Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

New York Lightens Up on Some of the Harshest Drug Laws in the Country

By Steven Wishnia, AlterNet. Posted April 3, 2009.


Let's hope the changes mark the beginning of the end of New York's Rockefeller drug laws.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

New York State is about to enact major changes in its Rockefeller drug laws, which contain some of the harshest mandatory-minimum sentences in the nation. The activists who've been trying to repeal those laws for years say it's a very welcome move but doesn't go far enough.

"I think it's a really positive step forward. It is not the end of the Rockefeller drug laws, but hopefully, it's the beginning of the end," says Caitlin Dunklee of the Drop the Rock campaign, an umbrella group campaigning to repeal the laws.

The bill "breaches the mandatory-sentencing wall," adds Robert Gangi of the Correctional Association of New York, the prison-reform group behind Drop the Rock. It might divert half the state's convicted drug felons from prison, the group estimates.

The bill came about as part of a deal among the "three men in a room" who control New York's government: Gov. David Paterson, state Senate Majority Leader Malcolm Smith, and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, all Democrats. They agreed to include it in the state's budget, so it would not be voted on separately. After several days of delay, the state Senate approved the bill on a 32-30 party-line vote on Thursday, April 2. Paterson has promised to sign it.

The new law eliminates the mandatory minimum of a year in prison for first offenders charged with Class B felonies (sale of up to 1/2 ounce of cocaine or heroin, or possession with intent to sell) and first or second offenders charged with lesser felonies (such as possession of 1/2 gram of cocaine). It also expands drug treatment and other alternatives to incarceration. Second offenders charged with B felonies, who now face an automatic 4 1/2 to 9 years, might be able to get treatment instead of prison if they can prove they're drug-dependent.

On the other hand, the bill retains the mandatory-minimum sentences for all other accused dealers, and only about one-eighth of the state's 13,400 drug prisoners will be able to apply for reduced sentences.

The old law, Silver said in a statement, "has not impacted crime or reduced addiction, but, rather, has led to a massive increase in New York's prison population."

Drug offenders make up one-fifth of the state's male inmates and one-third of the female inmates. More than 90 percent of them are black or Latino, and about 40 percent are incarcerated for possession charges.

Paterson was arrested at a civil-disobedience protest against the Rockefeller laws in 2002, when he was a state senator representing Harlem, but he has taken a more cautious stance since he succeeded Eliot Spitzer as governor last year. He objected to several provisions in a drug-law bill passed by the Assembly in March.

Gangi credits activist pressure for getting him to compromise. The deal was reached on the night of March 25, a few hours after about 250 people demonstrated outside the governor's Manhattan offices.

"We heard that Paterson's staffers were asking, 'Can we make a deal before the rally?' " Gangi says.

According to Paterson spokeswoman Marissa Shorenstein, the governor agreed to end mandatory minimums for second offenders charged with felonies below Class B, and to allow drug prisoners to apply for resentencing.

But he insisted that accused drug offenders who wanted treatment instead of prison would have to plead guilty first, on the grounds that the threat of prison would make drug users more likely to stick with treatment. The governor's philosophy is "treat, don't punish, but treat to be effective," Shorenstein explains.

The bill also revives the Rockefeller law's original 15-years-to-life sentences, this time for "kingpins" convicted of selling more than $75,000 worth of drugs.

The state's prosecutors largely oppose easing the law. And the New York Daily News editorial page, long a loud voice for the "fry 'em" approach to crime, called the proposed changes the "Drug Dealer Protection Act" and said they would unleash a crime wave.

New York's current drug laws date from 1973, when Gov. Nelson Rockefeller was facing two problems. First, heroin-related crime was exploding, with dope fiends funding their habits with muggings and burglaries and dealers killing each other in business disputes.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drugs, prison reform, rockefeller drug laws, mandatory-minimum sentenc

Steven Wishnia is a New York journalist and musician. The author of Exit 25 Utopia and The Cannabis Companion, he has won two New York City Independent Press Association awards for his coverage of housing issues. He is looking for a job.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
My fear
Posted by: aahpat on Apr 3, 2009 5:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that all that these minor reforms to sentencing and prison conditions do is make the status quo of drug prohibition more palatable and acceptable. When the fact is that there should be no drug war packing American prisons with young, mostly minority, Americans.

It is the drug war that has no humanity bringing more humanity to the institutions that facilitate and enforce the inhumane prohibition simply drags on the inhumanity.

Reforming the sentencing laws while continuing to lock people up for the disease of addiction and the simple non-conformist act of pot smoking does nothing to change the statistics in this report:

Drug Arrests and Race in the United States
MARCH 2, 2009
Decades of Disparity
This 20-page report says that adult African Americans were arrested on drug charges at rates that were 2.8 to 5.5 times as high as those of white adults in every year from 1980 through 2007, the last year for which complete data were available. About one in three of the more than 25.4 million adult drug arrestees during that period was African American.Download full report (PDF, 535 KB)
Download full report with cover (PDF, 585.04 KB)
Purchase a printed copy of this report

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tell Obama: end prohibition and legalize marijuana
Posted by: greenferret on Apr 3, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The harder we push today, the sooner the injustice of prohibition will end.

It's past time to end the failed, destructive policy of marijuana prohibition.

Tell Obama and your elected representatives that marijuana should be legalized and taxed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I answered my own question again Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Repugs. oppose reforming the laws because of jobs?
Posted by: aussidawg on Apr 3, 2009 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Many activists also believe that upstate Republicans oppose reducing drug sentences because prisons are one of the few sources of steady jobs in the region, whose economy has been slumping since the 1970s."

This statement says it all. The repuglucans want to keep the draconian laws so they have more prisoners to create jobs for prison employees? They have no problem with destroying people's lives with drug charges/imprisonment as long as people can make money by doing so?!? I wonder how these people sleep at night.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I know how they sleep Posted by: linecrosser
» saying it all Posted by: YogiBear
caronome
Posted by: Bayardtom on Apr 3, 2009 1:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The beat goes on and on and on. The answer is so simple. Legalize marijuana completely, not just for medical purposes but completely. Take all drugs out of the hands of the criminals and provide treatment for addicts. The governor of New York has it almost right. He proposes a treatment plan if people plead guilty. The hope is that this is the beginning of the end for the Rockefeller laws that have caused the most outlay for new jails and the most arrests and jail for drug addicts.

Lets cross the pond and study what England does in this area. They seem to have found a better approach to the drug problem. If we could only convince the puritanical poops in Congress of the idea we could save lives and billions of dollars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ease of access Posted by: YogiBear
Any step in the right direction
Posted by: notmom on Apr 3, 2009 3:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is worth taking, since "every journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step."

That said, it should, perhaps, be noted that New York state's repeal in 1923 of its Mellon-Gage (alcohol) prohibition enforcement statute arguably hammered the first nail in the coffin of that lamentably failed attempt to legislate "morality." The alleged thought process behind the repeal was that, if the Feds wanted Prohibition, the Feds should be responsible for enforcing it; the state didn't want to spend the money and endure the diversion of law enforcement from investigating and making arrests for other, more "serious" and violent crimes.

In which case, I see no problem at all with history repeating itself!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Can you imagine Posted by: Sister_Lauren
PATTERSON and NEW YORK LEGISLATORS are IDIOTS
Posted by: ds1st on Apr 3, 2009 7:39 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let’s let the BASTARDS that would KILL or ENSLAVE our CHILDREN through DRUGS out of jail.

The LEGISLATORS and PATTERSON are BLIND wanker WINKIES!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're wrong about one thing Posted by: thornwolf
New York decriminalized pot many years ago
Posted by: thornwolf on Apr 4, 2009 2:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In New York, possession of user quantities of marijuana is a violation, equivalent to a parking ticket, and not a crime. You can have almost an ounce of pot in your possession and receive no more than a ticket for it. Simply answer the ticket, pay the fine, and walk away.

Try not to be caught with four ounces or more, though, because according to NY law that means you're trafficking and that is a big-time no-no. But you can keep a little stash, twist one up and relax.

Hey, California is about to say it's ok for medical marijuana users to drive. Makes sense. One former cop I know told me that he could always spot the pot smokers on the road. He says they're the ones driving down the center of the lane at precisely the speed limit. I think that says something.

Personally, I'd rather be chauffeured by a stoner than a drinker any day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

2 billion years in served in prison misery
Posted by: TrollTreason on Apr 4, 2009 4:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets not forget about those 50 million felonies and the 15 million people on social security due to the drug war making these cheaply manufactured substances toxic and unaffordable. ALL THESE PEOPLES LIVES WERE DELIBERATELY DESTROYED BY THE DRUG WAR. How about the peaceful pot smoker who is forced to deal with thugs and is introduced to heroin or crack in his search for some smoke????

The drug war is a funding mechanism for crime, treason, The Mafia, terrorist organizations and a war on the American people and their constitutional rights of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.. JUST LIKE IT WAS PLANNED TO BE! Anyone who supports this phony war is a traitor!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's still the Federal DEA to deal with.
Posted by: CarlaWaters on Apr 4, 2009 5:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wouldn't they trample upon state's rights such as these? I don't support such tyranny but knowing the DEA's history, those devils will do almost anything to keep the drug war going.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Upstate NY MJ Offenders Do More State Prison Time...
Posted by: picket on Apr 4, 2009 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The DA's need the numbers to get re-elected. The Republican State Senators care nothing for human rights violations or the break-up of families. Prisons = employment Prisons = re-election

In NY 25 grams or less is a citation but 3rd offense of 25 grams or less becomes a misdemeanor. [28.34 grams = 1oz] Over 25 grams is a misdemeanor. I do not know if these laws will be changed with the new reforms.
http://normal.org....States Guide to MJ Laws

MJ needs to be taken out of Schedule 0ne, it is NOT a narcotic or addictive.

Drug treatment will be expensive for occasional MJ users in NY and they will have to admit to an addiction to avoid prison. MJ use for pain or other medical conditions is considered an addiction. Taking legal pain meds for legitimate reasons is not considered an addiction, although one CAN and probably will become physically addicted to the prescription drug.

There are people in New York State Prisons with Class C or D MJ Possession Charges, doing more time than Violent or Sex Offenders. If a MJ offender breaks his/her conditional release even if it is not for another arrest or for failing a drug test, the MJ offender may be doing something like five years total time or MORE. This is cruel punishment but Parole Board Members sleep very well @ night,anyway.

MJ use is part of the fabric of society, generation X or Y ers know, even Baby Boomers know if they are honest. That is why groups LAUGH when MJ is discussed in a crowd.

Save Society a lot of $$$$$$ and cruelty to humans. LEGALIZE MJ.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

medical issue
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Apr 4, 2009 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drug use and addiction need to be treated as a medical issue, not a criminal one.

We need a completely new paradigm for dealing with the problem of drug use. Including prescription drug use, which under my plan, all drugs would be prescription. It should never be easy to get a prescription to a truly harmful and addictive substance like heroin. Only certified addicts should be given the legal means to obtain heroin and it should be given in a medically safe way.

Pot, on the other hand, should be sold OTC and taxed and regulated like beer.

A massive education program should be implemented to give young people the HEALTH knowledge they need to keep them healthy, both physically and mentally. Being healthy means not abusing drugs. It also means not eating crap food all the time.

Drug use is a health issue. Treating it as a criminal issue is counterproductive and barbaric.

Granny's crazy videos Go get a chuckle!

Luv,
Granny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just hearing the name Rockefeller
Posted by: linecrosser on Apr 4, 2009 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The name Rockefeller literally makes me ill. It is the iconic name for corruption. But I know that on the verge of tasting my latest meal a second time, I can just smoke a joint to cure my nausea.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Passing a Bill is all about Money
Posted by: NickA on Apr 4, 2009 2:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just another way of a corporation getting money from the government.

Now, they pretend it is the name of health. "Just agree you are guilty and need help." Then, the government will pay us to help you ... instead of imprisoning you.

We all know the answer is to legalize drugs. Yes, Marijuana should be legalized. But, it seems the others should also be legalized. Then, let the market sort things out. After law suits etc only the non harmful drugs will survive.

And in all cases, those who are sick should get help.

Until the people get the strength to fight big business, drugs will never be legal. And almost everything free will be worthless.

The air is polluted. Want clean air, pay for it. The water is polluted, want clean air, pay for it. Funny part is, it is the corporations who pollute it, and it will be the corporations who sell the "clean version of it."

Welcome to bigger thinking.

Nick

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Non-addictive pain medicines
Posted by: VH on Apr 4, 2009 8:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is known that chemists can manufacture non-addictive pain medicine. Then, why don't they?

Perhaps the Rockefellers - of both the NY Rockefeller Medical/Cancer Centers and the NY State Prison System - would care to enlighten us.

http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/epstein/aof2.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

By law, the drug czar must oppose any attempt to legalize
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Apr 5, 2009 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally, I think this needs to be corrected.

From statute, Title VII Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998: H11225, "and take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use..."

This law is is in clear violation of the constitution, not to mention a whole host of other protective laws. There is a legal framework to go after them, there has just been a lack of political will.

As a member of the group of people (Hippies) who have been especially targeted for this ethnic cleansing, I really resent it. It is time for these people to be called exactly what they are. Look what they are actually doing to people!

How did they get away with doing this for so long? Because the press, many religious 'leaders' and most all politicians refused to care about them in the slightest. Pretty damn sick if you ask me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Legalization Debate Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Legalization debate, my eye Posted by: Sister_Lauren
There's little sympathy for drug users...
Posted by: YogiBear on Apr 5, 2009 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...in the general society. I work at a small newspaper office, but I'm the only one there -- even among the "liberals" who thinks (or admits to thinking) that drugs should be decriminalzed or legalized. It's astounding the number of minor offense drugs that get people a night in jail, and therefore permanent community condemnation, loss of job, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement