Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democracy and Elections

Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner: "We Will Be Ready."

By Brad Friedman . Posted September 22, 2008.


Ohio's top election official describes how she is planning for a fair presidential election in an exclusive interview with Brad Friedman.
2008augustdemconventionday3brunner010
Advertisement

I first met Jennifer Brunner during the summer of 2006, at the DNC's summer meeting in Chicago were I was asked to speak to some of their attorneys about the dangers of e-voting and how their party needed to wake up to the battle they faced against this rising menace to democracy.

Brunner was running that year to replace the discredited Republican J. Kenneth Blackwell as Ohio's Secretary of State that year, as hopes for Democratic electoral wins in the Buckeye State, and indeed across the nation -- on the heels of what one Republican scandal after another -- were just beginning to reach a fevered pitch.

As one of the Democrats' great hopes, she was a keynote speaker at one of the conference's main sessions. I took the opportunity to introduce myself after she left the podium, to offer my assistance, should she need it, on matters of e-voting which had vexed Ohio in '04, and were set to get far worse in '06 and beyond.

The exchange was a quick, and even chilly one. It was, after all, back in the day when the bulk of the Democratic Party was in almost complete denial about the perils faced by the still-rising electronic menace; from the utter loss of transparency and the ability for citizens to oversee their own elections on both touch-screen and optical-scan voting machines; to the ease of tampering with such systems; to their alarming error rates and utter lack of testing by anyone; to the fact that these machines often simply failed to work at all, denying thousands, if not millions of voters of their legal franchise on Election Day.

I admit to being less than impressed with her interest in the matter back then, though to be fair, I would hear later, through the grapevine, that she was less than impressed with me in the bargain.

But that was then, and this is now -- following one Ohio election meltdown after another, and then her own version of CA Secretary of State Deborah Bowen's "Top-to-Bottom" review of all of the state's e-voting systems -- Brunner clearly has a different outlook on the nightmare of a system she would be elected to oversee in November of 2006.

The results of Ohio's landmark "Evaluation & Validation of Election-Related Equipment, Standards & Testing" (aptly acronymed "EVEREST") stunned Brunner, as she detailed in an exclusive interview she granted me at just after the test results were released, in late 2007. The findings were a mountain of "critical security failures" in virtually every aspect of Ohio's e-voting systems.

Since then, she's faced fired from virtually every side -- from friend and foe alike, in Ohio, from hard-right Republican partisans, to hostile election officials, to litigious and desperate voting machine companies, to stubborn Democratic-leaning public advocacy groups -- as she's scrambled to try and restore a semblance of democracy to the Buckeye State before what it certain to be the largest, and perhaps most contentious election in the state's history this November.

I had the opportunity to sit down recently, face-to-face this time, for an extended interview with Madame Secretary in Denver, during the Democratic National Convention.

While a fair number of Democratic power players at least seem to have a clue about the myriad Republican attempts to keep voters from voting this year in their ever-surging War on Democracy, concerns about e-voting remain an issue about which many Democrats remain in either complete denial, absolute cluelessness, or paralyzed-fear over the unsubstantiated belief that discussion of such concerns might frighten voters from the polls.

None of those failures of imagination or courage seem to be the case for Ohio's Secretary of State anymore (if they ever were), as she, at the very least, seemed to more clearly than ever, understand the precariousness of the entire system she has been tapped to oversee in one of America's now-most notorious swing states.

In our wide-ranging Q&A, which follows below, she and I discussed a number of noteworthy, and newsworthy, items, including:

  • Challenges and surprises she's faced since becoming SoS in 2007, even by constituencies one might think would otherwise be supportive of her;
  • Concerns about her tie-breaking decision to move Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) to an all paper ballot system, just 73 days before the state's primary election last March;
  • Directives she's issued (and will be issueing) for this year's general election, such as requiring counties to inform all voters that they may vote on a paper ballot; that there must be two lines created at polling places -- one for those who wish to vote on paper, and another for those who prefer to vote on touch-screen; the end of voting machine "sleepovers" at poll worker houses prior to election, and other new security requirements;
  • Whether or not there has ever been any accountability for so much that went wrong in 2004, in places like Warren County, where press and public were famously locked out of the counting room on Election Night, or in Knox County where the last vote was not cast at Kenyon College until 4am on the morning following Election Day;
  • Concerns about student access to polling places this year, and steps being taken to try to help assure it;
  • Whether citizens may use video cameras in the polling place to document what may go on there this year;
  • And beyond all of that: Will Ohio be ready for whatever may come this November, and will they be the Buckeye State again in 2008, or the "blackeye" state that they became in 2004.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election protection, george w. bush, democratic party, republican party, jennifer brunner, bob fitrakis, stephen spoonamore, ohio election theft 2004, stolen election, electronic vote count fra, cliff arnebeck, king lincoln bronzeville , kenneth blackwell

Brad Friedman is an investigative journalist/blogger and the creator/publisher of The BRAD BLOG, which has been focusing for some years on the many issues involved in election integrity. He can currently be seen in a number of documentaries now in release around the country, including David Earnhardt's Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections, and the just-released Murder, Spies & Voting Lies: The Clint Curtis Story, by documentarian Patty Sharaf.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
good interview Brad
Posted by: politicky on Sep 22, 2008 5:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must give this woman some credit for being willing to work out the $h*tstorm that was Ohio '04 and implement changes so there is no repeat malfeasance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The biggest red flag ...
Posted by: ydef on Sep 25, 2008 12:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is all a HUGE improvement over what it was four years ago, as it appears the secretary of state is both honest and competent. Hats off to Jennifer Bruner.

However the biggest red flag that appears unresolved is the lack of one standard protocol to prevent 'sleepovers'. It's not reassuring to hear that each county will have its own process of oversight of the voting machines that will only be 'signed off on' by the Secretary of State. Lack of a uniform policy makes ensuring each county's unique form of 'sleepover prevention policy' that much more difficult to enforce. Hearing that some machines will be in cages, some in locked rooms, etc. sounds like there will be no way to absolutely confirm that each respective oversight policy is adhered to except to just 'take the word' of the local board of elections that the machines were properly secured. This is especially worrisome in trouble spots like Warren county.

For instance, I would be interested to know whether Ms Bruner is aware of WHO those poll workers and others responsible for the public and press lockout were, and whether those individuals are going to be again working this election. Since there was obviously a coordinated effort by officials in that county to prevent oversight of their tally, there should be extra emphasis on independent monitors working to ensure every step submitted by the board of elections that is signed off on is complied to.

It's good to know that there's someone like Jennifer Bruner working to make the process fair, and this interview does go a long way in dispelling public unease, especially in cases like shenanigans in Warren county. She's in position to be most cognizant of the personnel on that board of elections and what her comfort level is with those people. On this one point, I wish that Brad had probed a little bit harder on this. Otherwise I would say it was a fantastic interview. Props to both Brad and Jennifer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]