Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

Respectable Reefer

By Gary Greenberg, MotherJones.com. Posted November 14, 2005.


Sativex, a pulverized, liquefied, and doctor-prescribed form of marijuana, has the potential to transform the drug-war landscape.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If it weren't for the little photo gallery on the wall, the office where Dr. William Notcutt's research assistants keep track of their patients would be just like any other cubicle at the James Paget Medical Center in England. As phones ring and stretchers wheel by and these three women go about their business, the snapshots -- Cheryl Phillips, one of Notcutt's staffers, gently holding an emerald green bud of marijuana; a group of people in lab coats smiling for the camera, sinsemilla towering over their heads; a hangar-sized greenhouse stuffed to the gills with lush pot plants -- are about the only evidence that this hospital in East Anglia is at the epicenter of one of the most extensive medical marijuana research projects in the world.

In part, that's because there's no actual pot here; by the time it gets to Paget, GW Pharmaceuticals, the British startup that owns the greenhouses, has turned the plants into Sativex, a pure extract of pot that comes in a pharmacy-friendly bottle and is designed to be sprayed into the mouth. And in part it's because the frivolity is carefully confined to the photos, taken against company policy during a field trip to the secure, undisclosed location where GW grows its weed. After five years, Phillips and her colleagues have grown used to having cannabis -- as the British call marijuana -- in their workaday lives. Not only that, but their boss has been on a bit of a campaign to keep things sober.

"To get to the perception that this is a medicine," Notcutt says, "we've had to move away from the funnies that relate to the pot world. So no pot jokes."

Over a beer at the end of his day, this rumpled, 59-year-old anesthesiologist and contract researcher for GW is positively ebullient about the news that just today the Canadian government approved Sativex, a success he thinks is likely to be repeated soon in England and eventually in the United States. He'll gladly tell you how important earnestness has been in getting GW to this point, how Sativex owes its success not only to the rigorous science of its successful clinical trials but also to painstaking attention to matters of perception.

Take the spray concept. There are sound medical reasons for spraying cannabis under the tongue rather than smoking or eating it. The mucosa of the mouth will absorb the drug faster than the digestive system, indeed almost as fast as the lungs, but without irritating the respiratory system. And Sativex can be precisely metered -- a single one-tenth milliliter spray contains 2.7 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), pot's main psychoactive chemical; 2.5 milligrams of cannabidiol, which doctors think reduces anxiety and muscle tension; and all of pot's active ingredients known as cannabinoids -- so that it can be accurately studied.

But it also has "the advantage of looking like a medicine to the outside world," Notcutt says. "It has been served up like a medicine, prepared like a medicine, researched like a medicine. It looks like a medicine, and it's prescribed like a medicine." Taking pot out of joints scored on the street and putting it into bottles found on pharmacy shelves shows that "we're not just being silly about the herb, even though in the end that's exactly what it is. It's as if you just squeezed the plant," he says, wringing an imaginary stalk in his hands.

Notcutt began trying to medicalize cannabis more than a decade ago, and has been working with GW and its founder and executive chairman, Geoffrey Guy, since the company's inception in 1998. He credits Guy (who wouldn't be interviewed for this article) with hitting upon the spray, just one of the measures he's taken to distance Sativex from its unsavory origins.

Guy has styled GW, which he started solely to develop cannabis medicines, as just another drug company seeking to develop just another drug. He raised money in the usual ways -- first from private investors, then with a 2001 stock offering that garnered $48 million, and finally, in 2003, with an estimated $65 million licensing deal with German pharmaceutical giant Bayer -- and used it to purchase the rights to pot varieties that a Dutch company had spent millions of dollars and more than a decade developing for their medicinal properties.

Guy presents himself as neutral in the drug wars and gained the support of the British government by offering to institute extraordinary security measures at his grow facility to prevent "diversion." The British government, in turn, gave him permission to grow his pot and test it on human subjects and so exempted GW from an international treaty forbidding private production of outlawed drugs. Guy developed a way to blend the plants (a process he has likened to making blended burgundies) into precise mixtures whose chemical profiles can be standardized (which regulators like), patented (which investors like; cannabis itself can't be patented), and then described in company press releases as "a novel prescription pharmaceutical product derived from components of the cannabis plant."

Having successfully distilled pot's reputation as a medicine from its reputation as a way to get high, Notcutt says, "the powers that be at GW worked hard to maintain this myth. We start in that comfort area, we don't talk about anything outside this comfort area."

This hard work has no doubt paid off in Canada and England, reassuring regulators that, as Notcutt put it, "we're talking about a serious medical subject here." The real audience for all this mythmaking, however, isn't Britain or Canada, which will ultimately account for only a small percentage of the cannabinoid drug market, estimated to be almost $1 billion a year. It's the United States, where, Notcutt says, things are different. "Marijuanaphobia is much greater on your side of the pond," he told me. "We've never had the reefer madness."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Gary Greenberg is a contributing writer for Mother Jones. His writing on science and public policy has also appeared in The New Yorker, Rolling Stone and Harper's Magazine. For information on reprinting this article, contact featurewell@featurewell.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Good Deal
Posted by: progressive_vet on Nov 14, 2005 3:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marijuana should be made to seem respectable. Half the people that love it are...

Now why can't the US be as cool as the UK?

Two questions:

1. Do people lucky enough to be prescribed a bottle of spray still catch a buzz?

2. Did they remember to breed the munchies out of the equation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good Deal Posted by: jwg
I'm afraid...
Posted by: hotar on Nov 14, 2005 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the munchies are here to stay. Increasing appetite is one of the things medical mj is touted for. cookies, anyone?

As for acceptance on this side of the pond, the U.S. govt is so entrenched in its position, I think it will take decades for reform. And I don't see decriminalization of pot as one of the outcomes; the rationale for medical mj would be undermined by the availability of a pharmaceutical alternative, and all that beautiful bud would still be contraband, with recreational use still a crime.

On the other hand, I think the Sativex product might get you high. The active ingredient profile is the same as plain old mj. Maybe the dosage is lower, but therapeutic levels (enough to stimulate appetite, for instance) might well be accompanied by a buzz. So I see a situation in which alot of people would try for a prescription, for "quasi-medical" purposes, such as relief of muscle tension, etc. Perhaps, down the pike, different forms of the drug will become available. For instance, a formulation low in THC/high in cannabidiol would be good for relaxation, sleep aid, etc.

It will be interesting to watch this unfold, but I think the situation in the USA will take a very long time to evolve. Kind bud is here to stay, at least for the time being.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Could Never Happen In The U.S.
Posted by: doneman2000 on Nov 14, 2005 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anything good to come from cannabis will come from outside these borders as "Reefer Madness" still invades the very consciousness of the drug warrior mentality in the U.S. With a $60 billion dollar bureaucracy to maintain and cannabis being the biggest fish to fry within the madness (775,000 pot arrests last year 89% for possession only) cops aka DEA guard the cannabis supply in this country with a zealotry akin to a father protecting his 12 year old daughters virginity. In this case, however, the people they hurt are the sick, the hurt, and the dying. Do they care? Probably not as most don't think that far. It's the law, right? God, how much evil has been done in the name of the "law"? How much needless suffering goes on under the guise of "saving the children"? When the lawmakers are nothing more than paid shills for any special interests that will drop a few bucks in the campaign coffers how righteous are the laws they pass? The ignorance with respects to pot in this country are so astounding you'd never know 100 million people have smoked the stuff. God how dumb can a country get?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This Could Never Happen In The U.S. Posted by: walldodger1969
» RIGHT ON, Jeffrey7! Posted by: LeonDion
Sad but positive
Posted by: ken_sailor on Nov 14, 2005 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, this stuff in the inhaler is an extract of marijuana, e.g. marijuana in another form. It will probably have standards for content (THC and other psychoactive constitiuents), and so averages can point the way to usefulness in the average case - just as prescription medicines are typically studied and prescribed.

Opiates and various forms of cocaine are also used for medical purposes. Don't fool yourself into thinking that this medicalization of cannabis will lead to legalization. Most probably GW stands to lose a lot if cannabis is ever legalized since legal cannabis will be so much cheaper than prescription sativex.

While patients who can benefit from pot can get it sooner rather than later if GW makes it through the legal hoops, this is really a baby step forward.

Marijuana is not dangerous, has lots of benefits, and only drug war insanity keeps it illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It'll never get across the pond!!!
Posted by: stoney13 on Nov 14, 2005 8:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds good we'll never get it here! Why? The DEA and the neocon drug warriors will never go for it!!!

Even if the herb it's made from is grown in England and not one drop could ever find it's way into the hands of stoners it will never fly!

Only the complete legalisation of marijauna is acceptable!! We need to get on the internet and send our congress members gobs of e-mails untill they squat and produce!! This will never be an issue untill we make it one!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How to shift perception Posted by: Michaelmammal
"A spoonful of sugar makes the medicine go down..."
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 14, 2005 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since smoking anything may be harmful, THC could be digested. And since hemp grows wild, cultivation is uncomplicated.

The problem is that enough voters still believe it is a gateway drug. (Actually, my gateway drug was breast milk.) It will be hard enough just to get Sativex legalized in the US.

Until something forces a change, we will continue to spin our wheels in the same old ruts. Sativex is treatment for our insane politics, but the patient's prospects remain uncertain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Laughing out loud Posted by: redfrog
And to think...
Posted by: Habaro on Nov 14, 2005 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...how the hippies of the Vietnam War generation were so [seemingly?] open and free only to devolve into ever-increasing nazis as they age. I can't wait to see what terrors our current closed-minded youth morph into twenty years from now. Evolution is clearly not linear by nature, but rather transient and omni-directional at best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» montana freeman Posted by: trace
No mention of Marinol
Posted by: woodbee on Nov 14, 2005 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is already a cannabis drug in existence in the U.S. We used to hear Marinol mentioned as a reason why medical pot shouldn't be made legal, and the reply was always that was so strong that it made its users almost nonfunctional. I wonder if Sativex has the same drawback.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Marinol -- it'll probably work. Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» RE: No mention of Marinol Posted by: memary10
War is condoned but they'll bust you for smoking a joint!
Posted by: neilemac on Nov 14, 2005 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's ironic you speak of the plight of the mailignment of the infamous herb, I posted a blog about it a mere few days ago. But they'll bust you for smoking a joint. In fact, I believe I took on a few issues in that post. In the words of a brilliant tune by Stevie Windwood on an early Traffic album:
Light up or leave me alone!
namasté

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» montana freeman Posted by: trace
MARINOL DERIVATIVE OF CANNABIS
Posted by: picket on Nov 14, 2005 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doctors rarely order this Schedule 3 drug because the DEA considers it too easy to abuse. Suffering cancer patients, starving to death would probably like the "munchies",though.

Zofran ODT is often used for cancer patients on chemo, for nausea. Ten tabs cost about $225.00.[three days]. Not bad for BIG PHARMA.

Cannabis works for both medical problems but the DEA says it has no medical use so.........prohibition works for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Didn't mean to be rude, its a Taurean's fool moon
Posted by: neilemac on Nov 14, 2005 7:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
montana freeman
Posted by: montana freeman on Nov 15, 2005 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my friend the 60's were a time of increadable change and transistion,if you had long hair you were easily included and a friend to share whatever was available ,we traveled around trying this,trying that learning ,trusting and loving each other. most or some of us never lost that good feeling of brotherhood and sisterhood, it was anything but perfect but it was ours and still is to this day, we cared for each other knowing nothing about the other person,can you imagine that? i had an old volkswagon and at one time going down the road picking up fellow hippies as we went we had nine people and there tiny possions in the car [bug by the way] what a party, singing and smoking and crusing down the highway ,my life is still that to this day and i know that there are many brothers and sisters who know what i'm talking about ,may the spirit be upon all of you in light and love , aho

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: treehugger Posted by: treehugger39047
» montana freeman Posted by: trace
mising the point - medicinal value !
Posted by: cobrajet on Nov 15, 2005 4:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think everyone is forgetting that cannabis has been a level 1 drug, illegal due to not having any medicinal value. GW has just set the precedent that indeed it does have medicinal value.
It is only a matter of time before someone brings the DEA to court to change the controlled substance schedule to move cannabis from level 1 to level 2 drug, since it does have medicinal properties now. This will then lower the penalties for possesion and use since it would no longer be a level 1 drug.
this could then set the stage for decrim hopefully. Lets keep funding groups like NORML, Drug Alliance, http://www.drugpolicy.org/homepage.cfm, since they are the ones that bring these cases to court !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

needstobelegal
Posted by: wantsitlegal on Nov 16, 2005 12:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
approximately 20 years ago I had to rush my cancer ridden mother to the hospital because of the extreme pain she was in. Her pain not only stemmed from the cancer she suffered but the fact that her chemo treatments left her feeling nauseated and unable to eat for days. The physician discussed several options for my mother, all of which had already been tried with no success. He then said point blank, "Sharon, I cannot prescribe it, but is there any way you can get your hands on a joint?" I smiled and said it could be arranged. He explained that it would decrease her pain and nausea while increasing her appetite. My mother refused because "marijuana is illegal" yet she had bottles of deloideds and morphine suppositories that were not helping. WAKE UP AMERICA! STAND UP AMERICA! WE ARE BEING BUFFALOED AND BULLIED!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: needstobelegal Posted by: memary10
DENVER reefer
Posted by: RepublicanReeferRaider on Nov 18, 2005 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this new type of chronic will never come to our part of the us(damn Europeans), but we still have denver colorado that just recently legalized weed, look into in in high times, also the legalizeation of pot is spreading all over, slowly but surely its getting there. so to all you out there head to denver or oakland, of even seattle . if this new chron cant come our way then there is alwsay another way to smoke freely

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Laughter from the Black Market
Posted by: P.E.A.C.E. on Dec 5, 2005 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Manufacturing the Cannabis plant into a drug, rather than recognising it as an "herb bearing seed" only enriches the black market by maintaining a counter-productive prohibition. If you want to know why Cannabis prohibition has to end, Google 'Law Enforcement Against Prohibition.' Taking an effective herbal therapeutic away from people who are suffering is no different than torturing someone who is well. Inducing scarcity of the world's most nutritious seed (Cannabis), is beyond moral accountability of any court. Obviously, Cannabis has never been within the rightful jurisdiction of the government, since it is the most useful, healthful, "strategic food resource" (See Executive Order 12919, W.J. Clinton, 1994) on Earth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sanitizing the plant so its more acceptable to the public, nice try
Posted by: seedless on Jan 18, 2006 9:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the big difference between this and Marinol? Ones a spray and one is a oral pill. I have tried Marinol 'recreationally' and its nothing special in fact it was a waste of millions of dollars by the pharm companies to once again sanitize the issue of green, fluffy, organic goodness. Straight medical marijuana is the route to take. Than let the patients decide if they want to smoke the medicine or preform on of the many ways to extraction to get all the essentials out, not just THC and one form of a cannabidiol as with Sativex. Actual cannabis should be legal in every state, if not actual buds than extracs such as hash oil, hash, cannabutter, pre-fabed edible marijuana [space cakes]. Its long over due, but with all the robots working the govt. and states it will be awhile. I agree that smoking the cannibus does cause potential health risks, but have you checked the list of side effects on any of your prescription medication's? Give me a break... Legalize, dont criticize, and overgrow the government. It should be hard they are all just a bunch a weeds that need picking or better yet a couple squirts of Raid.

seedless

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement