Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democracy and Elections

Troops Abroad Donate 6:1 to Obama Over McCain

By Luke Rosiak , Open Secrets. Posted August 20, 2008.


Soldiers also support Ron Paul over John McCain, suggesting troops want to get out of Iraq sooner than later.
Advertisement

During World War II, soldiers crouching in foxholes penned letters assuring their sweethearts that they'd be home soon. Now, between firefights in the Iraqi desert, some infantrymen have been sending a different kind of mail stateside: two or three hundred dollars -- or whatever they can spare -- towards a presidential election that could very well determine just how soon they come home.

According to an analysis of campaign contributions by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, Democrat Barack Obama has received nearly six times as much money from troops deployed overseas at the time of their contributions than has Republican John McCain, and the fiercely anti-war Ron Paul, though he suspended his campaign for the Republican nomination months ago, has received more than four times McCain's haul.

Despite McCain's status as a decorated veteran and a historically Republican bent among the military, members of the armed services overall -- whether stationed overseas or at home -- are also favoring Obama with their campaign contributions in 2008, by a $55,000 margin. Although 59 percent of federal contributions by military personnel has gone to Republicans this cycle, of money from the military to the presumed presidential nominees, 57 percent has gone to Obama.

With the latest campaign finance filings, detailing June fundraising, McCain has overtaken Paul among all military donors, though Paul still leads with contributors listing an overseas address. Financial support from military personnel for anti-war candidates Obama and Paul is a trend that the Center for Responsive Politics first observed last September.

Individuals in the Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine Corps have all leaned Republican this cycle, but the only branch in which that ideology has carried over to the presidential race is the Marine Corps, where McCain leads Obama by about $4,000. In each of the other branches -- including the Navy, in which McCain served when he was taken prisoner during the Vietnam War -- Obama leads by significant margins.

"That's shocking. The academic debate is between some who say that junior enlisted ranks lean slightly Republican and some who say it's about equal, but no one would point to six-to-one" in Democrats' favor, said Aaron Belkin, a professor of political science at the University of California who studies the military. "That represents a tremendous shift from 2000, when the military vote almost certainly was decisive in Florida and elsewhere, and leaned heavily towards the Republicans."

In 2000, Republican George W. Bush outraised Democrat Al Gore among military personnel almost 2 to 1. In 2004, with the Iraq war underway, John Kerry closed the gap with President Bush, but Bush still raised $1.50 from the military for every $1 his Democratic opponent collected.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, obama, soldiers, mccain, election 2008

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
American Soldiers Are Paying A Price...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Aug 20, 2008 12:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of the rest of us can only imagine. A debt is owed and the payoff is an executive who actually cares about the troops, not some chickenhawk Viet Nam era hack. An honest accounting for debts owed should come on election day. I wonder if Diebold is capable of understanding the full implications of "debts owed".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Draft Obama
Posted by: edgar1 on Aug 20, 2008 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"It's hard to describe how apolitical a lot of the enlisted ranks are. He's worried about other things than following the news."

Statistically, it's unclear if these numbers mean anything. No doubt the repeated deployments have embittered or disillusioned many servicepeople, regardless of who they support for President. The abuse of the National guard and the stretching of the regular army because of the cowardice of Rumsfeld and Bush to institute a draft must never occur again. If Obama intends to intervene around the world in places like Sudan, Georgia and Afghanistan, let him have the guts to open up the draft. I doubt his radical buddies like Ayers and Dohrn would endorse that, but they have to stay out of trouble or back to the uncomfortable underground they go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Draft Obama Posted by: Quannah
Free US from Israel
Posted by: weathered on Aug 21, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its not a relationship, its a bribe and its killing us.

Still in denial, just look around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

expect some ballot snafu
Posted by: jimsenter on Aug 22, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yep. expect some sort of snafu, mail too slow distributing absentee ballots, or a fire in some facility, or a roadside bomb blowing up a lot of them, to dampen the impact of this. The GOP has demonstrated their willingness to blackball tens of thousands of elligible voters in the past. Georgie's hacks in the Veterans Administration are illegally denying folks access to VA hospitals for the purpose of registering veterans to vote. Do you think they will hesitate for a second to disenfranchise active duty soldiers? Not on your life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this is supprising to who?
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 26, 2008 4:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To volunteer to serve after an attack is noble and honorable...

but once they GET you
in uniform... and after you find out the whole thing is a lie, you write an article saying that theirs a 6:1 donation spread between parties and are wondering why?

plus all the other insane limitations trying to keep the truth from leaking out into the real world...
but the soldiers on the ground know first hand of the duplicitous and greedy bunch of thieves they have making their life and death decisions sitting in DC and are voicing their disdain with their wallet...

unfortunately for all these soldiers/sailors/airmen, they're about to discover that no matter who wins ...they that serve... will still loose because both parties are the same!

privileged elites be dammed

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

small sample of dontaions by officers probably
Posted by: whealeydj on Aug 28, 2008 3:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is a sobering caveat to this study. it does reflect the battle fatigue of long and multiple and dangerous deployments by the interventionist Bush and the knee jerk militarist and interventionist McCain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain willl renew the draft
Posted by: luzmejor on Sep 10, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do believe that he wants to do Vietnam over again to prove he would have done it better than his superiors of that time.

Probably there is no person who wouldn't want a second chance to prove himself a "winner." It would be stupid of us to give him an opportunity like that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]