Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

This Is Your Government on Drugs

By David Sirota, Creators Syndicate. Posted April 4, 2009.


Some politicians are starting to acknowledge the tragic absurdity of the war on drugs. But we have a long way to go.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Finally, a little honesty.

Now that America has frittered away billions of taxpayer dollars arming Latin American death squads, airdropping toxic herbicide on equatorial farmland and incarcerating more of its own citizens on nonviolent drug charges than any other industrialized nation, two political leaders last week tried to begin taming the most wildly out-of-control beast in the government zoo: federal narcotics policy.

It started with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton stating an embarrassingly obvious truth that politicians almost never discuss. In a speech about rising violence in Mexico, she said, "Our insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade," and added that "we have co-responsibility" for the cartel-driven carnage plaguing our southern border.

She's right, of course. For all the Rambo-ish talk about waging a "War on Drugs" that interdicts the supply of narcotics, we have not diminished demand -- specifically, demand for marijuana that cartels base their business on.

According to the Office of National Drug Control Policy, Americans spend about $9 billion a year on Mexican pot.

Add that to the roughly $36 billion worth of domestically produced weed, and cannabis has become one of the continent's biggest cash crops. As any mob movie illustrates, mixing such "insatiable" demand for a product with statutes outlawing said product guarantees the emergence of a violent black market -- in this case, one in which Mexican drug cartels reap 62 percent of their profits from U.S. marijuana sales.

That last stat, provided by the White House drug czar, is the silver lining. Every American concerned about Mexico's security problems should be thankful that the cartels are so dependent on marijuana and not a genuinely hazardous substance like heroin.

Why? Because that means through pot legalization, we can bring the marijuana trade out of the shadows and into the safety of the regulated economy, consequently eliminating the black market the cartels rely on. And here's the best part: We can do so without fearing any more negative consequences than we already tolerate in our keg-party culture.

Though President Barack Obama childishly laughed at a question about legalization during his recent town hall meeting, his government implicitly admits that marijuana is safer than light beer. Indeed, as federal agencies acknowledge alcohol's key role in deadly illnesses and domestic violence, their latest anti-pot fearmongering is an ad campaign insisting -- I kid you not -- that marijuana is dangerous because it makes people zone out on their couches and diminishes video-gaming skills.

(This is your government on drugs: Cirrhosis and angry tank-topped lushes beating their wives are more acceptable risks than stoners sitting in their basements ineptly playing Halo ... any questions?).

Despite this idiocy, despite polls showing most Americans support some form of legalization, and despite such legalization promising to generate billions of dollars in tax revenue, Clinton only acknowledged the uncomfortable reality about demand. That’s certainly no small step, but she did not address drug-policy reform. Confronting that taboo subject was left to Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va.

Last week, this first-term lawmaker proposed creating a federal commission to examine potential changes to the prison system, including a relaxation of marijuana statutes.

Webb hails from a conservative-leaning swing state whose criminal-justice laws are among the nation's most draconian, so there's about as much personal political upside for him in this fight as there is for Clinton -- that is to say, almost none. That isn't stopping him, though.

"The elephant in the bedroom in many discussions on the criminal justice system is the sharp increase in drug incarceration," he said in a speech, later telling the Huffington Post that pot legalization "should be on the table."

Finally, a little honesty -- and now, maybe, some action.

Copyright 2009 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drugs, webb, marijuana, clinton, mexico

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, The Uprising, was released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network -- both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
enough already!!
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Apr 4, 2009 12:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there does NOT need to be yet another commission or study...from 1974 onward the government's OWN researchers have found and admitted that cannabis is relatively harmless (one stating it's no worse than coffee) and should be legalized...DEA administrative judge young said at the very least cannabis should be available medicinally...enough is enough. and this doesn't even begin to address the economic benefits of industrial hemp...enough is indeed enough!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: With gay marriage legal in Iowa Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Sirota's Party Hack Myopia
Posted by: aahpat on Apr 4, 2009 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clinton stating the obvious was a ploy to get Mexican President Calderon off our back about our part in the mess on the Mexican border. She was not starting some dialogue for reform as Sirota vaguely implies and as Sen. Web forthrightly asserts. It is disingenuous misrepresentation of the Clinton statement to say otherwise.

Clinton is part of an administration that came to power with misrepresentations and vague innuendo about reform that has turned into greater escalation and militarization of the drug war than even Bush imposed. When Clinton mentioned American demand what went unsaid, and what Democratic Party hack Sirota ignored, was $3-billion in Byrne drug task force grant money that the administration included in the 'stimulus' package to stimulate more arrests, more drugs courts, more police and more prisons for drug users. Even the Bush administration tried to zero these grants out as the pure pork that they are.

It makes me angry to see hacks like Sirota draw false associations between the great efforts of Sen. Webb the conn games of the proven drug warrior Hillary 'for the children' Clinton. Hell, her husband gave America its world record prison population. The commission recommended by Webb would look specifically at the prohibition escalations of Clinton's prohibitionist husband.

On top of it all Sirota draws a false distinction between the pot black markets and the black markets for other drugs. Foolish. Prohibition economics are not nearly as simplistic as Sirota implies. The rapid growth of Mexican cartel meth production and distribution into and across America since the Senators Obama, Clinton and Biden co-sponsored the 2005 combat Meth Act demonstrates that when you deprive a distributor of one black market another distributor will simply take it over. Deprive the cartels only of pot and they will rapidly grow the other markets. Meth, heroin and God only knows what else. See my essay: IMPEACH OBAMA, BIDEN & CLINTON!

If pot is legalized it will compel the cartels to expand other drug business. In the process it will drive the anarchistic cartels into the hands of the major heroin producers in the world, the Taliban and alQaida.

America cannot responsibly legalize just marijuana. It must regulate all of the intoxicant drugs or it simply leaves more dangerous substances in the hands of the voracious anarchistic predators who today instigate the need for this debate about legalization of pot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sirota's Party Hack Myopia Posted by: Vulcanflu
» Go Sister! Go, go! Posted by: aahpat
» Try Reading What you Write Posted by: aahpat
» We Almost Agree Posted by: aahpat
» RE: We Almost Agree Posted by: MaudDib
» RE: We Almost Agree Posted by: aahpat
» Wrong! Posted by: aahpat
Jim Webb's Courage, By Glenn Greenwald
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Apr 4, 2009 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jim Webb's Courage

Found at the totally awesome issue oriented news site, Cannabis News

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CNBC for marijuana legalization!
Posted by: DignityForAll on Apr 4, 2009 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, this debate from CNBC is super encouraging. (from 30 Mar 2009?)

The Agitator, Legalization Debate

"Former DEA chief Asa Hutchinson is the only person on CNBC’s (oddly enormous) panel arguing against legalization. These aren’t stoners or activists. They’re financial reporters and pundits. And they seem to be uniformly in favor of legalizing. This debate has come a long, long, way since the 1980s."

One of the panelists makes a good point near the end, drug laws have been kept in place mostly by "inertia". It's possible to have rapid repeal of drug prohibition, if people speak out. Sensible to keep an eye on the alcohol industry or the private-prison industry, but no need to exaggerate their power in shaping drug policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: more negative consequences than we already tolerate in our keg-party culture.
Posted by: stellabloo on Apr 4, 2009 6:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the epitome of human civilization that we claim to be, we certainly spend a lot of time re-inventing the wheel, don't we?

The British Empire commissioned a study on the use of ganja in India and its effects on a society where it had been used for thousands of years.

The Canadian government commissioned a study on the non-medicinal use of drugs during the Trudeau years.

Dr Lester Grinspoon, Harvard professor emeritus, spent years researching the effects of marijuana, starting under the Nixon administration, and now champions its use.
www.marijuana-uses.com/

The controversy about the presence of THC in the body of an olympic athlete exists because marijuana has the potential to be a PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING drug. So much for the stereotypical 'stoner'.

Any more negative consequences - what negative consequences? A slump in the sale of anti-depressants? People would just go to bed after a couple of beers and a toke? Young people would respect the law?

Same old reefer madness, watered down in an attempt to make it more 'modern and relevant'. I don't expect the cops and the bulls and the lawyers to be swelling the ranks of the unemployed anytime soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All voices must be heard
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Apr 6, 2009 2:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» RE: Comcast is in on it Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Tell Obama: end prohibition, legalize marijuana
Posted by: greenferret on Apr 6, 2009 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's well past time to end the failed, destructive policy of marijuana prohibition.

Tell Obama and your elected representatives that marijuana should be legalized and taxed; just like alcohol.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I really am so tired of this
Posted by: Juven on Apr 6, 2009 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the only solution is ending prohibition. Think back in history and show me one time that concept worked; never.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama Plans Intensified Pot Arrests
Posted by: aahpat on Apr 9, 2009 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our Drug Warrior president Barack Obama Plans Intensified Pot Arrests

Attorney General, Eric H. Holder Jr., in an interview with the New York Times in Mexico City:

"And with marijuana sales central to the drug trade, Mr. Holder said he was exploring ways to lower the minimum amount required for the federal prosecution of possession cases."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Solution for Afghan opium growers
Posted by: jwg on Apr 13, 2009 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If marijauna was legal in the US then opium farmers in Afganistan could shift to a more rewarding crop than wheat or oats. They know how to grow better pot and hash anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DRUGS KILL AND HURT CHILDREN
Posted by: ds1st on Apr 14, 2009 8:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I adopted a drug addict’s child. She is retarded and feeds through a tube.

DRUGS HURT CHILDREN.

The only reason PELOSI and FRANKS want DRUGS LEGALIZED is to RE-ENSLAVE the BLACK COMMUNITY. These RACIST WHITE LIBERAL DEMOCRAT LEADERS want our children to be their slaves and do their pathetic bidding.

!!NO WAY to the RACIST DEMOCRATS PARTY!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement