Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

Walter Cronkite Knew a Failed War When He Saw One: Vietnam and the War on Drugs

By Ethan Nadelmann, AlterNet. Posted July 18, 2009.


Later in life, Cronkite became an outspoken crusader to end our nation's disastrous policies on illicit drugs.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Everyone knows Walter Cronkite was "the most trusted man in America" and someone whose rare expressions of personal opinion -- such as on the Vietnam War -- could powerfully influence the views of Middle America. But fewer are aware of a passion of his that he came to relatively late in life -- ending the nation's disastrous war on drugs.

I first learned of Cronkite's interest in the drug war back in 1995, when a producer for The Cronkite Report -- an occasional series on the Discovery Channel -- called to ask for my help on a documentary that he and Cronkite were doing on the drug war. The one-hour report that resulted provided a devastating critique of the nation's drug policies.

Focusing on the lives of three women who had been sentenced to many years in Bedford Hills prison in New York, the program revealed the utter waste of human lives and taxpayer dollars that define the drug war.

Neither Cronkite nor the women involved suggested that they had done nothing wrong. But the extraordinary lengths of the prison terms to which they had been sentenced, for relatively minor participation in the illicit sale of drugs, combined with the impact on their children and families, and the absurd amount of money being spent to punish rather than help and treat -- all this shaped Cronkite's devastating indictment of the drug war.

Walter Cronkite got it -- and he got it early. He knew a failed war when he saw one.

I didn't know, however, if that would be his last word on the subject. Fortunately, it wasn't. In 1998, he joined other prominent individuals in signing a public letter to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan that stated: "We believe that the global war on drugs is now causing more harm than drug abuse itself."

Two women played a pivotal role in Cronkite's involvement thereafter with my organization, the Drug Policy Alliance. The first was Marlene Adler, his longtime assistant, who appreciated Cronkite's commitment to this issue, and I think shared his views as well.

The second was Dr. Mathilde Krim, a friend and neighbor of the Cronkites' in New York, the founder and co-chairwoman of amfAR, the HIV/AIDS research and advocacy organization, and a board member of the Drug Policy Alliance. It was at her home that I first met Cronkite in person. And it was with Krim's and Adler's assistance that Cronkite agreed to join DPA's honorary board and also to sign the fundraising letter that has helped DPA recruit tens of thousands of new members.

He wrote:

I remember. I covered the Vietnam War. I remember the lies that were told, the lives that were lost -- and the shock when, 20 years after the war ended, former Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara admitted he knew it was a mistake all along.

Today, our nation is fighting two wars: one abroad and one at home. While the war in Iraq is in the headlines, the other war is still being fought on our own streets. Its casualties are the wasted lives of our own citizens.

I am speaking of the war on drugs.

And I cannot help but wonder how many more lives, and how much more money, will be wasted before another Robert McNamara admits what is plain for all to see: the war on drugs is a failure.

While the politicians stutter and stall -- while they chase their losses by claiming we could win this war if only we committed more resources, jailed more people and knocked down more doors -- the Drug Policy Alliance continues to tell the American people the truth -- "the way it is."

Few allies have been as important. Cronkite's involvement with DPA and our drug-policy-reform movement raised the sorts of eyebrows that most needed raising. It helped legitimize our cause. And he brought home, both with his words and the mere fact of his commitment, the powerful analogy between the failure of the Vietnam War and the failure of America's longest war -- the war on drugs.

I know he got a kick out of the reactions to his fundraising letters for DPA, whether it was to be attacked by Bill O'Reilly or quoted favorably (just a few weeks ago) by John McLaughlin on his TV show, the McLaughlin Group.

I once asked Cronkite -- at a dinner at Krim's home a few years ago -- whether he had ever tried marijuana. As I recall, he laughed, and said not exactly, except for the "contact high" he might have gotten around CBS's offices back in the 1960s, when smoking was still allowed and not everything smoked was tobacco. Perhaps he said something too about some youthful experiences during World War II -- but I don't remember exactly.

But of course, the issue for him was never about the drugs and whether people used them. What mattered was intellectual honesty, sensible moral judgment and the obligation to speak truth to power, no matter how unwelcome or inconvenient that truth might be. That he was almost 80 years old when he first took on this cause is a testament to his vitality and integrity and an inspiration to me and so many others.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: war on drugs, walter cronkite, drug policy alliance

Ethan Nadelmann is founder and executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Cronkite's Death Marks the Death of a Nation
Posted by: lorenbliss on Jul 18, 2009 1:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As others have said, the death of Walter Cronkite signals the end of an era. I was never one of his fans, though that was a matter of aesthetics only; a New Yorker, I preferred the urbane, sometimes subtle and often caustic intellectuality of David Brinkley to Mr. Cronkite's Midwestern folksiness, and beyond that -- with the signature bias of my generation's daily newspaper editorial departments -- I scorned all U.S. television news as a contradiction in terms even as I envied its salaries.

But I don’t know anyone in journalism whether print or broadcast who ever doubted either Mr. Cronkite’s skill or his ethics, and the notion expressed by a few diehard critics that he willfully disseminated the government’s Big Lie propaganda about the Vietnam War is not only patently absurd but maliciously slanderous.

What such malcontents are too hatefully closed-minded to comprehend is that we journalists are never better than our sources. In my experience the most vivid example both of this trap and how one sometimes escapes it was provided by Jimmy Breslin, in 1966 a columnist for the late and (even now) very much lamented New York Herald-Tribune, in its heyday undoubtedly the best English-language daily ever published anywhere. Mr. Breslin went to Vietnam a flag-waving hawk, spent several weeks there not being cozened at Saigon press-briefings but out humping the boonies with a squad of Brooklyn-born Marines, and returned to the City and his typewriter at The Trib to denounce the war in a blistering column his editors and publisher had the astonishing courage to run on Page One.

Mr. Breslin was, I believe, the first major-influence U.S. journalist to recognize the genuine loathsomeness of the imperialist folly that became known as the Vietnam War, and the conversion Mr. Breslin experienced later became commonplace. That it took Mr. Cronkite a bit longer is more than anything else testimony of the extent to which the technology of broadcast journalism makes it, paradoxically, as factually remote as it can be emotionally intimate.

But the bitter truth of what U.S. journalism has become under its monopolist masters is that neither Mr. Cronkite nor Mr. Breslin would ever be allowed in the newsroom of today, whether print or broadcast. Monitored to strangulation by word-quotas and popularity ratings, reduced to Judith Miller stenographers and Jayson Blair fabulists, today’s journalists are specifically hired to be nothing more than propagandists of the single-party, one-purpose state the U.S. has become -- a state the sole function of which is the perpetuation of capitalism by any means possible: that is, the absolute empowerment of the ruling class and the total subjugation of all the rest of us.

That the United States would become such a Big Business despotism so reduced to ignorance by lies and therefore so hopelessly impervious to change was unthinkable in Mr. Cronkite’s day. Hence it is not just Mr. Cronkite who is missed; it is all that he stood for, especially the commitment to truth, whether in the craft of journalism or in the nation at large. To paraphrase John Donne: the bell that tolls for Walter Cronkite tolls for each and every one of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legalize Marijuana in California
Posted by: ab390 on Jul 18, 2009 2:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter how many people we arrest, it's still easier for high school students to buy pot than beer. Keeping marijuana illegal does not benefit our children. It benefits special interest groups: the alcoholic beverage industry, the prison industry, police departments and their suppliers, government bureaucrats, and drug cartels.

Tell your legislators in Sacramento to legalize marijuana. Visit yes390.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too late Walter
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Jul 18, 2009 4:17 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember Walter's big revelation. Students everywhere prepared for more intnesive demonstrations than ever in early '68. Westmoreland wanted 206,000 more troops. More bombing.

The US military was spying on the antiwar movement. We knew it. Walter must have known it. But he didn't report it. And he promoted the war from the time of his butt boy JFK to the time he magically discovered we were losing during Tet.

Actually we broke the Tet offensive, but the point was that the Viet Communists would never give up, and any retard could see that. Millions of students and progressive activists saw that from 66-69, so where was Walter. Makin the big bucks and sucking off every pol in the country.

He made me sick. I wish a VC shell had ripped his spine apart.

And Walter. Many people didn't give a crap about the moon, and most kids today have no idea what happened up there nor do they care. For me 1969 was another shitty year in Vietnam and Laos thanks to assholes like you and most of the media. The men that should be celebrated are journalists like IF Stone, not a whore like you and Dan Rather who was panting up the crotch of every officer he could find in his time there.

OK Alterneetters. Now you can lambast me. I brought down another one of your heroes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He was a bootlicking lackey Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: He was a bootlicking lackey Posted by: Calamagrostis
» RE: He was a bootlicking lackey Posted by: Longdream
» RE: He was a bootlicking lackey Posted by: Longdream
» RE: summer of '69 Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Uncle Walter
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 19, 2009 5:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a news junkie. Whom, you may ask is responsible for the the info-addiction that I have been trying to live with for over forty years now? My connection's name was Walter Cronkite.

Walter Cronkite died peacefully yesterday at 7:42 PM EST. If you happened to be watching CBS last night, you'll be forgiven for missing this major piece of news. For reasons I can't quite figure out, they decided not to preempt their regularly scheduled programming in honor of the man who, along with Edward R. Murrow, made CBS News. The bulk of last evening's coverage was handled by CNN and the NBC-owned MSNBC.

It was a different world in which Walter Cronkite thrived. Lord only knows how he would have functioned during the age of Twitter and the twits on FOX Noise. That he was unhappy with the direction TV news had taken since his final broadcast on March 6, 1981 is common knowledge. The world of mindless info-tainment saddened and bewildered him. I've often wondered if he ever sat through an entire edition of FOX and Friends - or even a few minutes of it. One can only imagine his reaction.

It is said that television news came of age with the death of John F. Kennedy forty-six years ago. I had vague hopes that cable news, too, would "grow up" after the trauma of September 11, 2001. Apparently those hopes were in vain.

Walter Cronkite is dead and he's not coming back.

Walter Cronkite 1916-2009

Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Giving up so easily? Posted by: Scalpel
» Uncles Walter and Bob Posted by: johnwinthrop
So he opposed the wars in Vietnam & Drugs
Posted by: kettleblack on Jul 19, 2009 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He must have been a Liberal!
Proof that Main Stream Media is Liberal-biased!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Monolithic Malevolence of Media-bashing
Posted by: lorenbliss on Jul 19, 2009 4:07 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point at which both ends of the domestic political spectrum truly join hands -- where the present-day (alleged) Left becomes indistinguishable from the (very real and utterly dominant) Right -- is the savage anti-intellectuality that, in the eyes of the civilized world, has become the defining characteristic of all U.S. politics.

As evident in the (alleged) Left’s reflexive hatred of ideology and analysis as in the Right’s instinctive malice toward science, it is this quality -- this meticulously fostered rejection of intellect and logic -- that, more than any other single factor, defines the United States as a one-party nation.

Precisely as intended by our rulers, it is also what imprisons us in perpetual powerlessness.

But nowhere is the de facto one-party solidarity of the U.S. more evident than in the rabid hatefulness both the (alleged) Left and the (real) Right so often express toward mass media.

Interestingly, it is also a geographic condition.

It is something I almost never encountered in my native New York City, which, not coincidentally, statistics now prove to be the last remaining stronghold of domestic literacy -- and thus of implicitly revolutionary opposition to the relentless reduction of the United States to Moron Nation.

But once I stepped out into “America” -- that proudly nyekulturniy land beyond the Hudson River, that realm of ignorance and bigotry James Baldwin symbolically rejected when he discovered Manhattan is indeed Another Country -- I found not just widespread antagonism toward mass media in general but overt contempt for anyone employed as editors, writers or photographers.

When I was in the South and Middle West, the fact I was a member of the working press still identified me as “probably liberal” and thus earned me near-instant sources in a number of the groups I covered.

But in the Pacific Northwest, my press card and my New York City origin combined to evoke an intensity of hatred from the (alleged) Left the likes of which I had hitherto encountered only from the Ku Klux Right when I was a civil rights activist in the South.

Seattle's (alleged) Left damned me not just as “another media whore” but as “a Jew York intellectual.” It was also in Seattle -- never mind I am a goyischa agnostic -- I learned that violence is as much a tool of the (alleged) Left as it is of sheet-and-pillowcase thugs in East Tennessee

All this said, the attacks on Walter Cronkite evident above are merely expressions of the same savage anti-intellectuality that traps Moron Nation in a miasma from which no escape is possible.

While such accusations are undoubtedly true of today's media employees, they are tragically slanderous when applied to Mr. Cronkite or to most of us who were members of his generation of journalists.

A major part of the tragedy is that this very cacophony of slandering helped hide media’s takeover by Big Business.

It is especially outrageous that one of Mr. Cronkite’s detractors has -- as if to steal an imprimatur for malicious slander -- misappropriated the name of Izzy Stone.

The implicit Big Lie becomes obvious once one Googles I.F. Stone, who not only had the deepest respect of the community to which he and Mr. Cronkite each belonged, but was granted a long litany of professional awards and commendations by many of the same organizations that so honored Mr. Cronkite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Defense secretary says forces must show progress in a year
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Jul 19, 2009 4:41 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Defense secretary says forces must show progress in a year or risk losing public support

"If we can show progress, and we are headed in the right direction, and we are not in a stalemate where we are taking significant casualties, then you can put more time on the Washington clock."

Everybody who wants to "put more time on the Washington clock" raise your hand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For Sister_Lauren: More on One-Party Malice
Posted by: lorenbliss on Jul 19, 2009 7:53 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To describe in more detail what defines the United States as a one-party nation -- that is, what the (real) Right and the (alleged) Left have in common -- it is not just their reflexive rejection of intellect and intellectual process but their venomous hatred and contempt for intellectuals as persons: their bottomless malice toward those of us who regard intellect -- in its broadest sense a synthesis of reason and intuition -- as the only truly meaningful human capability.

This hatefulness was always characteristic of the Right, whether theocratic or secular, simply because the Right recognizes intellect as the medium in which the Mother of Revolution inevitably appears.

Hence the self-destructive anti-intellectuality deliberately metastasized throughout U.S. society by psycholinguistic manipulation: initially via the post-World War II, anti-New Deal purges that turned “intellectual” into a nasty synonym for “subversive,” subsequently by public education and Big Business media.

But that anti-intellectuality did not become characteristic of the U.S. Left until the Vietnam Era, when the draft-exempt bourgeoisie turned viciously against the draft-vulnerable working class.

This not only destroyed what little remained of the New Deal Popular Front but spawned a pseudo-Left of bourgeois values wrapped in progressive language. Its embrace of anti-intellectuality was essential to mask its contradictions: for example the (now alleged) Left’s signature anti-unionism, its relentless war against the poor, and its hate-the-working-class embrace of forcible civilian disarmament.

All of these contradictions are facilitated and maintained by the taboo against rational thinking. This not only prohibits the examination of such issues from the perspective of class conflicts, but forbids acknowledgement of the pivotal truth of class struggle itself.

It is relevant here because the same taboo robs the (alleged) Left of any ability to comprehend the realities of communications media -- no matter whether mainstream or alternative.

This lack of comprehension leads directly to the trashing of Walter Cronkite and his kind because it prevents the (real) Right and the (alleged) Left from understanding the differences between reportable fact and unreportable suspicion.

By necessity -- whether in mainstream or alternative media (my half-century career included work in each realm) -- suspicion must be excluded from news reports until it is confirmed as fact. This is not only mandated by ethics but made imperative by law.

The (alleged) Left’s failure to grasp this reality is self-marginalizing to the point of nullification.

Thus, with not only the ability of effective communication but the essential tool of objective analysis stolen literally at birth, meaningful change is rendered forever impossible.

Thus too the (alleged) Left functions as an archetypical “useful idiot” in service to the (real) Right, producing within itself a smokescreen of distracting noise that, however well-intentioned, most often merely hides our ongoing subjugation.

Which is not to say there are no real Leftists in the United States. There surely are; indeed -- though I bitterly recognize the U.S. is so inescapably trapped in Moron Nation, its conditioned selfishness has probably banished socialism forever -- I myself remain a socialist.

But I know our only hope is the faint possibility the functional example of the European, Asiatic and Latin American Left -- in which the necessity of intellectual process is not just fully recognized but enthusiastically embraced -- may somehow again acquire the same relevance and power here it had from the late 1800s through the end of World War II.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just imagine how horrible it would have been if America won that war
Posted by: RR#1 on Jul 21, 2009 3:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they would not have waited 30 years to go onto their next adventure like they have in Iraq. In that respect the "Vietman Syndrome" was a blessing. Now they have to keep people so poor that they will volunteer to go to war for economic reasons because the economy is so bad there are no other alternatives-and that's the way it is this day July 21, 2009.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Support a sensible marijuana policy
Posted by: greenferret on Jul 21, 2009 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two bills in Congress - the Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act and the Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act - could move federal marijuana policy two big steps forward.
It's time to end the government's senseless and costly war on suffering patients and nonviolent marijuana users.

Tell your members of Congress to support a better marijuana policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lucas
Posted by: itouch backup on Jul 21, 2009 9:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
commitment to truth
Posted by: hahaho on Jul 30, 2009 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That the United States would become such a Big Business despotism so reduced to ignorance by lies and therefore so hopelessly impervious to change was unthinkable in Mr. Cronkite’s day. Hence it is not just Mr. Cronkite who is missed; it is all that he stood for,links of london tiffany especially the commitment to truth, whether in the craft of journalism or in the nation at large. To paraphrase John Donne: the bell that tolls for Walter Cronkite tolls for each and every one of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement