Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

Got Pot? It's Legal to Take It on the Plane in Oakland

By Josh Richman, Oakland Tribune. Posted October 19, 2009.


Oakland International Airport may be the nation's only airport with a specific policy letting users of medical marijuana travel with the drug.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Oakland International Airport may be the nation's only airport with a specific policy letting users of medical marijuana travel with the drug.

The policy is spelled out in a three-page document quietly enacted last year by the Alameda County Sheriff's Office. It states that if deputies determine someone is a qualified patient or primary caregiver as defined by California law and has eight ounces or less of the drug, he or she can keep it and board the plane.
Deputies warn the pot-carrying passengers that they may be committing a felony upon arrival when they set foot in a jurisdiction where medical marijuana is not recognized. But they say they don't call ahead to alert authorities on the other end.

"We never have. We're certainly within our right to, but we never have," said Sgt. J.D. Nelson, a spokesman for the sheriff's office. "Our notification of the passengers is for their own safety and well-being."

California voters approved medical marijuana use in 1996, while federal law still bans all possession and use.

But Oakland attorney Robert Raich notes the Code of Federal Regulations says a prohibition on operating a civil aircraft with knowledge that there is marijuana aboard doesn't apply to carrying marijuana that's "authorized by or under any Federal or State statute."

The federal Transportation Security Administration does the screening and when marijuana — or any suspected contraband — is found, the sheriff's deputies are summoned.

Low Profile

Oakland's airport policy was enacted in February 2008, but Raich said he didn't want to publicize it until recently lest the Bush administration change federal regulations, or lest it become an issue in Obama administration drug officials' confirmation hearings.

"All other airports in medical cannabis states should have similar policies but they don't," he said, adding that he hears San Francisco International and Los Angeles International airports are relatively kind to medical marijuana users while airports in Burbank, Ontario and San Diego are not.

Raich, who has seen two of his medical marijuana cases argued before the U.S. Supreme Court and has taught Oakland Police cadets about medical marijuana issues, said medical marijuana users generally didn't have much trouble when Oakland Police used to patrol inside the airport terminals. But that changed when the Alameda County Sheriff's Office took over in mid-2007. That summer TSA screeners referred to deputies a traveling medical-marijuana user from Washington state.

"The sheriff's deputies so harassed this person, it was heart-wrenching," Raich said. "They took his medicine, they broke his bong, they took his edibles. They were threatening him."

'Pinball machine'

Raich said he found that the sheriff's office was unwilling to change its policy. So he consulted various officials including those at the Port of Oakland, which owns and operates the airport.

"I felt like a ball in a pinball machine," he said. "I felt like I'd talked to every single employee at the port and they all seemed sympathetic but they all told me the same thing: 'That's not our policy "... that's the sheriff doing that on his own.' "

Raich eventually went to the Alameda County counsel's office.

That office "finally told (Sheriff Greg Ahern) he had to comply with California law whether he liked it or not, and only then did he adopt a policy," Raich said.
"Greg Ahern is out of touch with the people of California who voted for Prop. 215 and medical cannabis in 1996 and have continued to support it by wide margins ever since," Raich said. Sheriff's spokesman Nelson said the sheriff "neither supports nor opposes the medical marijuana law.

"He's had no position on that," Nelson said. "He's just trying to do the best he can when a state law conflicts with a federal law."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: marijuana, pot, medical marijuana

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
PDX
Posted by: dadanbetty on Oct 19, 2009 2:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was told 2-3 years ago that same is allowed flying our of Portland.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It would be nice to know where we will be safe
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 19, 2009 4:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I refuse to travel for this very reason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Snitches Are Everywhere
Posted by: melpol on Oct 19, 2009 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iron fisted drug laws will remain as the government takes a more flexible approach to medical marijuana. But they will never give up the social control illegal drugs provides. One million police informers are in every corner of the nation. Most of them are illegal drug users. Their ears are wide open for law breakers and enemies of the state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vending Machines for Mary Jane
Posted by: tlwinslow on Oct 19, 2009 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be great if the U.S. decriminalized drugs and allowed them to be taxed, regulated, sold and used like alcohol and tobacco. Too bad, there's such a giant bureaucracy that makes it living off locking people up for it, the question is, what's in it for them?

A step-by-step approach would decriminalize mary jane (MJ) first. One little ole vote in Congress and there could be vending machines selling Marlboro T, M, and M-T blend in every bar, and two kinds of smoking sections in restaurants not one.

Maybe hi tech can finally solve the problem by creating a smokers' space helmet that allows them to smoke in public without emitting a particle of smoke, recycling it or storing it. Then laws can be passed legalizing MJ smoking as long as the helmet is worn. Wanna be the next Bill Gates? Here's your big idea.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Green Festival™ San Francisco November 13-15, 2009
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 19, 2009 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Green Festival™

Welcome to Green Festival™, a joint project of Global Exchange and Green America. We’re celebrating what’s working in our communities—for people, business and the environment. Join us at the nation’s premier sustainability event in San Francisco for 3 days filled with the best in green!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: hi
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 19, 2009 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
spam poster, please delete posts and block poster.

Thanks, Lauren


I sent the message above to AlterNet's report this poster line AFTER I chased the 'tail' off of it. These games are annoying and if law enforcement goons think annoying me is sport, imagine how that group sport adds up to torture.

It does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Local Sheriffs are part of the problem
Posted by: kettleblack on Oct 19, 2009 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sheriff Ahern is an example of how local law enforcement officials try to enforce Federal Law, when they are paid to uphold state and local laws.

"He's just trying to do the best he can when a state law conflicts with a federal law." When it comes to power, they always opt for the most, even when it is clear who signs their paychecks: the State, not the Feds.

Law enforcement officials have been inundated with false propaganda that they believe in, and therefore Pot Is Evil. They have not been told the truth, and so they falsely believe that they are "saving" the society.

Educating the police on the facts should be a priority of the anti-prohibition people, if they want to get the law off our backs.
Police are supposed to protect us, not suppress us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huffington Post
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 19, 2009 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
New Medical Marijuana Policy: Obama Administration Will Not Seek Arrests For People Following State Laws


- Malkin72 I'm a Fan of Malkin72 30 fans permalink

This is the biggest "complication" of legalization.

As far as I know, there is no accurate way to detect how recent pot use is/was so someone stopped for DUI could test positive for pot up to a month after their last use.

I have no good answers for this one.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 AM on 10/19/2009

- KindOne 4 fans permalink

Well I do, you could check California law. You can google it. The issue has gone all the way through our courts, been decided, and reported in the press.

Americans for Safe Access won the case. We also are not having any problems, making me wonder why that little fact is always left out of the news stories. Must be that famous 'liberal' bias we keep hearing about.

The courts have determined that the law will treat pot just like other over the counter and prescribed medicines, basically it is the responsibility of the driver to not drive impaired, something that is very easy for potheads to comply with.

What I would question is why people like you never question the impact on driving of all those other drugs. There are lots of prescription drugs that seriously impact driving, yet law enforcement never makes an issue out of them.

Why are potheads targeted when it is actually older drivers who are killing people?

Could it be because of a religious prejudice? Because I don't know what else it could be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

June, 2008
Posted by: linecrosser on Oct 19, 2009 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a effort to put MJ smoking lounges in the Denver airport. I don't think it worked but all the arguments were sound. Comparing drunk people to stoned people. "Marijuana is safer, why are we driving people to drink" is a fantastic read. I recommend it Highly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Glenn Greenwald, Obama's commendable change in federal drug enforcement policy
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 19, 2009 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Glenn Greenwald

From the comments,

So you want to give Obama credit for not arresting sick and dying people?

That is very white of you.

-- sonofloud


Sorry if it sounds racist, but I have to agree with him 100%. What about all those brown people rotting in jail?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a new trade school in Michigan, Med Gro Cannabis College
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 19, 2009 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A 'growth' industry: training in the medical marijuana field

Retraining for a career in medical marijuana may be a stretch, given the legal risks. But there appears to be no shortage of potential trainees. Crain's says Med Gro has been profitable since it opened. Oaksterdam's Web site says "thousands of students have taken classes with the hope of entering the budding cannabis job field."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

U.S. Support for Legalizing Marijuana Reaches New High
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 19, 2009 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
U.S. Support for Legalizing Marijuana Reaches New High (with graphics)

Doesn't Gallup realize addiction has nothing to do with pot? It is weird to see addiction stuff mixed in with cannabis issues, that is so 20th century. What is wrong with them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

.
Posted by: stacyhinjosa on Nov 11, 2009 11:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry for my English. I have no idea why marijuana is still not legal. Now is the time for legal weed. Nowadays, with the use of a vaporizer, smoking weed is almost perfectly healthy. Vaporizers take away all the negative effects of marijuana. The best herbal vaporizers are now even cheap to buy and great to use. The Obama administration claims to want change yet is not doing anything to reap from the tax potential of legal weed. I think legal weed is inevitable and necessary. The government can't continue trying to police something it can't control. Think about how safer our neighborhoods would be near South Texas and California where drug trafficing is common place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

.
Posted by: stacyhinjosa on Nov 11, 2009 11:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry for my English. I cannot fathom a reason why marijuana is still prohibited. Now is the time for legal weed. Nowadays, by smoking with a vaporizer, smoking weed is almost perfectly healthy. Vaporizers remove all the negative effects of marijuana. The best herbal vaporizers are now even cheap to buy and great to use. The Obama administration claims to want change yet is not doing anything to reap from the tax potential of legal weed. I think legal weed is inevitable and necessary. The government can't continue trying to police something it can't control. Think about how safer our neighborhoods would be near South Texas and California where drug trafficing is common place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My pot flys and so do I
Posted by: zowie on Nov 13, 2009 2:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always take pot on the airplane. I hide it in [bla,bla,bla] and they never find it. They have even patted me down, had a dog close by, and went through all my carry-ons. If it ain't metal, they can't find it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PDX is a nice airpot!!
Posted by: zowie on Nov 13, 2009 2:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I enjoy going through PDX and always have my pot carry-ons!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement