Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

Did Anti-Drug Propaganda Help Bring About a Psychedelic Renaissance?

By Ryan Grim, Wiley Press. Posted July 20, 2009.


As the anti-drug program spread into 3/4 of all school districts by the '90s, America's youth enjoyed a psychedelic renaissance.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following is an excerpt from Ryan Grim's new book, "This Is Your Country on Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America (Wiley, 2009) This is the 2nd excerpt in a series from the book. Read the first excerpt here).

The D.A.R.E. program is now in three-quarters of all school districts, reaching more than twenty-five million American kids. It also has branches in more than fifty nations worldwide. Ironically, it was born just as more than a decade of rising drug use was ebbing among all age groups, including baby boomers, who now had the sorts of responsibilities that can preclude taking recreational drugs: careers, mortgages, and, most important, children.

Apprehensive new moms and dads in the eighties and early nineties helped make D.A.R.E. a global phenomenon, but they were surrounded by countless other sources of parenting help. Best sellers such as Melody Beattie’s Codependent No More and Charles Whitfield’s Healing the Child Within: Discovery and Recovery for Adult Children of Dysfunctional Families, both published in 1987, helped to build a massive market in recovery and wellness literature during the period. Self-esteem, self-actualization, and self-help, pop-psychological leftovers from the individualistic sixties and narcissistic seventies, became buzzwords to live by as millions of Americans were introduced to their “inner child” and the potentially catastrophic consequences of neglecting it. “With our parents’ unknowing help and society’s assistance, most of us deny our Inner Child,” Whitfield writes of this hidden, wounded aspect of the psyche. “When this Child Within is not nurtured or allowed freedom of expression, a false or co-dependent self emerges.”

Motivational speaker John Bradshaw further popularized the notion with his 1990 best seller, Homecoming: Reclaiming and Championing Your Inner Child. He went on to host a ten-part TV special by the same title and to author four more self-help best sellers. Together, his books would sell more than ten million copies. He and Whitfield both identified a national psychological crisis that had been caused by neglectful, unloving, and “spiritually abusive” parents.

They urged boomers not to make the same mistakes while rearing their own children—whether the one within or the ones without. “Give your child permission to break destructive family roles and rules,” advises Bradshaw. “Adopt new rules allowing pleasure and honest self-expression.” He also assures readers that “mistakes are our teachers—they help us to learn.” Kids will make more mistakes than adults, he suggests, because “they have lots of courage. They venture out into a world that is immense and dangerous. Children are natural Zen masters; their world is brand new in each and every moment.” Children, therefore, shouldn’t be held back by rigid rules but allowed the freedom to explore. They shouldn’t be scolded but reasoned with. Parents should be friends and confidants, not authority figures. In a 1990 New York Times article, Wendy Kaminer summed up the codependency movement’s attitude toward parenting: “Shaming children, calling them bad, is a primary form of abuse.”

The movement was strong enough—and ostensibly permissive enough—to disturb some of the more conservative elements of American society. A columnist in Georgia’s Fayette Citizen was perplexed as late as 1998 by the proliferation of “parenting classes,” many taught by folks just out of college. He called one of the programs and spoke to its director. She told him that “the most prevalent problem is improper parental discipline,” which probably reassured spare-the-rod types. But that wasn’t all. “You wouldn’t believe how many parents still don’t realize that under no circumstances should spanking or hitting be used to discipline children,” she added. And “the second most frequent problem,” she said, “is not parents endangering children, but rather parents who try to ‘control’ their children, which stifles self-expression.”


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drug war, psychedelics, ryan grim, dare

Ryan Grim is the senior congressional correspondent for the Huffington Post and can be reached at ryan@huffingtonpost.com. He is author of "This Is Your Country on Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America (Wiley, 2009).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
1990's acid wasn't quite like 1960's acid, but the future awaits still
Posted by: Zuma on Jul 20, 2009 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1990's acid wasn't quite like 1960's acid. it was edgier, grittier, speedier. those are subjective descriptions, i know, but from my experience at least true and accurate even if nonspecific in any chemical sense -i'm no chemist...

which led to another aspect; general dosage differences, specifically 1960's 'heroic' doses vs later more pedestrian lesser dosages, to use terence mckenna's phrase for the pivotal difference, were acutely noticeable. mckenna himself was somewhat a significant distinction from the earlier generation's LSD lightning rod and commentator, tim leary, in many ways. no doubt consciously so at that. mckenna made several good points, not the least of which is the big difference between a trip on a hit of 400-500 micrograms vs. one on one of 100-300. one 500 mike trip is so qualitatively diffferent from one on lesser doses as to beg questions on similarities. with the doses different, the experiences were different, and so too the uses. -and again mind that the acid itself was somewhat different, and generally precluded taking double or triple doses at once.

on a trip under a 'heroic' dose, there comes a point where one is practically functionally disabled at least during the greatest peak. when peaking on a heroic dose, walking and talking become absurdly complex external operations, and one is best left to lie down comfortably and check out what *is* enabled on a whole other plateau. certainly in private -not in public, say attending a concert or something. it's an exponentially greater degree of difference in experience. a young person tripping on lesser doses and availing themselves of the earlier cultural artifacts aren't quite having the same experience as their forebears, and unaware of the difference. the ego dissolution aspect is considerably lessened for one thing. inversely, the earlier heads had those humbling experiences to such degree, they're not too inclined to LSD experience 'snobbery' for one thing and make any point of the distinction -as say terence himself did (not out of any such 'snobbery' i dare to hope to presume, but it made sound that way when listening to his talks). hell, the resurgence at all was welcomed.

another difference between mckenna and leary, a big one, was that mckenna focused less on LSD at all than compared to psilocybin mushrooms, especially given that the mckenna brothers authored a popular book on growing shrooms at home, but that's several different topics all at once...

jimi hendrix's question, 'are you Experienced?' is a key one.

other major points [of heroic dose trips] to consider are those very differences between trips on acid vs. shrooms -LSD doesn't 'talk back' to a user with any sense of presence of the Other.

and then there's the whole very very huge question of ayahuasca, and the corrobable detaled information [in group sessions] it imparts...

lastly, it definitely should be suggested that non-heroic doses of LSD, even sub-psychedelic, have their place and use, such as dealing with alcoholism. no matter how delectable a beer may taste on acid, there's still peculiar detachment from any drunkennness. the research, as i understand, continues, with renewed freedom and vigor.

-earth, like reality (even sans the convention of conventional reality) and the cosm at large, is alive and speaks to us always. one might as well be a flat-earther to ignore that historically important point. and it's mouth coalesces in the amazon. protect and defend the amazon and it's human stewards, now more than ever. -the future awaits still.

http://www.matrixmasters.net/blogs/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» i stand corrected Posted by: Zuma
How many billions of $$$ are we going flush down the toilet on this phony, endless war on drugs???
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jul 20, 2009 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's as much a waste as teaching abstinence to prevent teenage sex!!!

Unfortunately, some people have addictive-type personalities, and they will probably abuse drugs & other things during their lives! Sadly, there is no way to ban or stop this in a free society!

Furthermore, classifying marijuana with heroine, cocaine, etc., is just plain wrong! This is done in large part because the alcohol & tobacco corporations are afraid pot will destroy their profits!

Moreover, as I've said before:

The phony, endless war on drugs has ruined many people's lives while providing police departments, lawyers, judges, the prison industry, DEA, etc., all sorts of job security, bonuses, overtime pay, ever increasing revenue & powers, their own smuggling/dealing/money-laundering opportunities, etc.!!! (And this is just the tip of the rotten, corrupt iceberg!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mother Earth to Humans: wake up
Posted by: doodahman on Jul 20, 2009 11:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The persistence of psychedelics in our society, despite the Nazi like repression that society has imposed on users, is because the hallucinogenic awaking of the human mind is a necessary mechanism for the earth to save itself, or, rather this latest flowering of life. One thing McKenna was also known for postulating was that psylocyben and ergot derivatives are the earth's means of communicating with the sentient beings that inhabit her. It uploads into our noggins the vital truth that we are all part of a complex web in which the destruction of any part is truly a destruction of each of us and all of us. It draws the vital connection between what we think of as the individual and the whole from which it comes.

Or as some aboriginal peoples have described, mushrooms are the medicine that teaches us how to live.

And you can see the effect of its criminalization-- we live in a world run by people who have no goddamn clue how to live.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mother Earth to Humans: wake up Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: Mother Earth to Humans: wake up Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Yep
Posted by: ArizonaRed on Jul 20, 2009 12:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a southern public middle school, circa 1985-86 (in the heyday of Just Say No), the textbook used in the "drug education" segment of my health class gave a wonderfully unbiased and vivid description of what LSD intoxication is like. About 7-8 years later, based partially on what I'd read in that textbook, I tried LSD for the first time. And do not regret it. AND the textbook description was accurate.

I don't know if the description in and of itself was supposed to terrify me into NOT trying it (ie descriptions of hallucinations and synesthesia), but I read it and said to myself, "Now that would be interesting..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anyone remember the book "Go Ask Alice"?
Posted by: kogwonton on Jul 20, 2009 3:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That book was required reading when I was in high school. It was intended to frighten people away from hallucinogenics. It had the opposite effect on me. I was a little too young to have had a taste of that fine LSD-25 that was going around in the sixties, but I did find that one could make up for that by taking more of it. There were unfortunate occasions where the acid was unclean, and that made things a little unpleasant at times. But I would guess that I had managed more than one 'heroic' experience, and I think that the dissolving of the ego experience was well worth the intensity. Sometimes I joke that it is everyone's 'patriotic duty' to have at least one good ego-crushing experience. I found that nothing compared to it, and I think what I gained was of the utmost value in terms of introspection, and my perception of life itself. I've been hammered by those that think it is a useless experience, and worse, that it is dangerous and costly to society. I always respond that 'so is the space program'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dare to grow dendrites
Posted by: tazdelaney on Jul 20, 2009 4:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
good piece, guy.

as terence mckenna, world-class mathematician turned psychedelic proselytist pointed out, dendrite growth is the physiological requisite for learning anyghing new and the more drastically new, the more dendrite growth required. studies show clearly that nothing grows dendrites as rapidly as psychedelics, with music a distant second (the first time you ever heard jazz, for instance), images third and symbol languages way down at 4th. as mckenna, campbell and others pointed out, virtually all native societies use psychedelic substances found in their region, often in shamanic animist ceremonies involving those plants, other magic such as music/dance/art and communal sex. this ages-long deep usage of psychedelics is offered as an explanation for our quickly-developed massive cerebrums making us 'as smart as we are.'

so, naturally, in an unnatural society of organized crime governments and militarized theocracies in which obedient slave-soldier-consumers are preferred and dumbing-down is the uniform 'schooling' and socializing brainwash... anything that makes us smarter, makes us question authority and get creative is precisely anathema.

'DARE to keep kids off propaganda!'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What he said :) Posted by: kogwonton
hmmm
Posted by: tazdelaney on Jul 20, 2009 4:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the first time i did LSD i was 16 and it was at the atlanta pop festival in 1970. i'd wanted to do it since i was 11... i had about $200 on me but before i'd made the decision, the water supply ran out as there were 300,000 hot attendees and the jugs being passed around were laced...

when i started feeling it, figured out what it was. i didn't know about proper dosage or how long acid lasts, but figured more would be better. so i went on a shopping spree an dbought this microdot, that blotter and some windowpane – eating em all like M&Ms.

i'd come especially to see hendrix, airplane and captain beefheart. sadly the latter two didn't show, but by the time hendrix came on stage, me in touching distance of his blue gown – well, i never got any closer to the godhead.

this guy who'd come all the way from philly to see beefheart realized i was quite out there and took care of me for the weekend. like many there, and something good LSD inspires, i was buck naked and virtually oblivious of it. i have no idea how i got back to durham, north carolina, seeing like bosch and max ernst... i'm about to buy the video of that event which i just located, should be quite a treat.

while historians still wrongly claim that the mythology we all know was the religion of the greeks, bah. their deep spiritual tradition was the eleusinian mysteries and its sex and psychedelics initiation rite for those in their mid-teens for whom the moment for revelation was at hand, if it ever would be.

it's been over a decade since i last had trustworthy acid, sigh, guess i'll have to go to amsterdam where a gram of liquid LSD (1200 300mic hits) is said to cost $15k. i used to prefer at least 500mics. sadly, i understand that these days, an average dose is more like 100mics, not as powerful as good pot, so lots of kids really haven't had the full experience, yet think they have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hmmm Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: hmmm Posted by: Johnny Hempseed
hmmm 2
Posted by: tazdelaney on Jul 20, 2009 5:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in 2004 or so, the bush DEA or drug czar's office put out some flagrantly false disinformation about drugs. when some groups protested this, a court ruled that it was perfectly legal for the government to invent data as it saw fit. it does so about everything else; so why not about drugs...

remember back in the late 1960s when the govt stated that its studies showed that LSD 'broke chromosomes and would likely lead to mutants and birth defects'? pure pseudo-science... as came out from a participating whistleblower, massive amounts of liquid LSD had been injected into rats testicles... as tim leary pointed out, if they'd injected as much water or, heheheh, liquefied communion wafers, into testicles - the resulting broken chromosomes would have been the same...

as a lifelong multimedia artist {http://home.roadrunner.com/~madlaney/taz/spell1.html}, drug use has been a seriously beneficial stimuli and tool, (as it has been throughout history and shamanic prehistory.) while largely in the 1970s, but on occasion since, i've done psychedelics some 300 times in my life. it has been more important to me than what was laughingly termed 'education'...

to have spent my life ruled by vicious mass-murdering idiots like LBJ, nixon, reagan, bush, clinton, bush, obamabush has been like some really dark joke. torture a teenager at gitmo and get a medal. get busted for your 'pursuit of happiness' harming none and go to prison for years.

with the exception of nazi psych pharma crystal meth, which does indeed drill tiny pinholes in the brain... i've yet to read any truthful anti-drug material. considering my drug use over the past 42 years, if the drugwar disinfo were true; i wouldn't be able to make a mudpie. my guess is that w bush couldn't play me a decent game of chess...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm one of those 90s acidheads
Posted by: khaleesi on Jul 21, 2009 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The acid phenomenon left me wiser than I could have ever hoped to have been otherwise. I loved acid for all its good and bad experiences. It was like being born again all the time or stepping into another dimension. Acid is a harmless drug to those who can deal with the truth in its entirety. It is a shame it is illegal. I cannot imagine what kind of intellectual achievements we may have today otherwise. That being said, the worst thing about the 90s acid boom was that it went away. It was everywhere and then it seemed like the chemists died or something wtf?! I miss acid and all of its experience tremendously!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nowadays...
Posted by: GradientConsequence on Jul 21, 2009 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is most definitely still acid daze. Actually the past few years, even despite the bust in Kansas, there has been quite a resurgence in supply of good, pure, heady, medicinal lsd, i know this first hand. You people claiming it isn't to be found or trusted must not be in the scene still or something, cause its plentiful (esp. this year!).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Support sensible marijuana policy
Posted by: greenferret on Jul 21, 2009 11:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two bills in Congress - the Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act and the Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act - could move federal marijuana policy two big steps forward. It's time to end the government's senseless and costly war on suffering patients and nonviolent marijuana users.

Tell your members of Congress to support a better marijuana policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

blare premire
Posted by: itouch backup on Jul 24, 2009 1:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement