Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Prisoner Politics
Also in DrugReporter
LSD Cured My Headache
Arran Frood
Progressive Voter Guide to Drug Issues
Find out If Drug Reform Is on a Ballot Near You -- Voter Guide
Phillip S. Smith
Drug Czar Fails Spectacularly at Cutting Marijuana Consumption
Bruce Mirken
Marijuana Is Real Medicine
Paul Krassner
How Will the Economic Crisis Impact Drug Use?
Tony Newman
Nothing was more striking in Gov. Pataki's State of the State address in January than his use of the word "reform" no fewer than 31 times in a 69-minute speech. It's striking, because if there's anything New Yorkers will not get from this administration, it's genuine reform.
For the governor to pursue real reform, he would have to challenge some entrenched Albany special interests and Republican Party politics. A look at how the governor "reformed" the Rockefeller-era drug laws reveals how unwilling or unable he is to do that.
Last year, after a decade of promises to revisit the state's 30-year-old drug laws, the governor finally signed a "reform" measure. The need for real reform was obvious; the Rockefeller laws are a well-established failure. They impose harsh minimum mandatory sentences on first-time, nonviolent drug offenders, stripping judges of the freedom to base their sentences on the facts of each individual case. Under rigid sentencing guidelines, judges are forced to lock up thousands of nonviolent young people who would be better served by effective drug treatment. The "reform" legislation did little to change this injustice.
The Rockefeller laws have wasted millions of dollars, to say nothing of the unnecessary waste of prisoners' lives that can never be recovered. Even the U.S. Supreme Court recently affirmed the importance of judicial discretion -- which is absent in New York's law.
When the need for real reform of these laws is so obvious, why would the governor look the other way? Because, arguably, Mr. Pataki is more interested in protecting the interests of New York's Republican Party than in serving the interests of the people of New York.
Let me describe one example of this dysfunction. The population of upstate New York, the political base for the state's Republicans, has been steadily declining in recent years. We have the greatest out-migration of any state in the nation. Our upstate communities are losing jobs too, and state government has pushed the problem from bad to worse by increasing the cost of doing business. Sadly, jobs in the prison industry are among the few employment opportunities the Pataki administration has protected upstate.
There are New Yorkers moving upstate, but they are prison inmates. In fact, prisoners from downstate represent a full 30 percent of all those "moving" upstate since 1990. While only 24 percent of New York prisoners come originally from upstate, 91 percent of all New York's prisoners are incarcerated there.
This works out nicely for New York's Republican Party. Why? Because the population figures that determine Senate and Assembly districts include prison inmates. It's simply not in the Republicans' political interests to support measures that would let those locked up under the old drug laws go free.
Andrew M. Cuomo is a former secretary of housing and urban development and a former candidate for governor of New York.
| More Opinion: | ||
|
Why Everyone Loves Hot, Smart Older Women Sex and Relationships: The word "desperation" has disappeared from the definition of "cougar"; words like smart, successful and funny have taken its place. By Vanessa Richmond, The Tyee. October 10, 2008. |
How Badly Can the 'Experts' Ruin the Planet? ForeignPolicy: Look no further than the World Bank to see how many economic, social and environmental problems so-called experts can make worse. By Robin Broad, John Cavanagh, AlterNet. October 10, 2008. |
How Scary the Economy Would Be in McCain's Hands Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: McCain's economic plan contradicts his recently held fundamental views and is far out of touch with the needs of the country. By Jared Bernstein, Huffington Post. October 9, 2008. |