Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

DrugReporter

Timothy Leary's Long Acid Trip

By Neal Pollack, The Nation. Posted July 29, 2006.


Psychedelics are supposed to destroy the ego, but they didn't stop LSD pioneer Tim Leary, who never lost his penchant for self-promotion.
yogabig
Timothy Leary's Long Acid Trip
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

My intersection with LSD came at a time when Dr. Timothy Leary's legacy had been watered down to near-flavorlessness. It went as follows: One tab of acid at a late-era Grateful Dead show at Soldier Field, where I hallucinated a giant eagle and got mocked by a nurse for wearing a necklace made of Fimo beads that I'd bought in Oregon; another tab two nights later, followed by eight hours of seeing vampires crawl across a leaky apartment ceiling in Evanston, Illinois; and about a quarter-tab in the spring of 1994, which led to a night of then-stereotypically freaky New Orleans French Quarter tourism. While Leary was going about the slow process of dying online in Beverly Hills, surrounded by web geeks who hadn't been born when he began to expand his consciousness, I felt like I was sucking the fumes from a bus that had long since left the station.

In these wretched drug days of widespread crystal-meth addiction, transcontinental Xanax-popping and speed-laced Mexican ditch weed posing as The Chron, it's harder than ever to swallow the idea that mind-altering drug use could transform our staggering society. That prospect becomes even harder to entertain when you consider the most famous proponent of narcotics-fueled social change. Robert Greenfield's comprehensive biography of Leary is an epically thrilling, wicked epitaph for the vain, bizarre, self-promoting guru who, depending on your perspective, either poisoned or blessed our culture with his ridiculous "turn on, tune in and drop out" mantra. As Greenfield boldly and correctly asserts, Leary was the "wrong man" to inherit the future of psychedelic research. Psychiatrist Humphry Osmond, who coined the term "psychedelic," even compared Leary to Hitler -- not for the magnitude of his crimes (which were absurd and, other than escaping from prison, arguably not even criminal) but for the transcendent quality of his sociopathic megalomania, which he parlayed into drug guru status.

This 600-page tome doesn't really begin to percolate until Leary starts taking drugs. Until then, it's standard biography: Thoughts of an absent alcoholic father traumatize an intelligent but self-absorbed West Point dropout. A sad childhood leads our protagonist down the path to unfaithful husbandry. His first wife, the mother of his two children, commits suicide. That terrible event, which would shatter an ordinary life, barely seemed to affect Leary; if psychedelics are supposed to destroy the ego, they didn't do a very good job with Tim Leary. The book quotes an anthropologist, experienced with tribal drug-taking cultures, who in the fall of 1960 said that peyote had "no place in our culture or our mythology. We don't have anything that enables us to explain or deal with this and therefore I don't think it is something we can introduce." But by then it was too late. Leary had already slipped acid into the well.

In Greenfield's telling, the great decade began as self-parody in Cambridge, Massachusetts, while Leary was still a lecturer at Harvard. More specifically, it was Halloween, 1960. Leary was conducting sleazy, absurd drug "experiments" at his house. A houseguest ingested a lot of psilocybin. Meanwhile, Leary's preteen daughter Susan was having a slumber party upstairs. The guest went upstairs and lay in the bed in the middle of the room. When Leary pulled him out, his guest referred to the girls as "middle-class bitches" who needed him to "stir them up a little." Leary almost let him, deciding at the last second that the party was Susan's "trip." He said, "You have the right to do anything you want so long as you don't lay your trip on anyone else." What Greenfield refers to as "the first commandment of the psychedelic era" was actually born as a way to keep a guy from sexually molesting a bunch of girls. I suppose Leary should, at least, get credit for preventing that.

Greenfield systematically shatters the still-self-perpetuating myths of what was once called the counterculture, portraying it as little more than a freaky mirror image of mainstream celebrity-obsessed America. He's brilliant at charting the course that self-styled 1960s rebels took toward careerism and self-aggrandisement, though certain characters, like Ken Kesey and Richard Alpert/Baba Ram Dass, come off better than others. A little more than halfway through the book, as the tumult of 1968 swirls around Leary, Greenfield pinpoints the birth of the "speaker-leader phenomenon, which made stars out of the leading counterculture figures":

Tim was a pioneer of the lifestyle. His view of what was going on in America was restricted to what he saw on his way to and from the airport, the questions he answered after his lecture, and whatever happened at the party that followed. Like a rock star, Tim appeared, performed, and then left. Between his own life and the lives of those more than twenty-five years younger than he, there was virtually no connection.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Your Trip
Posted by: Taylor on Jul 29, 2006 2:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's pretty short sighted to write off the entire 60's psychedelic movement based on a couple of bad acid trips and a biography of a flawed counter-culture icon. There are deep layers more to it than that, as folks who have actually been there can attest. The whole "psychedelic thing" may seem quaint and dated to younger sensibilities, but it's essential to understand it was born of a particular generation, many of whose members sought to externalize the awesome experience of tapping into a shared universal truth as a response to the divisive currents of the day. There's certainly nothing trivial about that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Your Trip Posted by: Glennk1949
» RE: Your Trip Posted by: Taylor
» RE: Your Trip: Taylor, Posted by: SamFox
» RE: Your Trip Posted by: equidave
» RE: Your Trip Posted by: revcarln
» RE: Your Trip: recarln, Posted by: SamFox
Sounds pretty shallow to me...
Posted by: justaperson on Jul 29, 2006 4:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I doubt if anyone who hasn't experienced psycedelics will ever be able to understand what positive benefits they offer. The whole acid movement was not about celebrity or Leary or any other self-proclaimed guru, It was all about what was learned by the people who experienced them, inisghts into themselves and a world of possibility rather than nilhism. It was a continuation of shamanism, of an alternative to healing. Not much was being offered or has been offered by the straight culture or corporate medicine to heal the longing for love and peace most humans need to thrive. As can be witnessed by the world today, aflame with hatred and war, people who have never used psycedelic drugs really can't claim to have doen mush to further humanity or the planet. Until society becomes sane, there will always be Timorthy Learys. The fact that he fell off the edge of the cliff during his daring climb into the heights of conciousness does not mean much. This book sounds like it is seeking celebrity for itself by exhuming Leary's ghost for a backroom autopsy bound to appeal to the rabid conservatives of today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sixties were pretty shallow Posted by: coldeye
More than LSD
Posted by: Artkansas on Jul 29, 2006 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was acquainted with Tim in the early '80s when his energy was devoted to promoting Space Activism and Space Colonization. Energy was the word. He always had an acid-like electricity about him. On stage he was mesmerizing. He was truly a great cheerleader and knew how to get an audience enthused.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» much More than LSD Posted by: ed hannam
Mistakes were made
Posted by: indy675 on Jul 29, 2006 4:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As they always are with anything "new." (of course, we know that the use of Psychedelic plants isn't new, it is as old as mankind.)

I worked for Humphrey Osmond and J.R. Smythies back in the early 70s after they left Canada and set up shop at the University of Alabama, of all places, so I know asomething about the subject.

What Osmond referred to as psychedelics have a place, I believe, in our post modern culture, but they wlill never be mainstream, and maybe they shouldn't. However, their use for transcendence has not gone away, it just went underground, as it always does, only to pop back up at a later time in history. I am not talking about the adulterated crap that young people took at rock concerts by the early 70s.

In the last 35 years or so, good, sound protocols for the use of quite a few psychedelics have been used, and the results in many cases have been nothing short of phenomenal.

Nevertheless, these substances are not to be played with, espeicially by young people who do not have a clue what they are doing. Interestingly enough, that is exactly what the government made happen when they out-lawed them. Kids, today can find what passes for LSD and other substances ,that can be exceedingly dangerous, especially to kids.

The wholesale out-lawing of psychedelics, often called Entheogens today, and the ensuing "War on Drugs" has been disastrous for this country. But the government, and certain others, makes far too much money off it to give it up, even though almost anyone will tell you that it has been an abject failure.

Altered states of consciousness are as much a human need as the other needs in Maslow's hierarchy. It isn't going away.

It is also true that our culture totally ignores this truth and, therefore, makes no room for it, except for the ever present sedative anesthetic, alcohol, and the stimulant nicotine, both of which are addictive (niccotine being far more addictive than heroin). The culture has done so at its own peril, as we have seen.

Much good did come out of the 60s. People saw alternative realities and set out to manifest those realities. Many have been highly successful on a limited scale.

No, it is not a good idea to put LSD in the water supply, though the idea can sometimes be an amusing fantasy. People are different, and we know that LSD can really shake-up the psychic structure. What will prove a highly insightful experience for a seeker, will be a nightmare for a tight-ass, puritan. Not a nice thing to do, even to a puritan, tightass.

Better to leave powerful tools, such as these substances, to modern day Shamans, who know what they are doing. The idea is not to destroy the ego. One cannot function in the world without the ego. The idea is to detach it long enough to see what our egos will not allow us to see or experience and then spend the time it takes to intergate that experience into our normal waking consciousness. There are very good protocols for that too.

Ours is a society driven by productivity, no matter that that which is being produced is often junk, poison (to body, mind and spirit, not needed or even wanted, until we are told over and over that we are nobody without whatever piece of junk someone is trying to sell us. We are enouraged to work 12 to 16 hour days to continue to produce and consume. There is little time for spiritual growth, just dogmatic religions, which use fear guilt and shame to enforce their belief system in others.

As a psychologist, I can tell you that enforced fear, guilt and shame cause more damage in our sociey than psychedelics ever will.

We may be productive as hell in this country, but we are some of the most ignorant people on earth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mistakes were made Posted by: revcarln
» RE: Mistakes were made Posted by: Michaeltone
» RE: Mistakes were made Posted by: AlienSlave
Acid, Amnesty and Apologies
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 29, 2006 4:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll let you in on a little story. I used acid for exactly one year: from the summer of 1974 till the summer of 1975. My first experience was, so help me Mitch Miller, the night that Richard Milhaus Nixon announced his resignation from the presidency - one week and one day before my sixteenth birthday. I remember thinking at the time, "So these are the hallucinations I've heard so much about! But I wasn't seeing things. This was the real McCoy, so to speak. I finally went to bed with the dawn. I slept so late the following day that I missed the Trickster's rambling and riveting, "My mother was a saint" speech. Slept right through the dang thing and didn't see it in its entirety for many years.

I'm not too sure that a revival of LSD would be a good thing for our culture; though I have to admit it would probably make enduring the era of George W. Bush and fiends just a tad easier. One of the great joys of acid was watching something really trite and stupid like the Laurence Welk Show. In fact, Lenny Bruce once suggested that people do just that! The drug would completely exaggerate the absurdities of something like the Welk program to mind-numbingly comical purprtions. Can you imagine sitting through one of Dubya's press conferences, tanked out of your skull on windowpane?? It makes me laugh just thinking about it!

My last trip was early in the summer of 1975. It was such a terrible experience that I thought I was dying. I made a deal with God that if He would only let me land safely back on earth, I would never do it again. Thirty one years have now gone by and I'm happy to tell you that I've kept my end of the bargain. For many years, I felt that acid made me just a little bit mad. I was capable of extreme emotion at times, laughter or tears, and I knew that it was the result of my one year of (very frequent) experimentation. It was only about twelve or thirteen years ago that I realized that I was back to my old self. All the side-effects have, thankfully, dissappeared.

Maybe if acid's comeback meant an elimination of crack/cocaine or meth that could be seen as a positive thing but I can't for the life of me imagine that happening. I've know too many people in my life who today are mental basket cases due to their overuse of LSD decades ago to reccommend it as a stepping stone to spiritual enlightenment.

Ahh! But what memories!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
The Daily Rant

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: Glennk1949
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: Glennk1949
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: Glennk1949
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: Glennk1949
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: Glennk1949
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: Glennk1949
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: 1984NOW!!!
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: ArtemInox
» RE: Acid, Amnesty and Apologies Posted by: ArtemInox
» I Remember Posted by: Danimal
» RE: I Remember Posted by: Tom Degan
very predictable
Posted by: rsaxto on Jul 29, 2006 4:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point of using drugs that do not have a very predictable outcome totally escapes me. Playing with drugs that way is at best a waste of time and at worst a death sentence. Lots of people believe false things without drugs and taking drugs increases the possibility of false beliefs that include the stupidity called war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: very predictable Posted by: Entheogenic
disinterested in a people mag bio book
Posted by: Reverend Bookburn on Jul 29, 2006 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one from any movement or counter-culture should be above criticism, but such a trashing, especially in these dark times, is useless. It has long seemed to be a tendency in progressive movements to be 'reaching out' by slamming subculture and underground music scene figures, similar to the way the Democratic Party kisses up to the religious right and dubya worshippers.

I recommend to interested parties to pick up better books about or by Dr. Leary. Actually, I'd love to see a biographical film.

Rev. Bookburn
Radio Volta
Philadelphia
ReverendBookburn.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shroomies
Posted by: Madam Hatter on Jul 29, 2006 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IS there even still acid around? I mean real LSD - not the speed shit from the late 70s that they called acid. There isn't in my neck of the woods - 'round here they do 'shrooms. Much more fun and lots less chemical hangover. Or so they tell me...

And I thought this article was pretty snarky too. I was a little too young to hear much about Leary at the time, tho I've read about him and the other characters mentioned here - Keasey (Oregon's own!), Ginsberg, Warhol, et al. and they all were madmen (and I mean that in a good way) weren't they?

But this passage left me a little stunned:
"Leary: "I didn't want to impose my realities. The idea is that everybody takes responsibility for his nervous system, creates his own reality. Anything else is brainwashing." Manson: "That was your mistake. No one wants responsibility. Everyone wants to be told what to do, what to believe, what's really true and really real."

More than anyone else, Leary embodied the mixed-up dreams of the '60s. It's sad that Charles Manson saw into the American psyche more accurately than he did."


Speak for yourself, dude! I'm sorry you believe that about the "American psyche," but it's a little presumptuous for you to proclaim it so. Especially in an article about expanding your mind and seeking alternative realities.

But I guess, what do you expect from someone who writes: "Used in the right doses by the right people, under controlled circumstances, certain drugs have creative potential.

But of course, the author has determined that HE is the right people, using the right drug in the right dose in the right controlled circumstances.

Nothing's worse than a self-righteous, hypocritical drug user (or alcoholic, or liar, or jaywalker - for that matter) sitting in judgement on others doing the same thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shroomies Posted by: Glennk1949
» RE: Shroomies Posted by: clzatzman
» RE: Shroomies Posted by: ArtemInox
» RE: Its still here Posted by: AlienSlave
» Shroomies Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Shroomies Posted by: Dboy
Once again...
Posted by: talkville on Jul 29, 2006 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Focus on some personality and get all sorts of juice out of it. Ignore the entire context of those times and the constellation of forces driving the social base-- not least of which is the economic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 100% right !! Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: 100% right !! Posted by: harris
» "Know Tim?" Posted by: AdamSelene40
Doors of Perception
Posted by: sofla100 on Jul 29, 2006 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think a big revelation of the psychedelics is that they will very quickly give your reality a big shake up. Most of our scientists all believe, for example, that consciousness comes from the brain, its a byproduct. But from mushrooms and LSD, you can learn pretty quickly that this isn't true at all. Something called consciousness exists independenty of the brain, it isn't caused by the brain at all. This is so contradictory to everything our science and society is based on that it blows out the lights of many people. They just have no basis to deal with it. As for Leary, I don't think he was nearly as productive with this revelation as say people like Alpert, AKA Ram Dass. Agree or not, Alpert went to India, met his guru, and went on to open a path into the Eastern Consciousness scene, ie, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sufi stuff, that still continues to this day. This path was never enough or powerful enough to impact our society which still seems to be going backward (ie, you can take Prozac but don't touch mushrooms!) as witnessed by many trends and politics, but, it is a path important to those touched by it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Doors of Perception Posted by: AlienSlave
Ignorance is Bliss
Posted by: PeaceLove on Jul 29, 2006 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People like Steve Jobs and religion scholar Huston Smith consider their psychedelic use to be among the most importand experiences of their lives. Indeed, in my own circle of friends I know many "psychoactivists" (Terrance McKenna's term) who use and profit from LSD and other psychedelics. This includes researchers, businesspeople, scientists, artists, and therapists, one of whom got a PhD in LSD Psychotherapy from Stanford when that was still possible.

The smear book against the Holy Fool Leary probably has much truly damaging personal info about the man but it seems to ignore the positive effect he had on a generation of enlightened progressives. All the major social movements of the Sixties, from Feminism and gay rights to the anti-war protests probably owed much of their power and passion to a generation reared on LSD.

Psychedelics are extraordinarily powerful substances and their virtual banishment from public discourse (except in the context of Leary-bashing) has been a tragedy. Before it was outlawed (for political reasons), twenty years of LSD research had yielded very positive results in treating a wide range of disorders, including schizophrenia and alcoholism, and in reducing the recidivism rate among prisoners. It's about time for an honest and open reappraisal of LSD and other mind-expanding drugs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ignorance is Bliss Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Ignorance is Bliss Posted by: AlienSlave
A New Awakening Is Needed
Posted by: sofla100 on Jul 29, 2006 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The outlawing of psychedelics was a great travesty and disaster for society. It is truly unbelievable when you can have legal drugs like alcohol which are far more dangerous and have killed far more people then LSD ever will. The same goes for marijuana, really a pretty safe drug, being outlawed. But the problem now is that because it is outlawed, procurring and using a drug like LSD exposes one to a risky, dangerous scene, where paranoia rules. I mean, who wants to go to jail? An entire generation now is therefore trapped in a materialistic world view where getting ahead, getting money, me first, buy more, rules the day. And we get idiots for President on top of it, and stupid wars.
I don't know when the next great awakening will come, the sixties ended 36 years ago, but we are so ready for it all over again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Am Your Pundit (Pollack) On Drugs
Posted by: CaliforniaWill on Jul 29, 2006 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here -- once again -- we have a Pollack "I am so much cooler than you are" diatribe masquerading as, hmm, journalism or satire? (flip a coin). You'll take note of the cliche backhands (hippy-dippy, guru, etc.) by which readers are supposed to conclude that the writer has "superiorized" himself to the alleged topic of the writing. Let's see, is he writing about Dr. Timothy Leary, a bad bio. of said Leary, or "this really cool piece I wrote about ME, ME, ME, Neal Pollack!!"

Journalists who don't place a balanced perspective for readers to make up their own minds about a topic, but "guide" them instead to the writer's 'tude are pundits and propagandists, plain and simple. Those who lard -- yes, it is a verb AND a noun -- their punditry with cliches as stale as hippy-dippy (didn't Carlin use this when he first began 40 yrs. ago?) and guru (which I don't think Dr. Leary ever used in a serious context) really need to upgrade their WordPower vocabulary.

It's fine to try to gain or give some perspective on a previous time period and its personalities, to interpret them for current readers -- not so fine to grab a quick hunk of history and spin it as trivia simply because the author "missed the boat" when it was actually happening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"SANDOZ, SANDOZ, WHO TAUGHT YOU
Posted by: SamFox on Jul 29, 2006 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Love?" "Have you ever been experianced? Well, I havvvee..." "Yes, I am experianced! You know what I'm talkin' about, Jimi!" & "Lucy In the Sky With Diomonds" inflenced me much more than Timothy. Turn on, tune in & drop out came a bit later for me. I'd already turned on when I heard that. Eric Burdon, Jimi Hendrix & the Beatles had more influence.

I was in a small town in the 60s. No TV in my house. Listened to rock radio a lot & record albums & 8 tracs.

In '68 & 69 I took lots of acid. It was my favorite pass time. I was young, naive and very in-experianced when I moved with a friend to a big city. I was introduced to a cap of English White. I was fascinated by LSD from that rather mild experiance. Some in the group I was hanging with were experianced & gave good advice to us neophite trippers that probably later saved my life. "ALWAYS remember! It is not real! Don't forget that no matter what you see!"

Not always so easy. Especially after 2 1/2 tabs of Blue Owsly 4 way or a couple tabs of Orange Sunshine. But I always managed to keep that in the back of my head. It saved me for sure one night when driving back to my small home town. I was going to share some OS with a couple of old friends as I thought LSD was wonderful! My brother was with me as I headed home to share the 'wealth'. I thought I was coming down & so I drove. I had forgotton I had eaten not 1, but 2-3 tabs of OS. I peaked again as I was driving.

Suddenly I was flying a space ship in space. No differance in starry sky & freeway. Looking down was the same as looking into the sky--all stars & planets. I had my brother tell me how to pull over so he could drive. I surely would have crashed without him. Just one of many heavy duty 'trips'. Then there was the night the Doors came to town...

I was 'experianced ' over 100 times. I don't recomend LSD at all.

Late in '69 I went to spend a night at a crash pad called the House of Miracles. I went in & sat down. One guy my age (early 20's) was talking about Jesus Christ. (I was sober for some days prior.) I knew I was home! I received Christ into my life that night. He did something LSD could not do. I was changed, transformed. Not perfected, but I was changed!

I had a lot of growing to do in the Lord. I was very immature. I thought I was further along spiritually than I really was. About 18 mo. later something came up. I was being tested. I failed. I got mad at God & went off on my own. I took acid again. That is when I learned LSD could be the initials for Lotta Satanic Deception. I had never had a bad trip before. Lots of heavy ones, but no freakouts or bummers. I was made to know I was no longer welcome in that realm. One night I had an entity of some kind (I think a demon) throwing lightening bolts through me to drive that point home.

If you want to know the truth in life, don't pass Jesus by. Then you'll know I do not lie.

There's a Bible in the drawer of the hotel room, just crying out to be read...but it stays right there, collecting dust, 'cause no one understands what's being said... I recomend reading it!

Yeah Eric, you know what I'm talkin' about!

There are a lot of spiritual counterfiets. Only one is real. Which one? I go with Jesus Christ. He said of Himself, "I am the way, the truth & the life. No one comes to the Father but by me." One of His followers, Peter, said "There is no other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved." I agree.

I do advocate for medical cannabis though. Not as a spirtitual tool, however. It was never intended for that.

Looking for expanded conscienceness or searching for God through substances can lead to a very bad place. I have been there...

SamFox

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A Comment on Medical Marijuana. Posted by: aussidawg
Pollack right winger?
Posted by: harris on Jul 29, 2006 1:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TIM RULES!

Pollack sucks!

Don't beleive this airhead, junk article.

Read Tim's books, especially The Politics of Ecstasty and High Priest if you want to know what he really did.

This article is so shallow and negative, I can't help but think that it is a political hit piece. I don't understand why Alternet would post it.
It belongs on Rush Limbaugh's site or somewhere like that.
Why wouldn't they do a positive/negative two article thing like they did with Hugo Chavez?

The positivity and depth of Tim's writing have given me immeasurable inspiration and insight since I took my first of a bout 3 dozen acid trips since the age of 18 (in the early 90's). And I will always stand up for his memory, especially since so many seem to want to trash him..

BTW, the reason acid is very hard to find, but was plentiful through the mid 90's is the bust of Leonard Pickard.
Google him he's a very interesting guy.

It's cool hearing from the older people who experienced the first generation era. Thanks!

On the other hand, even when I was a teenager, my friends and I scoffed at the shallow clowns who claimed to "hallucinate" nothing but "giant Eagles, "vampires" etc.
"Duh, hey guys - giant neon spiders are crawling all over me, getem'off, ahhduh!!" for hours straight!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» nail's head Posted by: ed hannam
Pollack = Psychedelic lamo
Posted by: harris on Jul 29, 2006 2:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I apologise for the insults, but someone has to stand up for Tim's memory here.
You deserved to be mocked by the nurse at that concert.
Your trip experiences show anyone who is even moderately experienced that you are mentally and spiritually childish.
You aren't even fit to criticize Leary's choice of shirts, let alone his life or his lifes work.
You didn't say a single substantive good thing about the guy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pollack = Psychedelic lamo Posted by: Glennk1949
On the Bus
Posted by: gonzoskismet on Jul 29, 2006 3:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did acid for the first time in Lee Park, Dallas, Texas in the summer of 1969, six months before I got drafted. It was Purple Haze. I could not fucking believe it. I tripped the night away with some of the most wonderful people I have ever met or, now, will ever hope to meet. I'm sorry that it's gone. It helped me a lot, both before Hell,during Hell and after Hell. I never met Tim. I can't even guess if he was a Great Man or not. But I do know that he had more balls and personality than the man that is pResident of the United States now. Now, we got a nation full of Death Dope. I guess that's better in some peoples eyes. Hail Atlantis!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On the Bus Posted by: amazingjim
At risk of giving away too much Sage Wisdom
Posted by: marklar on Jul 29, 2006 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
read up on Salvia Divinorum.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The history of lysergic acid predates the 60's
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jul 29, 2006 8:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the way, Albert Hoffmann (http://www.hofmann.org/) , the inventor of LSD, has a few things to say on the subject that may be more relevant and certainly a lot more level-headed then the "tune in, turn-on, burn-out" approach of Captain Trips and his troop of merry hippy-crites (yes, that is an overly broad generalization - but aren't those the best kind?)

At the risk of disrupting the rather happy general tone of this thread, here is the LSD-related story of one Dr. Frank Olsen, a US Army biochemist who died in 1953:
http://www.frankolsonproject.org/

The CIA's technical division had taken to secretly dosing people with LSD around this time; this happened to Dr. Olsen, a biological warfare scientist, on a CIA-army 'retreat' in the Maryland backwoods. The whole story is unclear, but within two weeks he had been diagnosed a being in a psychotic state, with delusions of paranoia - this diagnosis being done by Dr. Abramson, a part-time consultant to the Army Chemical Corps. A few days later, Dr. Olsen was dead; you can read the details at the above site, and the questionable nature of his 'suicide'.

I read about this incident years ago and have followed it ever since; my guess is that Dr. Olsen, with the proverbial 'head full of acid' was overcome by an epiphany: the shocking realization that working on biowarfare weapons was a really bad idea. The CIA was probably so worried about this acid-induced behavior of an army biowarfare researcher that they had him 'removed' - this was the COld War in the 50's, remember. That's my guess, anyhow. By the way, Fritz Haber, inventor of industrial ammonia production and WWI gas warfare, had a similar realization - the feeling that he had made terrible mistakes with his life. So did Ted Taylor, Kanatjan Alibekov - a whole host of military scientists who looked back in shock at their careers. Many have then turned to work actively on nonproliferation. Who hasn't seen a movie where a scientist says, "Oh no! What have I done!". There but for the grace...

There are many incidents or reports of this 'epiphany-inducing' effect of some classes of psychoactive drugs - but in the wrong time and place, and without psychological support, the effects (including distortion of time and space perceptions and visual or auditory hallucinations, often reflecting subconscious distress) could be disastrous. However, that's also why these drugs showed a lot of promise as aids in treating alcoholism, heroin addiction (see ibogaine, for example), and even forms of depression. At some point a healthy society would reclassify them as psychoactive pharmaceuticals, available by prescription under a doctor's supervision. Sounds weird, doesn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A sign of the times
Posted by: yesman on Jul 29, 2006 8:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the '60's, people took drugs in an effort to explore alternate realities, other levels of consciousness. It was an internal analog to the space program. Certainly, it was an effort fraught with peril of various sorts.

Now, most people take precription drugs marketed by multi-billion-dollar corporations that are designed to numb you emotionally and intellectually so that you can withstand the pointless hassle and degradation which constitute daily life, as served up by the corporate masters in totalitarian Amerika.

So, I'm really not sure why I should approve of ridiculing the former rather sanctimoniously, as the author does, rather than focusing on the real, current problem (the latter). I'll take utopian experimentation, however flawed, any day over totally succumbing to the deadly bourgeois grind which life has become in the last 30 years or so.

Furthermore, if we change our consciousness (whether with drugs or some other method), we do change reality. What is "reality" except our consciousness, and if it is something else, how would we know it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Psychedelics being revisited
Posted by: brunowe on Jul 29, 2006 9:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Evidently, the use of hallucinogenics in controlled medical procedures is being looked at again. There was an article on the BBC website back in April. There was also a study just done that indicated that "People who took an illegal drug made from mushrooms reported profound mystical experiences that led to behavior changes lasting for weeks -- all part of an experiment that recalls the psychedelic '60s."

In both cases, the idea was that proper use could help with drug addiction or depression in terminally ill patients.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've never tried Salvia, and probably never will...
Posted by: equidave on Jul 30, 2006 12:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the discriminatingly adventursome who love life, themselves and deepening their appreciation/participation in the Mystery of if ALL,

Honoring that you know what's best for you and that a feeling like "this is not for me" is best often respected (at least for now), may i encourage some of you to take/enjoy a deeper look at the following (non-toxic, use-tested and sacred) wonders of earth nature and human possibility:
1. Psilocybin (in Mushrooms, ie Ps. Cubensis)
2. DMT (in traditional Amazonian preparation/brew "Ayahuasca")
3. Salvia (in both oral and smoked dosages)

All of these "entheogens" (hallucinogens with long histories of sacred and valuable use/exploration by humans) you can easily learn more about (www.erowid.org, et al) and safely, peacefully experience at progressive levels of dosage/impact....to discover if there really is or is not, for you, more here to learn from and celebrate.

For sure the dissolving of boundaries, expansion of consciousness and communication or communion with unusual domains of being/experience/relations is not for everyone, or not for everyone at this very moment, but to imagine a human being going from the cradle to the grave without having encountered and personally experienced the organic psychedelic tremendum is, in my opinion, as tragic an omission from the core experiences that celebrate and advance humanness as it would be have lived a life but having failed to enjoy healthy sexuality, attended a birth or been present at the miraculous passing of a human life.

Get into it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

great experience
Posted by: dadanbetty on Jul 30, 2006 12:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tripped with my ex-wife at the time (a beautiful person inside and out) for the first time about 7 years ago in my apt. My roommate, David babysitted us and secured the blots for us. I remember the episode of the Simpsons that was on was about one of the characters being a sycophant (I'm pretty sure).
We ventured out (without David) and could not seem to stop laughing. Our last stop before coming home was at perkins restaurant and her reading and telling me about an article in the newspaper about a rapper who produced the typical absurd, dehumanizing lyrics about women with all of his blingy and that now he was going to hang it all up and work for the lord. I went to the bathroom and was standing at the urinal peeing and a man came to the urinal next to me to do the same thing. He said something and I couldn't stop laughing and I remember when he left I think he said something about: fucking wierdo or something to that effect. We laughed so hard. The only downside was the sensitive painful cheeks the next day due to the uncontrollable laughing.
Overall *****

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"drugs"
Posted by: equidave on Jul 30, 2006 2:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please people,
Consider expanding your lexicon so that there is room for necessary distinctions and deeper appreciation for this domain off being.

"Drugs" is rarely an accurate enough reference for all people to accurately be sharing the same meaning. This is why it works well in propaganda phrases like "The war on...".

I suggest that we expand our terminology to build distinctions based on the following attributes:
1. the chemical family of the active compound and its primary focal point/region of metabolic activity in the body
2. whether it is arising organically in nature or being synthesized in the lab
3. whether or not the substance has significant bio-assaying (history of human used testing; be it in extended cultural context or in isolated scientific testing) for its relative safety (and value) or toxicity (and danger).
4. the effect that it tends to have on the human organism and mind/emotion/"spirit"
5. etc.

Along such lines of conscious and critical discrimination, new terms like "entheogen" will allow us, for example, to cease the injustice of sweeping thousands of years of use-tested and sacred relationship with say an herb or mushroom into the same trashy, empty camp as those terms no co-opted out of any normal meaning by Washington, Madison Ave. or the Vatican.

The cost of reductionism, of collapsing ideas and definitions (a la "drugs"):
1. America has more people in its jails than any other nation (.) who are there for the first time for being in possession of a plant that no credible scientific body has ever been able to prove presents 1/100th the list of dangers (to personal health or the public at large) as: commercial tobacco, alcohol and processed white sugar

2. Scientists (some of our most intelligent people on the planet) must ask for (and are almost always, since late 1950's, denied) permission from politicians (some of our most unconscious and dishonest and confused people on the planet) to do research to future our understand of natural compounds that are found everywhere in nature and are being produced right in our own human bodies.

3. .... the list is long....


...and our time is short.
Perhaps its time to heal our relationship to the larger organic matrix upon which we utterly depend and, once again, and re-engage our entheogenic bridged conversation, education and symbiotic co-evolution.

Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ah, a topic we should all agree on somewhat
Posted by: Joe Ox on Jul 30, 2006 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My tripping days were the early 80's. For those here who had that same chronology you will get what I am saying.
By that time the only real connection to teh 60's was either a few older folks wandering around having never changed a bit since '67, and a host of college age 60's wanna bes. On the other extreme were the preppy sort of fraternity guys w/ their pink Izod shirts and deck shoes. Filling in was us, the non descript group of hangers on who, sometimes took the trips to achieve some spiritual goal, and other times to laugh so hard the stomach muscles would hurt for days. In either case what I remember most was the comradere among the group (4-8 guys) and some of the very creative things we would conjure up to do all night long. Some of my very best memories, that still get a chuckle and a smile, were formed while tripping w/ the guys. I do not regret one second of those times, which makes it complicated as I deal w/ my own teens.
Someone somewhere here mentioned the contemporary tendency to take prescription drugs to cope with what life has become, in many ways well explained in a long article called "The Cubist"...a search should find it. And within the cubicle, what we do all day really has little to no value, if we stop and think about it. Most people answer emails, deal with whatever is physically dropped on their desk, make a few calls, get a few calls, make up new and exciting ways to describe the new approach you are taking to create that new "widget per hour" report or whatever, stay in the cude a safe time after 5PM so the boss knows you are working, then go home somehow feeling stressed even though, if you died tomorrow, the company would be just fine w/out you. The real reason for the stress is we've become unessential.
So, a little hydrocodone here and there never hurt anyone, made you work harder and smile more, and after all it came from the Dr didnt it? You dont tell anyone, its not a shared experience, or even a sharable experience, until you end up w/ a 20 pill a day habit and rehab staring you in the face. My best friend just finished the hell I described here.
Would he have been better off w/ the trips? Of course, but most of us don't even possess the frame of mind needed to get the same thing out of the trips anymore, we would be disappointed I think and unable to duplicate that old feeling. Whatever is missing in us, that would allow us to enjoy tripping, whatever that is, and regardless if we intended to trip or not, but whatever that is if we could get that back, the whole country would be better off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mirror
Posted by: coldeye on Jul 30, 2006 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tim Leary was the all American hero. In the bad way. Our materialism today and reliance on prescription drugs for every ailment in part was Tim's doing. He was a shape-changer, being what people wanted him to be. I remember him in Cambridige in the early 60's. No one believed anyone would take this entertaining would be intellectual seriously. but who would believe mindless hip hop would dominate the musical world, or 12 year olds would look like 21 year olds?

