this pack of mindless, dribbling idiots until they have to sell the next 3 generations of their family into slavery.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

repeal prohibition NOW
Posted by: drblack on Apr 30, 2007 1:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The human race got along just fine without any drug prohibition. Laws against drugs are only a little more than 100 years old.
This is the kind of crap that happens all the time because of the immoral and failed "War On Some Drugs'.
Violence would be cut by 75% if drugs were no longer prohibited.
Maybe then the Police could go after real criminals for a change.
How the hell can a plant that has been shown to be safer than coffe be illegal?
I wrote an essay in Jr. High school in 1981 that stated that real threats to our nation would be allowed to flourish because we were wasting our law enforcement on protecting people from themselves.
I even speculated that the USA would be attacked by terrorists if the drug war was allowed to continue because the CIA and FBI would be too busy fighting plants and their extracts to find the real dangers that threatened the USA.
The police,courts,politicians,customs ,banks are filled with corruption because drugs which cost pennies when legal are now worth hundreds because they are illegal.
If someone you know and love is gunned down there is a good chance it was because drugs are illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: repeal prohibition NOW Posted by: douglashoyt
» RE: repeal prohibition NOW Posted by: Doubtom
When?
Posted by: kelt65 on Apr 30, 2007 4:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will America end its mindless worship of police?

How many true stories that reveal police to be nothing less than absolute scum, worthless criminal garbage do we have to endure before we send them to their rightful place?

Nearly every television show on prime time is the most breathless idiocy of police worship.

Tell a cop he's a scumbag today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» another thing Posted by: kelt65
» RE: another thing Posted by: CatDad
» RE: When? Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: When? war on drugs Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: When? war on drugs Posted by: zyxwvut
» RE: When? war on drugs Posted by: kelt65
» RE: When? Posted by: Babypants
» RE: When? Posted by: De-evolutionary
» RE: When? Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: When? Posted by: Aussie Kim
» 10%'ers Posted by: hbw
» RE: When? Posted by: ALANHESTER
No-knock Entry
Posted by: guybjones on Apr 30, 2007 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A major part of the problem in these tragic instances, the overall stupidity of the "war on drugs" aside, is the increasing reliance of police on "no-knock warrants," which allow them to barge into a residence unannounced. U.S. Supreme Court caselaw used to require the existence of an "exigent circumstance," such as the imminent destruction of evidence, threat to the community, or escape of the suspect, as a prerequisite for such entry. Unfortunately, the Court has largely eviscerated 4th amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures in the home (especially with its decision last year holding that evidence obtained through search warrants that were improperly served could not be suppressed) and the cops currently enjoy wide leeway to come busting through the front door without any announcement of their presence beforehand. The number of instances of homeowners either A) shooting at police who came into their homes, understandably under the impression that their home was being invaded, or B) cops who end up killing innocent homeowners due to warrants that were served on the wrong location, or contained false information to begin with, is staggering. Until use of the no-knock entry is constrained to those circumstances which genuinely require it, these tragedies and criminal invasions of the home will continue unabated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Race & $$$$$$
Posted by: mizipi on Apr 30, 2007 5:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The story did not state it, but I bet the cops were white and everybody else was black. Just like NY City, where white cops can shoot blacks any day of the week and all is well. Anyway, we (those with an IQ over 85) know that the War on Drugs is just like the War in Iraq - a government run business that is very, VERY profitable. Just try to call your local law enforcement and start asking questions about how much money is spent and how much manpower is used to enforce the drug laws................. Then a bunch of NARCS will enter your home, shoot you, plant drugs, blah, blah.....

Ain't it great to live in a nation with so much government?!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ice Cube, Not Ice T Posted by: stagolee
» You're right.... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Hakim Bey said it best with this gem from the 80's ...
Posted by: kelt65 on Apr 30, 2007 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RESOLUTION FOR THE 1990's: BOYCOTT COP CULTURE!!!

IF ONE FICTIONAL FIGURE can be said to have dominated the popcult of the eighties, it was the Cop. Fuckin' police ev- erywhere you turned, worse than real life. What an incredible bore.

Powerful Cops--protecting the meek and humble--at the expense of a half-dozen or so articles of the Bill of Rights- -"Dirty Harry." Nice human cops, coping with human perversity, coming out sweet 'n' sour, you know, gruff & knowing but still soft inside--Hill Street Blues--most evil TV show ever. Wiseass black cops scoring witty racist remarks against hick white cops, who nevertheless come to love each other--Eddie Murphy, Class Traitor. For that masochist thrill we got wicked bent cops who threaten to topple our Kozy Konsensus Reality from within like Giger- designed tapeworms, but naturally get blown away just in the nick of time by the Last Honest Cop, Robocop, ideal amalgam of prosthesis and sentimentality.

We've been obsessed with cops since the beginning--but the rozzers of yore played bumbling fools, Keystone Kops, Car 54 Where Are You, booby-bobbies set up for Fatty Arbuckle or Buster Keaton to squash & deflate. But in the ideal drama of the eighties, the "little man" who once scattered bluebottles by the hundred with that anarchist's bomb, innocently used to light a cigarette--the Tramp, the victim with the sudden power of the pure heart--no longer has a place at the center of narrative. Once "we" were that hobo, that quasi-surrealist chaote hero who wins thru wu- wei over the ludicrous minions of a despised & irrelevant Order. But now "we" are reduced to the status of victims without power, or else criminals. "We" no longer occupy that central role; no longer the heros of our own stories, we've been marginalized & replaced by the Other, the Cop.

Thus the Cop Show has only three characters--victim, criminal, and policeperson--but the first two fail to be fully human--only the pig is real. Oddly enough, human society in the eighties (as seen in the other media) sometimes appeared to consist of the same three cliche/archetypes. First the victims, the whining minorities bitching about "rights"--and who pray tell did not belong to a "minority" in the eighties? Shit, even cops complained about their "rights" being abused. Then the criminals: largely non-white (despite the obligatory & hallucinatory "integration" of the media), largely poor (or else obscenely rich, hence even more alien), largely perverse (i.e. the forbidden mirrors of "our" desires). I've heard that one out of four households in America is robbed every year, & that every year nearly half a million of us are arrested just for smoking pot. In the face of such statistics (even assuming they're "damned lies") one wonders who is NOT either victim or criminal in our police-state-of-consciousness. The fuzz must mediate for all of us, however fuzzy the interface-- they're only warrior-priests, however profane. America's Most Wanted--the most successful TV game show of the eighties--opened up for all of us the role of Amateur Cop, hitherto merely a media fantasy of middleclass resentment & revenge. Naturally the truelife Cop hates no one so much as the vigilante--look what happens to poor &/or non-white neighborhood self-protection groups like the Muslims who tried to eliminate crack dealing in Brooklyn: the cops busted the Muslims, the pushers went free. Real vigilantes threaten the monopoly of enforcement, lÉse majest­, more abominable than incest or murder. But media(ted) vigilantes function perfectly within the CopState; in fact, it would be more accurate to think of them as unpaid (not even a set of matched luggage!) informers: telemetric snitches, electro-stoolies, ratfinks- for-a-day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great response! Posted by: gary_7vn
» RE: Great response! Posted by: kelt65
» WOW!!! Keep on talking, mate!!! Posted by: gonzoskismet
Eventually people will start realizing that America is an unfit place to live
Posted by: LMNOP on Apr 30, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
N/T

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The people allowing our police to adopt paramilitary/military tactics is the problem.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 30, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Allowing our police to use the same tactics in our cities and suburbs as though they were patrolling Baghdad is wrong, foolish, and arguably unconstitutional. The most important duty of our civilian policing force is, after all, to protect the lives and property of the citizens. How they reconcile that duty with common no-knock warrants is beyond me. The fact that an elderly person would hear the crashing sound of intruders--possibly violent drug dealers or sky-high users looking for $10 for a fix--and enforce her constitutional right to defend herself and her property through the use of lethal force is a predictable outcome from overly broad use of no-knock warrants.

There are obviously a certain number instances in which no-knocks are essential for the protection of the police and, indeed, the protection of the suspects. A known armed-to-the-gills crackhouse, or a known methlab filled with toxics and combustibles make good candidates for "Surprise, criminal"-style raids. But a little old ladies house? Based on very poor, unverified information? Not so much. Limiting the number of no-knocks, and using them only when appropriate is the best way to keep folks safe. Better cooperation between the citizens and the police wouldn't hurt, either, from a "get the correct information before acting" perspective.

The cops-turned-criminals will have a decade behind bars to think about how they should have protected Ms Johnston instead of precipitating her death. Hopefully, it won't take the rest of us that long to see how badly the broad use of no-knock warrants infringes on our fundamental rights as U.S. citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Disgusting War on Drugs
Posted by: gary_7vn on Apr 30, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This kind of thing happens all the time. If the victim had been a 25 year old black man, everyone would have bought their story instantly. The only reason we are talking about this is because she was 92 and a woman.
The War on Drugs, Terror, you name it, produces a lot of collateral damage, what a surprise.

When will America have a War on War?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Disgusting War on Drugs Posted by: MatthewSavage
» The terrorwar on drug users... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
guntotingliberal
Posted by: guntotingliberal on Apr 30, 2007 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since this is what police are capable of now, do you really want them to be the ONLY citizens allowed to bear arms? If drug prohibition contributes to this behavior now, as my fellow liberals insist, why wouldn't gun prohibition - more prohibition! - exacerbate it?
It's inconsistent to favor one prohibition and support another.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not at all .... Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: Not at all .... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: guntotingliberal Posted by: morticia
» RE: guntotingliberal Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: guntotingliberal Posted by: Wacre
» RE: guntotingliberal Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: guntotingliberal Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: guntotingliberal Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: guntotingliberal Posted by: ALANHESTER
Undercover drug cops, undercover political police - welcome to Stasi
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 30, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stasi was the East German police system, made up of a vast network of undercover police and citizen informants. Family members were recruited to spy on one another, and torture and wiretaps were common.

The Stasi operated with broad power and remarkable attention to detail. All phone calls from the West were monitored, as was all mail. Similar surveillance was routine domestically. Every factory, social club and youth association was infiltrated; many East Germans were persuaded or blackmailed into informing on their own families.

The Stasi kept close tabs on all potential subversives. Stasi agents collected scent samples from people by wiping bits of cloth on objects they had touched. These samples were stored in airtight glass containers and special dogs were trained to track down the person's scent. The agency was authorized to conduct secret smear campaigns against anyone it judged to be a threat; this might include sending anonymous letters and making anonymous phone calls to blackmail the targeted person. Torture was an accepted method of getting information.


The film, The Lives of Others, now in theaters, describes this system - which is very similar to the ones that Bush, Cheney, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, etc. have set up in the United States. They are now using slimy, dishonest undercover drug cops as political snitches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A few thoughts
Posted by: willymack on Apr 30, 2007 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To say the "war on drugs" has been a disaster would be a gross understatement. Why, then, does it persist? In my opinion, it would appear that certain government officials are getting fat kickbacks for looking the other way while hundreds of thousands of harmless, hapless victims of this insanity are rotting away in prison. There's even talk that the CIA uses drug money to finance their "black ops". The situation is far worse than in the days of (alcohol) prohibition-a real disaster for the less fortunate among us. People will ALWAYS look for ways to get high; it's hard-wired into our brains. Why not take the first steps toward legalization, taxation, and CONTROL of the drug trade as we've done with booze?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A few thoughts Posted by: mizipi
» RE: A few thoughts Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: A few thoughts Posted by: ALANHESTER
Drug War Statistics
Posted by: fanny666 on Apr 30, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drug War Facts (PDF file)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mandatory minimum?
Posted by: mcubed on Apr 30, 2007 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You would think that police officers killing an innocent person and planting drugs on their victim would carry a longer sentence than the draconian mandatory minimums for posession that some non-violent offenders are serving.
The war on drugs makes no sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mandatory minimum? Posted by: morticia
amerikkka in a nutshell...
Posted by: gltirebiter on Apr 30, 2007 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
where to begin?
first, drugs are made illegal, and private corporations are contracted to conduct random drug testing on the working public (and a highly lucrative racket it is, too).
anyone failing a random test loses his or her job, without any meaningful recourse...you failed, you are fired.
cops are given more and more power to spy and arrest and assault drug users.
more arrests mean more prosecutors, judges, prisons are needed to process the offenders.
more and more citizens are convicted of drug offenses, sent to prison.
because of their criminal records, these citizens cannot find gainful employment upon release.
because of this increase in unemployable citizens, recidivism is common...or trumped up by the authorities.
all these prosecutions and convictions create crime statistics the authorities can use to ask for more power, more money.
and here is another thing to think about...
nobody i ever knew who was busted was a voting republican.
once arrested and convicted, citizens are disenfranchised, they lose the right to vote, thus eliminating an entire bloc of political opponents.
not only does the drug war perpetuate itself through an endless cycle of arrests, convictions, incarcerations, confiscation of property, and probation.
police and prison guard pacs donate heavily to repugnicunt political campaigns.
this is a social purge, pure and simple. the dope smokers neither respect nor vote for these bastards, so the authorities can eliminate them by demonizing their behavior and creating a premanent criminal/prisoner class with no hope for the future, thus ensuring that the cops, guards/judges/probation officers/prosecutors/snitches will always have their jobs.
this country has become a festering, stinking shithole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: amerikkka in a nutshell... Posted by: gary_7vn
Why isn't this on the TV news?
Posted by: WitchyNy on Apr 30, 2007 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why isn't it in the New York Times?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

let's not forget hemp
Posted by: Don Garb on Apr 30, 2007 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The cannabis prohibition started as a way to keep alcohol cops on the payroll and to stifle the hemp industry. Every day cotton growers, pulp and paper companies, oil corporations and agri-businesses all benefit from the removal of competitive hemp. Hemp is the single most productive resource on the entire planet, it is the champion, it is the king, it rules above all others. One acre of hemp will grow more fibre, more oil and more protein than any other crop. And it will do it with less labor, less fertilizer, less poison and it will renew the soil to boot. Sure, scumbag psychopathic cops murdering a woman then covering it up is awful. But allowing the entire planet to be murdered so that corporate cronies can get rich un-sustainably, the mind boggles. We have to put a stop to this madness. My girlfriend's New Year's Eve resolution is to tell it like it is, and not pull any punches, let's all do the same. Oh and another thing, every cop that knew about this atrocity and stayed silent or even acted to protect the bastards are guilty criminals as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: let's not forget hemp Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: let's not forget hemp Posted by: Aussie Kim
Drug War Credibility Gap...
Posted by: picket on Apr 30, 2007 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Geico getco makes more sense than the so called "Drug Warriors" and our elected officials.

The sad truth is that the damage that has been done, to the fabric of our society, by the inhumane drug laws and greedy interests will never be rectified in our lifetime.

If by some MIRACLE our elected leaders were to get their minds around the real problems TODAY and put a stop to the current Washington Drug Policy Deceptions, some of us will have HOPE for the lives of future generations of American citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We blame the cops-
Posted by: WitchyNy on Apr 30, 2007 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but they are just doing what they are told to do. Bust down doors...arrest/shoot anyone using drugs. They knew they were screwed when they saw they shot an old lady. They clearly did not intend to shoot an old lady...it is the senseless drug war that killed her. And the government giving uneducated and scared and angry men guns and such power.

A woman cop once told me that they were losing the drug war...and they did not know what else to do. (besides random drug raids)
Well, I don't think they are supposed to win it.

Remember in the Godfather when the government (excuse me-the Mafia) were first planning to start bringing drugs to America? We will only sell it to the Black people, they said, they are animals anyway.

What if Black people stopped using drugs and instead organized and turned their despair and anger on the U.S. Government? Can't have THAT happen...here....use some more drugs.

And of course, now our young white kids are using hard drugs. You reap what you sow....

WHAT TO DO.

