Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

Drug Policy Alliance Conference Comes at a Crucial Moment for Drug Reform

By Anthony Papa, AlterNet. Posted November 12, 2009.


More people than ever grasp the need to shift from criminalization to a public health model -- the Drug Policy Alliance's conference leads the way on this discussion.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Every day we read national headlines about the war on drugs. More and more elected officials are saying the war on drugs is not working and that we need to consider alternatives.

There are stories about states like California considering taxing and regulating marijuana. There is coverage about drug prohibition in Mexico leading to a war zone where thousands of people are being killed every year. There are front page stories about countries from Portugal to Argentina to Mexico decriminalizing small amounts of drugs because they realize that they can't incarcerate their way out of addiction. It is one thing to read about it, but it is another to jump in and try to come up with solutions to the failed war on drugs.

From Nov. 12-14, a wide range of advocates, doctors, lawyers, activists, treatment providers, law enforcement, students, educators and formerly incarcerated people will converge for the biennial International Drug Policy Reform Conference in Albuquerque, where it was previously held in 2001. The conference returns to New Mexico because the state is a beacon of reform, recently passing innovative medical marijuana legislation and the nation's first Good Samaritan law to prevent fatal overdoses.

The conference comes at a crucial time: More people than ever grasp the need for our drug policy to shift from criminalization to a public health model.

The viability of major reforms is increasing day by day, making now a pivotal moment for exploring alternatives to our nation's ineffective and damaging lock 'em-up drug laws.

This year's conference will cover a range of topics, chief among them marijuana legalization. In this new political climate, meaningful reform of marijuana laws is closer on the horizon than ever.

Thanks to decades of grassroots activism, combined with the harsh realities of the ongoing economic crisis, the national debate is finally turning in favor of the taxation and regulation of marijuana. In one of the key panels at the conference, an array of experts will propose possible regulatory schemes and discuss their potential effectiveness.

Holding the conference in Albuquerque gives us a unique opportunity to examine the intersection of immigration policy and drug policy reform, as well as drug war violence on both sides of the border.

Drug policy movers and shakers also plan to push the envelope by discussing innovations that have been successfully implemented in other countries: services like prescribing heroin to people who suffer from addiction to allow them to lead normal lives, or providing supervised injection facilities to protect people who use drugs from disease and lethal overdose.

Our nation's drug policy should be based on reason, compassion, health and human rights, but to do so will take a great deal of strategizing and organizing. Anyone who believes the drug war does more harm than good is encouraged to attend the conference. As usual, it will be a high-energy, can't-miss event, where even the strangest of bedfellows can find much to agree on.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drug reform, drug policy alliance, international drug policy

Anthony Papa, author of 15 To Life: How I Painted My Way To Freedom, is a communications specialist for the Drug Policy Alliance.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
I asked him years ago why he never talked about religion
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Nov 12, 2009 2:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in the obvious discrimination against potheads.

He said he never thought about it.

Lame!

I knew he thought about it because I had been sending him emails to his website about it. I also mentioned I was being like the Rosa Parks of pot legalization and he wrote an editorial using the reference to her with no reference to me, THEN he tells me to my face he never thought about it.

There is only one word for that, liar.

I wouldn't spend one thin red dime to support Ethan Nadelman or anything he does. Good luck on organizing your politics right in the nest of the vipers itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Left Wing Pot Smokers.
Posted by: melpol on Nov 12, 2009 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mass urine tests would lead to the arrest of 30 million American pot smokers. The vast majority of them are left wingers who helped put the president in power. Conservative Republicans want the Marijuana laws kept in place. It is a hammer held over a left wing pot smokers head. When the time is right mass urine tests will put the Conservatives in power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Left Wing Pot Smokers. Posted by: tim_s_eb@yahoo.com
Reality strikes sooner or later
Posted by: Atheistno1 on Nov 12, 2009 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's high time the government came to grips with reality & stopped the nonsense about the war on a substance. That war only propels to people because the substance is inert & cant react for itself. The real political hero will be the one to make the final commonsense decision that allows it to be incorporated into the trade market.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eality strikes sooner or later Posted by: Richardsievert
The Lawmakers Should Be More Concerned With Finding Missing Children
Posted by: picket on Nov 12, 2009 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Billions of $$$$$$$$$$ spent on the Prohibition of a MJ Plant that grows like a dandelion? Neither plant will ever be eradicated.

Police crawling on the ground scraping green plant leaves off the pavement to secure an arrest. SUCH A Cruel JOKE!!!

"The strictest laws sometimes become the severest injustice". Ben Franklin

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If getting sick is a crime, why not drugs?
Posted by: bondwooley on Nov 12, 2009 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's not forget the forgotten soldiers in the war against drugs:

Meth Rats

(satire)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ending the drug war
Posted by: vasumurti on Nov 12, 2009 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Throughout history, the legal and moral status of psychoactive drugs has kept changing. During the 17th century, the sale and consumption of tobacco were punished by death in much of Europe, Russia, China and Japan. For centuries, many of the Muslim domains that forbade alcohol sale and consumption simultaneously tolerated and even regulated the sale of opium and cannabis.

