Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democracy and Elections

Fighting for the Rights of Voters Behind Bars

By Anthony Papa, Drug Policy Alliance. Posted September 23, 2008.


Exercising the right to vote is important part of prisoner rehabilitation, but over 5 million convicted felons are barred from doing so.
Advertisement

A coalition of concerned citizens in Alabama is shaking up the GOP with their goal of registering voters in the most unlikely of places -- state prisons. A voter registration drive led last week by Rev. Kenny Glasgow, began registering prisoners to vote, a right guaranteed under Alabama's State Constitution, so they could cast absentee ballots.

The drive was originally embraced by Richard Allen, the commissioner of corrections in Alabama, but it was stopped when he received a letter on Thursday from the Alabama Republican Party opposing the drive. Its chairman, Mike Hubbard, told Mr. Allen that the party supports voter registration but not for prisoners, citing a need for safeguards against possible voter fraud.

Rev. Glasgow challenged this statement and said, "Voter registration drives are an essential part of our democracy. This action by the GOP and the Department of Corrections smacks of voter intimidation. Our focus isn't politics, its restoration. We're just doing what the Bible says, visiting people in prison and ministering to them. The chairman of the Republican Party and the chairman of the Democratic Party can go into prisons with us and monitor the registration process to make sure it's nonpartisan, if that's a concern."

In Alabama, nearly 250,000 people have been stripped of their right to vote due to a felony conviction. But, in a 2006 court ruling which was the result of a lawsuit by Ryan Haygood of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, a judge found that only those persons convicted of felonies of "moral turpitude" lose their right to vote. The judge found that certain felonies -- such as drug possession -- do not constitute crimes of moral turpitude and, therefore, individuals convicted of those crimes do not lose their voting rights, even during incarceration.

Rev. Glasgow's organization, Alabama-based The Ordinary People's Society (TOPS) and their national partner, the Drug Policy Alliance, estimate that more than 50,000 people convicted in Alabama of felonies falling outside the "moral turpitude" definition have been wrongly denied their right to vote, or anyway believe they lost that right due to a felony conviction.

While drug use is proportionally equal across all racial lines, African Americans are incarcerated for drug crimes at much higher rates than whites. Blacks make up only 26 percent of Alabama's population but are nearly 60 percent of the prison population. And, for every white person in an Alabama jail, there are about four black people.

"We've got to start restoring people's lives by providing treatment, by restoring the right to vote," said Reverend Kenneth Glasgow, TOPS executive director and state coordinator of their New Bottom Line campaign. "When a person gets a felony conviction, they can lose more than their voting rights; they can lose public assistance, public housing and financial aid for school. The drug war has become a war on people and we now spend more on incarceration than on treatment. Why do we spend more on producing criminals than producing citizens? We need a new bottom line."

The right to vote is an important part of the rehabilitation process and should be given to those who have paid their debt to society. An estimated 5.3 million Americans are denied the right to vote because of laws that prohibit voting by people with felony convictions. A few years ago, I was one of those Americans. I was on parole and could not vote after serving 12 years of a 15-to-life sentence for a nonviolent drug crime under New York's draconian Rockefeller Drug Laws. After my release, I felt the pain of felony disenfranchisement since it seemed I was being further punished for my crime. I was elated when, after waiting for five years, I got off parole and was able to cast my first vote. I felt I was fully welcomed back by society as a citizen.

"Alabama state law makes it clear that people incarcerated for simple drug possession never lose their right to vote, even while incarcerated," said Glasgow. "The GOP and the Alabama Department of Corrections cannot decide on their own which constituencies are going to have access to the vote, and which will be barred from it. We live in a democracy, after all."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: voting, war on drugs, voting rights, prisons, alabama, drug policy alliance, criminal justice system, felon disenfranchisement, naacp legal defense fund

Anthony Papa, author of 15 To Life: How I Painted My Way To Freedom, is a communications specialist for the Drug Policy Alliance.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
whats my rights
Posted by: Karl.Ben on Sep 23, 2008 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you take someone rights away..(murder etc) you have no rights yourself Voting is for those that pretend to be responsible members of society.

Ever wonder why the left wants criminals to vote? A big voting block for them...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: whats my rights Posted by: illit
What are my rights?
Posted by: PSYOP on Sep 23, 2008 11:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not a matter of feelings, it's a matter of law. The article cites only drug crimes as crimes that do not involve moral turpitude. I didn't read anything about murder. If Alabama laws allow certain prisoners to vote, they should be allowed to vote, regardless of whether the Republicans want them to vote or not. For non-violent offenders,any time in prison is too long - they're already paying dearly. Talk about immorality...if we actually enforced moral turpitude equally, the two political parties of the US would be running campaigns from prison.

Ever wonder why the right doesn't want criminals to vote? They'd get their a**es handed to them in the ballot box.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So when..
Posted by: Romantic Violence on Sep 25, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For non-violent offenses, 'offenses' that are truly victimlesss and are based rather upon the exercise of personal choices between consenting adults; when do you stop paying a 'debt' to society? 'Morality' will become the death of this society. Demand full and total enfrachisement upon release..period.

'If it harms none, then do as thy will'
Pantegruel and Gargantua

1789

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraqi prisoners got to vote, why can't Americans?
Posted by: harpy on Sep 25, 2008 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Released felons have the burdens of citizenship, such as paying taxes, obeying laws, and are required to work, plus there is usually some kind of community service involved. Why should a nonviolent crime, that you have to pay restitution for, court charges, probation fees, etc., take away all your citizenship rights forever when you've paid your debt to society?

Also, remember the Iraqi elections? They made a point of letting us know that all the prisoners got to vote. A privilege not afforded Americans!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

READ THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Sep 30, 2008 5:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It states: "that you cannot take away anyone's citizenship, for any prior act of servitude"!!! That makes the whole government guilty of treason, because they create laws, to create outlaws, in order to create a new slave class/ race, with no rights at all!!! ADDICTION IS: A HUMAN FRAILITY, NOT A CRIMINAL ACT!!! THUS MAKING THE WAR OF DRUGS: A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

VOTING MEANS NOTHING, IF WE CAN'T RUN
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Sep 30, 2008 5:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I CHIEF WANA DUBIE, WAS TAKEN OFF OF THE BALLOT FOR GOVERNOR OF MISSOURI, because I am a convicted felon!!! When I was running for state rep. dist. 150, in 2006, my opponent, the republican incumbent Jason Smith, co-sponsored a bill, to forbid x-cons the constitutional right to run for office, in order to have me removed from the ballot!!! The bill passed, but was struck down as unconstitutional, and I got 4.4% of the vote with 556 votes!!! I ran for state rep. to set the stage for the governors race this year, "DUBIE VS BLUNT", IT WAS TO BE THE RACE OF THE CENTURY!!! However the bill was reintroduced, and found to be put in place correctly, according to the MO. SUPREME COURT!!! GOV. MATT BLUNT, signed this bill both times, in order to forbid me from making the " WAR OF DRUGS" TWO SIDED!!! Our "NOT-SEE" government, is at war with it's own citizens, and this treason, must come to an END!!! The MO. ethics commission, stated that all laws are constitutional, until deemed otherwise by the supreme court, but join the MO. SECRETARY OF STATE, in claiming that I broke the law, but refuse me my day in court!!! I am only a convicted felon, because I planted marijuana publicly, to test the validity of the constitution, in this state of "MISERY", but was not allowed to use the constitution, in circuit (lower)court, and the supreme court, refused to hear my case!!! I was denied the constitution, all together, and they dare call me a criminal!!! TO BE "BLUNT" I DARE CALL IT TREASON!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]