Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

Stand Up and Tell the Truth

By Teri Weefur, AlterNet. Posted June 15, 2005.


asha bandele discusses her new role as drug policy reformer: 'If you're not talking about race at just about every juncture, then you're not talking about the drug war as it's construed in this nation.'
Advertisement

asha bandele (who writes her name in lower case), former editor of Essence magazine, is now the deputy director of public policy at the Drug Policy Alliance, where she works on organizing coalitions nationwide to help create meaningful and lasting drug policy reform. An accomplished poet, bandele is also author of The Prisoner's Wife and Daughter. She recently spoke with co-worker Teri Weefur about her journey from poet to activist.

You come from a very creative background, having worked at Essence magazine and being an author and a poet. How do you think your background and experience can contribute to the mission of drug policy reform?

I started my career as an organizer and any organizer needs to find out what role is best for her to play. I see my ability to write as one of the best ways I can contribute to the progressive movement. The challenge at Essence -- a publication that reaches some 7 million diverse readers each month -- was figuring out how to reach those readers who may not share the same beliefs I have. How do I get them to care about drug policy reform or prisons? I think my experience at Essence will be useful in helping the average person who needs to understand that the "war on drugs" is contributing to a less humane, less just society, which we sanction with our tax dollars.

What do you believe is the most flawed aspect of our drug laws?

I think the most obvious point is that we shouldn't be arresting people for what they put in their body, especially marijuana! But I think the biggest problem is the racial disparity. Minorities -- African Americans in particular --are the biggest targets of the "war on drugs." The discussion of race has got to be part of drug policy. If you're not talking about race at just about every juncture, then you're not talking about the drug war as it's construed in this nation.

In the short time you've been at the Alliance, how has your thinking on drug policy changed?

When I started talking to a young, white Marine who was losing his sight to glaucoma and who needed to use medical marijuana, he made me think about the people I wouldn't necessarily have considered before. I used to only think of the drug war through the lens of the Rockefeller Drug Laws, but learning that Marine's story makes me realize how much more complex it all is.

What do you think is the most effective way to divert young African Americans from entering the criminal justice system?

We have to understand that as long as young black men are viewed as criminals, nothing will change. And if there is a legislative scheme -- stated or unstated -- to expand the prison system, then there's nothing any one program is going to do. But we also know that when there are programs, mentors, community involvement and community empowerment vis à vis, after school programs, sports and the arts, young people feel like they have something to live for and they choose to live. That is the magic bullet.

There needs to be a full investment in the community, from a grassroots level upwards. I'm talking about nutrition, exercise, and true community involvement. It's when young people have that support that we see them making the right choices. It takes hard work, commitment and money, but it's less work than it takes to build and maintain a prison community.

Which systems should be in place to best reintegrate former prisoners back into society?

The first step is dismantling what's already in place. People can't be shut out of housing, jobs and society or be told they can't vote. Those barriers have to first be removed. If you walk out of prison and don't feel like part of society, you won't participate in it. It's like being invited to a party but told you have to stay in the foyer. You're never going to feel welcome.

I wish prisoners coming home had counseling by people trained to deal with folks who were in some of the worst confinements. I wish they had job training. With all the 25-to-lifers we have now, we'll have an entire generation being released with virtually no job training and with marginalized social skills. They need someone beyond the parole officer who will walk them through all the changes. Bureaucracy complicates everything, even for those of us who consider ourselves professionals, so imagine the confusion an ex-felon feels when just trying to get a driver's license.


Digg!

Teri Weefur is deputy web coordinator for the Drug Policy Alliance.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The war on drugs is a classic Gordian knot
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 15, 2005 4:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war continues because it provides something on both sides. Politicians get a free ride on the issue. Law enforcement gets funds. The issue of too many people and too few jobs gets shoved aside. Underground money spends just as good as legit. In the marketplace, how you got your money doesn't matter. Since all is for sale, only success matters.

During alcohol prohibition, it was immigrants who fulfilled the role African-Americans and Latinos are playing today. The children of those immigrants today run many of the big businesses. JFK's family were bootleggers.

Decriminalizing recreational drugs would not end problems. It would alter them from public issues corrupting our society (which was what finally ended the Prohibition Era) to personal problems. So long as there is good money to be made underground, we will have an underground.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Morphine
Posted by: brasilaron on Jun 18, 2005 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The use of drugs, legal or illegal for recreation or whatever, is intimately tied to the perception (real or not) of pain. Many people try drugs for whatever reason but don't end up using them all the time or becoming addicted. However, and obviously, many do. Those who do, i think you will find, have a perception of some personal pain, more often than not psychological. As the band Morphine sang "When they find a cure for pain, i'll throw my drugs away". Now there is no way we can do away with pain, but we can try to be compassionate about the situation and come up with some way for these people to get help rather than lumping them together as the same type of criminal. A trafficker is not the same as a crack-head or a heroine addict, howver, we treat them in similar ways. The criminalization of pot completely baffles me, it has no logic and has no useful purpose to society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Morphine Posted by: bornxeyed
Bushistas Propagation of Dis-information
Posted by: neilemac on Jun 20, 2005 5:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Deception and fear propagated by the White House Bushistas are smoke and mirrors keeping the American populace and the entire world focused on controversial issues such as "the war on drugs", "weapons of mass desctruction" and "same-sex marriage" while in the name of "democracy" and "American interests". they dupe you the people and ravish the world of its resources. The bodybag count of returning American youth from Iraq (mostly black youth from Vietnam War) should alert you to their total disregard for human life. American lives lost for what, non existent weapons of mass destruction? No, and not even oil; but yes oil, in a way, guaranteeing the disruption of its flow gives Texas billionaires excuse for inflated prices and profits blamed on the "world's oil shortage." It is not as if it is the first time an American régime did so, it's the blatant lies and disregard of your lives, rights and liberties that now takes center stage for me. Give the Bushista liars their rightful due, focus on truth, rise up, demonstrate and be truly free and brave, voice your choice for "Liberty, Freedom and Justice for all!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pot use is not abnormal, so why is it criminal ?
Posted by: cobrajet on Jun 22, 2005 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LEts not forget that the origin of pot prohibition got it start because of the hatred of the Mexican immigrant worker, and also the african jazz/blues musicians. The govt hated their freedom they expressed when using pot, and this prohibition has given govt a way to bypass due process, smash the Bill of rights, and now allow forfeiture of citizens private property !!
The drug war is not even really based on drugs, it is based on lies from govt-sponsored media smokescreens. We need to take a stand and motivate the media to tell the real story, catch the govt in a lie, a coverup.. thats news !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» There actually is an answer to this one Posted by: aswgt@ix.netcom.com
Its The Income
Posted by: pjrsullivan on Jun 24, 2005 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And how to keep income out of ordinary peoples hands is the driving force in the so called war on drugs.

The criminal classes require that they not only have control of the economy, they also in their primitive behaviors, need to deny income to the mass of the population. This is the function of the Police, to "Maintain the disparity."

Our War criminal terrorist political system requires death and destruction to maintain itself. Incidentally, the reason that the criminal deceptors keep saying that "Oswald did it," is because The significance of killing a sitting president reveals that if they hit him, how many ordinary people did the Wall street war criminals kill? The American fixation on running death squads has included mass murder of American citizens right here at home in this old crown colony. The drug war is a cover for internal death squad activities against the people of america. The DEA is comprised in large measure of old line mafia families and Mormon gunmen. The Mormons being comprised of a bunch of Anglo peasants habituated to obedience.

With our advanced technology, these contract murderers working for wall street and English Imperial interests are being identified. Mossad, incidentally coordinates at the high level these terrorist death squads that operate in our midst.

Our predator criminal leadership is nothing new, nor this mess of atrocity specialists that lord over us with gun club and dagger. What is new is that a certain number of them are "Getting their turn." You see america like other bits of political nonsense is really a big joke, that is why smirk can not stop laughing, he is aware that he is an idiot and he cannot believe how many people are more idiotic than he is.

Yet, when the criminal classes start getting their turn in this land of games, they want to launch nuclear weapons to send the human race backward so that they do not wind up on trial like their hireling Pinochet.

The secret of nuclear weapons is that they were never ment for others, the plan from the beginning was to use them on Americans, and everybody else.

War is a tool that is used to "Subordinate the mass of the domestic population to exploitation at the hands of the dominant class." As to the world trade center attack, on 9-11, it is now obvious, "Oswald done it."

http://politicsofet.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its The Income Posted by: bornxeyed
This is the heart of the issue of the drug war.
Posted by: aahpat on Jun 24, 2005 4:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Minorities -- African Americans in particular --are the biggest targets of the "war on drugs.""

This is the heart of the issue of the drug war.

I believe that Richard Nixon and the Wallace wing of the Democrats colluded in making the controlled Substances Act in 1970 not to mitigate addiction but to subvert and neutralize the electoral empowerment effects of the voter Rights Act and the 26st Amendment. Their targets were dissident minorities and nonconformist young Americans who were empowered by laws written not out of altruism but under duress from massive street protests for minority rights and against the Vietnam war.

This is why addiction rates climb. Its the mass disenfranchisement that is the real success of the drug war. More Americans were disenfranchised by the drug war than made the difference in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. this keeps America's right wing in power, regardless of party. Had gore won, he was a drug warrior. Had Kerry won he too was a drug warrior. A career drug prosecutor.

The modern drug war was created to subvert American democracy and at that it has been a massive success.

this is why asking for concern for the Black community in fighting the drug war won't work. The prosecutors of the drug war see high minority conviction rates and mass disenfranchisement as their Jim Crow success.

I have a different strategy for fighting against the drug war. The Drug Policy Alliance has articulated much of it. Eliciting concern for drug war victims won't work. The nation is brainwashed by thirty five years of zero tolerance fear mongering. the only thing to break through the programming is a greater and more valid fear. Trump their fear with reality.

al Qaeda's success strategy - Silent Jihad - is my information reference page of terrorism related drug war facts. Educating Americans to the real dangers caused by the drug war can help to break the programming.

I talk about this more today on my http://leftindependent.blogspot.com/ LeftIndependent blog in an essay titled "Fight terrorism to win the drug war".

Good luck Asha. You will need it. But you are working with a great bunch of Americans at the Alliance so you should find yourself with a creative environment to expand within.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"instead of war on poverty, they got a war on drugs so the police can bother me"
Posted by: happychild on Jul 6, 2005 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi asha - good luck with your new position. It sounds like you are pro-people rather than anti-drugs - thank God! Should common sense ever start really influencing the policy makers' decisions at a high level in this gov't of ours, just imagine what great things could be accomplished. I believe in the possibility...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's all about money
Posted by: gymshoes on Jul 14, 2005 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The so-called War on Drugs is all about money; it's a cash cow for the US government; it employs hundreds of thousands of agents and gives plenty of work to hundreds of thousands of lawyers.

Secondarily, the WoD is used as a means of minority oppression.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's in a name?
Posted by: pink pink you stink on Jul 14, 2005 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just because Asha Bandele enjoys spelling her name in an unconventional manner is it really quality journalism to endulge her ego at the expense of proper grammer? I mean, come on, it just reads better when done corectly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's in a name? Posted by: moltar
My buddy started smoking pot in 1969 and never stopped.
Posted by: moltar on Jul 16, 2005 12:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His brain is shriveled. He's paranoid. Can't leave the house without 10 joints on him "just in case." At one time, he had promising artistic talent - he was actually pretty good, had a ways to go but a good start. He decided to work in factories to experience the working class life, and of course that meant smoking a lot because of the incredibly boring and stupid activities he did, like moving barrels around. And more pot as he began to grow his own. He later got a job at a nursery, lifting supplies to help with his pot farm. Mom's dead, Dad's insane (paranoid schizophrenic), and the nursery folded, so Bill sits in his parents' kitchen rolling joints. He's 52 years old now.

I did my share of drugs, but my wife insisted that I stop after 10 years. You know that stupid Star Trek episode where the "pod plants" get Kirk and Spock, and the leader of the colony says something like, "all these years .... and we've accomplished nothing. Nothing!"? Well, it's true. When you're 25, you can laugh it off. 35, a little doubt creeps in, but another joint makes it go away. 45, well fuck you all, I'm still cool and I'll smoke as much as I want. 55 - who knows?

The current pot laws are insanely punitive, vary widely from community to community, and indeed are effectively racist. But we don't need more people getting stoned in a crummy, unfulfilling society. We need to get people access to more fulfilling lives, where you don't need to shrivel your brain to feel connected. Possibly by going out and helping others, people might get that feeling. Try this thought out sometime: maybe it's NOT all about me. Well, come back to it in 5 years.

Let's see, I've done pounds of pot, maybe 10 acid trips, 2 mesc, 3 shrooms, coke, never injected (fraidy cat!? yes). What did I learn about drugs? Just this: what drugs want you to do is to take more drugs. And you know it. For me, cocaine was the "instant junkie" drug - after my first lines, I knew I would never stop, even if I had a pound of it in front of me, just keep on keepin on till I passed out or died. Yup, "coke is it" as they used to say.

Good luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» To boldly go ... Posted by: bornxeyed
bill & bush doing lines
Posted by: joedangelo on Jul 21, 2005 4:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While it may be true that conspiracy buffs are "adrenaline freaks," isn't it also true that the much more common and respectable "trusting souls" are self-pacifiers who are afraid to consider frightening theories of reality, regardless of evidence? A picture exists, made by an undercover team of the Drug Enforcement Administration, showing George W. Bush snorting cocaine with his buddy William "Rockefeller" Clinton. You have been asleep, if you did not know that Clinton and the Bush family are cronies and get together at old man Bush's mansion in Kennebunkport, Maine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bill & bush doing lines Posted by: bornxeyed
The Scary FDA & Medical System
Posted by: revsuzanne on Jul 28, 2005 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think most simple things like alcohol or pot use need to be used with "common sense" if at all. Yes, there is a price to pay for anything that has the potential of altering perception.
The really scary thing is that we have school systems REQUIRING vaccinations, and all the vaccines these days contain mercury, which is a powerful neurotoxin. We have an epidemic of autism and other neurological syndromes as a result. The Patriot Act absolved the drug manufacturers of all liability for ruining your children's health. Flu shots are also life endangering.
During the Reagan administration, Donald Rumsfeld saw to it that big pharma got complete control of the FDA, and as a result, medicine is not only costly but undertested and dangerous to the public health, health care is too costly, the food supply is increasingly questionable, and the FDA has been trying to remove our free access to nutritional supplements ever since.
Everything within our government, and all legislation is for sale to the highest bidder, the public trust be damned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Whoa! Reality check for ya Posted by: esactun
Give them a chance
Posted by: MISHKA on Aug 8, 2005 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I could not agree more with you aisha! Growing up in my small town community it often seemed as though it was harder to find those who weren't using some type of drug (whether out of sheer boredom or to cover up painful parts of their life). I strongly believe that had we had opportunities to express our pain through other means, or just simply something to interest us and occupy our time many of my friends would not be lost in a world of smoke.. I am deeply passionate about giving children the opportunity to do things that allow them to recognize their talents and interests and i am so grateful to people like you who can also recognize the need for change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War on Drugs and Me
Posted by: bambic on Aug 19, 2005 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am one of a number of victims of the war on drugs.
My house was raided by the police---they were looking for a meth lab and were very pissed off when they only found a weed pipe.
I am a college-educated white woman who turned fifty this past week. I worked as a "staffer" when Jerry Brown ran for president in '92. I am disabled due to a back injury and also suffer from depression and major anxiety disorder. Marijuana helped all three of my problems, physical and emotional. But when I went to see my probation officer this week, I explained to him---after my "random" drug screen---that my doctor had prescribed a pain killer (Lortab) and a tranquilizer (Valium), thinking that my up-front honesty would help me. He then began to lecture me: Doesn't your doctor know you are on probation in drug court? Don't you know that these pills are highly addictive?
I wanted to say,"But I can't smoke weed anymore (which is not addictive nor lethal if you overdose) and you will not find any THC in my urine". I just sat there thinking about the 99 days in did in jail (Little Rock) waiting to go to court because of the $50,000 bond I was given---the same amount given a major cocaine trafficker and a woman with three meth labs.
I now also suffer from PTSD from the time my house was raided and a gun was held on me as they told me to get down on the floor. I still have nightmares. So when my doctor faxes him the list of prescription drugs she knows that I need, I still may be in serious trouble if this "drug court" judge decides that I should not be taking anything, doctor-prescribed or not.
At this point, I'm very close to losing it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

people abuse drugs -- to escape something
Posted by: eosinglemum on Aug 24, 2005 12:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dear asha,
i have a neighbor girl by that name. thank you for this article. i know someone who saw the drugs and the guns come in to the neighborhood in south central la and ruin everything, who had to crouch down in the crib to avoid the bullets, who got exposed to bud at the age of 8 by his brothers...i also know some one who pretty much smoked marijuana his whole life...and didn't quit till he was over 50 due to high blood pressure.

i also know my self that smoking bud messed me up in high school. i think it has its place, but needs to be respected. i have always felt there was a spiritual element to it, but to cut class and smoke bud on the back stairs of the auto shop ain't solving nothing.

it is good to get this discussion going and i think bud in the black community needs to be discussed more thoroughly in a critical way.

eosinglemum

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I tell her that no one has died from smoking weed...
Posted by: robinrollin on Sep 8, 2005 8:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well I think they may have ! Conspiracy theory only! but ha it is a drug war and a drug used by lower economic groups( don't ya think it would be a wonderful way to experiment with that group thru drugging the drug, altering the substance or and contamination i.e. nuke, bio, chemical., and seeing what happens? After all they are mostly black and low wage earners or social misfits.
The conspiracy! Tell her that no one has died from smoking weed, and that people die of alcohol everyday, ya from drugs prescribed that interact with alcohol to eat there insides out i.e. ulcers ....
Oh ya where did Lime’s disease come from and how did it jump half way around the world to mostly rural pot growing areas???? Conspiracy ? No my little girl Logic…
Robinrollin…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where do we go?
Posted by: robinrollin on Sep 8, 2005 8:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well so? Where do we go? I have seen Temporary hysterectomy -yes that’s right Uterus surgically removed, severed from the body and on the patients chest, for 30 mim. .before being reattached .Ya and that was supposed to be a C-section! 1 in 4 women in America can’t have a virginal birth! Why? Cause there's a Dollar to be made cutting! So where do we go?
robinrollin...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]