Each year, the U.S. government spends more than $30 billion on the drug war and arrests over 1.5 million people on drug-related charges. Over 318,000 people are now behind bars in the U.S. for drug violations, greater than the total number of people incarcerated for all crimes in England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain combined.

Our government is calling for billions of dollars to fight a drug war it can't win. Roughly 75 percent of this money goes to enforcing laws and regulations, but only 15 percent goes to drug education and prevention, and a only a meager 10 percent goes to treatment for addicts.

During the 1950s, long-term prison sentences against drug users choked the courts, strained and disrupted prisons and drove black-market prices even higher. The latest casualty in the drug war has been our civil liberties: mandatory drug testing so we can all be “drug free”. Some of these tests have been struck down by the courts, where the government is the employer. But others have been upheld. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia denounced these drug tests as “an immolation of privacy and human dignity in symbolic opposition to drug use.”

Even putting America under martial law will not solve the nation's drug problem. Iran executes hundreds of drug offenders. Malaysia has hanged dozens of drug users in the past few years. In neither country has the drug problem receded. In fact, in Malaysia, the addiction rate continues to rise. On the other hand, the Dutch government, with its liberal social and political philosophy, tolerates drug use, and the addiction rate is declining.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So Close yet so far... Posted by: dougontrack
ending the drug war (cont'd)
Posted by: vasumurti on Nov 12, 2009 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to a 2003 Zogby poll, two of every five Americans say “the government should treat marijuana the same way it treats alcohol: It should regulate it, control it, tax it, and only make it illegal for children.” Close to 100 million Americans, including over half of those between the ages of 18 and 50, have tried marijuana at least once. Military and police recruiters often have no alternative but to ignore past marijuana use by job seekers.

In 1996, California voters passed a law to regulate medical marijuana within the state. In 2000, voters in California approved an initiative allowing people who are arrested for simple possession of drugs to go through a rehabilitation program rather than through the court process that would result in prison. Since the program began, most agree it has been very successful. It results in less recidivism and is considered cheaper than imprisonment.

Richard Posner, Chicago's chief judge of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and one of the nation's leading legal scholars, says marijuana use should be legalized as a way of reducing crime. Posner, a Reagan administration appointee once described by American Lawyer magazine as “the most brilliant judge in the country,” explained his views on marijuana in The Times Literary Supplement, a British publication, and in later interview:

“It is nonsense that we should be devoting so many law enforcement resources to marijuana," says Posner. "I am skeptical that a society that is so tolerant of alcohol and cigarettes should come down so hard on marijuana use and send people to prison for life without parole.”

Posner is the highest-ranking judge to publicly favor the repeal of marijuana laws. Several judges of the federal district court, a level lower than the appeals court, have made similar calls, including Robert Sweet of New York and James Paine of Florida, both Carter Administration appointees.

New York University law professor Burt Neuborne said it's significant that “one of the leading intellectuals in the judicial system recognizes that the laws don't seem to be working well.”

Posner and other federal judges have complained that sentencing guidelines force them to give unjustly severe prison sentences to relatively minor drug offenders. Says Posner: “Prison terms in America have become appallingly long, especially for conduct that, arguably, should not be criminal at all. Only decriminalization is a sure route to a lower crime rate. It is sad that it appears so far below the horizon of political feasibility.”

Rufus King, a Washington, DC lawyer who has served on the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, calls the drug war, “A worthless crusade.” According to King, drug use is a social problem, not a law enforcement problem. He observes: “Cigarette use is declining through changes in cultural values in the population. Like most smokers and alcoholics, most users of illegal drugs poison themselves because they want to be intoxicated. No human force can do them much good until they want help.” King is optimistic that the current anti-drug hysteria will subside, and responsible and reasonable drug law policies will be adopted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

End marijuana prohibition now
Posted by: greenferret on Nov 12, 2009 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's well past time to end the failed, destructive policy of marijuana prohibition.

Tell Obama and your elected representatives that marijuana should be legalized and taxed, like alcohol.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keeping marijuanna illegal provides "job security" for cops, prosecutors, private prisons, DEA,
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Nov 12, 2009 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
etc., etc., A large percentage of their "fall guys" would no longer be put through their "system"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Decriminalize it.
Posted by: lclark on Nov 12, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The government has no right to prohibit adults from consuming a non-addictive harmless natural substance.

They've created a criminal industry as a consequence and burdened us all with enormous policing costs.

It's just another useless form of prohibition and finances gangs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Decriminalize it. Posted by: aussidawg
I never thought I'd be grateful to the banks
Posted by: Outspokengrandmother on Nov 12, 2009 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never thought I'd be grateful to the banks but if the result of their economy killing avarice we get sensible about reforming our drug laws into something that makes an iota of sense... if we start emptying our prisons of people whose crime was getting high.... I'm grateful. Whatever it takes to make this stupidity go away I'm grateful for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

specifically morning: the drug war violates our privacy and civil liberties
Posted by: vasumurti on Nov 12, 2009 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In his 1992 book, Visions of Liberty, former Executive Director of the ACLU, Ira Glasser writes:

"The use of wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping emerged during the Prohibition era. Roy Olmstead was a suspected bootlegger whom the government wished to search. It placed taps in the basement of his office building and on wires in the streets near his home. No physical entry into his office or home took place. Olmstead was convicted entirely on the basis of evidence from the wiretaps.

"In his appeal to the Supreme Court, Olmstead argued that the taps were a search conducted without a warrant and without probable cause, and that the evidence seized against him should have been excluded because it was illegally gathered. He also argued that his Fifth Amendment right not to be a witness against himself was violated.

"By a 5-4 vote, the Court rejected his arguments and upheld the government's power to wiretap without limit and without any Fourth Amendment restrictions, on the grounds that no actual physical intrusion had taken place.

"Olmstead's Fifth Amendment claim was also dismissed on the grounds that he had not been compelled to talk on the telephone, but had done so voluntarily. Thus the Court upheld the government's power to do by trickery and surreptitious means what it was not permitted to do honestly and openly. It wasn't until 1967, in a similar case involving gambling, that the Court overruled the Olmstead decision by an 8-1 margin and recognized that the Fourth Amendment applied to wiretapping and electronic surveillance.

"Interestingly, these cases arose in the context of crimes like bootlegging and gambling. During the past twenty years, the majority of wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping by both state and federal officials has been in cases involving drug dealing and gambling.

"Serious crimes of violence, such as homicide, assault, rape, robbery, and burglary, are rarely the target of electronic eavesdropping, which is not normally a useful tool in such cases.

"From the beginning, when wiretapping was virtually invented to enforce laws prohibiting the sale of alcohol, to the late 1960s, when gambling was a major target, to the present, when the use and sale of drugs other than alcohol are the main target, these intrusive devices have been used mostly to enforce laws aimed at punishing and proscribing personal conduct that society deems immoral.

"Because such conduct essentially involves private activities among consenting adults who are all likely to want to keep those activities secret, they are harder to investigate and prosecute than crimes like robbery or burglary, in which an unwilling victim will probably aid any investigation...the invasion of privacy inherent in wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping remains with us as part of the legacy of our attempts to criminalize personal conduct.

"The other major use of electronic eavesdropping has been to punish political dissent. For decades, former FBI director J. Edgar Hoover used wiretaps and other electronic devices to spy on political figures and citizens not yet suspected of having committed a crime. He built vast dossiers on their political activities and personal lives. Special units of local police called 'Red Squads' did the same."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hi
Posted by: somavelina on Nov 13, 2009 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is a great place------- Cougarmatching.com ------- It's a premiere cougar dating community for older women seeking younger men and young men seeking cougars. Come in, post a message, a picture of yourself and check out the hot photo galleries. You will find someone you like here...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

**the war on drugs has failed**
Posted by: reg373 on Nov 13, 2009 3:50 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, you 86 the crime syndicates by legalizing the industry. It's legal for the seller...
BUT, it's still illegal to use it / mandatory 30 days jail / webcam in your cell... ;^)
-- found a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Future history / wishful thinking
Posted by: mizobe on Nov 15, 2009 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....a war against drugs had raged in the streets of America. This was primarily a war of Ethnic Cleansing waged by racists and anti-evolutionists. The anti-evolutionists feared the mind-expanding drugs and the profound truths that they unlocked. They were joined by special interests who were desperate to protect their investments against the miracles of environmentally sound hemp based fuels, fibers, medicines and plastics. Insane dogma and rhetoric followed.
The rest of the world watched in horror as entire rainforests and their indigenous peoples, plants and animals were driven to extinction by the so-called ‘Coca Eradication’ doctrine which involved the aerial spraying of herbicides and dangerous bio-weapons of mass destruction by the USA. For every loser who was supposedly saved from the evils of drug addiction a thousand innocent third world peasants and farmers were killed or driven from their ancestral lands and way of life. By the end of the drug war nearly one quarter of all the world’s ten million prisoners were incarcerated in jails inside “the land of the free”. The majority of these were non-violent people of color who were not guilty of any real wrong-doing.
Having become the world’s only remaining super-power, the USA eventually collapsed as the entire free world turned against it’s absolute power and it’s draconian, morally corrupt ideologies...
Young people began voting in vast numbers. It soon became legal to do anything so long as it does no harm to the environment, people, their property, or to animals. Society became peaceful, luxurious, sane. The Prison Industrial Complex went the way of the Berlin Wall. The arts and sciences flourished as never before. Humanity had made giant strides forward...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jack wills
Posted by: Nike air max Special on Nov 20, 2009 6:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent post! Just wanna thank you for what you have shared. Look forward to reading nice articles from you. jack wills

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement