Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

The Electric Kool-Aid Medicine Test

By Terrence McNally, AlterNet. Posted May 24, 2006.


Hallucinogen researcher Charles Grob says psychedelic drugs have the potential to alter modern medicine.
Advertisement

In 1954, when the national mood was one of suspicion and conformity, Aldous Huxley wrote, "All ... the hallucinogens that ripen in berries or can be squeezed from roots -- all, without exception, have been known and systematically used by human beings from time immemorial."

Ten years later Timothy Leary was fired from Harvard for "systematically using" LSD (admittedly not from a berry or a root) with students. Leary's sensational promotion of turning on and dropping out closed the door on serious dialogue or research into the potential benefits of psychedelic substances. Yet today, in the midst of the current revival of patriotic and moral paranoia, some are beginning once again to scientifically consider their value as visionary or psychological medicine.

Charles Grob, M.D., is director of the Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics at the UCLA School of Medicine. He conducted the first government-approved psycholobiological research study of MDMA, was the principal investigator of an international project in the Brazilian Amazon of ayahuasca, and is now studying the use of psilocybin with advanced-stage cancer patients. He is editor of "Hallucinogens: A Reader" and recently co-edited, with Roger Walsh, "Higher Wisdom: Eminent Elders Explore the Continuing Impact of Psychedelics."

Terrence McNally: How and when did you decide to work with psychedelics?

Charles Grob: Growing up in the '60s, it was impossible to not be exposed to the controversies and the extraordinary powers of these compounds. In the early '70s, I read much of the literature that was available at the time, and I was struck by the potential these compounds had to help us understand the mind and mental illness, and to help us develop new and novel treatments. I was aware that, in order to speak out on this issue, one needed credentials, so I went back to school and got all the degrees and training I needed. It was always my intention to conduct proactive approved research in this area, though in the late '70s and early '80s there was virtually nothing going on in this country or elsewhere.

McNally: In 1973 I interviewed Stanislov Grof, who was then doing government-funded research in Maryland on the use of LSD with terminal cancer patients. Six months later I tried to follow up, and the state of Maryland wrote back that Dr. Grof was no longer in its employ. He had been let go, and the government funding had ended.

Grob: Around the same time, I heard Grof speak at the annual meeting of the Humanistic Psychology Association in New York City, and I was impressed with the enormous potential of the work he was doing.

McNally: Tell us about your study on anxiety in cancer patients.

Grob: At the L.A. Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, we have full regulatory approval to conduct a study using psilocybin -- the active alkaloid in hallucinogenic mushrooms -- in the treatment of the anxiety associated with advanced-stage cancer.

McNally: What is the status of the study at this time? Do you have any preliminary results?

Grob: We've been treating individuals for the past year and a half who fit all our inclusion/exclusion criteria. To date, we've studied five subjects in entirety. We're approved for a total of 12, so we hope to treat seven more. We're finding recruitment very challenging because we have very tight inclusion/exclusion criteria. We've interviewed a number of individuals who at first seemed to fit our criteria, but whose medical condition then drastically deteriorated so that they could no longer participate. We're very interested in talking with individuals who might fit.

McNally: Where would potential candidates learn about this, and how would they apply?

Grob: Our website -- canceranxietystudy.org -- details the inclusion/exclusion criteria and provides information about the methodology.

McNally: Can you verify Huxley's contention that all plant hallucinogens, without exception, have been known and systematically used by human beings from time immemorial?

Grob: Certainly the anthropological and historical evidence is very rich that even pre-civilization cultures highly valued hallucinogenic plants. Aboriginal cultures often used them as one of the core activities for reinforcing belief systems and tribal cohesion. This is quite apparent if you look at the indigenous peoples in the Amazon basin in South America, where the plant ayahuasca is used for religious, spiritual and healing purposes. As far back as human habitation of the Amazon basin has been established, there are indications that ayahuasca was an integral part of their lives and belief systems.

McNally: I've traveled a bit in the rainforest of Ecuador, and among the Achuar people it is an important and seldom-used ritual taken at key passages in life.


Digg!

Interviewer Terrence McNally hosts Free Forum on KPFK 90.7FM, Los Angeles (streaming at kpfk.org).



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Perception always trumps facts
Posted by: tanstaafl28 on May 24, 2006 2:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if there was overwelming scientific evidence proving positive medical benefits for prohibited drugs, there is little chance the U.S. will ever reform its draconian drug laws. Too many people are profiting from maintaining the status quo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is Reality That Difficult?
Posted by: ChristopherLL on May 24, 2006 3:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
True spirituality and enlightenment has nothing to do with psychoactive chemicals. It is there to be accessed by doing the human work of honesty, humility and insight. These psychoactive chemicals are being promoted by their supposed help for a few individuals. Even 12 participants in a study is insufficient to generalize in any way to a larger population. Any life change that is gleaned from psychoactive agents is, by definition, chemically induced and therefore artificial. A very limited number of cultures use psychoactive agents but when they do it is an established part of their rituals and not used in everyday life. And what about nicotine, alchohol, narcotics, etc.? They are psychoactive as well so should we include them in research to enlighten the population? They already use them (or rather overuse them) and it is not my belief that I live in an enlighened culture. And adding more psychoactive agents to ingest will not improve our situation. Reality is not the problem but perception and distorting that perception it then becomes delusion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: schnoggi
» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: cold2touch
» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: peacefulaim
» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: ArtemInox
» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Is Reality That Difficult? Posted by: peacefulaim
» ArtemInox Posted by: BillC
Balance
Posted by: Uncle Tupelo on May 24, 2006 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is when some balance would be nice. I don't know from this whether there are any legitimate medical concerns about LSD and MDMA use. If there are (and I suspect that there are), it's sort of dishonest and potentially dangerous for AlterNet to post this without mentioning those concerns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Balance Posted by: Dan Metcalf
» RE: Balance Posted by: owleyes
» RE: Balance Posted by: jwg
» RE: Balance Posted by: MEL810
» RE: Balance Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: Balance Posted by: AP
Personal Growth versus Crutches
Posted by: jhbeck23 on May 24, 2006 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As already commented, drugs provide an artificial access to different regions of perception and consciousness. Humanity today (except for some indigenous peoples) has shrunk its consciousness down to the hard outlines of the material world -- and important achievement but not a goal in itself -- and is only beginning to experience a renewal of abilities such as drugs can sometimes provide.
. Good social settings for drug use are crucial. Readers of Plato's Symposium are rarely aware that a symposium is an alcohol ritual, where everyone got drunk and focused on nevertheless speaking intelligently about an important subject, in Plato's case, love.
. Using drugs as tools for compassionate, highly trained work with people who are suffering seems a pure good to me. Promoting uninformed use of drugs leads to dependencies and worse.
. The 60s, also my formative time, were a liberation effort, but they were largely led by people who had not yet achieved personal wisdom. The strong survived, many crashed and burned, and the fearful became the neo-conservatives who plague us today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reality is relative
Posted by: Nheduanna on May 24, 2006 5:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who is to define the nature of reality or spiritual enlightenment? The above writier's arrogance is typical of current consensus reality. The rationalists' fears of mind-expanding drugs seem to be more about losing control of the privileged reality that they've carefully constructed, but which flies in the face of their professed spiritual path -- the compassionate teachings of Jesus.

My own experience, which is influenced by psychotropic experimentation, is that everything is connected -- disease and health, sacred and profane, fear and courage -- all One. If more people could accept this connection, we'd see a precipitous decline in war and disease along with the flowering of a more egalitarian, truly compassionate world community.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eality is relative Posted by: nickbk
» RE: Relativity is real Posted by: cold2touch
» RE: eality is relative Posted by: peacefulaim
Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds
Posted by: ssegallmd on May 24, 2006 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, I have little authentic experience with hallucinogens, but I have read and heard the same claims repeatedly that these drugs can cause a lasting paradigm shift in an individual's philosophy.

The argument is roughly the same one for broadening ones world view by travelling outside of one's country, gaining a new perspective not otherwise avaiable, and carrying that expanded horizon back into ones original environment where it will factor in to all decisions.

Likewise, or so the argument goes (and I believe that it is probably accurate): if one travels into an alternate reality to gain a new perspective, one brings these new insights back to bear onto everyday life.

And since I have not heard this claim made about other types of drugs (including other psychoactive substances that are not hallucinogenic), I tend to believe the claims even moreso, and feel that I have missed out on something that I would have considered valuable thanks to my culture's Neanderthal drug policy the result of which makes access to the drugs more difficult and more dangerous (danger of incarceration, danger of toxicity from unregulated manufacture of chemicals and drug substitution).

What could be more of a threat to those that want us dull and subdued and to be seduced by the marketplace. They work tirelessly to inculcate the values that they wish us (but not themselves) to hold: it is wrong to steal [from your employer], it is stealing to call in sick inappropriately or to not do your best job, work hard and with dedication and you will be rewarded, etc.. The last thing they need is for people to become more satisfied with their lives by developing an authentic inner life and to stop seeking fulfillment by consuming without restraint and being in debt.

At first, I confused the author (Terrence McNally) with Terrence McKenna whose Wikipedia entry can be found here. I remember hearing tapes in the early 90's of his lectures from the 70's and 80's rebroadcast on KPFK Pacifica radio (listener supported radio without corporate influence) for southern California that were originally aired in the Bay area on KPFA out of San Francisco. He impressed me then with his articulate tales of the journey passing through Huxley's 'Doors of Perception'.

Completely off point but very funny (and who couldn't use a laugh right now?): Concerning the Beatle's song 'Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds' (which Lennon repeatedly and convincingly denied was inspired by or about LSD), refers to "a girl with kaleidoscope eyes". One web site collects misheard song lyrics from contributors who had been singing the wrong words and later found this out. One gentleman heard "the girl with colitis goes by" instead. I love it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds Posted by: Dan Metcalf
» RE: Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds Posted by: gonzoskismet
On safety and spirituality
Posted by: brad on May 24, 2006 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The safety of psychedelics can be seen in the tens of millions of people who have taken them with literally only a few hundreds cases of negative physiological effects. In this regard it is much safer than asprin or Tylenol.

Spitituality and self development are part of the natural processes of human existance and as such are intricately tied to the natural world. Almost all religious celebrations involve eating plants in a cerimonial conection to the natural world, the use of psychoactive plants is no different and many believe it is part of the evolution of people and perhaps the wellspring of ancient religions. History is full of ritual use of plants and to think that we should not use them now, that they are a false profit is being blind to human history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting Read...
Posted by: littlebozo on May 24, 2006 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, Alaric was not a Hun - they were his enemies. He was a Goth, specifically a Visigoth. Perhaps you were thinking of Attilla.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Interesting Read... Posted by: Brother Artemis
I'm not close-minded
Posted by: bettsoff on May 24, 2006 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm just not interested in the stuff. I support research on it, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hmmm
Posted by: richardpmendola on May 24, 2006 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a significant portion of my life, my attempts at transcendence came, through something appropriately called communion. I ate and drank what I was told and believed was literally the body and blood of Jesus. Cannibalism by my own standards.

I wished really hard, but I do believe that I was never transformed. Alas, when I began, I saw with the eyes of a child. By the time I stopped I noticed that none of the other god-eaters were all that different from the general populace either. In fact, we seemed somewhat less than the Quakers, who mostly just sat quietly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hmmm Posted by: gonzoskismet
Entheogens are our friends. (part 1)
Posted by: Uriahz on May 24, 2006 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's my experience that the purposes you have for taking a hallucinogen will necessarily affect the outcome of your trip. For myself, I've always taken them with an eye towards a greater understanding of myself and the world around me, and as such psilocybin particularly has proven to be a great teacher. I wouldn't say that I take them in the context of a ritual, but rather that I take them when it strikes me that the time is right. It's not something you should schedule, you know? And the more scheduled or frivolous your trip is, the more important your set and setting are. In other words, have understanding and nurturing people around, in an environment where you feel safe and secure. That said, after a dozen or so trips I've found that I very rarely come away from a 'magic mushroom' trip with great new insights-- it's more like attending the same old church service over and over again, even though there's people flopping in the aisles and speaking in tongues. It's nice to visit, but of limited growth potential in regard to the pursuit of inner knowledge.

On a related note, in my studies of shamanism (which cannot be effectively seperated from entheogenic use, in my mind), I came across a very interesting book by the french anthropologist Jeremy Narby called The Divine Serpent which discusses his studies of the ayahuasqueros of the Ashinca tribe in the peruvian amazon. It's widely known that the shaman of amazonian tribes possess a truly vast knowledge of different useful plants in their native jungles. It has always been assumed by anthropologists that they spend significant amounts of time in the education of their apprentices, teaching about all the different plants. This is apparently not the case. According to the Ashinca shaman, they don't spend any time whatsoever on passing on such lore. Instead, they claim that all their knowledge is derived from their entheogenic use. Ayuhuasca, and its synthetic compound DMT, are particularly interesting and potent hallucinogens that often cause hallucinations of snakes (hence the title of the book), and the experience of talking with great spirits of the forest. It's claimed that by forging a relationship with those great spirits, that they will receive knowledge as needed from those spirits while tripping on Ayuhuasca. Interestingly enough (and this was a great surprise to me), the hallucinations correspond significantly with the images we see in the study of molecular biology. One shaman, who had never been out of the jungle, much less read a biology textbook; and who had a photographic memory, committed to painting images of his visions. When shown to a molecular biologist, Narby was shocked to see the biologist have no difficulty immediately identifying all of the different brightly colored elements in each of the paintings. One common image is that of spiralling ladders or linked eyes in long chains. In researching other cultures' mythology, he found a great number of symbols signifying a ladder to heaven from which knowledge was passed, and postulated that perhaps ayuhuasca allows you to speak with your DNA, in a sense, as does your DNA communicate with all other DNA around it through visible light produced by the DNA (at extremely low power), as the light-producing capabilities of DNA has been recently demonstrated. Regardless of how it happens, the fact that the Ashinca don't bother with any normal sense of education, but rather gain their education through the process of entheogenic ritual and the direct spiritual communication associated with that is quite remarkable, to my mind.

(Continued in next post)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Entheogens are our friends. (part 2)
Posted by: Uriahz on May 24, 2006 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I personally consider the illegality of hallucinogens in particular among drugs to be a great crime against the freedom of religion. I certainly wouldn't consider heroin to be a religious experience, nor would I classify cocaine as a healthy thing to be doing, regardless of the fact that they should be legalized, but with hallucinogens in particular, we're talking about something that can effectively and easily be used for clearly spiritual purposes. I consider it furthermore a crime against the freedom of religion that you have to be a part of an organized church to be considered religious. It is to my mind a incredible disservice to mankind that the freedom of religion solely means that you can pursue the religious beliefs that your family has had for generations, and not the religious beliefs that you decide for yourself.

In regard to the spiritual use of MDMA in the rave setting, as stated by a poster above, it's absolutely clear that many of those who started the rave culture distinctly believed they were having religous experiences while dancing and tripping to house music. That is of no doubt whatsoever. For you to claim that they are being disingenuous in those claims says to me that perhaps you have either never actually investigated the rave culture beyond what you've heard on the news and on the street, or perhaps you have a sort of wrong-headed sense of moral superiority over those who do not share your own particular view of the world. I would encourage you to step outside your bubble for a moment and understand that just because you personally do not find certain activities to be spiritually uplifting, there is no necessary correlation that those activities cannot be greatly rewarding in a spiritual sense. Many ravers consider the rave to be like attending a special type of church and claim to experience incredible feelings of connectedness and non-being consistent with the religious experiences of the pentacostal church. Who's to say they're wrong?

I wouldn't be so brave as to call their experiences 'purely artificial'. If it gives you a greater sense of your place in the world and causes you to treat those around you with greater understanding and compassion, it is unequivocally a True Religion in the purest sense of the words. And that's all I've got to say about that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time for a spiritual awakening
Posted by: harinama on May 24, 2006 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This country has sped along a path of unilateralism, cultural proselyzing and egoism, material hedonism and military & economic imperialism for hundreds of years now. What has it gotten us? Presently America and it's people are reviled throughout the world for our hubris and self righteousness. Illegal and immoral invasions of other sovereign states such as Iraq (and soon Iran, Syria,etc) under the criminally ironic auspices of spreading "democracy" and "free trade", only serve to catalyze our enemies against us and our way of life.

Isn't it time, we became a member of the world of nations instead of using intimidation, extortion, destruction to control others?

Entheogens have been used since time immemorial to expand human consciousness, increase awareness and humble each and every individual to the vast connected and transcendent universe. They have been used to humble us through showing clearly our internal discord, and our proper place within the universe of consciousness.

Unfortunately, entheogens have been often misused in this culture, through their use as "party drugs", not unlike alcohol, to get "high". Each entheogen has a purpose, and a proper set and setting for its use. We must have respect for them, and take them with an openess to gaining new insights and clarity, not to combine them with other drugs to get wasted. (although, sometimes, they still might get some of what the entheogenic spirit teacher has to offer).

As others have stated, many legitimate paths to enlightenment do not require use of entheogens, but that does not disparage those cultures that take them as part of a greater culture full of validation and ritualistic involvement. Each culture has it's way toward a higher level of consciousness, and entheogens can at the very least give the user a glimpse that a higher, spiritual existence is possible.

Look to yourself for truth, and you may begin to hear it in others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drugs and Religion
Posted by: aussidawg on May 24, 2006 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that hallucingenic drugs do enable the user to sense an altered relationship with thier existance is one major reason it will probably NOT be opened for testing and eventual medical use. Our society doesn't like departure from the status quo, meaning it doesn't encourage people to look at reality differently than everybody else. Unfortunately, even religions such as Buddhism are not really accepted as "valid" religions in our society. The accepted religions are generally some facet of Judism or Chrisitianity, period. Many years ago, I also tried hallucinigenic drugs. I personally did not particularly like the experience, but knew many that did, and yes, their perception of the world around them was changed for the better. In short, I without a doubt think that study of these drugs and their use in psychiatric areas should be implemented and I do feel that they, like marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and any other drug, do have a beneficial use in medicine. Declaring drugs as medically useless is nothing short of morality induced prejudice, and the prohibition of said drugs is nothing short of an infringement of individual rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LSD/marijuana
Posted by: kenhymes on May 24, 2006 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Minor point: LSD often affects the later experience of marijuana, amplifying the latter's psychedelic properties among those who have repeatedly used LSD. I mention this in connection with the interviewee's remarks about the social and scientific effects of a generation's experience with "hallucinogens."

I put that word in quotes, because it is a word which misleads about the nature of drug experiences, and of perception in general. All perception is mediated, first by the mechanics of our senses themselves, and then by the socially constructed filters we place upon the information we receive through our sense organs. A tiny example: you never actually see or hear in real time - everything is delayed by the passage of light and sound through space and matter.

Cross-cultural studies of linguistic categories and semantic fields reveal vast and critical differences in the way different people apprehend reality. It is a big mistake to ascribe any permanent correctness to our own filters. Even if I accept positivism and empiricism (which I do only provisionally, within a lifetime of experience that challenges tidy epistemological boundaries), just during the lifetime of these ways of looking at reality, everything has "changed." We look at people's mental processes very differently than several generations ago.

Sexual abuse is a perfect example - didn't used to exist, now it is everywhere and causes enormous ripples of damage affecting virtually everyone in one way or another. Is this "true"? Of course it is. Is it the final understanding of social and family dysfunction? Of course not. So... are the survivors who put everything through the lens of their abuse experiences wrong? No, but our perception of our own histories and of the motivations of others is filtered, mediated, both by the abuse, and more crucially by our socially constructed understandings of what the abuse means and "causes."

Hallucinogens change everything for many who take them. Some people handle it well, and go on to expanded creativity and empathy. Some people just become very messy.
I'm skeptical of claims that these powerful substances can be tamed into medicines. But I'm glad that work is being done which advances and expands the discussion about their meaning(s).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Courage to Heal
Posted by: azima on May 24, 2006 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just told the psychiatrist regulating my anti-depressants that I was going to go off of them for the summer so that I could spend a month in Peru with a shaman in ayahuasca ceremonies. My doc told me that my choice was extremely dangerous and he strongly advised against it and didn't want to see me again. This is a man I've worked with for over ten years. We've had a cordial relationship. I can appreciate that he's been trained to prescribe drugs, and if the medical cocktail works, to stick with it.

I have no personal resentment against him for doing his job. I do, however, wish the medical establishment were more open minded about the benefits of non-pharmaceuticals. I suspect that if there's no money in it for them, they'll snub the idea as ineffective. Then, we'll watch them coopt some of these traditional plants and patent them and deny indigenous people the opportunity to cultivate them any longer.

Would there ever be a possibility of an indigenous/pharmaceutical symbiotic partnership? I can dream.

Bravo to Dr. Grob for his research and the courage to endure the professsional ostracism that resulted.

Kudo's also to the progressive doctors who are learning about ayahuasca under the tutelage of Amazon shamans.

When the people lead, the leaders will follow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But did it work ... Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: But did it work ... Posted by: azima
» Sounds right to me ... Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: But did it work ... Posted by: outsidea
» RE: But did it work ... Posted by: azima
» RE: But did it work ... Posted by: outsidea
» RE: But did it work ... Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» GOOD CALL! Posted by: turbocrusher
» RE: The Courage to Heal Posted by: aussidawg
Money Trumps Everything - even common sense
Posted by: Jammer2 on May 24, 2006 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no doubt in my mind that even if the scientific community were to discover huge benefits from now illegal drugs used today, nothing would change because science is now considered bunk in this country and religion is the top money maker for the politicians right now. You cannot imagine how many of the religious fundamentalists today were frying in the 1960's on LSD , Mescaline, Psilocybin, and anything else that they could get their hands on. They always had the best drugs for sale anywhere in North Texas! But now they fear that their children will follow in their footsteps and they want to return to the backward days of the 1950's.

Too late folks! Your kids are doing the drugs, having sex, and emulating their parents past actions now... only they are 8 to 10 years younger than when you were into that scene. Way to go people, you have failed miserably in your quest to return to the days of ignorance!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some Un-Psychedelic Implications
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 24, 2006 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I take this to mean that the some people believe that psychological illnesses can be overcome via the use of hallucinogenic drugs; these drugs have been successfully used to get alcoholics off alcohol and heroin addicts off heroin - can they also be used to get Prozac, Zoloft and Paxil addicts off their respective 'medications' as well?

I see a problem here - aren't you talking about the fact that psychologically healthy people don't abuse a ton of drugs? Wouldn't that undercut alcohol sales, tobacco sales, heroin sales, and pharmaceutical company sales? Big Pharma is pretty clear here: the only solution to pyschological illness is a lifetime prescription for their FDA-approved products...oh brave new world that has such marketing geniuses in it!

Also, these drugs are apparently good at overcoming brainwashing - by biochemically interfering with the sensory information received by the brain, they naturally cause a certain "questioning of reality"; i.e. if you can't necessarily trust the information delivered by your own senses (reportedly this is the most terrifying aspect of hallucinogens), perhaps you shouldn't trust the information delivered by your TV set, either.

The CIA, at the conclusion of it's 'experiments' with LSD on unwitting US citizens and government employees, published a classified handbook titled, "LSD: some un-psychedelic implications". All copies were reportedly destroyed - too bad. I'm sure it would make for some fascinating reading.

(A little warning from a historical aboriginal source: yes, these plants are powerful - but if you misuse them or treat them without respect, they will cause you to go crazy and kill yourself)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scared to find out who we REALLY are/
Posted by: gonzoskismet on May 24, 2006 5:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, I done a ton of acid, mescaline, psylosibin and pot in the Sixties. Here's my advice, the same advice I gave to both my children before both of them tripped. If you got shit in your head that you are not facing up to DO NOT TAKE THIS ROAD.
If you have the Hidden Monster in your mind that you are not willing to shake hands with DO NOT TAKE THIS TRIP. because it will turn out bad. When this bastard you've been denying so long comes out of the closet and DEMANDS a confortation, you will not be ready for it. And you will freak, you will lose your fucking mind and what little grasp on what you so laughingly call reality in the process.
Go back to your normal point of view where the Government and Jesus can take care of your mental needs and you have no need to think for yourself or take any other kind of responsibility for what you do. Evolution isn't for everybody.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real v. Artificial
Posted by: sterlingwisdom on May 24, 2006 5:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I took LSD and other psychoactive substances when I was in my 20's. Not every experience was pleasant (I soon learned to isolate myself in the forest or at the beach to avoid bummers) but most of them were very educational. When I stopped learning new stuff I stopped taking the drugs and moved on. Many of the things that are an important part of my life today and have been for many years now - Taoism, the I Ching, t'ai chi - I was open to and discovered while experimenting with psychoactive stuff.
I don't understand the attitude that a drug induced experience is "artificial." It changes your brain chemistry. That's real. Whether the experience leads one to spirtuality or not probably depends on the individual. None of my friends with whom I took LSD ever had any interest then or now in the things I listed above that are important to me. There is one thing we all agree on however, "Straight people have no idea what it is like to be stoned but stoned people know what it is like to be straight."
People are always ready to believe in a savior, Jesus, drugs, the Internet, whatever. I don't believe anyone or anything is coming to save us but if psychoactive drugs could be used to help make a few people's lives better it is simply stupid and cruel to try and prevent that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eal v. Artificial Posted by: yesman
I took LSD in the 60's & early 70's
Posted by: MEL810 on May 24, 2006 9:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and I think that LSD usage led to serious depression for me.
Be very careful on this road. One reason LSD experiments were stopped was their unpredictability. Even the most rigorous scientist with controls can not predict how a given subject will respond to LSD at any given time. Might do okay one time and freak out the next.
I took anti-depressant meds for about a year, long enough to clear up a serious depression. And the meds did work wonderfully for me and with little side effects. I tried nutritional therarpy first and then herbals such as St. John's Wort, which had no effect at all. I no longer take meds, just vitamins and am fine.
I for legitimate medical usage of any medicine or substance that helps heal or helps alleviate the suffering of the sick and dying.
Perhaps psychedelics can be controlled enough to help people. But personal experimentation is not the same.
And I would be very leery of so-called shamans aimed at naive, unstable Americans (one poster called it Don Juan tourism) searching for healing.
The people that take psychedelics as part of their religious rituals are doing so as part of a long tradition of their culture.
Taking a psycho-active substance miles from your own home and support system could be very dangerous. Be forewarned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't insinuate that people that like Jesus are unevolved!
Posted by: MEL810 on May 24, 2006 9:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please, I'm just so tired of people here insulting Jesus.
Many Christians are great, evolved people. Some aren't, but then, that's true of any given group of people, no matter what their faith or lack thereof.
And taking drugs, per se, doesn't make you an evolved person, even if you have decent experiences while tripping. Acid can give you the 'illusion' of great insight and when you come down, well, it was just one big hallucination you can't apply to day-to-day life.
It's the insights that you gain and apply to life from the drugs or from Jesus or whereever, that show you are evolved.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

common misconceptions
Posted by: mattstafford on May 25, 2006 5:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would argue that the "religious" experiences produced by altered states of conciousness are "authentic" and those produced in a church are "inauthentic".
I once read about a native woman's response to a misionary after hearing about heaven. She said: "You mean you've never been? I've been there with help of the mushroom,".
Most christians only get a second hand account of what a spiritual experience is. In the case of the few who do have genuine experiences, these were probably produced by DMT that occurs naturally in the human brain.

It is misleading to classify all chemicals that alter brain chemistry using one term. Tryptamines and Opiates have the exact opposite effect on the brain as one another. When using "hallucinogens" the user is forced to live the right way (not the American way). The only alternative will produce absolute terror as the negative energy within the individual will attack.

There is so much misinformation about drugs. "Hallucinogens" (with the exception of Datura and Amanitas) almost never produce true hallucinations. They make you see more of what's there, not things that aren't there. They can only cause death when taking a dose thosands of times larger than the normal dose or through suicide if the user is pressured into taking drugs or given drugs without their knowledge. "hallucinogens" will not make you think that you can fly. Most of the benifits come after the effects of the drug have worn off.

The desire to do drugs is universal. It has been practiced by virtually all cultures throughout history and is even done by animals. "Psychedellic" experiences are part of normal human brain functioning. Hallucinogenic drugs are produced in the human brain. All of you readers are in possession of the schedule I substances DMT and Bufoteine as well as 5-Meo-DMT (which is a legal grey area).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not the American Way Posted by: gonzoskismet
ALIVE!
Posted by: dove on May 27, 2006 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i wondered where my generation had gone...i know NO ONE like myself here in the wilderness of WA state. the article was fascinating & terrifying-i've been there. i grew up a Connecticut hippie in the 60's & took LSD around 25(?) times. my trips were about 50/50: half were terrifying, half fun & joyful. i was strictly raised & had many fears about letting go & trusting. we DID consider taking LSD a serious & God-seeking experience. ONE trip was exceptional & i will never forget it: i FELT the presence of God & i felt totally, joyfully, & completely ALIVE like never before or since. i felt like i was breathing from the center of my being, like a newborn taking her first breaths or like breaking through the surface of primordial muck into the pure, clean air of limitless freedom. i treasure this memory & wish i could feel it every moment of my life. that happened almost 40 yrs. ago. i would NOT recommend taking ANY drug without serious thot, including the "legal" ones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ALIVE! Posted by: LLMystic
» RE: LLMystic Posted by: dove
R2
Posted by: ArtemInox on May 28, 2006 2:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NOW the other side of the world can be seen. The thousand and one little and big things that now appear to lay just under the surface of every day life, things you always knew but never thought about are suddenly just there. This happens because a small piece of your subconscious has become conscious. You start to make connections with words, patterns, information, people, history, things you’ve known for years that make you say Ahah! Imagine that feeling several times in a day, instead of here and there every couple of months……and then, you might start to know things ahead of time, know what people are going to say before they say it, read people you don’t know like a book, reach over and pick up the phone before it rings and say hello, without thinking about it. And yes, there was someone on the other end. Depending on way too many variables for me to go on about here, these effects can last until the drug is metabolized, or for days, weeks, months after the last of it is whizzed away.



And here we are at the whole point: You can gather from those last few sentences that insights into the nature of things normally not available to the average waking mind are now there to be found if they are being looked for. That’s IF you have the sack and the will to come this far, and can deal with what you find waiting for you within yourself and the world around you…….



“Having said that I believe in reality more than ideology. As for halucination and illusion they are more what you speak of”



This sort of attitude is why so many people responded to your post. That is exactly the same thinking of any religious fundamentalist caught up in an extensive delusional system of dogma viewed inflexibly for the most part, projecting a belief that all others are deluded or to be pitied for not seeing the light so obvious to you. You can rationalize this and say that and amend something else, and append this here, but that statement alone gives away how you really think.





Let me fill in a blank that is unavoidable when speaking from inexperience. At one point in your post, you made a distinction between natural and synthetic. To read further on, it really does look like pointing out this distincion was just lip service At typically used/effective doses of common psychedelics, there are no hallucinations like you see in movies or anti-drug propaganda, no dancing gnomes in the living room. If someone ends up having temporary delusions or a psychotic episode, or they "never come back", it's because of what was already there brought to the surface. This method of access is again NOT for everyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yeah a little caution
Posted by: insulafortune on May 29, 2006 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These things have to be done responsibly and preferably scale up dosing. Nothing can be more dangerous sometimes than a massive trip for someone not used to transcendental states or being out of control. A semi -psychotic episode is definitely not for everyone especially if there is an unrecognized pre-existing problem. It's fun to jam sensory input but better be prepared for as well in case of a thorough trip into one's shadow which can be a very ugly place and yes this can lead to dangerous behavior.
These drugs if done slowly and responsably can be beneficial even in the bad trips, but they are not toys and overly optimistic propaganda concerning their benifits for humanity and peace is a little naive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

read gonzoskismet if in doubt 5/24 5:24PM post
Posted by: weary on Jun 2, 2006 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 1st paragraph of this post I think gets to the bottom of bad trips. Uptightness and psychedelics don't mix. If you don't have an attitude of openness to what psychedelics might show you about yourself, stay away. To a lesser extent, I think this applies to marijuana as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

xae
Posted by: xxcrazy on Nov 10, 2006 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
09.05.2006
Posted by: xxcrazy on Nov 12, 2006 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
09.05.2006
Posted by: xxcrazy on Nov 16, 2006 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]