Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

DrugReporter

New Study Shows Medical Value of Marijuana

By Rob Kampia, AlterNet. Posted February 22, 2007.


New research gives more ammunition to those hoping to change federal marijuana policy.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Ever since California and other states began passing medical marijuana laws in 1996, the federal government has claimed that -- as a 2003 White House press release put it -- "research has not demonstrated that smoked marijuana is safe and effective medicine." A new study, just published in the journal Neurology, definitively refutes that claim and underlines the urgent need for the federal government to change its prohibitionist policies.

The study, conducted by Dr. Donald Abrams of the University of California at San Francisco, found marijuana to be safe and effective at treating peripheral neuropathy, which causes great suffering to HIV/AIDS patients. This type of extreme pain, which is caused by damage to the nerves, can make patients feel like their feet and hands are on fire, or being stabbed with a knife. Similar pain is seen in a number of other illnesses, including multiple sclerosis and diabetes, and cannot be treated effectively with conventional pain medications. Standard pain medicines -- even addictive, dangerous narcotics -- have little effect on this type of pain.

Marijuana doesn't cure neuropathy, but in the UCSF study marijuana was clearly shown to give relief. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (the design that's considered the "gold standard" of medical research), a majority of patients had a greater than 30 percent reduction in pain after smoking marijuana. For many, that level of relief means having a bearable quality of life.

This result is all the more remarkable because researchers like Abrams are only allowed to test government-supplied marijuana, which is of notoriously poor quality. There's every reason to believe the results would be even better if scientists were permitted to study a better-quality product.

Abrams' study is only the latest in a growing mountain of research showing that medical marijuana can provide real -- and potentially even life-saving -- benefits. In a study published last year of patients being treated for the hepatitis C virus (HCV), those who used marijuana to curb the nausea and other noxious side effects of anti-HCV drugs were significantly more likely to complete their treatment. As a result, the marijuana-using patients were three times more likely to clear the deadly virus from their bodies -- in other words, to be cured -- than those not using marijuana.

Clearly, the White House and its drug czar, John Walters, should abandon their rigid, unscientific rejection of medical marijuana and start reshaping federal policy to match medical reality.

Unfortunately, this is unlikely; what's more likely is that the Bush administration will ignore the scientific data during its last two years in power, just as it has for the past six years.

That puts the ball in Congress's court. There are a number of actions Congress can take to put federal medical marijuana policy on a path toward sanity.

The first, and simplest, is to prohibit the Drug Enforcement Administration from spending money to raid and arrest medical marijuana patients and caregivers in the 11 states where the medical use of marijuana is legal under state law. This taxpayer-friendly act would remove the cloud of fear that now hangs over tens of thousands of desperately ill Americans and those who care for them.

But that should be just the beginning. Everything about federal medical marijuana policy should be reconsidered. That includes the arbitrary rules that needlessly hamper research, as well as the absurd law that classifies cocaine and methamphetamine as having more medical value than marijuana, which is grouped with heroin and LSD as having "no currently accepted medical use."

The guiding principle must be to handle medical marijuana as science, common sense, and simple human decency dictate. Recent research leaves no doubt that our government's war on the sick and dying must end immediately.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drugs, marijuana, legalization

Rob Kampia is executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project in Washington, DC.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Free Medication? Can't allow that!
Posted by: seamus on Feb 22, 2007 12:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The pharmaceutical companies who own the Bush administration aren't going to let people produce medicine in their own gardens any more than the alcohol companies are going to allow people to produce their own drugs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You can make your own alcohol Posted by: HistArch
» RE: You can make your own alcohol Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: drug busts! Posted by: sasquuatch55
I know personal testimony isn't universal, but...
Posted by: timebomb734 on Feb 22, 2007 12:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was on anti-depressants and anti-anxiety medications for years-from 7th grade to my junior year of high school. Despite trying a laundry list of prescription drugs, I continued to be a total panic attacking tweak case who couldn't talk to strangers. I couldn't get anything accomplished because anti-anxiety meds put you in freaking lala land. I know that my nighty bedtime smoke has helped me transition to life off of the mind-numbing medications. I am now a junior at a big ten university, I work two part-time jobs to pay for school, I'm on the dean's list, and I don't alienate everyone that I meet. Marijuana has been infinitely helpful in helping me achieve that, because motivation to try to do well at anything (at least for me) was a far bigger challenge on anti-anxiety meds than with pot. Unfortunately, fewer studies have been done on marijuana as a psychological medication than have been conducted on its use as a pain medication. Also, Paxil's manufacturer's might not be pleased with research or legislation that would threaten its booming sales in drugs of this kind.
Furthermore, people have the worst kinds of assumptions about marijuana. Drug War ideology has infused American minds with the idea that marijuana, cocaine, and heroin are equitable drugs that are all basically the same in varying intensity. I know its really egotistical sounding, but I love to use myself as the anti-myth of pot. It makes you lazy and forgetful? Duuude.....that's funny because I smoke everyday and pretty much work harder than anyone I know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good job Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon
» RE: Good job Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Good job Posted by: pomes
» RE: Good job Posted by: bornxeyed
Jennie
Posted by: Jennie on Feb 22, 2007 2:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an MS sufferer I can attest to the value of marijuana as pain relief. No it is not worth the US drug squad looking for me as I am in New Zealand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jennie Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Jennie Posted by: bornxeyed
Has anything been found that works better for glaucoma?
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 22, 2007 4:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the studies I read years ago said marinol was not as effective as simply smoking a joint.

And we might be a healthier populace if we ate the seeds regularly.

Only reason I can see that it is illegal is that it is threatening to corporate amerika and scary to cruel and close-minded people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

along with...
Posted by: Jennelle on Feb 22, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
banning marajuana, and all it's medical benefits, the ban also applys to all types of hemp. This ban on hemp was pushed by the big chemical companys back in the 1920's, so they could sell nylon and other synthetics, because hemp was so easy to grow and process. Even big coal got into it, because in many mineing areas, the familys supplimented their incomes with the growing,processing and makeing hemp products; therfore not being totally dependent on big coal. Besides, hemp is the most effective bio matter for makeing ethanol, yielding a 1-12 ration, rather than corn's dismal 1-1.5
Plus, hemp, in a 3 or 4 field crop rotation restores the soil, with out the use of petro based fertilisers, or any fertiliser Hemp can be used as a medicine, building material, fabric, animal feed and of course fuel. It grows most anywhere, in many conditions. It coukd be used to anchor restored barrier islands in the Gulf, also provideing habitat for many species. No wonder big chemical,fuel and pharma hate it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: along with... Posted by: Basenjis
» Paper Posted by: jwg
» typical Posted by: Jennelle
RE: I am formerly announcing suspending all empathy and pity...
Posted by: Gisele on Feb 22, 2007 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Truly a legend in his or own mind. Or filled with so much hate it can't be contained...I'd rather face a smoker!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» HEY! Where'd my comment go? Posted by: timebomb734
RE: I am formerly announcing suspending all empathy and pity...
Posted by: Gisele on Feb 22, 2007 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But...at least I've had my chuckle for the day!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: I am formerly announcing suspending all empathy and pity...
Posted by: xbj on Feb 22, 2007 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That takes care of the truth about smoking.

Now, about pot... I'm all for it, IF ONLY YOU MORONS WOULD EAT IT and not smoke it.

I'd also support THC in a pill, or in drinks marketed to adults.

But drive under the influence and get caught, and you'd never drive again.

So that about covers it. I'm not anti-pot, nor even anti-nicotine per se.

I'm anti-SMOKING. It's not the product that kills, it's the burning and breathing of it that kills.

Burning creates the carcinogens, not to mention burning all the chemical fertilizers and insecticides. Use those same fertilizers and insecticides on massive pot farms (as would certanly be done if it ever were legalized) and watch pot end up being MORE carcinogenic than tobacco, because of the way it is smoked, and because with ready availability people would be chainsmoking it like Linda McCartney.

If you want to get high or only want the medicinal benefits, PROVE IT... PUSH FOR A PILL. Not to legalize FURTHER suicide-killing smoking.

Oh, in advance to all the Big Tobacco shills decrying these posts... Goddamn every last one of you all to hell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: I am formerly announcing suspending all empathy and pity...
Posted by: eldoradoman1953 on Feb 22, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there is a speceal place in hell for you

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey, XBJ! Posted by: bassman
» RE: Hey, XBJ! Posted by: xbj
» RE: Hey, XBJ! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Hey, XBJ! Posted by: xbj
FDA report of April 20th
Posted by: ender on Feb 22, 2007 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On April 20th (4-20...coincidence?) the FDA declared that pot has "no medicinal value." Overlooking the fact that this ignores the 30+ years of studies already proving its value and relative harmlessness, if it has no medicinal value, then it is not a drug and so therefore the Federal DRUG Administration should have no jurisdiction over its use and neither should the DRUG Enforcement Agency.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You do realize pot can be taken orally with the same effects, right?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Feb 22, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Moron.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That is a LIE. Posted by: catnapping
Medical Value of Marijuana
Posted by: pfm on Feb 22, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For me this discussion is about our American hypocrisy of marijuana vs. alcohol. Moreover I feel whatever an “adult” chooses to put into his/her body is solely up to them, they need not my approval. There is ungodly profit in continuing to advocate and make use of marijuana illegal under all conditions . . . like “Deepthroat” said in …. All the President’s Men …. Follow the money …..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Freedom Haters Framing The Debate... again
Posted by: dover23 on Feb 22, 2007 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prohibition Laws reflect a totalitarian state. This is the issue, not debating whether there is enough medical benefit to change the law. Wake up stooges, you're talking about a plant here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» DrugWarFacts.org Posted by: fanny666
You don't need new research. All you have to do is REPEAL the HEMP PROHIBITION LAW(s)
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 22, 2007 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And instead of talking only about drugs, the authors should stop reinforcing rightwing frames by pointing out the INDUSTRIAL benefits of INDUSTRIAL HEMP unless they're happy to see liberals DROWNING in most elections !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you choose to smoke cannabis, make sure it's ORGANIC
Posted by: YinRising on Feb 22, 2007 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first time somebody asked me if the joint I was handing them was organic or not, I though they were joking or maybe just a pot snob.

After working with the medical cannabis movement in California for the past 5 years, I now understand accutely, the difference between organically grown cannabis, and conventionally grown and chemically tainted pot.

Do you?

This is a huge question that the DEA, and pot growers don't want you to ask because of it's implications.

If the pot you're smoking isn't organic, how do you know that any negative affects are coming from the cannabis itself, rather than the contaminants?

To dispell some of the disinfo and lies that were posted upstream, I'm reposting a comment that I made earlier in regards to medical cannabis.

Last year UCLA showed how SMOKING cannabis does not cause lung cancer but may in fact have a protective effect.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article /2006/05/25/AR2006052501729_pf.html
(erase space after "article ")


Or how 'bout this most recent study that proved cannabis to have medical value, even when smoked. They even used the governments own shwag weed and cannabis still proved to be an effective medicine for HIV patients.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article .cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/13/MARIJUANA.TMP (erase space after "article ")


And how about BigPharma working on "smoking" based medicines for faster delivery.
It's the same vaporization method that cannabis user have been advocating for years, just with new patentable technology.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070131/lf_nm/alexza_smokable_dc


And if you don't think Big Pharma has it's sights set on Medical Marijuana check out the latest work from GW Pharmacuticals.

http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/30/news/international /bc.gw.reut/index.htm?cnn=yes (erase space after "international ")


Notice that the link is to the "money" section at cnn.com. That should tell you something right there. Here's the good Dr.'s $ quote from the article.
“The cannabis plant has 70 different cannabinoids in it and each has a different affect on the body,” GW Managing Director Justin Gover told Reuters.
“Some can stimulate your appetite, and some in the same plant can suppress your appetite. It is amazing both scientifically and commercially,” he said in a telephone interview.

Oh, and how long do you think that pocket vaporizer took in terms of R&D.
5 years maybe.
5 years ago medical marijuana patients started bringing back Volcano Vaporizers from Germany and using them in California.
Hmmm?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cannabinoid Receptors
Posted by: fanny666 on Feb 22, 2007 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cannabinoid receptors (so named because of their affinity to THC) are one of the most common receptor types in the human brain... there's all kinds of research starting on these receptors.

It's already been established that activation of certain cannabinoid receptor types helps with neuropathic pain- for example a soldier who's had his leg blown off, but still feels intense pain in the foot that is no longer there.

Just an FYI from the neuroscience field...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

XBJ, have you reviewed the UCLA study about SMOKING marijuana?
Posted by: YinRising on Feb 22, 2007 7:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm reposting the link just for you.

Last year a UCLA study showed how SMOKING cannabis does not cause lung cancer but may in fact have a protective effect.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article /2006/05/25/AR2006052501729_pf.html
(erase space after "article ")

Here's another study, this one from Spain, that explains how the cannabinoids in Marijuana destroy and prevent cancer cells from growing, which is why smoking cannabis, does NOT cause cancer.
http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=748

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's only ONE study Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon
I GIVE UP
Posted by: xbj on Feb 22, 2007 7:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet pulls the original post, with 25 responses that now make NO SENSE whatsoever because there's no original post for the thread!

Now THAT'S free speech. And highly untypical of alternet, I would have thought higher of them, since there was nothing in the original post that warranted pulling or was against their terms of service.... apparently Alternet can't handle the truth about smoking EITHER.

I give up. Truly, remember when you smokers get to Heaven or Hell ahead of schedule, that SOMEONE at least TRIED to get the truth through those thick skulls of yours'.

And don't you DARE say "We didn't KNOW! No one TOLD US."

I DID.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I GIVE UP Posted by: OpinionsGetOld
» RE: I GIVE UP Posted by: xbj
» CensorNet Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon
who are you people?
Posted by: miggy on Feb 27, 2007 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Smokem if you gottem. Who can tell you otherwise? If youll let a Federal Government dictate what you do with yourself you are a slave. A mindless security whore who does what their told. Who does the telling what to do? This group says this, this agency says that,, who gives a crap. Pot is commercially illegal, not the same as unlawful. With so many rules and regulations, statutes and codes etc... who can follow it all. Stop thinking like mindless slaves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hemp = fuel
Posted by: martyweiss on Feb 28, 2007 1:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The main reason hemp is illegal is that oil companies can't stand competition or comparison.
Hemp oil is the fuel for which the diesel engine was designed. Hemp oil fuel is non-toxic, unlike carcinogenic petro-diesel.
Hemp can grow anywhere-- imagine farmers growing their own tractor fuel. Hemp needs no Monsanto genetics or Dow herbicides.
Hemp is the anti-oil.
Hemp is anti-corporate.
As long as corporations' money runs our government, hemp will never be allowed to compete with oil.
(There is also evidence oil company money was behind Prohibition is the 1920's. Alcohol would have hurt the monopoly Standard Oil had on fuel.)
Hemp fiber, left after the oil is extracted, would replace the trees being cut for paper, saving our forests, but hurting loggers and paper companies, who also oppose hemp legalization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]