Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

Is the Military Ignoring Its Heroin Problem in the Ranks?

By Megan Carpentier, Air America Media. Posted October 22, 2009.


Occupy the world's largest heroin producer in Afghanistan and it's no wonder the methadone clinics are overpacked -- but the military is mum on the subject.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The U.S. military has known about the problem of drug use in its ranks since the Vietnam War, when contemporaneous accounts suggested up to 15 percent of enlisted men tried or became addicted to opiates. But, for the first time since then, the military has soldiers in combat in a producer-country: Afghanistan, which produces more than 90 percent of the world's heroin despite decades of eradication efforts.

For many soldiers bored or traumatized, the access to cheap, strong heroin is likely to be a powerful lure and, in fact, reports going back to 2006 show that heroin can be easily--and cheaply--obtained mere steps off Bagram Air Base. Shaun McCanna, reporting for Salon in 2007, was able to arrange to receive heroin worth hundreds of dollars in the U.S. for $30 in the Bagram Bazaar multiple times.

My driver translates, "He wants to know how much you want? Twenty, 30, 50 dollars' worth?" From past experience, for I have arranged this same transaction a dozen times in a dozen different Bagram Bazaar shops, I know that the $30 bag will contain enough pure to bring hundreds of dollars on the streets of any American city. Afghanistan, after all, is the source of 90 percent of the world's heroin. I say 30 and the teen jogs off.

McCanna was initially turned on to the heroin problem at Bagram by the death of a soldier, John Torres, who told his family about the heroin problems at Bagram before his death under mysterious circumstances. McCanna bought heroin more than a dozen times in Bagram while filming a documentary about Torres' death and saw ample evidence that soldiers were trading military equipment for drugs as well.

In 2007, the military denied that there was a heroin problem among soldiers in Afghanistan.

At Bagram, according to a written statement provided by a spokesperson for the base, Army Maj. Chris Belcher, the "Military Police receive few reports of alcohol or drug issues."

However, when McCanna made arrangements to speak with three veterans receiving treatment for heroin addiction on the record, his efforts were stymied by the military and the VA. The only publicly available data available to McCanna showed the number of soldiers who fail random drug screenings, which all indicated low or non-existent levels of heroin abuse, despite reports from soldiers and rehabilitation facilities of soldiers using the drug.

McCanna's piece was published more than two years ago, but a recent filing by Gerald Posner in The Daily Beast indicates that little has changed with either the military's attentiveness to the problem or the market for heroin among military personnel. Recently, a former general-turned-drug-czar Barry McCaffrey admitted, to the military's chagrin, that a problem likely exists.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: pentagon, military, addiction, heroin

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Drugs, soldiers, and war
Posted by: Dr T on Oct 23, 2009 3:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the tail end of the Vietnam war, military estimates were that at least 100,000 to 300,000 American soldiers were addicted to opium. The V had no clue. Yet on return home, even though about half reused opiates, 88% did not become readdicted even though there was no formal treatment.

Harvard researcher Lee Robins looked at the data and found the set and setting had changed and these were the most important factors in maintaining or ceasing opiate use. She found the main reason for opiate use in Vietnam was boredom.

Whether this trend will continue with American forces in Afghanistan is unknown because the military, and now the VA, is again hiding the data. This hurts our troops and makes treatment
very difficult.

One other thing we should do is change one of our Afghani policies and set up a legal situation where we can buy the opium and sell it to pharmaceutical companies since they have a difficult time in obtaining opiate base for analgesic medications. This would also change the context for the war and might make a huge improvement.

The most stable time in recent Afghan history was between the 1930s and 1970s where foreign armies were not invading and they were trading products. For example, Afghanistan produced more raisins for commercial sale than California. This had a normalizing effect on the population and there were even Ms. Kabul contests in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

As Frederick Baisat once said: "If goods don't cross borders, armies will".

We need the light of openness on drug use by our soldiers and to end our failed war on drugs policies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Drugs, soldiers, and war Posted by: willymack
» RE: Drugs, soldiers, and war Posted by: bullgloony
Give Freedom A Chance
Posted by: melpol on Oct 23, 2009 4:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Afghanistan falls so will the whole region. But the whole region is already on the ground. The only thing that will give them a lift is their poppy fields. They can smoke it or sell it to a world desperate to get high. The profits are enormous. A barrel filled with poppies is worth 100 times the price of oil. Give freedom a chance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A stint in the Army
Posted by: colinmeister on Oct 23, 2009 4:37 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would cure all those long-haired hippy druggies!

LOL!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drugs at the top
Posted by: littlepitcher on Oct 23, 2009 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As in the Vietnam era, top brass in the armed forces are making millions importing heroin into the US. The rich and well-connected keep a stable of addicts they can trust, to mule the drugs back to America, and use their family members in the service to bring back heroin in waist bands so they can keep the underclass tranquilized.

One of the spokespeople listed has family in the business, in Hamilton Co., TN, and a substantial presence in Gwinnett Co., GA. In both locales, they have run Anglo immigration attorneys to protect their mules. Now, little Chattanooga hosts multitudes of methadone clinics and needs more, and Gwinnett Co., just outside Atlanta, hosts numerous DEA busts where the meth and cocaine make it to the evidence rooms while government workers withhold the heroin for their own rackets.

Look to the top--of Armed Forces management, of New York City police and management, in the White House, now and in its retirement annex at Beaumont, and you will find your heroin bureaucracy and its high-level perps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Links? Posted by: eddie torres
They used to export wheat.
Posted by: travelertoo on Oct 23, 2009 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before the U.S. invaded they exported wheat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOT IGNORING, JUST ACCEPTING
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 23, 2009 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does anyone expect people in a combat area to behave like good little boys and girls? It's such a contradiction. Drugs, smoking, drinking are all frowned upon. They can't even read Playboy Magazine anymore. The only way to address these "problems"? Don't send them to war in the first place. No wonder they go crazy. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is shocking. Just... shocking.
Posted by: eddie torres on Oct 23, 2009 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Opiate addiction? Organized crime syndicates and cut-out heroin smuggling? Long-term domestic turmoil? Isolated 2nd-class citizen veterans?

In Afghanistan?

How could the Pentagon have ever imagined...

We better give them more money so they can study this in time for the next narco-invasion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's been a while
Posted by: willymack on Oct 23, 2009 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thirty one years to be exact, since I retired from the Navy, but in my day drugs were a major problem, and maybe as bad as they are now.
I know, because I was the badass who investigated, apprehended, acted as baliff at the court martials, and escorted the convicted saliors and marines to the brig for further disposition.
Maybe I'm living in a dream world, but I couldn't bring myself to loathe even the worst of them. They were brothers in arms, after all, and many were merely hapless twits, caught up in the legal system.
Most weren't even out of their teens, but carried a lifetime stigma of federal felons.A federal drug rap is death to any good future, unless you have a rich Daddy, uncle, or other benefactor to sweep everything under the rug. George Bush comes to mind.
I always had a bad feeling about what I did, and as one who had no more moral objections to the use of psychoactive drugs than I had to drinking beer, wine, or whisky, I WAS, nevertheless assigned to do what I did, and would no sooner disobey orders than jump off a cliff.
Happily, my last tour of duty was as a drug abuse counselor, and I must say I derived a great deal of satisfaction from interdicting many cases of what ordinarily would've led to Bad Conduct, or even Dishonorable discharges.
Very few of my clients were true drug addicts, and were merely caught up in the legal system.
The Drug Exemption program and counseling centers saved many a young man and woman from a bleak future.
I must say, I'd rather be a counselor than a badass.
I only hope that the armed forces have programs similar to the one I was in all those years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heroin Funds CIA-Affiliated Warlords
Posted by: misencikjc on Oct 23, 2009 10:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is about far more than drug abuse among soldiers and Marines and I would strongly urge against DEA agents arriving on the scene, as seems to be suggested in the article.

Historian Alfred McCoy uncovered in 1971 how the CIA-affiliated Air America was transporting heroin from Laotian highlands to South Vietnam in order that the CIA could strengthen Laotian warlords, covert allies of the U.S. This is well-documented in his book 'The Politics of Heroin' and confirmed by recent declassified government documents: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB248/.

Strictly speaking on Afghanistan, McCoy had this to say: "When planning the Afghan War, the United States realized that the only allies we had were the Northern Alliance—the same warlords we had armed back in the 1980s, and who in the 1990s had operated pretty much as independent drug lords. The Northern Alliance controlled the one territory inside Afghanistan that hadn't banned drugs, and they were still very large opium producers and heroin smugglers. More important, they had huge stockpiles of opium left over from the 1999 bumper crop, which the world market simply hadn't been able to absorb—about 60 percent of the opium had been held back after the harvest. The Northern Alliance now transformed much of that opium into heroin and smuggled it into Europe and Russia.... These are the forces with which the U.S. allied itself to fight the Taliban, and the forces we have since installed in power in Afghanistan."

The drug use and abuse among US soldiers is an unpleasant byproduct of the governments need to raise funds for its warlord allies. I've written more about this in ZMag here: http://www.zcommunications.org/zmag/viewArticle/22375

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America the Junkified
Posted by: Hiroak on Oct 23, 2009 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America the Junkified
God (or whatever) shed his smack on thee
from Trailer Parks to Basram Base
The smack is good, but not free

Ajunkifa, ajunkifa
You loves me some smack indeed
And crown your smack
with stupid drug laws
and all the niggers'll be jailed

*Nigger - being the new term for po white trash, po hispanics, po blacks, po injuns, and all the desparate foolish young people who join up to kill people the world over. How fucked up we are is "so fucked up we can never find redemption".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: America the Junkified Posted by: manderson
Gift From Allah
Posted by: melpol on Oct 23, 2009 12:30 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heroin is more precious than oil to the billions that want to find peace. And Afghanistan has the poppy fields that produces 90% of the worlds heroin. The poppy is a gift from Allah to Afghanistan, it is their duty to share it with the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Years ago when I was in Uncle Sam's canoe club (navy)
Posted by: abusedbypenguins on Oct 23, 2009 6:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and on a 6 month Med cruise, hash was $50 a kilo in Turkey, grass was way cheaper. There were a few officers who smoked grass and when they ran out would buy from us enlisted. The XO wanted Navy CID to investigate but the Captain knew he couldn't sail a destroyer with half his crew in jail. After my tour of Viet Nam the east coast navy was easy to bluff. I would look at an officer and ask "What are you going to do, send me to Viet Nam?" They all knew those of us who had done a tour of a war zone and left us alone. We didn't care, the only reason we enlisted was not to get drafted into the army and die in a rice paddy. We just wanted to do our time, do our jobs, not be bitched at over military bullshit and get high off duty. My cousin was addicted to heroin because he was assigned to drive a truck in Viet Nam on a road that was constantly mined by the Viet Cong and a lot of his fellow drivers were blown up on that road. Drugs in the military have been going strong for 45 years because the powers that be keep putting us into stupid cluster-fucks (wars). The drugs won't stop until the cluster-fucks stop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tricare Insurance bails out
Posted by: peytonter on Oct 26, 2009 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My Son-In-Law was killed in Iraq in 07 my daughter turned to opiates and after 8 months I was able to get her into a Drug Treatment Program,but Tricare would only pay for In-Pt @ a Hospital 4 hrs from our home.After Drug Treatment I found a Dr.in Atlanta,Ga who put her on Suboxone a true "Life Saver" then after 1 year they STOP paying for this drug b/c they claim they do not pay for "One addictive drug for another" Tricare is behind the times and I amoung others are trying to get this STUPID rule tossed out.These young Men and Women die for our Country everyday and often times leave behind a family.Drug Addiction is a Disease and yet Tricare would not deny a Diabetic there Insulin,then they should not Deny an Addict medicine that will save his/her life.Soldiers are also addicted to drugs and yet this Country,Our Government Bails Out on them!!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for making me more aware of the drug problem amoung our Heros and lets fight to help our Heros recover from this deadly disease when they All come home.Thanks

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drug War Afghanistan Style
Posted by: aahpat on Oct 27, 2009 3:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This must be why the Obama administration is condoning assassination squads and "hit lists" of Afghan drug lords. Get a bunch of America's children strung out and then use that as a pretext to goose step all over the rule of law. That is what the drug war is really about, subverting respect for the rule of law, democracy and human rights values.

Afghans oppose U.S. hit list of drug traffickers
PUBLIC OUTRAGE FEARED Justice system will be undermined, officials say

By Craig Whitlock
Saturday, October 24, 2009

KABUL -- A U.S. military hit list of about 50 suspected drug kingpins is drawing fierce opposition from Afghan officials, who say it could undermine their fragile justice system and trigger a backlash against foreign troops.

The U.S. military and NATO officials have authorized their forces to kill or capture individuals on the list, which was drafted within the past year as part of NATO's new strategy to combat drug operations that finance the Taliban. The list is thought to include people with close ties to the Afghan government and others who have served as intelligence assets for the CIA and the U.S. military, according to current and former U.S. and Afghan officials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement