Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

DrugReporter

California's Big Chance to Stop Locking up Harmless Drug Offenders

AlterNet. Posted October 25, 2008.


Supporters of California's Prop 5 argue it would dramatically improve the way non-violent offenders are treated.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following are two important articles explaining the benefits the proposed Non-Violent Offenders Act initiative on the California ballot and the latest video released by its supporters and attacking the misconceptions about it. At the bottom of the article is a powerful ad that advocates of Proposition 5 have created and will start running on television, and links to what the proponents and opponents of Prop 5 are saying.

From the San Francisco Chronicle:

Prop. 5 would fund innovative treatment for drug offenders

Daniel Macallair, G. Thomas Gitchoff

California voters are rarely given the chance to vote for an initiative that addresses a problem that many thought was unsolvable. Proposition 5, the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act, provides the opportunity for voters to bring change to the state's crumbling and bankrupt criminal justice system in a manner that cannot be achieved within the special-interest-dominated world of Sacramento.

Prop. 5 is the only initiative on the November ballot that is slated to preserve state funds and save taxpayers' money -- at least $2.5 billion, according to the state's Legislative Analyst.

A 2007 bipartisan report authored by the Little Hoover Commission, entitled "Solving California's Corrections Crisis: Time is Running Out," stated that "30 years of tough on crime politics has not made the state safer" because of our failure to implement strategies that reduce the offender's likelihood to re-offend. Prop. 5 is a three-pronged effort to improve public safety by bringing balance to California's criminal-justice system.

The first element of Prop. 5 is its mandate to create a system of care for youth involved with substance abuse. Under this initiative, counties will be provided financial resources to establish a modern system of drug treatment.

The second area addressed by Prop. 5 is treating nonviolent adult drug offenders after their arrest. Many county-run drug treatment services are disjointed and poorly funded, which reduces their potential effectiveness. Prop. 5 creates a coordinated and unified continuum of services that gives judges greater flexibility and broader controls.

If an offender commits a nonviolent drug offense, Prop. 5 states that treatment intervention should be a priority. If the offense is a nonviolent non-drug offense but the judge determines that substance abuse was the root cause, Prop. 5 gives courts the flexibility to use treatment as an alternative to, or in conjunction with, incarceration. By offering more choices, the initiative eliminates the situation where judges must rely on a single treatment option or impose incarceration -- an approach long deemed a failure by addiction experts.

Perhaps the most important element of Prop. 5 is the establishment of rehabilitative services in the parole system. Today, inmates are routinely returned to the community with limited resources and few opportunities. Lacking both support and incentives, they soon fall back on old patterns. When offenders violate their parole, they are typically returned to prison, where they serve a mere five months before they are again released. Under Prop. 5, this failed one-dimensional system will be replaced by an array of sanctions and treatment options primarily operated at the local level. Interventions will range from incarceration to residential and nonresidential drug treatment. The initiative also mandates that higher levels of parole resources and supervision be devoted to higher risk parolees.

Prop. 5 offers voters a rare opportunity to bring change that is long overdue and that will advance the public safety interests of all Californians.

Daniel Macallair is the executive director of the Center on Juvenile & Criminal Justice and teaches in the Department of Criminal Justice Studies at San Francisco State University. G. Thomas Gitchoff is professor emeritus of criminal justice at San Diego State University and co-founder and past president of the Western Society of Criminology.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: nora, proposition 5

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from DrugReporter! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thank you.
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 25, 2008 3:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, this is great. Vote yes on five. I want a bumper sticker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bumper sticker art Posted by: Lauren
If Prop 5 doesn't pass...
Posted by: USAFVeteran1966 on Oct 25, 2008 3:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it will show that my fellow Californians have the same room-temperature IQ as McCain/Palin supporters.

Vietnam vet/Obama supporter
Eight reasons to vote against John McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The same old crap
Posted by: be marc on Oct 25, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, rather than criminalize millions of otherwise law-abiding citizens because someone deems their behavior to be "criminal", we're going to "diagnose" and "treat" them instead because someone has decided it's necessary. Instead of jailing them, we're going to save them.

Someone tell me the difference between having a glass of wine or smoking a bowl to chill out. The difference is some short-sighted person has judged one activity to be harmless and the other to be harmful.

Sure, some people are in need of treatment. Others are clearly not. Most of the people who profit from drug "treatment" are unable to make the distinction.

This is progress? This is the same old crap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The same old crap Posted by: Vic Fedorov
» RE: The same old crap Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The same old crap Posted by: DHopper
D Baker
Posted by: dbaker on Oct 25, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the state failed to protect its citizens from Narcotics that are non-indigenous, Cocaine and Opiate, for examples.
the state should face up and quit trying to hide that failure by hidding the victims, in prisons.
Since HIV and AIDS are found to be spread primarily through Intravenous Drug use, these substances that are the conduit for these infections, one could and should argue that the states failure was in the face of a chemical and biological attack on the citizens.
The state permits the availability of these substances, and then imprisons the users.


Dennis Baker

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WAR ON CITIZENS
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Oct 25, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war on drugs is another government POGROM

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wrote a letter to FOXN
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 25, 2008 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More Healthy Reasons to Raise a Glass

Drinking wine will give you more than just a healthy heart. Find out why you should start sipping both red and white wine

Send news tip to FOXNews.com
So I wrote:

Why wine and not medical marijuana? Religious discrimination?

Sister Lauren
THC Ministry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Won't benefit blacks much
Posted by: nfamous on Oct 25, 2008 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are not that many black people even in California. There are plenty of Mexicans however so they stand to benefit the most from this. Isn't it peculiar how progressive white people can become when there are few or no black people around? As soon as we show up whites jump the fence back to the conservative or moderate side. Black people are nearly half of all prison inmates. Since we now know that whites and blacks are almost genetically identical then the reason for this statistic must be environmental. White supremacy disadvantages blacks and puts or leaves them in financial straits at which time many wrongfully decide to pursue a life of crime.

White supremacy is the root of the cause, not a lack of black personal responsibility. If a man who cannot swim jumps off a cliff into a lagoon and then drowns is it fair to say that gravity killed him? No the water killed him because he couldn't swim but whites say that it's the gravity. That completely undermines the chain of causality but white supremacy was not meant to be logical. It's all about whites keeping their relative position to the bottom and the bottom is blacks and increasingly Mexicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Won't benefit blacks much Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: Won't benefit blacks much Posted by: Malkavian
How would this address the #1 drug problems: alcohol, tobacco and prescription drug abuse?
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Oct 25, 2008 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, is there such a thing as alcohol and tobacco abuse? Sure there is - any addictive behavior is abusive to one's self. The same is true for pharmaceutical drugs - prescription opiates kill ten times as many people per year as heroin does.

We are currently living in a Prohibition era, just like when alcohol was banned in the U.S. That's something that Islamic nations would approve of, isn't it?

"The first element of Prop. 5 is its mandate to create a system of care for youth involved with alcohol, tobacco and prescription drug abuse. Under this initiative, counties will be provided financial resources to establish a modern system of drug treatment."

Sounds like socialized medicine, doesn't it? We allow people to smoke and drink themselves to death, yet if they touch cannabis they are suddenly criminals.

It's an odd, odd situation - drug companies market amphetamines like Ritalin and Adderall to children, while methamphetamine and its relative ecstacy are widely demonized, even though the drugs are fairly similar. Oxycontin and vicoden are widely available, but it's illegal to smoke opium, even with a prescription.

California NORA initiative

About 35,000 California inmates, or about 20% of the prison population, are doing time for drug offenses. An unknown number, certainly in the thousands and possibly in the tens of thousands, are doing time for offenses related to their drug use. It is these offenders and their future brethren at whom the NORA initiative is aimed.

What is really needed is a complete overhaul of drug laws in the U.S., and the consolidation under one agency - insteady of the FDA, the DEA and the ATF, there should be one agency tasked with the job of regulating the production and sale of any such substances, be it alcohol or cannabis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great idea. All 50 states need to have this on the ballot.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 25, 2008 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And we need to unite and overcome the WOD propaganda that has allowed Al Quaida to kick America's ASS. Get rid of WOD and we won't be relying on Saudi Arabia for oil. Besides, it's not as if all those petro-pharmaceuticals have done any better than even marijuana.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Smart Thing To Do
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 25, 2008 11:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People turn to drugs to escape the depressing horror show of life on Earth. Reform that life and happiness will be so commonplace people will avoid drugs as the obvious trap they are.

Meanwhile, take the profit out of drugs and the criminals will look elsewhere. Treat drug users and addicts as mentally and physically ill and they will respond to get well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

snowbyrd
Posted by: lbrantley on Oct 25, 2008 3:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find Proposition # 5 to be innovative and I hope it passes. My concern is when employers conduct background checks: will these people be considered EMPLOYABLE?

California should send a "draft of this legislation 2 Florida ASAP'! HOPE IT PASSES!! Could create many internal employment opportunities 4 Californians..

Tampa, FLa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TimS
Posted by: TimS on Oct 25, 2008 10:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there are any laws on the books more stupid than the drug laws,,,jesus christ, it is absolutely clear that people who want to use drugs will use them. Let them. It's their business and no one elses. Drug laws just drive the price of the crap up and make people desperate and greedy.They don't stop for the cops, if they do stop it's because THEY want to. The prison and cop unions love the drug laws, it's the best job security they have, we pay for it all, cops guards wardens counselors and all their tools, all tax money. Same as sex, no law will ever make a dent in it, ever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]