1. Stop the war. Spend the money at home.
2. Free college for everyone
3. People before profits. We need to change the military-industrial-system to a envioronment first- people first- system.
4. Legalize pot. If people want to spend their days high on pot..let them. Let them sit around and sing and laugh and eat.
There are worse things.
5. Eat the rich. What ever system you call it..we don't need rich people running it.
6. Everyone must grow orgainc vegetable gardens. Make it a law.
7. Jobs must be meaningful and necessary and for the common good. If they are not-make them stay home and tend the garden.
8. God is the Earth. If you conspire to pollute-then you should go to jail-for religious education.
9. Jails are for education, and then freedom. Unless the crinimal is violent-such as a child molester or a rapist. Robbery is usually due to poverty.
10. Poverty is the worse form of violence.

Poverty, War, Capitalism, Ignorance and Racism are the problems.
Solve those problems and we solve the drug problem.
Drugs are just a symptom.
Take back our country from the rich. This is NOT a Capitalistic system. This is a DEMOCRATIC system.
Remember?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HOORAH Posted by: weatherking
» RE: We blame the cops- Posted by: Aussie Kim
Said but, not a surprize
Posted by: jazznut on Apr 30, 2007 2:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This doesn't come as a surprize to me at all. I've been to Atlanta and have spent some time there. I also knew long before i got there how corrupt and murderous the Atlanta Police Department are. I also had a memoruous experience with them. Stopped one night coming in from work to help a woman whose purse had been taken from her and dumped out and ended up in court for a ticket for my vehicle being on the curb, which i did to shine my headlights while she picked up her items. The jealous black bastard couldn't find anything else on me. He wasn't as educated, damned sure wasn't making more than me and didn't like it when he threatened to arrest me and i didn't back down from him. He didn't show up in court either and they threw it out. I was excited to go there because i heard so much about it and dreaded ever having to go back there when i left. I lived in NY and if i had to choose between the two? Give me NY. The interracial stuff didn't bother me much, i expected that, the intraracial stuff i couldn't get ready for. What shade of Black you are DOES MATTER there and i'm darker than blue. I spent 3 years in NY and didn't get that much disrepect. Black people are doing lots of things there but, they definately aren't in control, like i heard. The south is still the south and the plantation mentality is alive and well there. Hated it! I also didn't like the fact that it's surrounded by freeway which means it's easy to control in the event of a major contingent plan and the Atlanta police ALONE proved that during the '97 Feaknik, i.e. Dantes Inferno. They had one way in, one way out! That left me feeling very uncomfortable, also, the CDC is based there, didn't snuggle up with that thought either! The Atlanta Police are the political machines "Henchmen", they break backs at breakfast and murder somebody before lunch. I was born yesterday but, stayed up all night AND paid attention! I'm not surprized and won't be if these guys walk. Atlanta is a dangerous city and i'm not just talking about the citizens either! It's ashame this happened but, it happens every day. May she rest in peace, i'm sure she didn't expect to go out like this. I don't so much blame the police there, that's what they do, i blame the coward that falsely fingered her. "Bring me his head!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time was.....
Posted by: gonzoskismet on Apr 30, 2007 6:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time for another 'old hippie' story. There was a time in America where, if you were busted for as much as a SEED, you could be sent to prison for LIFE in Texas. (Correlative: The current pResident comes from there)
Back in those days, I worked as a columnist in some of what they called 'underground newspapers.' And, a place on the list of the 'House of UnAmerican Activities' list. I got an all paid visit from the F b of I, told them to go do their mothers and rolled on in life.
I hung out in a Dallas park in those days called Lee Park. It wasn't unusual in those days to have the drunk rednecks come by at 2 o clock in the morning and fire random shots into the park. So, everybody bought guns and shot back. It was the American Way, shoot back.
Narcs were everywhere in those days and it wasn't surprising to find some of them floating in Turtle Creek, which flowed through Lee Park. THAT was the price you paid for narcing back then. I think it was during that period that I embarassed the Libertarian faith. There was no law enforcement in Lee Park except to keep you awake in the morning after you had been up all night tripping some REALLY good acid.
Now, because of our 'so called' government, narcing is a business and old ladies are the victims. I saw a lot of innocent people killed in Dallas in the sixties under the drug laws then.
You could get busted back then for throwing a wad of aluminum foil from a car. The drugs would be 'provided.' Everybody carried a gun because everybody knew how things were. But an old lady can't shoot a gun that well So she died and they planted. WHAT HAS CHANGED in the last 35 years?
Nothing.
Does this make you mad, America? Or do you suck on the teat of Homeland Security and don't care what is being done to you as long as no 'terrarists' threaten you with loving Allah or loving America? How many times have you seen bearded men with the Koran tightly clutched to their breasts in YOUR neighbor hood?
BOO!!!! America. Boo! I feel for you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The police are an occupying force.
Posted by: wishninja on Apr 30, 2007 7:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is the only way to consider them at this point. They no longer stand for the rule of law. We must vote out the fascist occupiers or be left with force as the only alternative, but for now we must resist never call on the police, never. Stop snitching stop cooperating, stop giving up our rights without a fight. Someone breaks into your house shut up and get a better lock, someone crashes into your car call your insurance company, someone threatens your family go buy a gun and do some target practice or move out. But never call the cops never they are occupiers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ark angel
Posted by: eldoradoman1953 on Apr 30, 2007 7:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this should be the payback. those cops familys should get what the old lady got till then they wont understand the grief they cause

