Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

Stop Subsidizing Mexican Drug Gangs

By Bruce Mirken, AlterNet. Posted March 23, 2009.


The horrifying drug-war violence south of our border with Mexico continues to worsen, and we're the ones subsidizing it.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The horrifying drug-war violence south of our border with Mexico continues to worsen: beheadings, killings that now number several thousand at least, honest officials in fear for their lives. It's time to put an end to U.S. policies that subsidize these murderous drug gangs.

According to U.S. and Mexican officials, some 60 percent of the profits that fuel these thugs come from just one drug, marijuana. While much is smuggled over the border, an increasing amount is produced in the U.S. by foreign gangs operating on American soil -- often in remote corners of national parks and wilderness areas.

Every year, we read more headlines about clandestine marijuana farms being uncovered on these precious, environmentally sensitive public lands. These rogue farms not only pose a threat to hikers and the environment, they cost taxpayers more than a billion dollars each year in eradication and clean-up efforts.

This appalling situation, which now carries a real risk of destabilizing Mexico, is not just happenstance. It is the direct result of U.S. policies.

Like it or not, marijuana is a massive industry. Some 100 million Americans admit to government survey-takers that they've used it, with nearly 15 million acknowledging use in the past month.

That's a huge market -- more Americans than will buy a new car or truck this year, or that bought one last year. Estimates based on U.S. government figures have pegged marijuana as the number one cash crop in America, with a value exceeding corn and wheat combined.

Our current policies are based on the fantasy that we can somehow make this massive industry go away. That's about as likely as the Tooth Fairy paying off the national debt.

We haven't stopped marijuana use -- indeed, federal statistics show a roughly 4,000 percent rise since the first national ban took effect in 1937 -- but we have handed a virtual monopoly on production and distribution to criminals, including those brutal Mexican gangs.

There is a better way. After all, there's a reason these gangs aren't smuggling wine grapes.

We've seen this movie before. During the 13 dark years of alcohol Prohibition, ruthless gangsters like Al Capone and “Bugs” Moran had a monopoly on the lucrative booze market. So lucrative, in fact, that these scoundrels would routinely gun each other down rather than let a competitor share their territory. Sound familiar?

Today, the bloodbath is taking place in cities like Tijuana and Juarez, Mexico, but it's beginning to spill across our border. Prohibition simply doesn’t work – not in the 1930s and not now.

The chief of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s Mexico and Central America Section recently told the New York Times that marijuana is the “king crop” for Mexican cartels. He added that the plant “consistently sustains its marketability and profitability.”

The situation is so intolerable that three former presidents of Mexico, Colombia and Brazil have recently joined the chorus calling for a shift in U.S. marijuana policy.

There is no reason to believe that our nation’s current marijuana policies are reducing the use and availability of marijuana. Indeed, in the Netherlands -- where, since the mid 1970s, adults have been permitted to possess and purchase small amounts of marijuana from regulated businesses -- the rate of marijuana use is less than half of ours, according to a recent World Health Organization study. More importantly, the percentage of teens trying marijuana by age 15 in the Netherlands is roughly one-third the U.S. rate.

By taking marijuana out of the criminal underground and regulating and taxing it as we do beer, wine and liquor, we can cut the lifeline that makes these Mexican drug gangs so large and powerful. And at the same time we'll have a level of control over marijuana production and distribution that is impossible under prohibition.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drugs, mexico, u.s., war on drugs, cartels

Bruce Mirken is communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Absolutely!
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 23, 2009 1:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Legalization, regulation and licensing of drug distribution is the only way to deprive criminals, cartels and terrorists of billions of dollars. And the only way to protect children from premature exposure to drug use.

Today, drugs are distributed by abusers, addict dealers and gangsters. All of whom have a vested interest in growing their market to new generations. None of whom share society's morals and ethics about preventing children from getting drugs. In a legal and regulated market distribution system the profits, morals and ethics of drug sales will come under responsible adult supervision. For the first time in American history.

My one question to Bruce Mirken. Seeing as how the only thing that has ever, in the history of America, gotten politicians to change bad policies is thousands of Americans in the streets screaming at the politicians to adopt change, WHEN will Marijuana Policy Project start organizing street protest against the escalation and militarization of the Mexican/American border in the name of the war on drugs?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's time
Posted by: Dr T on Mar 24, 2009 4:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an addiction psychiatrist, I see two current example of how our War on Drugs is killing us - literally.

First, over 6000 people were killed last year in drug business crime along the Mexican border and over 1000 dead so far this year. The U.S.-Mexican border is becoming a lawless, ungovernable area hazardous to residents and tourists.

We’ve seen this before during our experiment with alcohol prohibition in the 1920s and ‘30s. Crime was rampant, law enforcement increasingly corrupt, and alcohol easy to get. It wasn’t alcohol that was the problem, it was the prohibition. Al Capone didn’t kill people because he was a drunk.

We solved the drug business lethality by legalizing and regulating alcohol sales and use.

Second, opioid-based analgesics (e.g., oxycodone) are in very short supply because pharmaceutical companies cannot get enough raw opium to make these prescription medications. This results in more human suffering.

One of the largest suppliers of opium is Afghani farmers. However our policy is to poison their poppies, increase opium’s price, and leave the profits to those who would create terror and fanatical oppression.

We could solve many of the problems in our war in Afghanistan by setting up a free market system to buy raw opium so that people in pain will have access to analgesics. The good money Afghani farmers would make would entice them to be our allies in a saner social and economic system and, since money usually trumps ideology, many insurgents would follow the money. Those Taliban and Al Qaeda who would abhor this system would have to come out of the mountains and into the valleys to attack us and Afghanis who support our policies, an ideal situation made for United States Marine Corp. helicopters and snipers,

Continued maintenance of our War on Drugs is psychotic in concept and increasingly lethal in outcome. End the drug prohibitions, legalize all drugs, and regulate them only based on their harm not to individual health (i.e., alcohol and tobacco are among the most harmful and are legal and regulated) but to public health.

It’s time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dr. T you are 100% right Posted by: aahpat
» RE: It's time Posted by: jakelivesay
Mary Jane
Posted by: electron on Mar 24, 2009 4:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war on drugs has been nothing but an expensive joke. Legalize now and take all the criminal aspect of it out of the equation. We need tax dollars to stimulate the economy, let them smoke a little pot to help out. The snack and fast food industry will also increase in profits. If we legalize we can control and tax it, pretty simple math.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rubbish
Posted by: cjennmom on Mar 24, 2009 5:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who thinks to legalize such filth as drugs clearly has more than a few screws loose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank you Posted by: aahpat
» RE: i totally agree Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» Not a planet, a state Posted by: aahpat
» RE: Not a planet, a state Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Not a planet, a state Posted by: aahpat
» RE: Rubbish Posted by: JChrist
» Facts and loose screws Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: ubbish Posted by: Juven
» RE: ubbish Posted by: john mont
WOD is only a US excuse to militarize other countries and enter into their affairs
Posted by: logansafi on Mar 24, 2009 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These articles always seem to only address the 'drug issue' out of all relation from the military welfare complex issue. The US 'drug war' though is only an utterly transparent excuse to enter the Pentagon and other US military and policing agencies into multiple Latin American countries. The US government wants the militarization of these countries and will never call their Drug War a 'mistake' since this is a multi-billion dollar segment of the military-industrial-policing complex. A lot of money rides on keeping this 'war' forever going!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

legalising marihuana????
Posted by: richholland on Mar 24, 2009 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the netherlands a drugsaddict is no criminal,

marihuana can be bought in licensed coffeshops.
to sell marihuana and to grow marihuana for resale is NOT allowed.

reading comments in Alternet gives me the feeling people donot realise USA has many people in jail for activities that are no criminal offences in many western european civilised countries.

if you can grow your own weed or buy it in a drugstore why you want legalisize it???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: legalising marihuana???? Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» That's the ticket, Cory Posted by: aahpat
CONGRESS IS BEATING THE DRUG WAR DRUMS
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 24, 2009 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over the past couple of weeks the congress has been holding hearings in various committees about the Mexican border mess. Most all have been nothing but police and military people beating the drug war drums for MORE MORE MORE... MORE DRUG WAR!

On Thursday the Senate Homeland Security Committee will hold one of the most important of these hearings. Again it will be police and military people terrorizing the senators, for the Obama Administration's escalation and militarization plan. They will hear no dissenting opinions because they have invited no dissenting opinions to testify.

We need to let the senators know that we do not want more drug war. We need to contact the senate Homeland Security Committee NOW and tell them, in no uncertain terms NO MORE DRUG WAR!

I wrote to them a couple of weeks ago. You can write them too. Its not too late. Here is a page with contact information for the committee. It has fax numbers and I recommend using the fax numbers. Emails will go into a file in a computer. Hard mail is too late and would sit in a security bin at the post office for three months. FAX goes right into the office TODAY.

United States Senate Homeland Security Committee contact page. (includes my letter to the U.S. Senate Homeland Security Committee. Feel free to use any of it as you please.)

If your senator is not on the committee then write to the committee itself as a concerned citizen. Share the FAX number and information with your friends and family. The more we flood their FAX lines the more they will get the idea that American do not want this war.

with more troops going to Afghanistan and troops still in Iraq how long will before Obama ask for a draft to send troops to the Mexican border?

IF THEY DON'T HEAR IT FROM US THEY WON'T HEAR IT!

NO MORE DRUG WAR!

NO MORE DRUG WAR!

NO MORE DRUG WAR!

NO MORE DRUG WAR!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I mis-cued on letter Posted by: aahpat
Who's REALLY the guilty one?
Posted by: jal64 on Mar 24, 2009 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The primary guilty person is the one who looks out at you from the mirror. If everyone who partakes of so-called "recreational drugs" recognized the fact that it is ONLY THEIR USE that supports the kidnappings, beheadings and miscellaneous mayhem. Anyone, who for their OWN greed and amusement buys any of this stuff, should be considered a co-conspiritor to murder. The problem will continue to worsen so long as there are buyers. Without buyers, the sellers will learn to grow something else and the drug gangs will wither away along with their violence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bull$h!t Posted by: aahpat
» RE: Bull$h!t Posted by: jal64
» RE: Who's REALLY the guilty one? Posted by: mtatasmith
» Cops like Jal64 are the guilty ones Posted by: moyshekapoyre
» RE: Cops like Jal64 are the guilty ones Posted by: Outsidetheboxlookingin
» LOL Posted by: aahpat
» LOL Posted by: aahpat
» LOL Posted by: aahpat
» RE: LOL Posted by: jal64
Why do Drug Warriors Hate Our Children?
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 24, 2009 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The prohibition economy imposed by the war on drugs gives the sales and distribution of drugs over to addicts, abusers, gangsters and cartels. All of whom are happy to sell drugs to American children without any moral, ethical or social constraints. Legalization, regulation and licensing would put the sales and distribution of drugs under responsible adult supervision but drug warriors 'just say no'.

Drug warriors prefer to force immature American children to make responsible choices without any adult support other than 'just say no' propaganda. Leaving children to run the gauntlet of their formative years between addicts and gangsters on one side with police, prisons and mandatory minimums of anal rape "tough love" on the other.

So I have to ask; Why do Drug Warriors Hate American Children?

Why do Drug Warriors refuse to protect American children by adopting democratic institutions of regulation, licensing and taxation? Institutions that are proven, real and effective market controls?

Prohibition is government imposed criminal anarchy. And it is authoritarianism that forbids use of democratic institutions of regulation, licensing and taxation that are effective market controls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Its simple Sister Posted by: aahpat
» One last try Posted by: aahpat
Decriminalization and taxation options
Posted by: PaulK on Mar 24, 2009 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, what if large growers were heavily taxed? Precedent was set in the 1930s when individuals were given the right to produce up to 200 gallons of beer/wine per year at home. This meant that the revenooers didn't have to chase the small fry. Large distillers were taxed.

The technology of growing small amounts of weed in the basement is evolving to the point where police have to get lucky.

As for heroin, economics dictates that we have to cut out the middleman somehow.

Take lifetime addicts and put them on low-budget reservations with food and a controlled daily fix. Of course, help them when they want to get off the junk. This would reduce crimes committed by the unmoneyed drug crowd.

We might also be better off selling hard drugs, anonymously, only in small volumes to individuals, at distant reservations in the desert, and at somewhat lower prices than the foreign cartels. This would supply much of the moneyed drug crowd. Without billions in money fueling the cartels, the value of murdering anyone plummets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is time
Posted by: mtatasmith on Mar 24, 2009 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so tired of feeling like a criminal - I don't particularly like alcohol and I especially don't like what I feel like the next day after "enjoying" a couple glasses of wine. But allow me just a little puff..and things become much clearer and easier to understand. The frustration levels drop and life becomes good. It is my belief that we as a nation would benefit in many ways - if we could just get over ourselves and legalize pot. Hell, maybe all the families with alcohol troubles in them could gain some peace....just some wishful thinking...a pipe dream...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Failing Strategy
Posted by: phist on Mar 24, 2009 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If reason, logic, and the facts won't change anything then what makes any of you believe throwing money at some lobby group or directly demanding their congress critters to lift marijuana prohibition is going to change anything?

Here is a list of all the groups that support the war on drugs:

1) Alcoholics (they hate user of any drugs other than their own and even then they hate themselves half the time)

2) Alcohol suppliers (protecting demand for alcohol)

3) U.S. Business (any effort against drug users is good PR for them)

4) Drug dealers, pushers and black market business (goes without saying but still has to be said)

5) Mexican based drug suppliers (a.k.a Mexican drug cartels)

6) Weapon manufacturers (any war is good for them)

7) Police, DEA and any other type of law enforcement officials (many would be out of work if there were less people considered as criminals to pursue and prosecute - protecting demand for law enforcement)

8) Prison employees (protecting the demand for housing criminals)

9) Anyone who has no use for marijuana (by supporting the war on Marijuana they automatically make themselves look good to the status quo)

10) Drug and alcohol addiction treatment centers (the more 'sick' people judges and lawyers say there are the more of a demand for health care providers there is)

11) lobby groups who capitalize on some promise that if individuals give them money, they will use the money to influence lawmakers to come to their senses and end marijuana prohibition (you know who you are).

Not sure how many people are part of the 11 groups listed above but I am sure they outnumber those of us who really do oppose the war on drugs (or just marijuana) and are appalled by the consequences of that war. After decades and several generations one would think that such ignorance would have been eliminated by now but there really is no end to the stupidity in sight.

I smoked marijuana for over 20 years and the only reason I quit was because nearly all employers are piss testing. The piss test does very little to screen out alcoholics, cocaine addicts and just about any other drug user except marijuana users as THC stays in one's system for far longer than the 'evil' ingredients found in those other drugs. All a drunk has to do is spend less than a day not drinking alcohol before going in for an interview (read: piss test). A meth or cocaine addict has to spend maybe a few days without using before the interview. A marijuana user has to spend weeks or even months not using to pass a piss test interview. People should just send a piss sample along with their resume as it seems that every employer cares more about the quality of one's pee than they do one's other qualifications.

If there was anything I could do to end the war against Marijuana, I would have done it already. None of us can come out publicly against the war on drugs because that would be just begging for legal troubles. People who don't use drugs certainly won't come out publicly against the war on drugs for the same reason and the added reason that they have nothing to gain for themselves. Sure, there are indirect gains for them but most of them don't think that deeply. Additionally, those shallow minded people who have no use for marijuana are themselves useful idiots to the others who favor the war on drugs. How so? Shallow minded people believe that they can make themselves look better by making others look bad. (see point #9 above)

I wish all of you success in the fight against the war on drugs but those who support the war on drugs are far more powerful than you or I.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Slaves, submit to your masters! Posted by: leafsong1
Addicted to Authoritarianism
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 24, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The biggest bunch of addicts in America are the puritanical moralistic authoritarian junkies. They abuse the constitution and stick their pointy hooded noses into other peoples lives bringing crime, terrorism and despair to the world, they are impossible to live with.

Authoritarian junkies have no respect for the rights of others.

Authoritarian junkies have no concept of reality. They live in a fantasy world of zero tolerance perfection. A fantasy that the world will never live up to but that the authoritarian addicts can't forsake.

Authoritarian junkies can't be educated to basic economic laws of supply and demand.

Authoritarian junkies won't be informed about the public health science of Harm Reduction.

Authoritarian junkies have no humanity.

Authoritarian junkies lie about protecting children while imposing laws that expose more children to drugs.

Authoritarian junkies are violent blood-lusting monsters who call for mass murder as a final solution to the problems that they themselves cause.

Authoritarian junkies get pleasure from packing prisons with harmless people and seeing those people gang raped under mandatory minimums of anal rape tough love.

Authoritarian junkies don't even care about America. They support a drug war that gives billions of dollars a year to America's sworn enemies, the Taliban and alQaida. Policies that are getting American soldiers killed.

Authoritarian junkies support support policies that subsidize the proliferation of COP KILLING guns on American streets.

Authoritarian junkies are so sick with their disease that they have become a public health, public safety, national security and social justice threat to the viability of the United States of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In the last twenty years...
Posted by: leafsong1 on Mar 24, 2009 11:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...most prices have nearly doubled, but the price of Mexican Brown has remained exactly the same, and Humboldt KGB has only gone up 10-20 percent. Obviously, all of our interdiction efforts can be described as insignificant and totally ineffective.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Which Model to Re-Legalize with: Beer or Alcohol
Posted by: bcainw on Mar 24, 2009 12:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with Mirken, MPP, DPA etc. is that they are only interested in a alcohol model which generally does not allow individual cultivation. The MERP model treats Marijuana like we treat beer and is the ONLY model that will effectively defund the drug cartels:

MERP Headquarters
The Marijuana Re-Legalization Policy Project (MRPP)
http://www.newagecitizen.com/MERP.htm

Re-Legalize Marijuana Now, Obama (1)
http://www.newagecitizen.com/MERP/RelegalizeNowObama01.htm
Re-Legalize Marijuana Now, Obama (2)
http://www.newagecitizen.com/MERP/RelegalizeNowObama02.htm

Marijuana: Past, Present and Future from Bruce Cain on Vimeo.
http://www.vimeo.com/2056650

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Instant the US touched Afghani soil Opium went berzerk
Posted by: Shankari46 on Mar 24, 2009 12:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why? The reason so many Americans are poisoning themselves with drugs is because our government is complicit. I mean the CIA has been involved in peddling drugs for a long time. Our zombie banks launder the money. You are right that this is big business. It is so big in fact that the criminal elements within our own government don't want it to stop.

Why are Americans so ignorant and lax, indifferent? You think that is an accident? Why use armies when you can dope everyone up? The British did this to the Chinese. Do you recall the opium wars in China. Their entire society was devastated by drugs. This was a British tactic.

Take the drugs out of the hands of criminals. Good one. Which criminal? The Mexican gangs or the US government? The CIA? I agree. Sell dope legally and get them out of national parks. Get them out of cities preying on kids.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a Controlled Drug Market Might Look Like
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 24, 2009 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Living in a highly regulated state for alcohol I have no real problems with a regulatory structure for intoxicants. So here is my personal concept of a regulated distribution of intoxicant drugs. It is based on successful programs and policies already in existence with some changes for respecting the rights of individuals to to make responsible choices beyond the prohibition false choice of do or don't do.

I would like to see pot sold in state stores and in taverns or other such licensed outlets. And people would be able to grow if that is their choice in the same way they can now brew their own beer and make their own wine supply at home. An annual tax stamp would help people comply with restrictions on access by underage people.

The hard drug system that I envision would be a variation on the Swiss heroin prescription model. I would have a multi level dispensary/clinic system with the highest level being addictions rehab systems. At the lowest level a person could get, either from the clinic or their personal doctor, a 6-12 month prescription for personal consumption of a restricted amount of their drug of choice. That would minimize addiction potential. If the doctor or clinician sees signs of problematic use they would kick the person up to a more restricted clinical level of access that would reduce the quantity prescribed and reduce the term of the prescription. Incurable addicts should get heroin prescriptions and clinical support for fixing their lives.

I would make this system available for all chemicals and substances with an addictive potential and have it funded entirely by user taxes and fees.

The Swiss have significantly reduced street economic crime and new heroin addiction with their heroin prescription program. Addicts must stop selling in order to stay in the program. This reduces the number of new addicts. It breaks the criminal economic cycle of addiction. It gets the addicts out of dealing for gangsters thus reducing profits for gangsters and cartels.

I firmly believe that people today use harder drugs because the current prohibition has systematically cut off less addictive alternatives. When Nixon started this mess we had pep pills. Among poly-drug users meth was called "monster" and was vilified. But when Nixon's Controlled Substances Act banned pep pills the gangsters and right-wing doper bikers saw the supply vacuum created in the market and adopted the meth formulas used by Hitler for keeping his troops going. This is how the first major meth epidemic happened in the 1970's.

Give people safer choices along with education and a support system that they can function in normally and most will do just that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Americans Consume Greater Numbers of Legal Psychotropic
Posted by: Shankari46 on Mar 24, 2009 12:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
drugs than Europe. Article on Mental Health drug usage

Now if you legalize marijuana will use go down or will our entire society be completely zombified as if it already were not.

What's really wrong with America?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Convince a Majority of 535 v. 40-million
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 24, 2009 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which is more likely.

1. Convince some 40-million American intoxicant drug users to stop using drugs.

2. Convince a majority of the 535 members of congress to fix the failed crime fostering and terrorist funding drug war policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'd like to go to church
Posted by: linecrosser on Mar 24, 2009 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I to busy to look it up, but some where in the Bible it says we should obey local laws. The church won't take a side on this political issue. Good or bad, no middle ground. It's okay for members of the church to drink, and take prescription drugs, So relief and relaxation isn't the issue, it's the legal problem that doesn't do any good, and in fact does more harm. Keep this matter in prayer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Homegrown is alright with me.
Posted by: yale on Mar 24, 2009 7:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until legalization happens, we should all be growing our own. Its usually the greedy ones that get caught because of the large amounts they try to grow. Find out in your state, the number of plants that constitute a felony. My state is 8 or more, I can grow 7 with the threat of only a misdemeanor if I ever got caught. Spread them out some, in groups of 3, or 4. Also mulch them heavily to avoid frequent watering, and to keep weeds down. There is still time to start your own for this year. Help stop the war at the border and grow your own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Homegrown is alright with me. Posted by: richholland
Illegal Drugs Cost More!
Posted by: Javan on Mar 24, 2009 9:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They want the price to stay high so it has to be Illegal. I am sure there are plenty of politicians benefiting from illegal drug sales, judges too. Our system is very corrupt!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cherokee Fred Hussein Jesus
Posted by: hood1 on Mar 25, 2009 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our country is responsible for the problems in Mexico.

Our lawmakers pay billions to buy support for the failed war on drugs. They know it cannot be won and it is destroying one million Americans every year. But they are addicted to the 100 billion wasted every year waging this war on US (drugs).

When you pay the leaders in Mexico billions they want to show support. They have a different culture. They go out and shoot a few thousand low lever cannabis farmers to show support. Over 70% of the drugs imported from Mexico is cannabis. Americans love the stuff it is one of the safest herbs known to man. But our leaders say no it is bad for you. And we will put you in jail and waste billions paying Mexico for cannabis eradication. Now they are destroying two countries with their lies... But the corporations supporting the war are reaping billions in profits and still paying million to OUR representatives. They in turn are ignoring the majority of Americans that say end the war legalize tax and regulated cannabis....

Cherokee Fred Hussein Jesus

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Harvard economist: Prohibition creates violence, legalize all drugs
Posted by: sunnywater on Mar 25, 2009 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Published: Tuesday March 24, 2009

Because of his title as a Harvard economist, people tend to listen to Jeffrey Miron. And, if the old principle holds true and controversy always creates interest, expect a lot of people to be talking about Miron's latest volley into the mainstream media.

"Prohibition creates violence because it drives the drug market underground," he wrote in an essay published by CNN on Tuesday. "This means buyers and sellers cannot resolve their disputes with lawsuits, arbitration or advertising, so they resort to violence instead.

"Violence was common in the alcohol industry when it was banned during Prohibition, but not before or after."

Miron's proposed solution to ending the cartel war along the US-Mexico border is both simple and enormously complex.

"Violence is the norm in illicit gambling markets but not in legal ones. Violence is routine when prostitution is banned but not when it's permitted," he wrote. "Violence results from policies that create black markets, not from the characteristics of the good or activity in question.

"The only way to reduce violence, therefore, is to legalize drugs."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not gonna do it
Posted by: YogiBear on Mar 25, 2009 8:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you were waiting for this administration to do something to actually help stop the drug violence, this latest gem from our SecState, Hillary Clinton, should disspel the notion:

"'Our insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade. Our inability to prevent weapons from being illegally smuggled across the border to arm these criminals causes the death of police officers, soldiers and civilians," she said during her flight to Mexico City. I feel very strongly we have a co-responsibility.'"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drug Warrior John Kerry border insecurity hearings
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 26, 2009 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
U.S. Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is going to El Paso,TX on Monday to thump his chest and look macho over the blood and chaos caused by his drug war policy. I wrote to him in his capacity at chair of the committee and I am encouraging others to write to him also. And if your senator is on the committee write to them too. Contact information for the committee is on the letter.

Drug Warrior John Kerry border Chaos Hearing

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement