Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

Two Years in Jail for a Joint?

By Anthony Papa, AlterNet. Posted April 14, 2006.


The drug war, and the hard-nosed zealots who wage it, have reached new lows in Massachusetts.
Advertisement

The war on drugs reached the pinnacle of cruelty when 18-year-old Mitchell Lawrence was sentenced to two years in jail for selling a teaspoonful of marijuana to an undercover police officer for $20.

On June 30, 2004, detective Felix Aguirre, employed by the Drug Task Force, was assigned the duty of going undercover to buy drugs from kids who hung out in a parking lot in Berkshire County in Massachusetts. Merchants had complained to police about the kids. Mitchell Lawrence was there with his pipe and a few buds of marijuana. He had no idea the parking lot was less than 1,000 feet from a preschool located in the basement of a church, nor did he know this parking lot was the site of a police sting operation.

Aguirre approached Mitchell and asked him if he had any weed. Mitchell pulled out a small bag of marijuana. The cop offered him $20. Mitchell hesitated; Aguirre insisted. Mitchell, who had seen Aguirre hanging out with other kids, motioned the cop to follow him up the street where he intended to smoke with him. Aguirre waved the $20 in his face. Mitchell, who was broke at the time, took the money, the first time he had ever accepted money in exchange for marijuana.

In the months that followed, Aguirre approached Mitchell again for marijuana. This time, however, Mitchell refused. Weeks later, a crew of undercover cops stormed Mitchell's home and placed him under arrest. Mitchell was found guilty of distribution of marijuana, committing a drug violation within a drug-free school zone and possession.

On March 22, 2006, Mitchell Lawrence was sentenced to two years in prison.

While this outrageous case happened in a sleepy burg in Massachusetts, the case of Mitchell Lawrence is one of countless tales of drug war madness that takes place on America's streets daily.

Mitchell Lawrence's story was eerily familiar to me. In 1985, I was the subject of a police sting operation after passing an envelope containing four ounces of cocaine to undercover officers in Mount Vernon, New York. I was set up by someone who offered me $500 to transport the package. The individual who introduced me to the cop was an informant facing life in prison. He was offered a deal -- the more people he helped ensnare, the less time he would serve. I received a sentence of 15 years to life under New York's draconian Rockefeller Drug Laws.

Mitchell Lawrence's disproportionate sentence was handed down one day before the release of a national report by the Justice Policy Institute (JPI) titled, "Disparity by Design: How Drug-free Zone Laws Impact Racial Disparity and Fail to Protect Youth," which includes research from Massachusetts.

The JPI study, commissioned by the Drug Policy Alliance, found that drug-free zone laws do not serve their intended purpose of protecting youth from drug activity. The Massachusetts data on drug enforcement in three cities found that less than one percent of the drug-free zone cases actually involved sales to youth. Additionally, Massachusetts researchers found that nonwhites were more likely to be charged with an offense that carries drug-free zone enhancement than whites engaged in similar conduct. Blacks and Hispanics account for just 20 percent of Massachusetts residents, but 80 percent of drug-free zone cases.


Digg!

Anthony Papa is the author of "15 To Life: How I Painted My Way To Freedom" (Feral House).



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Marijuana...
Posted by: waves999 on Apr 14, 2006 3:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
decreases the intelligence of those opposed to its use....


Just because I am paranoid doesn't mean they are not after me….

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Marijuana... Posted by: cyberfactotum
» RE: Marijuana... Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Our System Is Broken
Posted by: thinkverybig on Apr 14, 2006 3:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This case is just one of many that needs changing in our country. We all need to speak out when someone is wronged. So many people are too consumed with themselves that they don't think to care about anyone else. Well we need to start thinking about our neighbor, remember "We are our brother's keeper."

The United States has many many many laws purposely designed to target minorities and the poor. Prisons are privately owned and are run like a business which in tale need customers (prisoners) and there is no concern of how that get them. We Americans must stand up to this and the many other wrongs that are going on in this country and throughout the world. We must protest for change. I truly believe we need an entire new system of governing. A complete overhaul of our social, political and judicial systems would be a good start. To protest my views and thoughts about this matter, I have decided to vote neither Republican or Democrat. I will vote for MYSELF from this day on until there is CHANGE in our laws, primarily our entire system.

I would encourage all of you to wake up and understand that we are all the same. We are all one and we must come together with love and compassion and not be divided by those in power who wants us to bicker and fight amongst one another. Their fear is that we all will unite and demand change. Demand that the rich and wealthy share more of their money. Their biggest fear is that we no longer see color as a divider but instead as a uniter.

Let's give them their greatest fear and come together for the good of us all and change our present way of living. We can make life better for us all and especially the poorest. We can do this.... We must do this. We must change.


Please join me... I am seekinig volunteers to assist me in launching a new website by the name of "WeMustChange.org"

I need creative people, a web designer etc. I'm looking for a future staff of volunteers .....

I can be emailed at david@thinkverybig.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For a joint?
Posted by: jlohman on Apr 14, 2006 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's minimizing it for the sake of a story. I support decriminalizing the use of marijuana and hard drugs and making them available via prescription. But this was a drug pusher that would have easily sold to one of my grankids. Pushers who hook kids should go to jail. Sorry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: For a joint? Posted by: Longhorn
» nope, that's the amount Posted by: deborama
» RE: For a joint? Posted by: bookwoman
» RE: For a joint? Posted by: kick
» RE: For a joint? Posted by: liberalibrarian
» THC Ministry Posted by: Lauren
» RE: For a joint? Posted by: Pinklillies
» RE: For a joint? Posted by: Techubus
» RE: For a joint? Posted by: supersapien
» RE: For a joint? Posted by: TotallyAshamed2bAmerican
» Total assumption. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: For a joint? Posted by: Asmodeus
» RE: For a joint? Posted by: montana freeman
» Pusherman!!! Posted by: billevans
The Best Government Money Can Buy
Posted by: dlf on Apr 14, 2006 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Massachusetts researchers found that nonwhites were more likely to be charged with an offense that carries drug-free zone enhancement than whites engaged in similar conduct. Blacks and Hispanics account for just 20 percent of Massachusetts residents, but 80 percent of drug-free zone cases.

I'm sure the Massachusetts minority voters are happy that Sen. Kennedy is right out front protecting the rights of illegal immigrants, instead of shining a light on a policy that effects people who can actually vote for him today.

Fourteen states, including Massachusetts, do not allow felons to vote, but do reinstate voting rights immediately after their release from prison. Eight states permanently disenfranchise felons depending on the type of felony conviction. In four states — Alabama, Kentucky, Virginia and Florida — people with any felony conviction are barred for life from the polls, unless the government grants them individual rights through a petition process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Welcome to AmeriKKKa Posted by: doctorsquared
American Justice System putrid and inbalanced
Posted by: orinoconw on Apr 14, 2006 4:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know something is wrong when an american soldier gets six months for using his dog to terrorize an iraqui prisoner; but someone else gets two years for selling a joint...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen! Posted by: Longhorn
» I second that AMEM! Posted by: Lizmv
» RE: Amen! Posted by: aussidawg
Very sad
Posted by: WhatNow? on Apr 14, 2006 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"even if it means ruining a young man's life in the process."

Man, who would want such nonchalance with a statement that's so cold?

"mandatory minimums. These laws handcuff judges and force them to impose harsh sentences."

It also gets a group of people working the system that have no empathy for other people. Some reasonable, decent, and intellegent people will quit before they sell their souls to follow these laws. So we lose people that can make things better.

Reading Noam Chomsky's interview the other day mentioned that many of our policies are savage. I thought that word summed it up perfectly. This is savage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Very sad Posted by: Nixonisinhell
Son of a bitch
Posted by: Orwells_nightmare on Apr 14, 2006 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's an outrage. That's entrapment, surely. If I were a member of that boy's family, I'd want someone's head on a stick. But this is what the cops count on, the family being too ashamed to protest the illegal charge and arrest of their drug-dealing teenage son so that they don't realize the bastards in blue have railroaded a sixteen-year-old boy into two years hard time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Son of a bitch: edit Posted by: Orwells_nightmare
» RE: Son of a bitch Posted by: Pinklillies
» RE: Son of a bitch Posted by: thinkverybig
Law is the Law.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Apr 14, 2006 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anti drug laws have been on the books for nearly a century. Why has not the laws been changed.

People want tough drug control laws.

This is a sad fact. The people don't appreciate social freedom to live ones own life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Law is the Law. Posted by: jwg
» follow the money Posted by: thermite
» RE: follow the money Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Law is the Law. Posted by: Lilybelle
So sad, too bad!!!
Posted by: bookwoman on Apr 14, 2006 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am from Springfield, Massachusetts which is about an hour's drive south of Pittsfield, in Berkshire County. Our laws are especially hard on those who sell drugs within 1,000 yards of a school. The pooh poohing of the school being a day care doesn't wash, as we know that many dealers are now hitting at the elementary school crowd, getting them hooked at a very early age.

Mitchell was selling to kids. In this case, the school was a daycare. However, the law is intended to act against those creeps who hang around on street corners near schools waiting for students to come and go. No one is saying Mitchell wasn't selling or sharing (that's how dealers start kids on the spiral downward). He shouldn't have been doing what he was doing, period and he certainly shouldn't have been doing it where he was doing it.

I, too, believe that, in the face of medical proof of the effectiveness of marijuana as an adjunct in treating certain diseases, our laws concerning use of this drug should be changed and adjusted. However, that hasn't happened yet.

In closing, I have two grandchildren, and if Mitchell had been caught near their elementary school or daycare, he would be dealing with me and not just the Commonwealth's legal system.

A creep is a creep!!!! I suggest that Mr Papa choose his wars more wisely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: marcinde
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: marcinde
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: glorybe
» RE: Prohibition didn't work Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: Techubus
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: jwg
» Ja Man! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: Pseudo Morals
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: Herestratus
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: bqtrain
» RE: You're sad, too bad!!! Posted by: BsAs light
» RE: You're sad, too bad!!! Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: lenny666
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: TotallyAshamed2bAmerican
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: WyrdSister
» THANK YOU, WyrdSister! Posted by: mendomama
» Um, are you on drugs? Posted by: undenialbly_raziel
» RE: So sad, too bad!!! Posted by: Asmodeus
it is SO SAD how my fellow lefties cannot see the forest for the trees
Posted by: cry0fan on Apr 14, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am also for marijuana legalization. But there are so many things on the leftist agenda that can never hope to be implemented at this time, given the trend in alignment of the white majority with the GOP. Why? Because the left has alienated the white majority in this country. Don't you see that?

You can NEVER hope to implement any of the left agenda under the present circumstances. THe GOP is now the party of the white people. The LEFT made sure of that! The left itself has pushed the white majority away from it. I can only think that this was deliberate.

Don't you see that by having a left agenda all bound up in race and gender politics, all bound up in moral wedge issues, instead of bread and butter economics that would apply to EVERY American, the left has become a tool of the overclass used to split the white majority.

Until the Left realizes that any real American left can only be built around the white lower middle class, the largest single bloc in America, we will continue our slide into fascism. Our prisons will grower larger. Censorship will worsen. Mass immigration will expand. Tax burden will shift even more from the top to the middle. Our freedoms will constrict even more. The bloody war will expand into Iran and Venezuela and Colombia.

All because the Left is a golem, a husk, a tool of the overclass. A dead monster turned against all of us by overclass money. A fauxleft that eats away at the core of what social capital america has left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It ain't just America. Posted by: medstudgeek
drugs, the law and a kid
Posted by: jrmart66 on Apr 14, 2006 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK< tough sentence. wasted police time etc etc etc
the bottom line is what the kid did was ILLEGAL!

don't do the crime if you bitch about the time.

And who say's this was the "only time he accepted money"?
And who say's he had no idea there was a pre-school around the corner?

why should we take his word?

did he sell the weed? Yes
was it illegal Yes
did he know it was illegal? Yes.

end of story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: drugs, the law and a kid Posted by: brasilaron
» LEAP is great Posted by: Lauren
» RE: drugs, the law and a kid Posted by: dbarber
» RE: drugs, the law and a kid Posted by: bqtrain
» RE: drugs, the law and a kid Posted by: thermite
» RE: drugs, the law and a kid Posted by: aonghus36
» "End of Story" Posted by: fifthworld
What are our priorities?
Posted by: sls1982 on Apr 14, 2006 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHy are we wasting time on the prosecution of this drug? I mean honestly, haven't enough resources, people, and money been spent trying to eradicate its use. Working in the public sector, it seems thatthe money and people used on this issue could be better spent alleviating/researching true problems in our society such as poverty, homelessness, education inequity/reform, etc. Maybe if we spent more of the money working towards sustainable solutions for these issues, maybe people wouldn't need toturn to drugs in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What are our priorities? Posted by: glorybe
» RE: What are our priorities? Posted by: dbarber
» RE: What are our priorities? Posted by: aonghus36
» Yea, just what are your priorities? Posted by: Againstthewindwalking
» RE: Yea, just what are your priorities? Posted by: montana freeman
» RE: What are our priorities? Posted by: Pseudo Morals
Not Harsh Enough
Posted by: glorybe on Apr 14, 2006 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Current drug laws are not harsh enough. Back in the 1950 era just the simple possession of a joint was enough to send a good student to prison for years. Frankly it worked great. Pot was rare as hens teeth. Once punishments became more liberal pot and other drugs ruined a whole lot of lives. Perhaps a return to the era when we would throw the key away on a 16 year old for minor possession is a better answer than anything we have today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not STUPID Enough Posted by: janvdb
» Uh, not quite... Posted by: J-
» RE: Not Harsh Enough Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Not Harsh Enough Posted by: glorybe
» RE: Not Harsh Enough Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Not Harsh Enough Posted by: dbarber
» RE: Not Harsh Enough Posted by: BassClefJoe
» RE: Not Harsh Enough Posted by: bqtrain
» RE: Not Harsh Enough Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Not Harsh Enough Posted by: bqtrain
» You're sadistic. Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Not Harsh Enough Posted by: thermite
Legalize Pot Now
Posted by: janvdb on Apr 14, 2006 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jailing people for any sale or use of this harmless-unless-grossly-overused substance is pure viciousness and utter stupidity.

I'm tired of this misuse of my tax dollars.

White sugar, grossly overused, is far more damaging to health than pot. Is anyone getting 2 years for the possession of small quantities of this dangerous substance -- sugar?

Alcohol is far more damaging to the lives and the health of abusers than pot. Yet, we learned the hard way that prohibition simply swelled the coffers of organized crime and encouraged widespread lawbreaking.

Exactly the same is true of marijuana and other drugs; we just haven't learned because most of the organized crime and the political and social problems associated with its huge power are playing out in Latin America, where the people are brown.

Hasn't anyone read about California's excellent results with their treatment-not-incarceration program? It's saving taxpayers millions in unnecessary prison costs while reducing drug use and allowing users to rebuild their lives, get jobs, take care of their kids and pay taxes.

We need to respond to all drug-related charges with forced treatment.

We need to provide drug treatment on demand to all who request it.

We need to stop all international interdiction efforts and allow Latin American countries to legalize and tax their entire cocaine and marijuana cultivation and processing industries.

We need to provide adequate programs for the rehabilitation and reintegration of ex-cons into productive lives.

We need to tax and sell marijuana in liquor stores.

We need to provide free or sliding-scale mental health treatment to ALL, including humane asylum facilities for those who need them.

We need to give family members the right, with professional supervision, to force family members into detox and mental health treatment without the involvement of the criminal justice system. Facilities for such treatment should be made affordable to all on a sliding-scale basis.

We need to provide, at government expense, prescription drug and talk therapy as necessary to all people with mental health issues, regardless of their financial circumstances. This should be part of single-payer national health insurance.

We need to put far more resources into Social Services and their attempts to intervene into dysfunctional familes and abused children. More children should be in foster care. More newborns should become wards of state and adopted into better circumstances immediately upon birth. The best interests of the child should far outweigh parental rights.

We need to put far more resources into the Office of the Public Defender, who should be equal in salary, power, office size, prestige and so on to the District Attorneys who so recklessly and wantonly destroy people's lives, frequently in an attempt to promote themselves into a conservative (viciousness-based) political career.

Our punitive, destructive approach to "the drug problem" is part and parcel of a refusal to face up to the fact that many using individuals are legitimately in despair for economic, social and psychological reasons which could be proactively addressed, mentally ill, being abused or, in the case of harmless-unless-grossly-misused substances like pot, simply exercising their legitimate rights to use natural substances as they, as independent adults, should be free to do without interference.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Legalize Pot Now Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Legalize Pot Now Posted by: jwg
How come our parents and grandparents were smart enough to get rid of Prohibition and we aren't?
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 14, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since juries will believe whatever law enforcement tells them, planting evidence on those they arrest is as old as alcohol prohibition. Who's more corrupt?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Massive hypocrisy - and what about ADD speed drugs?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 14, 2006 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On one hand, pharmaceutical and food companies are busy getting rich pushing medications and drugs on children - from Paxil to Prozac to Ritalin and caffeine, children in the US are probably the most highly drugged up of any children on the planet.

ADD drugs (ritalin and relatives) are all amphetamine derivatives; kids learn pretty guick that they can grind them up and snort them for a more intense high. "Mood disorder' drugs like Paxil have been shown to lead to suicide in many cases, and furthermore these drugs are often pimped out by doctors with financial ties to the pharma companies.

Meanwhile, the 'Patriot Act' provisions that were supposed to be used to fight terrorism are now in full force for marijuana 'crimes'. Wiretapping, undercover setups - it seems that now anything goes. The main goal in many cases is just asset seizure, of which the police get a cut.

For a more complete expose on this issue, see Medicinal Marijuana and Big Pharma.

Cannabis is less dangerous then alcohol or tobacco. Two years in prison? How much time do rapists serve? Often less then that - six months or a year. We have a perverted criminal justice system - cannabis is not the problem here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How liberal is MA really?
Posted by: medstudgeek on Apr 14, 2006 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the place is anywhere near as lefty as the Repugs would have us believe it shouldn't be too hard to get this repealed. Any Bay State residents care to comment?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The so-called "drug war" is a cover for racism and ...
Posted by: Deborah on Apr 14, 2006 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until the main supplier of serious drugs like heroin and cocaine that come into the USA is really dealt with, then kids as well as adults will get hooked on drugs.

Marijuana is a minor drug only illegal because it doesn't produce the amount of profits that the main supplier of these other, more dangerous, drugs want and need to continue the arming of death squads and paramilitary groups that create the civil wars throughout the world. It bits into their profit because it is truly a weed, so hence it is illegal but STILL very handy to throw "dangerous" youths into jail.

Poor youths and youths of color are looked upon as worthwhile only as cannon fonder in this militarist society. Either they go to war or become incarcerated after reaching a certain age in order to get them off the streets by the usage of these draconian drug laws. Can't have a French-style workers' revolution lead by youths in the streets here in America, can we now?

Do any US American citizen have the guts enough to confront the real problems and the real drug lord in order to keep their kids off drugs or out of jail? The CIA is the largest supplier of drugs in this country and around the world. I dare anyone to get the real info by reading a police detective's discovery of this fact: Michael Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon". I connected the rest of the dots by just watching the government and our society in action.

The ruling elite in this country fear the minorities in this country which together outnumber them; that is why these inhumane laws are made by their tool, the government (state and federal) to keep brown people of all shades down with fear and/or incarnated. The US of A has the largest prison population in the world (even more than China), the majority of which are Blacks and Hispanics. Has anybody really asked themselves "why?" instead of falling into stereotypes that reinforced racism?

Until the CIA, the 1% rich that own this country and its tool, the government, is dealt with, any drug laws made to "protect" our kids will instead backfire in our faces.

Time to connect the dots, fellow Americans, and to stop blaming each other who are the real victims of this so-called "drug war", another war that has gone on for the last 30 years and that will never end for a reason. It is a very useful tool of oppression on all fronts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here's my attention span. Posted by: WhatNow?
» oh yeah I forgot for a moment Posted by: WhatNow?
A Leader in the "Free" World?
Posted by: aussidawg on Apr 14, 2006 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the U.S. goes militarily into the middle east touting freedom, we continue to have the largest prison population per capita in the world. A large portion of these prisoners are non-violent drug offenders (as the above article points out, this kid was causing no harm to anyone), incarcerated because they chose to endulge in a substance deemed "immoral" by an indoctrinated portion of our population. The hypocracy has got to stop! Drug prohibition evolved at the same time as alcohol prohibition and was initiated by the "Christian" Temperance Movement for persons deemed immoral because of using alcohol or a variety of drugs. Although alcohol prohibition was abandoned due to the corruption produced by, and the lack of enforcability of prohibition, drugs were not. Drug prohibition, perpetuated by government propaganda and falsehoods, has created the same problems as alcohol prohibition (corruption, organized crime, unenforcability) yet remain in effect with no serious challenge to it. Why? The answer is simple...the amount of money created by keeping by keeping these substances illegal. Don't think our government doesn't profit from illegal drugs? Guess again, and to see recent examples of how our government is involved, see: http://www.drugwar.com/howmoneyworks.shtm. One of the reasons the FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds was gagged from testifying to Congress by Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft was because of her knowledge of use of funds from illegal drugs to fund the wars in Afganistan and Iraq.

A lot of people believe in the War on Drugs because of the propaganda the government provides them. If these folks couuld just be educated about the truth (and all aspects of the truth) about drugs (including alcohol and tobacco), I think the fight to stop this insane war would be easier going. A lot of people suffer because of this senseless war, not just recreational users, but also chronic pain patients, cancer patients, glacoma sufferers, the list goes on.

To the people that read this website, if you are one of the misinformed supporters of the war on drugs, I urge you to learn more about what you are fighting and base your decisions on YOUR research, not what your "trustworthy" government tells you, and look at your own behavior and see if you are perfect enough to be deciding what others should be doing with their lives. Finally, live and let live.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The greatest worth
Posted by: BsAs light on Apr 14, 2006 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What comes from the earth is the greatest worth. Marijuana is a blessing and not a curse.

When I was about 8 years-old my father told me his brother had something called Hodgkin's disease. Acutally he had had it over many years but it had gone into remission. Unfortunately it had returned and with a vengeance; it didn't look like he was going to make it. He was 33 - my age. He tried everything from powerful opiates to alcohol and nothing relieved the physical and emotional pain of chemotherapy like Marijuana. My uncle lived in Hawaii, and was hospiced in a hospital which was very progressive for that time and I thank god every day that they permitted my father to bring it [grass] back to his room to smoke. They both smoked together and shared precious few happy moments before my uncle finally succumbed to the ravages of the disease. He was 6 feet tall and weighed 190 pounds healthy and died weighing just over 110 lbs. All forms of cancer and their treatments are a bitch but I thank god every day that that man we all loved didn't have to suffer more than necessary before passing thanks to nature's blessing.

If you don't like my fire then don't come around cuz I'm gonna burn one down. . . If everyone could just mind their own fucking business, from abortion to drugs to sexual preferences, and worry about their own nasty little habits like judging others. Maybe grandma up there should be more concerned about the new video game her grandson is playing calle BLOODY RAPE ORGY SLAUGHTER on his Playstation. In fact maybe Junior would be better off smoking a little herb and going outdoors so he can feel the sun on his face and experience the wonders of god's creation, not Sony's or Microsoft's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How is this for hypocrisy
Posted by: BsAs light on Apr 14, 2006 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A teenage boy gets 2 years for a joint (entrapment no less) and our shit-for-brains president can be a draft dodging COKE SNIFFING, ALCOHOLIC who was basically AWOL during his Air National Guard service and later starts one, and soon to be 2 wars in the Middle East. Wow something is really wrong with that picture!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sigh. Posted by: bqtrain
A timely story ...
Posted by: kablooie on Apr 14, 2006 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Considering that the Easter season featured at one time in history, in Scotland, "Carling Sunday," in which "carlings" (hemp-plant sprouts) were consumed as part of a seasonal ritual during a time when plants (especially medicinal herbs) were honored.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Double Standards Inequality Under The LAW
Posted by: Cardascian on Apr 14, 2006 12:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two points White Collar Crimes impact vs one joint--and I don't even smoke cigs!
Other point: US citizens prosecuted for one joint while ILLEGALS violate our laws in every breathe they take--what is going on here? Why the double standards for NUMBERS?
(Ex) frightening, a l9-yr old arrested for presenting a copy of Proof of Insurance. The date had been changed to make it current when it had expired.
Results: the last semester high schooler who just wanted to get his old clunker to auto shop was jailed: not once but twice.
First prosecution for misdemeanor, 2nd for FELONY or 20 years in Jail. Charges: TAMPERING WITH GOV DOCUMENT
How many illegals do that?
Why are they being rewarded with citizenship?
Why was he jailed twice: then forced to give DNA sample?
He did not benefit!
Is this the way our nation is going: US citizens spyed upon, prosecuted for denouncing a lyeing President and administration who would send our sends to die on foreign soil as prior generations have around the world for OPEN BORDERS USA?
HS Band, Choic, Athletes DRUG TESTED: why not Congress or Judges?
It can ONLY become more RESTRICTIVE for generational citizens.
Youth at a mall congregate and are told to break it up.
YET MILLIONs wave foreign flags telling us "you stole our land!" SO we should give back the Louisiana Purchase to the French.
Why don't we ALL give back ALL land to the animals--at least they don't dump, degredate and destroy!
STOPUSAGiveaway@Care2.com
One Nation Under G O D

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And The Band Played On!
Posted by: dlf on Apr 14, 2006 12:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans have very short attention spans. That said, few seem to remember that Ollie North was the tool for The Reagan/ Bush crack cocaine epidemic. Their Guns For Drugs scheme devastated the Black community for years. Of course Blacks have had to bear the blame for that as well. Yes after they introduced this insidious drug came the mandatory drug sentencing laws. It must be nice not to have to be bothered with remembering where the root of this tree is buried:

Senator John Kerry's 1988 U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations report on Contra-drug links concluded that "senior U.S. policy makers were not immune to the idea that drug money was a perfect solution to the Contras' funding problems." [2] According to the National Security Archive, Oliver North had been in contact with Manuel Noriega, Panama's drug-lord.

The Reagan administration's support for the Contras continued to stir controversy well into the 1990s. In August 1996, San Jose Mercury News reporter Gary Webb published a series titled Dark Alliance, linking the origins of crack cocaine in California to the contras. Freedom of Information Act inquiries by the National Security Archive and other investigators unearthed a number of documents showing that White House officials, including Oliver North, knew about and supported using money raised via drug trafficking to fund the contras. Sen. John Kerry's report in 1988 led to the same conclusions, however, major media outlets and the Justice Department denied the allegations.
Contras

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

war on drugs = war on poor/minorities
Posted by: antiapathy on Apr 14, 2006 2:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that way they can't organize or vote against the corporocracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How I Helped My Mother Become a Criminal in Japan
Posted by: Drae on Apr 14, 2006 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My mother vehemently opposes the great scourge of marijuana and other illegal drugs. She supports these insane laws even after her only son was ensnared by them and sentenced to fifteen years in the slammer for possession in Alabama.*

We've has numerous discussions in which I've tried to illuminate how insane these laws are; yet she would never budge. One must obey the law, according to her, no matter how crazed it may be. The law is the law!

You can imagine my delight when she committed a drug felony in Japan. See, we were standing on a street corner in Tokyo and she had a miserable sinus headache. She asked me if I had any Sudafed and I said I did. Now, as we both knew, Sudafed is an illegal substance in Japan. It's their way of controlling meth production.

I couldn't help gloating to her as I passed the banned substance over to her. Was she aware she was commiting a crime at this moment? And did she know we could be imprisoned for years for this? Me for smuggling and her for ingesting it?

"This is differant!", she snapped. I never could get her to explain why.


*Fortunately for us, Alabama has a serious prison overcrowding situation. My brother was released after serving only three years of his sentence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes, King Posted by: fifthworld
And I browsed SPR's site last night
Posted by: Bwesley on Apr 14, 2006 2:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel horrible for the kid but even worse because I browsed this site last night: http://www.spr.org/. I agree with the comments about this boys time vs. the soilders that abused Iraqis. Everyday there are repeat sex offenders getting off with slaps on the wrist and this kid who isn't even violent gets sent to jail for TWO YEARS. Think about what that does to one's psyche. These laws destroy our youth, an entire generation, and stir up hate. They will only come back to bite everyone in the arss.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The wisdom of prohibition
Posted by: jeff2045 on Apr 14, 2006 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It costs fifty billion plus per year (very conservative estimate) to incarcerate drug-related offenders. DEA, Customs, state and local law enforcement, and prosecutorial costs far exceed the mere cost of incarceration. And let's not forget the cost of providing medical and social services to the families of those caught in the wide net cast in the so-called war on drugs. The social costs are enormous. Last but not least, many of these "offenders" could work, pay taxes, and otherwise contribute positively to their families and communities, if we but stopped to examine the cost vs. benefit of this "war".

Criminalization increases exponentially the very problems they seek to ameliorate. I'm a staunch liberal, and I'd love to see progressives retire from the politics of prohibition, whatever the form, including tobacco and gun prohibition. Intelligent regulation and control provide many answers, and coupled with education, treatment, and closely-monitored decriminalization (of drugs), the cost in taxpayer dollars and social degradation and demoralization would be far less than the alternatives.

If hard core drug addicts could access an affordable source, legally provided under strict medical supervision and regulation, and free education, counseling, and treatment (provided to the general public as well), drug-related crime and the associated costs would all but disappear.

We could shut down the half of our prisons, free up law enforcement and the courts to pursue real criminals committing real crimes, and fund universal health care and a living wage with the resources we'd have left.

Ultimately, the drug war serves only those who seek political careers which limit our civil liberties and eliminate social services.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on Apr 14, 2006 3:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two years can be a light sentence in Texas. In 1969 Lee Otis Johnson, a black activist in college, was sentenced to 30 years for allegedly passing on one marijuana cigarette to an undercover officer. He got out a few years later when enough protests got his case to the supreme court.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just goes to show you...
Posted by: davidbdr on Apr 14, 2006 3:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that you should never, never, never give, sell or pass anything to someone you don't know or isn't with a friend (and that's even risky). Weed laws are ridiculous and we all know that. When was the last time two or more people got into a fight and beat the hell out of each other while stoned? Many a bar in my town has had blood spilled in back alleys or on front sidewalks caused by a mean drunk. Girlfriends have been stabbed or people pounded for making the wrong eye contact. Alcohol is evil for some people. It makes them belligerent and uninhibited.

It used to be a joke when I was in the Air Force that the AF police had the best stuff. True but funny and probably the case for those that use the "anti-drug" platform to get elected or push their agenda. I'd love to see what's in their medicine cabinet. How about it, Rush? We all know that they are hypocrites with their other positions. Why should this be different?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just goes to show you... Posted by: WhatNow?