Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

DrugReporter

The Top 10 Things I Know About Drugs

By Tony Newman, AlterNet. Posted June 2, 2006.


We have to learn how to live with drugs -- because they aren't going anywhere.
Advertisement

I know a lot about drugs and the drug war, both personally and professionally. Drugs have had a positive and a detrimental impact on my life. I have laughed, played and found inspiration while intoxicated. I have also struggled, fought and cried because of my addiction to drugs.

I have spent the last six years working for an organization that is working to reform drug laws. I have read thousands of newspapers articles, had thousands of conversations and spent thousands of days thinking about drugs. What follows are the top 10 (plus one) things I have learned from my immersion with drugs and the drug war.

1. Drugs are everywhere. Despite a $40 billion a year "war on drugs" and political speeches about a "drug-free society," our society is swimming in drugs. Cigarettes, sugar, alcohol, marijuana, Prozac, Ritalin, Viagra, steroids and caffeine. The vast majority of Americans use drugs on a regular basis. People always have and always will.

2. Different people have different relationships with different drugs. My wife is someone who can enjoy an occasional cigarette and only smokes when she drinks. I am an addict who cannot control my cigarette problem. If I have one cigarette, I will end up smoking a pack a day. Some people have serious problems with alcohol and can't enjoy even a single drink. I can handle alcohol and enjoy a drink or two some nights, leave it alone on others, and I rarely have negative experiences with it. Different strokes for different folks.

3. People use drugs for joy and for pain. Many people enjoy using mind- and body-altering substances. How many of us enjoy having some drinks and going out dancing? How many of us enjoy a little smoke after a nice dinner with friends? Many people bond with others or find inspiration alone while high on drugs.

On the flip side, many people self-medicate to try to ease the pain in their lives. How many have us have had too much to drink to drown our sorrows over a breakup or some other painful event? How many of us smoke cigarettes to deal with anxiety or stress?

4. Drug abuse does not discriminate, but our drug policies do. Rush Limbaugh, Noelle Bush and Patrick Kennedy remind us that drug addiction does not discriminate. Unfortunately, our drug policies do. Ninety-three percent of the people incarcerated under New York's draconian Rockefeller drug laws are black or Latino, despite equal drug use among blacks and whites. Treatment for the privileged, jail for the poor.

5. Relapse happens. Anyone who has tried to quit cigarettes knows that relapse happens. I have unsuccessfully tried to quit cigarettes 15 times. While we know that drug treatment is more humane and more effective than prison, it is not a silver bullet. Many people will quit, relapse and need support to quit again.

6. Smoking five cigarettes is better than smoking 20. Using marijuana is better than using heroin. Many well-intentioned people think drugs are terrible and abstinence is always the answer. I believe that progress can be made, even if someone continues to use drugs. My 70-year-old landlord is a pack-a-day smoker. After some serious health problems, he is now down to smoking two cigarettes a day. This is progress. Some people who have struggled with heroin have been able to quit heroin, but still use marijuana. Our criminal justice system and many in the abstinence-only treatment world would view this as a failure and send the marijuana smoker to jail. I say congrats on giving up heroin. Keep it up.


Digg!

Tony Newman is communications director for the Drug Policy Alliance.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Stress and Being Human
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Jun 2, 2006 3:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"many people self-medicate to try to ease the pain in their lives." This is the real problem. What motivates people to use drugs and what fuels addiction has been ignored completely on a social or political level. It is all about punishing the victim instead. Yet there are 144 different addictions, sex, gambling, shopping, working, religion, etc. that have the same foundation: medication or behavior intended to bury the emotional pain. From what I have seen stress in this society is increasing rapidly and few know how to stop it. And all the laws, regulations and policies have had no impact. The political and legal institutions of this country no longer consider or understand human beings, only automatons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stress and Being Human Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Stress and Being Human Posted by: ChristopherLL
Legalization and control is only solution
Posted by: jlohman on Jun 2, 2006 3:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drugs (hard): We must de-criminalize the use of hard drugs by consenting users, but only if they agree to rehabilitation. Put drug pushers in jail for a minimum of ten years, and allow the legal sale of drugs via a physician prescription and at the lowest price possible with minimal markups. Only when we remove the profit motive will we drive the drug pushers out of business, and they will no longer be giving free drugs to teens to get them hooked. This is the only plausible way of minimizing this terrible drain on society (though the right wing will oppose it even to their detriment).

Drugs (Marijuana): Legalize the use of marijuana but apply the same laws to these users as we do to those who consume alcohol and drive motor vehicles.

And for the record I have never used either form of drugs, and coinsider myself a center-right Republican.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're no Republican Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: You're no Republican Posted by: jlohman
» Left-wing wackos? Posted by: sausage
» RE: Left-wing wackos? Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Left-wing wackos? Posted by: LMNOP
» well said (nm) Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Left-wing wackos? Posted by: lively56
» RE: Left-wing wackos? Posted by: Graeme
» RE: Left-wing wackos? Posted by: maribelle
» The problem with pushers Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: The problem with pushers Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: The problem with pushers Posted by: lively56
De-criminalize, the only way
Posted by: Poederbach on Jun 2, 2006 4:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Dutch citizen I a amazed why American and some European politicians and governments are so paranoid about drugs, but less about alcohol and normal cigarettes. Best is to de-criminalize drugs like Switzerland and The Netherlands are doing. Cigarettes and alcohol are a health risk and so are drugs. Fact is as you state in your article: drugs aren't going anywhere. But an interesting point would be to follow the money trail, you would be surprised and underdstand why drugs aren't going anywhere.

TomTom, Fearless Navigator and non smoker and non user of drugs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: De-criminalize, the only way Posted by: mokidugway
Nothing sane will happen in our lifetimes.
Posted by: wli on Jun 2, 2006 4:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I'll tell you why. The drugs aren't coming from miscellaneous guys like "Pablo Escobar" in distant lands. It's the CIA, DEA, et al. KB&R isn't just soaking up no-bid contracts in Iraq, they're warehousing tons of cocaine in their Columbian buildings and shipping it through their oil rigs and flying it across in military jets.

You don't do a takedown of corruption like that with mere lawyers and "public policy." You won't even get off the ground, and you'll be lucky not to end up dead for trying to cut into the CIA's profit margins. The "War on Drugs" can only end if and when the "ruling elite" are given the boot and democracy is brought to the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why drugs aren't going anywhere
Posted by: Jenny on Jun 2, 2006 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
God works in mysterious ways and when Delamer Duverus came to us the first thing He did was to expose a 50+ man illegal drug cartel composed of very prominent "citizens", physicians, dentists, attorneys, public servants, including law enforcement, and even businessmen and corporate executives.
The diet has lots to do with being prone to alcohol and drug addiction. If we could educate about this and if we could educate our people that they are funding their own demise by buying and using illegal drugs which can damage our genetics for future generations, then perhaps we could stop the drugs. It's a vicious circle and they use it against us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another evil of the drug war
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jun 2, 2006 4:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war on drugs makes the dea unwilling to allow the use of industrial hemp. Most fabric and paper ought to be made from hemp. If I had my way most cotton and soy would be replaced with hemp. Pine would never be used to produce paper just building materials when appropriate.

The war on drugs is a dream only a nazi would like! For most people it's a cruel nightmare.

In this so called "free" country where we are supposed to value liberty, I can not grow a plant to produce seeds that will provide me sustinence and ease my heart with essential fatty acids.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Misplaced blame Posted by: jwg
» RE: Misplaced blame Posted by: thorlives
» Absolutely true Posted by: aprille
» RE: Misplaced blame Posted by: babs
TWO TOLERANCE
Posted by: LMNOP on Jun 2, 2006 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand that some number of years ago, the Florida state legislature passed a bill declaring that most first drug "offenses" be viewed by the law not as crimes but as medical problems, that is, treated in a detox program rather than be convicted of a crime or imprisoned (I may have some of the details of this legislation incorrect, but the gist was what I indicated).

Governor Jeb Bush was recalcitrant to the conception that illicit drug use was not always a crime against society and vetoed the bill. He was proud to stand for ZERO TOLERANCE (remarkably, conservatives are proud to be intolerant and consider it a virtue).

Then his daughter Noelle got into trouble with illegal drugs, something about obtaining Xanax or a similar prescription sedative illegally, I believe by forging or telephoning in a prescription herself. Crime or illness?

Now this was different, Jeb explained. This was a private family matter, not a public spectacle, and should be viewed with pity and compassion. OK, so rehab is right for a Bush, not prison. OK, so she was caught with illegal drugs in rehab. Terrible personal tragedy, nothing to see here. New policy: ONE TOLERANCE.

Fast forward a few years to the celebrated Rush Limbaiugh case, also out of Florida. You know how that turned out. All of ditto-head-dom screamed "oersecution) in unison. After all, 300-400 OxyContin a week purchased by coaxing your domestic (illegal no doubt) to score for you on the streets, well that's just a back problem. And how dare thaey try to subpoena his health records to see if there was any validity to the claim. And he got the elitist Republican pass.

So now they're up to TWO TOLERANCE in Florida. Aren't you proud of America and it's just drug policy? I know that I am. How many flaws does a country have to possess before its people realize that it is no longer great, now it's just a wealthy, powerful, arrogant and hypocritical bully. And only Americans don't know that . But they will.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TWO TOLERANCE Posted by: susan28
Give it away and the world will be a better place
Posted by: solrev on Jun 2, 2006 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I use to sell kilos in this country for $175. I purchased the kilos in Nuevo Laredo for $20 and no one was getting shot. So the war on drugs has been very successful, it put a lot of money in the hands of the people who were suppose to have it. You do not think beer can compete with cheap pot do you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cry0fan? are you feeling okay? Posted by: peacefulaim
You must remember this
Posted by: robmikejas on Jun 2, 2006 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a recovering cocaine addict, I must say that the dangers of the drug far outweigh any positive results that de-criminalizing or legalizing could ever bring. In my opinion, anyone busted for cocaine use should be sentenced to immediate medical treatment(physical, and mental) and every attempt be made to alieveate the stress and or psychological condition that has created this problem. Trust me, the eventual physical problems that serious cocaine abuse will bring far outwiegh the pleasurable high it sometimes brings. I was a daily abuser for fifteen years and now in my sixties, am paying the price. I am also drug free since 1984 except for freaking cigarettes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You must remember this Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: You must remember this Posted by: caitlin
» Cocaine -- 40 Tons at a Time Posted by: AdamSelene40
It's a money thing
Posted by: sausage on Jun 2, 2006 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's too much money, both licit and illicit, for any poltician of either party to call for a sensible drug policy.

On the one hand we have the so-called legitimate forces of the law enforcement lobby and the drug rehab lobby. Let's be real, if funding for either or both law enforement or rehabilitation programs were drastically cut, a lot of poeple would be out of a lot of phony-balony jobs.

Then there's the illegitimate forces of drug distribution, or just to be more accurate let's call it the "illegal drug investment industry." Think about it. What other "investment" has as high of rate of return? And the higher up the "investment" chain we go, the lesser the risk of detection. I mean, does anybody really believe that the street gangs, Crips, Bloods etc., that the federal government went after hammer and tongs during the 80's "cocaine epidemic" had direct connections with the Cali, Columbia, drug lords in the beginning? The DEA goes after the high profile criminals, but never the white collar "investors."

There's too much money being made off the "drug war" for it to stop in our lifetime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's a money thing Posted by: hms2004
» RE: It's a money thing Posted by: lively56
All you Need is Drugs
Posted by: metamind on Jun 2, 2006 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That should be the motto of our society. It's sponsor is the American Pharmaceutical Industry. Just listen to your TV and it will tell you what drug is right for you and to "ask your doctor" for professional confirmation of your self-diagnosis. But solutions which don't require money, such as diet, herbs, exercise, friendship, meditation, yoga and community are laregely ignored. When was the last time you heard "All you need is community" from your living room spellcaster? ( TV )

Many fears are born of fatigue and lonliness. Such is the way of our life in the "money economy" which drives us to work harder than we should and to depend on money as the solution to all our problems.

The question we should ask ourselves is:

"What is better than drugs?"

Steve Moyer
Candidate for U.S. Senate
http://stevemoyer.us

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "What is better than drugs?" Posted by: WhatNow?
» Please look into SAFER Posted by: Lauren
Excellent article!
Posted by: brunowe on Jun 2, 2006 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marijuana and opium shouldn't be treated any more differently than cigarettes or alcohol. Overindulgence in those, or use of the harder stuff, should be treated as a medical problem (decrminalization). This would take the much of the profit away from the cartels.

There is an unfortunate Puritan streak in this country that led to Prohibition that is manifesting itself here. There are, of course, economic interests as well. I think of what is called the prison-industrial complex. In New York, most of the prisons are upstate. These areas are politically conservative and also benefit economically from the presence of prisons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcellent article! Posted by: LauraK
"Problem$ are profitable."
Posted by: betweenthedreams on Jun 2, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "war on drugs" is actually a war on sustainable agriculture. Drugs don't make seeds. Herbs do. Cannabis is not an optional resource. It is a critically determinate to mankind's slim chance of achieving sustainability on this planet.

Every negative experience anyone has ever had with so-called "drugs" has happened in the context of the "drug war." Problems are being created to create a market for the counter-productive measures, being imposed at the point of a gun. Such prolonged, radical imbalance in agricultural production of fuel, food, herbal therapeutics, etc. guarantees that scarcity of essential resources, and contamination of the auquifer by chemical drugs, will continue. Unless prohibition ends, mankind's addiction to toxic, unevenly distributed, finite chemicals will end in synergistic collapse of the Earth's environment, humankind's economics and our social structures.

The Economics of Punishment are impacted. The degenerative inertia is strong. Unless there is a coordinated shift in policy, most likely to come from the public, up to the so-called leaders, time will continue to be the limiting factor in the equation of survival.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drugs Won The Drug War
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 2, 2006 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The War on Drugs is, has been and will continue to be a failure unless it's methods change. It amazes me that the same people who claim to be so knowledgeable about enterprise and market capitalism have such a tin-ear on this.

The bottom line is this: our drug policies have caused the problem to get worse by making it very profitable to get people hooked and keeping them supplied. The harder governments push the more profitable it becomes to sell the drugs. Repression by police will not work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» well said Posted by: weary
» War on a noun Posted by: churchofone
Drug Laws are Criminal!
Posted by: aussidawg on Jun 2, 2006 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just this past Sunday, a person wote a letter to the editor of our local newspaper urging that a new drug rehab. center not be allowed to open. His stated reasoning was "this drug rehabilitation center cannot be allowed unless it has high walls topped with barbed wire, armed guards and 24 hour high tech. surveillence equipment because these drug addicts have proven themselves to be unworthy of our trust." He the stated "we need to deal with drug addicts like Singapore where if a person is caught using drugs, they are hung by the neck until dead. Then, we wouldn't have a drug problem." There are way too many people that have this attitude toward drug use and it makes my skin crawl! I recently saw a documentary on the History of Drug Prohibition, and it was enlightening to say the least. Drug laws originally were initiated that prohibited Chinese immigrants only from purchasing or using opium. The laws were later expanded to prevent Mexican immigrants from using their native marijuana. The laws were presented by demonizing their behavior while under the influence of these drugs. Finally, when alcohol prohibition came along with the ChristianTemperance Movement, all drugs were banned for recreational use because like alcohol, they "made people crazy and antisocial." This hysteria continues today just as it did almost 100 years ago, and the hysteria is completely based on a disinformation campaign by our federal government. As you can see from the above letter I quoted, there are still many people that believe drugs will make people criminals. Until we as responsible Americans can convince the dumbed up majority that drug laws cause the crime, not the drugs, we are fighting the losing side of the drug war. The only way to initiate change is through education of others at the local level. At the very least, we must convince a majority of lawmakers that harm reduction, such as in Canada and the UK must replace the harmful war on drugs. Our government is turning americans against americans and destroying way too many our of fellow citizens lives to allow this to continue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» it is a religious war Posted by: Lauren
Deni
Posted by: Deni on Jun 2, 2006 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep in mind that the government continues the drug war because it keeps a lot of people employed: cops, jail related occupations, etc. Not to mention the dealing power with other countries like Mexico. There's always a lot of lip service, but you will never see anything change because the government likes it just the way it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Deni Posted by: aussidawg
Interstate 420
Posted by: Sanchez on Jun 2, 2006 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has been so many ideas and beliefs stated here. I want to offer mine. Simply put, every person that chooses to smoke should save their seeds (they can stay good for years when frozen). Then from late August to Late June (depending on where you live) you should drive down the interstate and throw your seeds out the window onto the grass beside the road. Many seeds will sprout, and many will grow and multiply fairly quickly. Even those highways mowed occasionally cannot stop this plant from growing (it is after all a weed). The point in this is not to smoke it (it probably wouldn't even be worth smoking), but rather to illuminate the idiocy of making a naturally occurring plant illegal. In many parts of the country, this could be a 4/20 tradition since the date falls into the right planting period. Spread this idea around if you like it, and maybe in a few years the scent of the interstate may make traffic jams a little less stressful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Interstate 420 Posted by: jwg
» RE: Interstate 420 Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Interstate 420 Posted by: thorlives
» RE: Interstate 420 Posted by: aussidawg
How Many Drugs Have Been Killed, in the War On Drugs
Posted by: indy675 on Jun 2, 2006 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seen a bottle of Valium shot up lately? How about an ounce of Pot, decapitated? Any rocks of crack-cocaine, dragged through the streets and hung from a bridge?

No? Didn't think so.

The War on Drugs is bogus. Declaring war on inanimate objects should seem stupid to most people with more than three neurons firing, but that's America for you.

All the government has to do is scare people bad enough, and they will vote to declare war on a grapefruit; piss their pants, wave the flag and we are off and running again, spending billions of our hard earned bucks bulldozing fields of grapefruit trees. Note: The people who are doing the bulldozing will be working for no-bid contractors.

I realize that Cannabis is not the same thing as grapefruit, but the War on drugs is, nevertheless, stupid, if your real purpose is keeping kids off drugs long enough for their nervouis systems to fully form. As a matter of fact, criminalizing drugs assured us that our kids would be using drugs for generations to come.

The simple fact of the matter is that drugs are not going away. Not Ever!

There are many reason why that is true. I won't go into all of them, but one is very simple. Mankind has always sought alternative states of consciousness and always will. A healthy society will find a way to accomodate that need or it will spend more money on prisons than it will on the basic necessities of life with dignity, which is what we are currently doing.

What we really need to do is stop declaring freakin' war on everything of which the majority disapproves or everything that frightens us.

Now, in addition to the war on inaniminate objects, we have a war on an extreme emotional state; the War on 'Turr.' That war, too, is bogus.

The Bushites even tried to connect the two, for simplicity sake, I assume. At least, the idiotic idea that pot heads were big Al Qaeda supporters fell through the floorboards, hopefully. But one can never tell, can one? We thought that TIA had gone away too, when we found it had only moved from the Pentagon to the NSA.

Lyndon Johnson decalerd war on poverty. That really worked out well, eh.? Give Reagan two years in the White House and there were more whole families living in their cars and on the streets than anyone had seen since the Great Depression.

Any presidential candidate who can find other ways of dealing with anything, other than declaring war on it or criminalizing it, I will vote for. Of course, that vote may or may not count because no one has declared war on paperless voting machines or election stealing.

Life in America is so grim, that the status of drugs is assured, legal or otherwise. Just ask Nicole Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Mission accomplished! Posted by: LMNOP
clinker
Posted by: cottontail on Jun 2, 2006 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given the miserable state of our culture it's little wonder folks resort to drugs. Stress, brought on by job worries (out-sourcing, lay-offs, lower wages and health care benefits slashed) and possibly a sub-conscious revulsion over the workings of our corrupt and criminal government, may cause many to choose drugs, both legal and illegal, to ease their burden. The simple life, if it ever existed, is over. Shop til you drop, be a good consumer, and especially you poorer folks, provide the military with cannon fodder to kill and be killed, is a recipe for ever increasing drug use.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Recovery Rocks
Posted by: mite on Jun 2, 2006 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to say how true this article is and all the comments, one who struggles with addiction everyday I live one day at a time. It is hard to stay clean and sober when one sees and feels the pain in this world.
I went back to school in my 50's to become a Substance Abuse Counselor and after a year stopped. I researched this system we live in to find the cause of addiction. I FOUND IT!!
It was started for money and continues to make us slaves while feeding us this disease-ADDICTION. Keep us down and feed us pleasure, keep us distracted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ecovery Rocks Posted by: rdeluca
DanD
Posted by: mumblingrepublican on Jun 2, 2006 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ah, but we need to lock people up so prison industries will make those capitalizing on them rich. The drug war has made it all possible and now they can get their tax breaks from the republicans. It has back doored slavery back into America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DanD Posted by: aussidawg
Latest research on Marijuana
Posted by: fenix on Jun 2, 2006 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Researchers surprised to find no link between marijuana, lung cancer
Study's findings apply even to heavy pot smokers
Marc Kaufman, Washington Post

Friday, May 26, 2006

This article also goes on to say that there is a positive effect of THC on lung cancer --

SO if I see one more comment about how smoking cigarettes and smoking pot are the same and one is legal and one isn't; I'm going to throw up.

Let's make sure, we aren't adding fuel to the DRUG WAR fire.

I tried to post the link, but am apparantly not saavy enough to get past the 40 character limit, so it is found on www.sfgate.com if you search for it, it was posted 5/26

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think the author made a strong case and agree in general with
Posted by: Timba on Jun 2, 2006 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
him. I especially think his second point is important to grasp. I had a terrible time with booze as a young man, found MJ and realized I could forge a life with it as my recreational drug of choice but that booze would kill me. Stopped drinking, raised a family, worked in middle level management in the health care industry for many years and now my wife and I run our own small business and I managed to do all this even though I smoked herb daily. I have other friends who can pound down the beer and be fine the next day but take a toke and feel a little off center for days. We need to realize as stated above that people will choose to alter their consciousness, then we need to add to that the concept that each person will have a different reaction to any given drug and that through experimentation can find what works for them. Mind you this is true for those who do not use drugs also, whether you get through the day using religion, bingo, blogging, whatever it doesnt matter as long as it works for you and helps you connect the dots of your life. To lock up people because you disagree with the method they use to alter their consciousness is reprehensible. No more powerful mind alteration can be had than the one you can get from religion and as we can see with theocrats here and around the world this is not always a alteration that can be called good and yet you see no one suggesting this form of mind alteration should be made illegal even though it can be tied to more violence, hatred and killing than any other agent of mind alteration. The war on drugs needs to end-LETS DECLARE VICTORY and then we can all go pursue our rush of choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THC Ministry Posted by: Lauren
Logic-proof
Posted by: gwyneth on Jun 2, 2006 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When many states have effectively decriminalized purse-snatching, car theft and other assault- and property- related crimes by releasing those perpetrators early to make room for those sentenced for dealing and possessing, something's wrong.

Because a huge percentage of property crimes are committed to pay for illegal drugs, our policies have created a strange situation in many communities where non-users suffer more real-world consequences than users. That's neither logical nor fair.

Nor is it logical to expend resources supposedly needed for battling terrorists to chase down 'marijuana tunnels' like the one closed last year in the Pacific Northwest. Terrorists may or may not be a threat to Americans, but thousands of dried plants surely are not.

We have a greater percentage of our population incarcerated than any other 'developed' country in the world, but instead of wondering why, we just build more prisons.

It's hard to see how decriminalizing drugs would make things any worse than keeping them illegal, but it would at least shift whatever harm they supposedly do directly to those who use them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Logic-proof Posted by: babs
There IS NO LOGIC to the Drug War. (as in period!)
Posted by: aussidawg on Jun 2, 2006 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war on drugs is a covert money operation for the feds. They hide their bullshit under the mask of morals. I have said it before, I will say it again, I am a chronic pain patient, and because of the nature of my affliction, I need pain medications, sorta like a diabetic needs insulin. Without them, I spend days on end in bed because it is too painful to walk. Please, you good Christians and law abiding citizens out there, why am I considered a criminal when a diabetic or a person with depression (ooops, I forgot, the mentally ill are also evil), or a person with hypertension that must control their blood pressure with meds. are not? You "good" people harass my physicians, and harass and label me an addict when all I want to do is try to function so I can contribute to your society. The drug war has half a million of our fellow Americans in prison, and one example is Richard Paey, a chronic pain patient with MS, confined to a wheelchair. Mr. Paey was busted for taking too many Percocet pills (per the authoritys) and sentenced to 25 years in Florida State Prison. When he arrived at prison, he was given a morphine pump that supplies him with more pain medication than he was sent to prison for. Now tell me, especially anyone on this site that happens to be in favor of the drug war, is that logical in your mind?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Few more points regarding the "WAR" on Drugs
Posted by: Shallow_Vain on Jun 2, 2006 12:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel very strongly about this issue... *NOT* having any personal experience with illegal drugs but having PLEANTY of experience with what happens after the Criminal Justice System is done, I firmly believe non violent drug offenses should be decriminalized. Further I believe that society as well as goverment would be very well served by decriminalizing some of the substances, controlling marketing and distribution as they do with tobacco and Alcohol, and taxing these substances, with the hope that said funds would be used for school etc.
My reasons for this are several, first there is a problem that is not addressed were non-violent drug offences occur, and that is the many of these crimes are commited by women. On average each woman in prison has 3.5 children.
Approximately 75 percent of incarcerated women are mothers, and two-thirds have children under the age of 18. Seventy-two (72) percent of women prisoners with children under the age of 18 lived with those children before entering prison.
So what happens to these kids?
First they go to family, family that usually has other children to care for or are already overburdoned financially. Second they go into the foster care system. Here are statistics on the next generation of convicted criminals ...
Forty-six percent had a family member who had been incarcerated
About 12 percent had lived in a foster home or institution.
Our current laws set up the next generation to be ready to go into the prision system, and the laws against drug offenses keep getting tougher and tougher.
Here's why...
Private prison companies stay profitable by courting political influence and supporting strict sentencing laws.
Corporate-owned prisons need a steady flow of inmates to maintain profits. To protect their profit margins, prison companies exert political influence by contributing thousands of dollars to state political campaigns. Lobbyists for private prisons support tough-on-crime legislation that ensures the continued need for prison space.
The number of prisoners in private prisons grew more than 2,000 percent between 1987 and 1996, soaring from 3,122 to 78,000.1 Privately-run facilities held more than 98,790 inmates at mid-year 2004—up 3.4 percent since 2003.
The business of incarceration is booming, with revenue passing the $1 billion mark in 1998.
Two companies dominate the for-profit incarceration industry—Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and the GEO Group, formerly known as Wackenhut Corrections. These two companies control 75 percent of the for-profit incarceration market.
They are NOT the only companies profiting from our "war". Munitions, guns, automobile, and a host of other law enforcement providers are ALL profiting from this little exercise in futility. In fact you would not see a more disappointed group of people if all of the sudden drugs ceased to exist in society.
Now do we feel morally superior to countries that choose NOT to fight the bad fight? I certainly hope not... we are paying very very dearly for our moral high ground.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why do we keep declaring War?
Posted by: Gtrpicker on Jun 2, 2006 12:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We declare war on anything and everything that bothers us: poverty, drugs, terrorism, prostitution, homosexualality, just about anything. It is crazy and we are crazy for allowing it to happen. We must start to use our language as it was meant to be used, as something that is specific to a definition. War is when we go about killing other people to get what they have or to keep them from taking from us what they want. War is about killing, not about changing anyone's habits or minds, it is about killing, and when we use the term war we are going to kill someone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» answer Posted by: Lauren
2. Different people have different relationships with different drugs.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 2, 2006 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article, and I can relate to it all; all his points ring. But it is his #2 that shouts at me.

I began what I expected would be "playing" with crack cocaine because at that time I had already given up tobacco, and although I had only tried alcohol, weed, and speed and those I could take or leave. So why not the same with crack.

I now know what addiction feels like. Even while I recognized very early on that I was helpless to resist crack, and I began participation in 12 Step programs with a month or two, it has taken me nearly 15 years to finally get 4 3/4 years clean.

I had to be shamed by law enforcement as I have never been shamed before in my life. I desperately wanted sobriety by DIY; I'm no weakling, I told myself.

Only the company of other addicts has saved me. Just as abuse of crack changed my life, so now 12 Step programs have changed my life. As one who has studied philosophy of religion most of his now long life, I am constantly amazed at the practical wisdom from Bill W. He, and they, were geniuses.

As it is an anonymous program, we don't hear a lot about it. I am comforted to know of the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of active participants. We're far from saints, but an honest program is one that helps others.

If you have a better suggestion, I'd sure like to hear it. But I won't hold my breath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TAKE ACTION
Posted by: picket on Jun 2, 2006 4:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In July Congress will vote on an amendment to stop the FEDS from arresting patients in states with laws that allow medical use of cannabis.
Is it too much to ask of Congress?
It is quick and easy........form letter available for convenience if wanted.
http://action.mpp.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TAKE ACTION Posted by: aussidawg
Okay - now why are there so few mentions of pharmaceutical companies?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 2, 2006 4:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see:

Methamphetamine, aka "ice" or "shards" - a very dangerous drug, the cause of all kinds of physiological and emotional damage to the users. For example, see the movie "Spun".

Pharmaceutical analog: Ritalin - prescribed to 7-year olds on the pyschiatrist's recommendation. Does this predispose little kids to a future of meth or cocaine addiction? Yes it does.

Heroin - the scourge of nations, produced in Afghanistan and other countries, shipped out to Europe and the US, the cause of all kinds of social ills.

Pharmaceutical analogs- many