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ark angel Posted by: Topaz
» RE: ark angel Posted by: morticia
There's a few things missing here. . .
Posted by: Topaz on Apr 30, 2007 9:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in this article. The only reason those cops are getting manslaughter charges instead of murder charges is because they're turning state's evidence against fellow officers in the Atlanta P.D. for corruption like this that has been going on for years. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Heads are going to roll for this. It's sad that it took the death of an innocent grandmother to bring this shit to light. Police officers take an oath to defend the Constitution, breaking that oath is more than criminal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

12 years for murder!!!
Posted by: doneman2000 on May 1, 2007 12:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is murder plain and simple. Yes it's tough for cops in prison. That's why they go to either a special prison or to a special place in a prison (ususally reserved for snitches). They should be made to do aminimum of 25 years and then come up for parole which should be denied for at least another 10 years. Drug prohibition is the root cause of this with fear being sold to the American sheep by politicians and bureaucrats see John Walters and the lies he spews if you want a specimen of this ilk to observe. BTW Walters is our drug czar. It will continue as long as we allow it too. With the drug war bureaucracy already bankrolled at $50 billion a year it will take fear of being thrown out of office to derail this disgrace for public policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The entire system is corrupt
Posted by: dogonvillage on May 7, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It’s not just the cops, it’s the criminal justice system. Prosecutors are aware of the dishonest actions of the police since they have to clean it up before they go to court. That’s one reason DA’s push for deals, they know laws were broken to make the arrest. As for the snitch that everyone is calling a hero, I wonder if he has lied for the police in the past for them to feel as though they could call him for cover.

Check the site November.org, I found countless stories about dishonest snitches when I was researching for my novel “SnitchCraft.” It really is an epidemic that needs to be addressed. Perhaps the visit to speak before Congress by the CI in the Johnston case will convince them to do something. I doubt it. The mounting fatalities in the “War on Terror” hasn’t triggered any action in DC. We should all be ashamed of the state of America! Edrea Davis

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ressless
Posted by: ressless on May 12, 2007 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"To protect and serve" is an incomplete sentence; we, the people, just assumed it meant us. In reality the police protect only themselves and serve only to further their own careers. How many more lives will destroyed before the American people wake up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tom Tele
Posted by: Tom Tele on May 15, 2007 8:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The big problem is regardless of what kind of person becomes a cop they are put in the position of having to encourage people to be their worst(snitch) and have to meddle in peoples affairs because they are trying to stop activity between consenting adults that is fairly harmless. Legalization would put the cartels out of business. And let our police regain their respected position when so many otherwise law abiding citizens are again on the right side of the law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]