Tim Leary took the organic rebelliousness of the Beat Movement into Mass Culture. The Sixties "Counterculture" was simply one more phase of the US fashion industry and entertainment media.

Leary was a genius. He did understand that the public is willing to change its definition of good and bad and real and unreal on a dime, if "it feels good". He never overestimated people. they were in fact like the lab rats he adn Alpert first tested at Harvard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mirror Posted by: harris
» why Posted by: Joe Ox
» It's only rock n roll Posted by: coldeye
Drugs aren't supposed to destroy the ego.
Posted by: Kanefire on Jul 30, 2006 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Without the ego we would not be experiencing life on a mental level, only a cause/effect/reaction world would exist. Before we lay ignorant definitions on complex design, we should find out what the ego is. The ego takes the form of whatever has become patterned in the persons mind. If the mind wanders into dark circumstances, the ego will reflect that darkness, If the mind is focused on positive thought patterns, the ego will become the voice of ascension. In the beginning there was the word, and the word was God and the word became flesh.
This is very similar to the idea of unified cellular theory where sickness is not caused by the body being invaded by germs but rather, all organisms exsist already and it is the environment that dictates whether it will be beneficial or harmful. This satisfactorally explains the placebo effect. Or in regards to the ego, reality. It also gives power back to the individual (and away from institutions). This theory is easily recognizeable in all domesticated animals and people. If put into stressfull environments, many negative characteristics are formed.
The notion that the ego needs to be destroyed is a western dualistic notion that only exists in the indivivual and collective minds. Nothing in nature is destroyed. Life is built upon life and nature only holds abundance. We have the tendancy to validate negative occurances rather than focus or visualize what it could be. This causes some to look at the ego negatively, therefore creating a negative world view and then a decending spiral continues. We have been given the creating gift of imagination and ego is a neccessary function of that. The real problem with the ego is the human identification with it. It is a highly evolved part of the person and therefore most worship it as themselves. What you think, you are some say. Our culture gives much power to the ego. This occurs when we are children and are forced to do something against our will. Because we each have free will, we must also have a release valve when others encroach on that free will. Media's seemingly greatest function is to manufacture consent, or spin free will. When ones desires are not fullfilled, the ego is there to rationalize existence. If not we would continue with our desires which may or may not be harmonious with our circumstances. The ego allows the creator to alter the creation to harmonize with other creators. Because this is such a high function with regard to human evolution, many have lost their identity as a whole and are conscious of themselves only through the lenses of the ego. This may take the form of a positive or a negative self image, either of them being false identifications as we are not the effect of our life circumstances, but are the causes. The effects are merely easier to quantify as they have been materially manifest. Drugs, with respects to the ego are interesting. In part, they help the experiencer become aware of the identification of the ego. They do this by altering a persons perception of reality, therefore altering who they are in that reality. In these transistions, one is able to see themselves as more than the thought patterns that have been established. One begins to see themselves from a whole(istic) view where the have roots and connection to all things. In this view one loses the smaller identity of the ego and gains the greater identity as a creator that has effect on all things as is not bound by the rational mind, but is emowerd by the tools of the rational mind, namely the Ego.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry... Get some new reporter
Posted by: Idunno on Jul 30, 2006 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone who doesn't have a foggy notion as to what LSD and other drugs can do to a person in a positive way has no business writing about the subject of psychedelic drugs in the 21st Century. After all, psychedelics is an important subject and AlterNet is an important venue. You have trivialized psychedelics in front of a liberal, experienced audience. What were you thinking? You have revealed yourself... now move over for someone experienced and serious about the subject.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Leary
Posted by: Pirate1 on Jul 30, 2006 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know... it is the work of a pretty small minded individual to go in and try to discredit a man based on his personal life.
Yes, Tim was a man of his time, a hedonist, a camelion, not necessarily someone you'd want your kids to emulate but to just paint him that way, ignoring the important research he did concerning the workings of the human brain and the effects of psychedelics is really mean spirited. The majority of people in history who did great things were terrible people personally. Give the man his due.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Leary Posted by: harris
Story of the Haight
Posted by: Molloy on Jul 30, 2006 10:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am happy to see that the majority of people replying to this article actually have some grasp of the true nature of psychedelics. It's heartening. If you would like to read a story from someone who was there from the beginning, click on the link to this screenplay for the movie: The Haight

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Weak minded.
Posted by: ericthefool on Jul 30, 2006 10:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vampires??? Eagles??? Are you joking???

I could say, "What were you smoking?" but it would be totally lost on you. But these kind of reports on your "LSD days" are bogus. Seeing anything but reality on LSD is a sign of a weak mind, and an uneducated user. To bad someone wasn't around to teach you the right way, it would have been something beneficial for the rest of your life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Weak minded. Posted by: aussidawg
Watch "The Incredibles" again
Posted by: axolotl_helix on Jul 30, 2006 11:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under the assumption that it is about more than it appears to be about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Watch "The Incredibles" again Posted by: Estonia Hill
leary???
Posted by: ed hannam on Jul 31, 2006 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just as james joyce was the least read but most discussed novelist, so too was leary the least read but most discussed psychologist.
to slot him in as only an acid guru is to show a gross lack of actually reading his writing, and to be guilty of exactly what his problem always was - people would rather believe the myth than the actuality - follow the shiny facade rather than the gristly workhorse.
this critic, just like pinchbeck, is just another blinkered, self-absorbed pseudo-journalist who has read the biography but not the works.
very quickly one realizes that leary advocated acid as part of a greater process, and that later in life updated all his 60's ideas - himself becoming a huge critic of the hippies.
sure, much of his stuff is freakazoid mental masturbation, no denying that - many of his predictions were entertainingly way out.
yes he was a master of self promotion, lifestyle promotion and pseudo-philosophy - but to anyone who actually read any of his books thats exactly what he said he was.
its easy to write of guys like him, and kesey, and mckenna and lilly as utopian brain-melters - but hey, they were working without a precedent. they never set out to be taken too seriously.
maybe you should actually read something leary himself wrote (or any other author) and put it in perspective before broadcasting a published opinion. you dont have to like it - just go a little beyond the sensational.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good Balanced Points Posted by: coldeye
» RE: Good Balanced Points Posted by: ed hannam
hmmmm....
Posted by: zombi on Aug 1, 2006 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i think the fact that leary (or at least LSD) was able to get so many of you to break through societal norms & restrictions in an attempt to experience something novel attests to the fact that, whether or not you "attained enlightenment" you did in fact move your own consciousness to another level. one not pre fabricated for you by you the existing, consensual reality. & in all "primitive" societies, even more than communion, the psychedelic experience was one of growth.

the fact that you are here, discussing these experiences w/ people across the nation from each other, rather than crackin' open some bud light & watchin' the game on the zombi box, is a testament that, in fact, this experience has sparked a connection w/in you to something (a community perhaps) greater than your own bubble.

my own experiences, both good & bad, have beyond doubt, opened my mind. before, i believed that the way we live is just the way we live & there is no other way. just like i was always taught & most the people i know still believe (sadly enough). that all changed after my first trip.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

its all ok
Posted by: ed hannam on Aug 4, 2006 12:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
personally i think the current acid situation is just fine.
sure its illegal - but inless you traffic or deal the shit no one acts like it is.
its not profitable enough to really get the attention of the mafia who stick to addictive shit like smack and speed.
you can get it anywhere.
it aint the best quality that often, but usually because its just weak. its too cheap to make to really need cutting with crap - tho mind you shonky manufacturing can lead to toxic residue.
as far as smuggling goes its gotta be the easiest drug ever.

personally - im happy.
old tims big thing was that these drugs were SELF ADMINISTERED. legalizing it so it becaomes government controlled would be a nightmare od who could and couldnt fo it. itd still lead to a black market - only this time maybe with more 'interested' groups like corrupt officials cashing in on it.

right now the rave culture and deadheads know all thats needed about getting it out there amongst a resaonably responsible community in environments designed for its use by folks who do the shit - not officials.
remember police-organized discos?? how dull were they...?
imagine that happening to acid.
nope.
i say leave the shit in the hands of the experts - ravers, djs and 2nd year chem. students.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

legit Leary bio coming this Fall
Posted by: Reverend Bookburn on Aug 14, 2006 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Short and sweet: most of us seem to understand the realities of the bogus Leary book and the reviewer on this page.

Good news: for those outside of tabloid-land or the Rush/ Robertson/ Bush-worship circles, there is a forthcoming legit Leary bio being released this Fall.

Title: I Have America Surrounded- The Life of Timothy Leary, by John Higgs, introduction by Winona Ryder. Published by Barricadebooks.com.

Forthcoming review in the monthly column by Paul Krassner in High Times magazine.

Rev. Bookburn
Radio Volta
Philadelphia
Reverendbookburn.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Acid Light zero calories ..take 2 they are small
Posted by: groovybear on Jan 20, 2007 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Im 44 earth years now and everyday i grin when i can. LSD is something that for me anyways will always be a great tool to allow my humanity and understanding of all that is in constant play IE reality...just another observation....for anyone who was willing to take the drug in a manner of lets see what i can discover or unfold in myself...unwavering and inviting the fx the chemical triggers in your neurotransmitters and neural pathways you know that our imagination and desire to be more than we are is a gift...when i took my first 500mcg trip it became clear that the architecture of life and our connection in the cosmos is elemental...the cluttered philos of politics and this trip and her trip and my trip are so unimportant its dissapation is just another flicker in the dancing flame of a fire...I saw Leary @ GMU in DC in the late 80s on his collegiate lecture circuit...when he opened up the forum for Q&A i patiently waited to ask him something that always bothered me...he said yes what would you like to add there pointing at me...I said Dr Leary i wont digress into any acidsoaked psychobabble im sure that gets old but after reading your autobiography it bummed me out to your ugly and selfrighteous attitude toward the arrival of the Merry Pranksters at Millbrook...he kinda grinned and said well in all honesty even though our approach to enlightment is as different as the east is west..the real deal was i had a soaring fever and felt like shit...and had zero stamina for the shenanigans and playful psychedelia that crew could muster...i said i totally understand that....even tho i love having fun and see the humor LSD encourages as part of a healthy experience....I cant stand being blown into a ego-less flashing collection of subatomic particles and have some dumbass try and convince the group he can perform duties like driving cutting fruit with sharp knives or even clean his firearm just to say he could...my trip is mine but if your trip involves sabotaging the many then adios my friend lifes too short for foolishness at least till the walls stop undulating in the dayglo fractal geometry for this kid...Peace T

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]