Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

DrugReporter

CA's Prop 5: Treatment for Drug Addicts Works and Jail Time Doesn't -- Here Are the Stories to Prove It

By Matthew Palevsky, AlterNet. Posted October 30, 2008.


Treatment graduates ask CA voters to give others the opportunity they had, to get treatment and turn their lives around.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following video by Prop 5 supporter Matt Palevsky puts a human face on the benefits of rehabilitation rather than incarceration for illicit drug consumption:

Matthew Palevsky is the Chairman of Students for Sensible Drug Policy, a drug policy reform organization with over 100 chapters on college campuses across America. Formerly a producer at The Real News Network, Matthew left TRNN to organize on behalf of California's Yes on Prop 5 Campaign. He also serves on the Board of Rhode Island Patient Advocacy Coalition.

And the following op-ed written for AlterNet by Drug Policy Alliance's Marsha Rosenbaum on California's chance for drug reform:

Prop 5: California Has a Chance to Treat Young People Struggling with Drug Problems the Right Way

California's policies have failed our youth. The state currently offers almost no help to young people struggling with drug problems. Without early intervention, too many get tied up in the juvenile justice system only to graduate to the adult criminal justice system. Next week California voters have the rare opportunity to support a measure that would simultaneously transform youth treatment, reduce adult prison overcrowding and significantly cut costs to taxpayers.

Prop. 5, the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act, invests $65 million per year into developing the first system of drug treatment programs for at-risk California youth under 18. No such system exists now, leaving all but the wealthiest families to navigate through the turbulence of adolescent drug abuse on their own. Low-income youths are generally first arrested and processed into the juvenile justice system before receiving any form of treatment; even then, programs are inadequate. According to the California Legislative Analyst's Office, only 10 percent of youth who needed treatment actually receive it. Prop. 5 proposes building a system of preventative, on-demand treatment for all of California's youth.

The potential rewards are clear. Untreated drug problems can have lasting impacts far beyond the adolescent years. Investing in treatment and support services is essential to empowering youth to become productive citizens. Under Prop. 5, parents, teachers and doctors could all refer young people directly to these life-saving health services without the need for a criminal justice intervention. Research shows that adolescent treatment is effective in reducing arrests, improving academic performance and keeping youth in school.

Prop. 5 ensures that the new system of care meets the full spectrum of youth needs, including family therapy, educational and employment stipends and more. These services seek to address the roots of the problem, and not just the symptoms. Prop. 5 also provides smarter interventions for young people. Young people found in possession of small amounts of marijuana would be required to complete science-based educational programs and counseling instead of being handed a misdemeanor conviction that can severely limit their potential. Prop. 5 is institutional reform. It starts by establishing an early intervention system to save lives and stop crimes before they happen. Going further, Prop. 5 expands access to court-supervised treatment and increases accountability for offenders in those programs. It puts rehabilitation back in our prisons. Meanwhile, it improves public safety by increasing parole supervision of serious and violent offenders.

These smart reforms will significantly cut costs to taxpayers -- something no other measure on the November ballot can promise or attain. According to the independent Legislative Analyst's Office, Prop. 5 will reduce incarceration costs by $1 billion each year and prison construction costs by $2.5 billion over its first several years.

The League of Women Voters of California, California Nurses Association, California Federation of Teachers, Consumer Federation of California, California State Conference of the NAACP and National Council of La Raza all agree: A "yes" on Prop. 5 is a "yes" to our young people's futures.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drug reform, nora, proposition 5

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How about stop putting all addicts in prison, period...
Posted by: grangersmith on Oct 30, 2008 4:29 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope the people of CA have a little mercy on the young, but the fact that we put drug addicts who have not robbed raped or plundered in jail is absolutely wrong to begin with...The drug companies have been huge financial contributors to the elected officials, and have managed to keep the drug dealer revenues in their pockets...They have pushed antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti ant's to the general public so much, they are given like candy to anyone who feels sad or upset or angry...Alcohol is a drug that kills thousands every day through abuse, accidents, domestic violence, and crime, yet it's legal...Children have parents who are in jail or who have neglected them who are addicts...These children deserve parents who can also go to treatment centers, get support and encouragement so they can have their children back and be responsible loving parents again...We have been brainwashed into thinking addicts are just bad, but crooks who lie and steal money in our government are normal...Pedophiles, especially rich ones have more support and understanding than poor addicts, adults and teen agers...Addiction is not a crime, it's a disease a dysfunction that cripples the mind and body, destroys families and individuals. The truth is our society punishes the sick and the poor, we knock people while they are down, and I think since we consider them bad, we do everything we can to destroy them or have them destroy themselves...It's the same for the mentally ill...I absolutely hate the society we live in now, it's so hateful, dysfunctional, selfish, cold and cruel, this article is superficial, just talking about a tiny tiny part of the dysfunction and hate that we lay on those who are weak and sick...If this bill passes, good for CA, a little gesture of the band aide over the gashing wound, but better than nothing...I use to live in CA, and I do not understand how in the world the steroid monster, bad actor, son of a Nazi became the governor...Maybe it's just that CA is always ahead of the times, and trends...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, well....if this isn't "Another Type of COURT"...Kid's Court...
Posted by: One American Lady on Oct 30, 2008 9:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is "in Existence...Drug Court / ?? Veterans Court / ?? Mental Health COURT...
Wonder What Type of COURT, will someone think of next?

But, if Any of It is Based on the Same Format, as Drug COURT... then, the Individuals, are looking at paying: $1,500 to $2,000, & Forced to Attend Meetings 3 t 5 times a week, Appear before the COURT Judge *once a week*, & if an individual "fails to appear at a Meeting, they Can GO TO JAIL for a certain number of days"...
& if they Fail a UA, it's "back to jail" for a certain number of days...AND...

the COURT FEES, INCREASE...& in about 10 months..Your Whole Life, is "Owed to the Government"... the court fee can go from ...let's say $900 to $2,995.00, in Less than 10 Months....whereas, a Prison Term, might last 6 months...or a Rehab Residential Center, for 6 months.

Oh, & while we're on this Sub-ject, "IF YOU ARE RECEIVING ANY GOVERNMENT CHECKS, THE CHECKS ARE *CUT-OFF, TIL THE WARRANT IS SATISFIED BY THE COURT / JUDGE".

There you have it: No Income to Pay the Rent / Pay for Food / Pay for Utilities, for probably about 2 months time, or until the Checks can be Reinstated...which usually takes the Government Agencies, 2-months to get straightened out...& back-to-normal, for you.

Is it really cheaper for an individual to be in an "outside Reform Group" rather than in Prison: Probably Not...but "IT PUTS THE BURDEN ON THE BACK, OF THE PERSON,WHO COMMITTED THE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR / ADDICTIVE *BEHAVIOR*."

Behaviors can be Re-Adjusted...called an "Attitude Adjustment" but a person's Livelihood, can't be Adjusted so Quickly, before their life, is At-Risk of Starvation or that person, becoming Homeless, to say the least.

Check it Out...the Government is Gonna Make Some Bucks, somewhat...Do the Crime / Pay the Piper...Pay the Court System... (they are in need of money, badly...they don't have enough to Eat on... ).

I haven't seen very many Ill Politicians, have you ?? Or Unhealthy Judges / County or State Workers...either.

As one olde saying goes: The Poor get Poorer & the Richer get Richer-er.

One American Lady.
Advocate to U.S. Citizens,
in Defense of Their Constitutional Rights..
Laws written by some of My Family / Ancestors

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is this forced treatment?
Posted by: sicntired on Oct 31, 2008 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean are you sent to a treatment facility or prison as the other option?Will this increase time for those that don't want treatment?If an addict wants treatment it should be available but to force anyone into treatment when they are not ready or to offer treatment but use a bigger stick to force people into treatment is a dangerous proposition.The option should be available and if that's all this does,great.If this is forcing people into treatment they don't want with harsh terms for those that refuse,forget it.Something realistic needs to be done for hard core addicts with long records.Life in prison for a disease is really sick.Maintenance on a drug other than methadone would be a positive start and much cheaper than a life sentence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clean and sober
Posted by: esornew on Nov 1, 2008 6:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Been there,done that. Jail only worsens addiction (plus likely to add more criminal attitude). Rehab can help, but the addict can only succeed provided AA/NA 12 step program is lived. This is not theory or law,it is over 20 years experience.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clean and sober Posted by: paganpat
first we tried prop 36 - prop 5 SEEMS better but....?????
Posted by: integritytoo on Nov 3, 2008 3:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Afetr recently divorcing a recent parolee of the CDC who went away fore possession for sales... (He is an addict trying to "score" $ for his habbit...) I "thought" he had a moment of sobriety in prison. BOY WAS I EVER WRONG! He is still eligable for prop 36 which would allow him leniancy on a great level for a bevy of terms however:

After remaining loyal to him- visiting him EVERY weekend for nearly 10 months- one weekend, I was ran off the highway travelling to visit him... ended up in a coma and with a paralyzed arm. After 5 months in the hospital, he paroled a week before my nerve grapht surgery to repair my paralyzed arm... 3 months later, he was gone for 4 days in search of a large dope purchase to support his habbit "that he doesn't have". That was the last I saw f him. He packed his things and left.

3 months later he is back in prison. The ONLY thing he left behind was all of his legal documents from prison . ALL tell-tells of drug purchases and dirty deeds on the inside.

In conclusion: prop 36 seems to be a bit of a cop-out for dopers. I witnessed this SEVERAL times first hand by his affiliates. Prop 5 sounds GREAT but, it poses a great deal of questions: who will pay? who will provide / what kind of treatment? Who will mandate that NO drugs get into treatment? Who will determine when someone is complete with their program? There are MORE inmates in the CDC for drug issues than any other so, how will CDC handle the volume? What will the parole / follow up stipulations be (will they be different?)? Statistically, what are the results? The CDC is ALREADY far too leniant and liberal regarding drug offenders- what -if any- will be the repercussions of re-ofense after failure from this program? what will follow up for this program be?

While prop 5 SOUNDS great, there are still far too many un-answered questions and not provided statistics.I am anxious to see what will come of it in the near future. I do have high hopes in that CLEARLY prison is NOT working.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.