Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DrugReporter

We Are a Nation of Junkies Hooked on Media-Fabricated Outrage

By David Sirota, Creators Syndicate. Posted February 16, 2009.


As the Phelps 'scandal' proves yet again, our narcotic of choice -- creating controversy where none exists -- packs a punch.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

I'm not sure if it's because we're strung out on "Lost" episodes, or if it's because we're still suffering from a post-9/11 stress disorder that makes us crave "breaking news" alerts, or if it's because the economy has turned us into distraction junkies. But one thing is painfully obvious after Michael Phelps' marijuana "scandal" erupted last week: Our society is addicted to fake outrage -- and to break our dependence, we're going to need far more potent medicine than the herb Phelps was smoking.

If you haven't heard (and I'm guessing you have), the Olympic gold medalist was recently photographed taking a toke of weed. The moment the picture hit the Internet, the media blew the story up, pumping out at least 1,200 dispatches about the "controversy," according to my LexisNexis search. Phelps' sponsors subsequently threatened to pull their endorsement deals, and USA Swimming suspended him for "disappointing so many people."
 
America is a place where you can destroy millions of lives as a Wall Street executive and still get invited for photo-ops at the White House; a land where the everyman icon -- Joe Sixpack -- is named for his love of shotgunning two quarts of beer at holiday gatherings; a "shining city on a hill" where presidential candidates' previous abuse of alcohol and cocaine is portrayed as positive proof of grittiness and character. And yet, somehow, Phelps is the evildoer of the hour because he went to a party and took a hit off someone's bong.
 
As with most explosions of fake outrage, the Phelps affair asks us to feign anger at something we know is commonplace. A nation of tabloid readers is apoplectic that Brad and Jen divorced, even though one out of every two American marriages ends the same way. A country fetishizing "family values" goes ballistic over the immorality of Paris Hilton's sex tape...and then keeps spending billions on pornography. And now we're expected to be indignant about a 23-year-old kid smoking weed, even though studies show that roughly half of us have done the same thing; most of us think pot should be legal in some form; and many of us regularly devour far more toxic substances than marijuana (nicotine, alcohol, reality TV, etc.).
 
So, in the interest of a little taboo candor, I'm just going to throw editorial caution to the wind and write what lots of us thought -- but were afraid to say -- when we heard about Phelps. Ready? Here goes:
 
America's drug policy is idiotic.
 
Doctors can hand out morphine to anyone for anything beyond a headache, but they can't prescribe marijuana to terminal cancer patients. Madison Avenue encourages a population plagued by heart disease to choke down as many artery-clogging Big Macs and Dunkin' Donuts as it can, but it's illegal to consume cannabis, "a weed that has been known to kill approximately no one," as even the archconservative Colorado Springs Gazette admitted in its editorial slamming Phelps. Indeed, it would be perfectly acceptable -- even artistically admirable in some quarters -- if I told you that I drank myself into a blind stupor while writing this column, but it would be considered "outrageous" if I told you I was instead smoking a joint (FYI -- I wasn't doing either).
 
That said, what's even more inane than our irrational reefer madness is our addiction to the same high that every pothead craves: the high of escapism. Nerves fried from orange terror warnings, Drudge Report sirens and disaster capitalism's roller-coaster economics, our narcotic of choice is fake outrage -- and it packs a punch. It gets us to turn on the television, tune in to the latest manufactured drama, and drop out of the real battle for the republic's future.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, drugs, pot, wall street, drug war, phelps

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, "The Uprising," was just released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network -- both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So many more productive ways to spin this story
Posted by: obliu222 on Feb 16, 2009 1:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Schmucks can win gold medals, too!"..."Olympians don't smoke out of aluminum cans, kids!"...etc.

It really does say something about the U.S. as a nation that this story is not met with more imagination and humor.

My advice: say no to eggplant, which contains the most nicotine of any edible plant. Feign outrage at the eggplant industry.

I'm going to go call those Truth ad people to see what can be done. I deserved better, eggplant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» eggplant, schmeggplant Posted by: aislinnluv
» it shouldn't be a story at all... Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Brot u. Zirkus
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Feb 16, 2009 1:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bread and circuses, all that's necessary to lead a nation around by the nose once they become too lazy to demand more.


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» McDonald's and Media Posted by: Artkansas
X pat observer
Posted by: davy on Feb 16, 2009 2:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are so on the money. As a Scots pal said to me the other day when the topic of "the bong" came up. "This is why the world has lost respect for America, your old country has become a land of empty barking dogs." Ignorance is not pretty and will never be respected. He also said another interesting thing. "It's the hypocrisy, the place reeks of hypocrisy. Only Obama keeps me hoping."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: X pat observer Posted by: sirios
...Psycological Warfare
Posted by: Anthhh on Feb 16, 2009 2:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The group running affairs behind the stage will have our American society as a habitation of monsters and ass holes. and they will accept nothing less.

It is simple : People who are assholes themselves, cant really complain about other assholes...assholes of War Crime.

Do you wonder why the bad attitudes on so many everyday people in your community? And Why Americans can't have harmony? Why, when they have a community structure they can be thankful about. And do a lot with.

It is psycological warfare running affairs from behind the stage.


... perpetrated on its own citizens in order to male us compliant to War Crime and Genocide.

Turn off the news and read. Get the voices and faces of those assholes out of your face and head.

Un-suscribe to your cable and sattelite. It is a contract signed with our own blood. When the services think they are the masters, it is time to put society back in order.


WTF?
I just heard a "presidential prayer team" commerciial (Genocide is spelled G-O-D! without the "encie")

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ...Psycological Warfare Posted by: junkgrl48
» RE: ...Psycological Warfare Posted by: Anthhh
Outrage
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 16, 2009 2:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The psychology of it is probably interesting...There seems to be a need to feel holier than somebody else. We project our own guilt and insecurity onto TV personalities.

It seems to be a function of repression. Thus, there is more outrage in the US than in Europe, and more in Muslim countries than Western countries.

The escapism aspect of it doesn't bother me. What's a little escapism when we're bombarded with gloom and doom day after day?

Of course, "progressives" aren't immune to the lust for outrage, and are never shy to exploit it for political purposes. The "nappy-headed hos" thing lasted for months, and a big pile of interest groups were all over it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Outrage Posted by: VZEQICVA
-
Posted by: Anthhh on Feb 16, 2009 2:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
. . . . . . PROPAGANDA CAN FACILITATE ANY RESULT THAT THE GROUP BEHIND THE STAGE WANTS

WE are DOOMED.

It is never going to end.

Obama is NOT the fat Lady Singing!!
. . The only way he can prove himself is to investigate and lock up a WHOLE BUNCH of people on charges of WAR CRIME. The people we know of , as well as those behind the stage..people who we never knew existed!

Then and ONLY then can you say Obama is real and not another puppet.

.. and that will not happen, simply because America does not have the propaganda to facilitate this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well. . . Posted by: Beck
» RE: Well. . . Posted by: Zeugitai
It's simply symptomatic
Posted by: kegbot1 on Feb 16, 2009 2:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of a nation gone completely insane.

Well done Mr. Sirota - short, sweet and brutally to the point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's simply symptomatic Posted by: Zeugitai
Heat sink?
Posted by: westomoon on Feb 16, 2009 2:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting perspective in this piece -- really got me thinking.

We keep marveling that Americans haven't taken to the streets and expressed real outrage as our lives have been steadily eroded. I wonder if this fake outrage acts to siphon off our coherent anger into these pseudo-controversies that we all know, at base, are meaningless. They seem to serve as a kind of heat sink to bleed the heat out of the boilers of the electorate.

To be a really good heat sink, the fake flap has to be about something that is not just meaningless, but also obviously not our business -- like the first OJ trial or the Terry Schiavo case. This Michael Phelps thing is the purest example -- first, what business is it of ours? Second, if there was ever a case where "it ain't broke," this peerless athlete is it. And third, so what? It's the perfect heat sink.

It's probably significant that the most tireless promulgator of this kind of meaningless indignation is Fox News. This could be the mechanism that allowed the neocons to co-opt blue-collar America into actively slitting its own throat while seething with righteous indignation. It's like the cognitive equivalent of junk food -- lots of calories, no nutrition. Psyops indeed, and a very effective version!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boycott Kellogg's Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Heat sink? Posted by: SteveO
» RE: Heat sink? Posted by: Zeugitai
_
Posted by: Anthhh on Feb 16, 2009 3:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
.THE GROUP BEHIND THE STAGE IS CONTEMPLATING
ANOTHER FALSE FLAG ATTACK ON US


Within this year, they are going to orchestrate another false-flag attack upon our country, which kills over a thousand Americans.

This false flag attack will mean that American Aggression can continue unchecked upon the innocent people of the Middle East civilizations which have already suffered horrific nightmare in the history of mankind!


Millions and millions have perished, and LAY DYING IN AGONY at the hands of MONSTERS! A group of fucking human beings who hide, plot and conspire. Murder, massacre and Genocide of civilizations.

The American People will allow it, unchallenged. The propagand has already facilitaed it. and it wont take much more propaganda to see it through when the event occurs.(sad be the fate of the false flag attack whose blood and names will be used as an excuse for this War Crime)

This is the purpose of the propaganda we see on our telivisions, radios and Mainstream News reporting.

If we could change the propaganda, then we could save MILLIONS MORE PEOPLE from the extended horror which surely awaits them.


Let's break our silence in Counter Propaganda. Fly banners over on the rush hour traffic . Anything you can carefully think of to tell people. Protest against the "we the people" who are being too silent and too complicit for too long.


We MUST also demand changes in the structure of the UNSC to NEVER AGAIN allow US War of Aggression on FALSE FLAG PRETENSES!!!!


- Thank You.
______________________________
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: _ Posted by: Zeugitai
It's sad (and so damned American!) that . .
Posted by: pete ess on Feb 16, 2009 3:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. a BLOGGER feels obliged to put in a disclaimer that no, he wasn't actually smoking or drinking while writing!

In the CIVILISED world there is absolutely no need to fear the faux-outrage of pathetic little Thought-Police who would foam at the mouth because you're stoned while WRITING (f'gawdsake!).

But in America, he probably needed to (if only to save the blogosphere from more smoke and smell).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the king of phony outrage
Posted by: Vik on Feb 16, 2009 3:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sean Insanity is, of course, the king of phony outrage. Remember when he was trying his very best to influence the Virginia senatorial election between George (Macacca) Allen and Jim Webb? Sean-Boy was so OUTRAGED about some of the things in books Webb had written (it's called FICTION, Sean--), but that, like his marathon running of the Reverend Wright tape, just did no good at all--

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

_
Posted by: Anthhh on Feb 16, 2009 3:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We just need to pay attention to Michael Pheps.

The "condemnation of him" is fake.. just reverse psychology.. because he is such a marvelously marvelous person Americans need to be reminded about how great America is..

"TEAM AMERCA!

REMEMBER THE SHINING OLYMPIC MOMENT!

" Look! Remember! Michael Phelps won so MANY MEDALS!" "Shiny Object over here!"

That is the subliminal message. "WORSHIP MICHAEL PHELPS"

down-play this, up-play that. If he murdered someone... it would surely be downplayed.
-TRUTH


The only reason a person in their right mind would have to actually hate him, is because he is giving the SCREECHING ASSHOLES something to screech about.

( in my opinion, his appearence is actually freakish)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: _ Posted by: Zeugitai
» RE: _ Posted by: bornxeyed
Media Complicity
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Feb 16, 2009 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not letting the people in this country off the hook for being completely uninformed and addicted to the next story concerning sex violence and perversion. However, the consolidation of the ownership of all media in this country into five multinational conglomerates serves the purpose of consolidating economic and political control Into the hands of the military-industrial oil private central banking complex.

in the past 20 years, as a result of the consolidation of the media in this country, 80% of the investigative journalists have lost their jobs. Many of these investigative journalists continue to connect the dots between the outrageous events of the day, such as all of the crimes committed by the Bush administration, and the actual perpetrators of these events. these investigative journalists write their articles and post them on well-established credible news websites.

People need to stop buying newspapers and watching the news on TV. It is all a purposeful distraction so that the rich and powerful can become more rich and powerful.

Go to 911inside job.net for many articles and videos.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Media Complicity Posted by: Sister_Lauren
junkgrl48
Posted by: junkgrl48 on Feb 16, 2009 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Again, on my Progressive RAdio, which has been a haven and provider of truth, these people who should know better, call and parrot the GOP talking points they picked up on MSM and the downer articles. You have to face, like I did: Are you addicted to being angry and outraged? PEOPLE QUIT LISTENING, quit reading these. MAKE YOUR OWN DECISIONS. Put 2 and 2 together--GOP--wants to do NOTHING but their usual recession/depression causing feed the rich, and is obstructing only to make Obama fail, not even caring about the real people that would fail as well. Rank, UN-American behavior. OR Obama and Democrats--actually working to get people back to work and try with the only entity we have left to help us--our Government. Our Union. Step into the light, people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't give two hoots in hell what Phelps smokes, but his sponsors...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 16, 2009 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...are the ones paying for his image.

So, likewise, I don't give two hoots in hell what they pay him, or Britney Spears, or Paris Hilton, or Bill Clinton, for that matter.

Free choice works both ways.

As far as U.S. Swimming goes, I'm certain that there will be no hard feelings for this octamedalist after his little spanking for acting out.

On a broader note, if you plan on being famous, you might want to exercise some common sense if your sponsors and your team are really important to you.

Overall, however, I agree with the author: it seems your lovely democrats are as married to "nation-building" as your wily republicans, and here we fixate over the choices of swimmers and cereal manufacturers.

At least the economy is going great, huh? Else we might have something to talk about...

Wait, did someone say "change"? Now what the hell were YOU smoking when you believed that line?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» joy with italics Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Lame, lame . Posted by: Tom Tele
» RE: Lame, lame . Posted by: Zeugitai
» RE: Lame, lame . Posted by: bornxeyed
cheap shots
Posted by: BST on Feb 16, 2009 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I worked for a newsopaper; I no longer do.

Two years ago I quit -- which means I left under my own volition. I got tired of kicking the poor, failing mule to its feet every day.

Every time you read a news story or view one on TV, please remember -- you are witness to the product of a business enterprise that is desperate for consumers and advertising.

The way to make consumers desperate (and addicted), too, to the product is through a narcotic-like feeding of fear, anger, despair, outrage, jealousy, humiliation....

It's like eating chips and candy in lieu of spinach and fresh fish. Easy and destructive.

Nuance is long gone from most news media. These purveyors hawk junk. So you get stories that are absurd but as easy to swallow as applesauce is for someone with a sore throat.

It's completely disrepectful to thinking people and completely insidious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cheap shots - the 'free' press Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: cheap shots Posted by: Zeugitai
cheap shots
Posted by: BST on Feb 16, 2009 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I worked for a newsopaper; I no longer do.

Two years ago I quit -- which means I left under my own volition. I got tired of kicking the poor, failing mule to its feet every day.

Every time you read a news story or view one on TV, please remember -- you are witness to the product of a business enterprise that is desperate for consumers and advertising.

The way to make consumers desperate (and addicted), too, to the product is through a narcotic-like feeding of fear, anger, despair, outrage, jealousy, humiliation....

It's like eating chips and candy in lieu of spinach and fresh fish. Easy and destructive.

Nuance is long gone from most news media. These purveyors hawk junk. So you get stories that are absurd but as easy to swallow as applesauce is for someone with a sore throat.

It's completely disrepectful to thinking people and completely insidious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cheap shots Posted by: junkgrl48
Isn't it just possible that we're only mildly interested in outrage?
Posted by: Beck on Feb 16, 2009 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I may see stories about Brad Pitt or whoever at supermarket checkouts, I never have heard one person mention them. The only things I've heard said about Michael Phelps were from people who thought his pot smoking no big deal. There seem to be two levels here: the media, finding things to talk about, and the public, which does have a mild interest in interesting, odd stories, but really could not care too much less. Anyone think if these stories disappeared anyone would really care? Most people wouldn't notice the loss, and those that did would find something else to pay attention to in less than a week. I think we have this all wrong. We're not lazy; we work the longest hours in the industrialized world. We take the shortest vacations. We're exhausted and worried and stressed. Probably 99 out of a hundred people who pay any attention to stories like these just wanted a distraction from the boss, the bills, and the future. Maybe we could start empathizing with each other more, criticizing each other less?

And maybe when we use "lost" or "American Idol" to define American laziness and stupidity, we could occasionally toss in the superbowl or NBA all-star game? Talk about invented, pointless distractions. Maybe people seeing unknowns trying to sing their way to better lives isn't any worse than millions watching millionaires slamdunk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great comment Posted by: LeeAnnG
Good old American values, I guess...
Posted by: katz22br on Feb 16, 2009 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A four year old kid kissing or hugging a classmate in kindergarten can get expelled for sexual offense, but a high-rank politician that uses public money to pay for honeymoon trips with young male interns will get no more than a slap on the wrist.

The open secret of baseball players using hormones and steroids to keep up with the impossible expectations of their game are worth of Congressional hearings and subpoenas, but the obvious conflicts of information on the 9/11 official report are not... nor are the crimes and wars of aggresion of the Bush (mis)administration.

A picture of an athlete supposedly smoking from a bong allegedly containing pot is worth of investigation, prosecution and dire consequences for the picture subject and for others directly or indirectly involved, but the callous pictures from Abu Ghraib caused only some temporary grief, and directed only at the "small fish".

People losing their jobs due to a depression they didn't cause get the book thrown at them, get evicted/foreclosed and are blamed for their own woes, but those commanding the Great Wall Street Con Games, who turned the U.S. (and the whole world) economy on its head, get a nice plump bailout so the rich folks don't lose a dime.

A scandal, indeed.

k

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

forget the false equivilency/ chronic pain paranoia
Posted by: Tom Tele on Feb 16, 2009 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article except for the shot at "doctors prescribing morphine for ..." If you ever actually knew anyone with chronic pain who needed narcotics you would realize the DEA makes treatment very difficult for such persons and that chronic pain patients have no rights.Doctors who treat people with chronic pain were regularly busted as drug kingpins by ignorant DA's. See last years presecution/prosecution of Dr Schneider in Kansas, merely the latest travesty. The judge did not care that the patients who went to this clinic had nowhere to go and told them to go to emergency rooms were they are treated like junkies and told to get lost. Untreated chronic pain is a major cause of suicide. Cannabis does n ot work for everybody on pain (it can make someone more bodyaware and make pain worse!)The idiocy of our drug laws is complete, do not blame opiods for our pot laws.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Main Point?
Posted by: Lilly on Feb 16, 2009 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article would be stronger if it had only one main point to make. With two, it seems to switch horses in midstream, thus weakening both arguments. Is the focus 1) Our whorish media pander to the public's taste for sensationalism or 2) The decriminalization of controlled substances would benefit society? I am surprised that the editors of AlterNet failed to pick this up. This isn't a matter of nitpicking, but an acknowledgement that, if you want to give somebody a message, the sharper you tune that message, the more likely it is to be heard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Main Point? Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Main Point? Posted by: Zeugitai
THE SPY RIDDLED ,OIL SOAKED, MONOPOLY MEDIA
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Feb 16, 2009 8:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a tiny group of bankers and corporatists own it all .. turn them off and throw their mags and rags away.... I wonder what kind of psychotronic warfare they are gonna throw at us with the new digital switchover , complete with a spybox in your living room.. TV was not put in your living room for your benefit

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not now folks don't touch that dial!
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Feb 16, 2009 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frank Zappa I guess said it best when it comes to American's love for the " slime on the video" ; and everyplace else from any women's magazine besides Ms. and Bitch/other feminist publications; to those store ads which tell women especially " must haves" and " essentials" this and that.
All one has to do is stay tuned to the local evening, morning and whatever news " on action news 8" to hear that " story about the convicted rapist released to live in Southbury[ CT ] till they become overcome by fear of rapists/molesters lurking in every playground and whatever.
I rarely watch the local news and since I don't get cable, occasionally I'll watch Rach Maddow on MSNBC online, but sometimes when I do stay tuned to channel 8/3/30/61 after the football game- I instantly get depressed with " the garbage that they feed you"!
America seems to love , as they'd say down South, sheeee-it and more shee-it! everything from the latest Acia berry diet to how jessica simpson gained 7 pounds and my favorite most hated fashion show that I even mocked in my soon to be posted match.com ad, " What Not To Wear" [ why not?]
and what this seems to do is make Mr. Joe Sixpack Plumber and Ms. Jane Circle K Clerk well-bathed in fear and major fucking stupidity; all the while as Washington DC and the big corporations and bankers fill their fat-lipped fucking assholes full of wine & cheese, yuppie finger foods at Obama's Inaugural Balls and "discuss" what is in the best interests of Joe Unemployed Plumber and Jane Circle-K Clerk.
But for some reason, we all realize that Brad fucking Pitt and Angelina Jolie's sex life is far more important, don't we?????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And football is superior Posted by: LeeAnnG
Escapism?
Posted by: bornxeyed on Feb 16, 2009 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
every pothead craves: the high of escapism.

Mr. Sirota, I thought you were just being cautious when you said you weren't toking when writing the article.

But it is obvious you never smoked weed because the last thing weed does is help you "escape" - that's alcohol and heroins claim to fame. If anything pot helps you cope with what you can't escape.

As PJ O'Rourke once said in Rolling Stone at least 20 years ago now, and I'm paraphrasing:

Weed makes you more senstitive to what's going on around you, and that is punishment enough for anyone.

Now, I can tell from that statement, as conservative as PJ O'Rourke was, he toked!

I smoke weed to cope with prescription-induced PTSD, I use it to concentrate on my work - I wrote every grad school paper stoned and had a 4.0 GPA, until I was poisoned and had to quit.

And I use it becuase the buzz makes everything a bit prettier and more interesting. But the only thing I "escape" with it is, now, the pain from my past that causes me severe stress thanks to a Dr. prescribing a neurotoxic antibiotic for an infection I didn't have.

Yeah, I wish it was legal and a Dr. could prescribe it. It would be cheaper, the quality nore consistent and I wouldn't have to worry about homelessness from the cost or an arrest.

But keep up the fight for us, David. We need non-tokers, especially.

And if you ever wish to change your status, give me a, ahem, buzz.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I apologize David.
Posted by: bornxeyed on Feb 16, 2009 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read the statement on "escapsim" and laughed so hard I never finished the paragraph.

OK, You redeemed yourself. My apologies. Now I'm going to go put on "Dark Star" and "escape" for 45 minutes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The majority of the talking heads=conservative media
Posted by: LOVELYT. on Feb 16, 2009 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who pose the fake outrage are high as a giraffes genitals, while doing so. Oxycotin headed, heroin blooded Rush, stick up his butt Insanity Hannity, Maulkin, and so on. There are more drugs in the their systems then was dealt on the block of "their" neighborhoods, this morning. I couldn't take them, any more serious then I would, Ned the whino! haha And those who are taking them serious, must be zooted too!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just another salvo from the Weapons of Mass Distraction
Posted by: socrates2 on Feb 16, 2009 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Repeat after me: "Weapons of Mass Distraction, weapons of mass distraction...'
Recall the words of Howard Beale, the wise man on television, in the film "Network,"--"We are in the boredom killing business..."
As long as you choose to remain addicted to ersatz-emotion and ersatz-venting, then you will leave the real villains alone.
Hollywood and the government have known it for decades. The point of modern (it wasn't always so) film and television "entertainment" is to help the viewer _experience_ pseudo-emotions and pseudo-catharsis while providing him/her the illusion of _living_ the adventure/drama of the character/hero on the screen, all the while _accomplishing nothing_ in real life.
It's a win-win all around. The film/TV producers screen their product and make money. The advertiser reaches his viewer and potential consumer and makes money; and the puppet-master, governing elites get a respite from a potential critical thinking-brain for 6 more waking hours; the taxes _you pay_ are spent as _they_ see fit...
Meanwhile, the TV/media-watching zombie "lives" in his solipsistic universe of pre-programmed, ersatz-emotions of happy endings and vicarious tragedies and discusses those _programmed_ feelings with his fellows the next day at the water cooler; and the master profits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Liam on the Left says:
Posted by: Liam on Feb 16, 2009 10:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about the Senator Burris "outrage" this weekend. What a bunch of crap...a made up story. These jerk ass "reporters" are basically a bunch of worthless Republicans who just want to be part of the in crowd. Bozos! Eight years of Bush/Republican crime escaped their notice!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We don't crave them, they're forced on us
Posted by: harpy on Feb 16, 2009 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I'm not sure if it's because we're strung out on "Lost" episodes, or if it's because we're still suffering from a post-9/11 stress disorder that makes us crave "breaking news" alerts"
We don't crave or control these things, we don't control programming, nor do we control headlines. The corporate media forces these "breaking news" bulls__t stories. Just change the channel or turn it off!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, how come...?
Posted by: Crazy H on Feb 16, 2009 11:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can a POT SMOKER win a bunch of gold medals? Shouldn't he be an overweight underachiever? Doesn't "everyone know" that POT SMOKERS have no ambition? Shouldn't he be growing breasts and gasping for air? Watching the Weather Channel all day long while eating cheesy poofs by the pound? Shouldn't he be smoking heroin and snorting LDS by now?

Surely, the government wouldn't lie to me about something like that. Obviously the photo is a fake...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My guess is ...
Posted by: monkeywrench on Feb 16, 2009 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.. that the only people who got their panties in a twist over Michael Phelps sucking on a bong were the in the "news" media, who are hungry to fill 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with something, anything, whether it be actual news or mindless blather. To them, it's all the same.

Hell, this morning over on the Today Show, they had to resort to scraping the dust and sludge off a six-month-old story about the dating habits of that Peterson guy who allegedly "off'ed" one or more of his wives. His case is stilll pending (and occasionally being tried in the media), but we were treated to the earth-shattering story that someone is actually dating him – as if anybody gives a sh*t. This is how low the laughable media is willing to sink to fill up their hours and make them a little less empty. Pathetic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It seems
Posted by: bettyn on Feb 16, 2009 11:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we raise up these so-called "Olympic Heroes" just to tear them down. Michael Phelps is a twenty-something normal kid who happens to swim really fast. He smoked weed at a fraternity party! BFD!!!!!! WHO hasn't at that age?!!!!!

The silliest thing about this "fake outrage" is that the people pretending to be so shocked probably did this themselves under the same circumstances when they were that age. Even the damned "born-agains" probably did SOMETHING not-so-saintly back in the day.

It doesn't count that you didn't get caught because you weren't "famous" when you did it, folks. Stuff like this happens. It is not news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good and Bad News
Posted by: Defenestrator on Feb 16, 2009 12:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Pediphile Hysteria
Posted by: travelertoo on Feb 16, 2009 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The media has everyone trained to look for a pediphile under every bush. I'm sure if statistics were checked though, that more children have been murdered by on and off-duty cops than by pediphiles. I'm not for anyone taking indecent liberties with a child but sometimes the media conducts an absolute witch hunt and the resulting lynch mob mentality gets innocent people hurt or murdered.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

allen
Posted by: pursah on Feb 16, 2009 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fake outrage is the media mogul's cheap preference to going to the expense of doing real stories that concern the public welfare.

One major fake outrage staple is "missing white girl." Living in the Orlando news area, we have been saturated with the baby Caylee media circus since last summer. Yes, it is sad the kid was killed by her mother, allegedly, but there is nothing anybody can do about it and it really only concerns the immediate family.

But the "outrage machine" has turned it into a circus. What amazes me is that there are armies of people for whom this "outrage" is a way of life. Can you imagine platoons of people camped out by the grand-parents house day after day during Orlando's unholy summer heat and humdity existing solely to harass the child's family? Don't these people have jobs, or lives or anything else?

This news trend is also bad for business. It gives the impression that Orlando so crime-ridden with rapists and kidnappers and car-jackers, it to too dangerous to go there. NOT good for business(tourism).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: allen Posted by: bornxeyed
A few points
Posted by: willymack on Feb 16, 2009 4:46 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. The brutal occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan continue as if bushco were still in office.
2.Crooks have stolen us blind, and are being rewarded for their crimes with taxpayer money.
3.President Obama promotes "clean" coal.
4.The rethugs are out to destroy the Obama presidency through non-cooperation and dirty lies.
5. No word of any forthcoming prosecution of the bush crime family, even though 71% of us WANT it.
So, what are we doing about any of this? Why, harping on some hapless twit, who also happens to be a world-class athlete, for smoking some pot, that's what. Sounds about right for US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A few points Posted by: racetoinfinity
Boycott Kellogg? good thing i can't afford it.
Posted by: nadine sellers on Feb 16, 2009 5:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not a moral issue, it is a civil problem, the tattler shall be haunted by the specter of his miserable mentality for months and years.

So, since Kellogg has decided to withdraw its use of the multi-medalist Phelps in future advertisement...then we, who would chose to buy their products...should withdraw our purchasing power from all of the cereal king's products;a very tiny revolution against poor judgment.

This is of course a mere assumption that we have a mind, albeit, a collective mind which makes decisions and acts upon them. Not a mindless mass which sits in front of screens and buys whatever the latest ads claim to be ..good..for you. Are we thinking humans?

Aside from the obvious photograph of a healthy man inhaling from a glass tube, what would arouse our ire? a swimmer biting his opponent's ear off? Beating his dog? While we allowed for bombing entire neighborhoods somewhere that week.

Is there evidence or old photographs of many CEOs and advertising executives having or still participating in relaxing or exciting behavior at parties? There are better concerns to address.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boycott
Posted by: YogiBear on Feb 16, 2009 5:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm generally against boycotts, but wouldn't it be great if we started boycotting companies for distancing themselves from Phelps and others in similar situations? If he loses an endorsement due to one toke, can't we show our collective disapproval by boycotting them for that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War on...
Posted by: schubert on Feb 16, 2009 7:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmm...So Phelps, who has succeeded in his chosen field at a level far beyond that which any mere mortal can imagine, smokes pot. The list of extraordinarily successful people who use this drug already includes Robert Parish, who had a long, brilliant career in the NBA and was a key part of a Boston Celtics team that was among the best teams in any sport of the late 20th century. It includes Willie Nelson, who had about as long and as successful career in his field as anybody could have. It includes Paul McCartney, who is as big a star as you can be, and had a hand in an iconic and massive body of extraordinary work...It includes many others on this level. Gee, marijuana is certainly a terrible scourge! So just why are we fighting to eradicate pot, exactly? Why are we tearing our society to shreds and exacerbating racial inequality with this idiotic War on Drugs?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank You for a fine article... It's about time someone said it!
Posted by: hughesrg on Feb 16, 2009 9:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fine work Mr. Sirota... This whole "scandal" is a farce. Here it is plain and simple: 90% of the people you associate/interact with throughout any given day be it work, church, the grocery store, a family reunion are smoking or have smoked weed PERIOD and you know what... THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT! The ONLY thing wrong is the draconian 'War On Drugs' that makes recreational and most therapeutic use of this fine, natural wonder substance illegal. Mr. Sirota is spot on in his assessment that amongst other things, America has become nothing more than a nation of hypocritical, news-ertainment addicted, disconnected pussies with our priorities completely askew. Let the rest of our wonderful republic worry about which celebrity, sports-star, musician, etc. is rolling a joint while Rome burns down around them. I'm going to pack my bowl and enjoy a hearty toke after a long day of planning and preparing for the revolution!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

While everyone is obsessed with Phelps, I wrote a letter to President Obama
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 16, 2009 9:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
asking him to overturn the tyrannical ban on Cannabis. How many of you did the same?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Real Battle
Posted by: racetoinfinity on Feb 16, 2009 9:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good post, David.

I hope you post a "take-your-gloves-off" post very soon clearly (if possible) outlining the real battle for our democracy going on now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prove it
Posted by: buggyhair on Feb 17, 2009 8:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to challenge Sirota's conclusion that it is "we" who are addicted to fabricated outrage. The assumption that because the media are reporting something we are interested is just that - an assumption. It's easy enough to prove that the media are addicted to fabricated outrage, but where is the evidence that great numbers of us are doing anything but filtering out the noise? In a country of 300,000,000 people, how many are really seeking out and soaking up every detail of the latest celebrity scandal? The news channels would love for us to be interested in whatever they're trying to shove down our throats, but where is the evidence we are?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"America's drug policy is idiotic."
Posted by: JPeaslee on Feb 18, 2009 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes. Yes, it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement