Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democracy and Elections

2008's First Disenfranchised Voters: Injured and Homeless Veterans

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted August 11, 2008.


Despite new legislation in Congress, the VA is poised to prevent registration drives at its facilities before the November election.
Advertisement

The first large block of voters to be disenfranchised in 2008 are the wounded warriors from recent wars and homeless veterans living at hundreds of Department of Veterans Affairs facilities across the country, according to veterans and voting rights activists.

"President Bush and Karl Rove are attempting to block voter registration of at least 200,000 and possibly as much as 400,000 veterans," said Paul Sullivan, president of Veterans for Common Sense, referring to injured former soldiers from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in various VA treatment facilities, veterans living in the VA's nursing homes, and homeless veterans living in VA shelters.

"We may have all kinds of hurdles," Sullivan said. "We may have the clock running out on us, but we will not give up. This needs to be shoved in the face of every single elected official in the country. We can fix this in a second We are talking about two or three sentences in legislation. We are talking about the integrity of our democracy."

In recent months, the Department of Veterans Affairs has resisted efforts by U.S. senators and top state election officials to allow voter registration drives in its facilities. Just last month, the VA issued new rules that banned election officials -- whether local registrars or secretaries of state -- from registering voters, saying it was a partisan activity that interfered with its medical mission. In most states, any time a person changes their residence they must update their voter registration in order to vote.

The VA's ban on registration drives, even by state constitutional officers, provoked a rebuke from the National Association of Secretaries of State -- a resolution urging the VA to rescind its policy -- and revived the issue in Congress, where separate House and Senate bills would force the VA to become a voter registration agency like state motor vehicle departments, where people are proactively given an opportunity to register to vote. Under the VA's current policy, any resident in its facilities must seek help with voter registration and voting.

The problem with the congressional efforts, according to Sullivan and others following this issue, is that the VA appears to be on course to run out the clock before meaningful voter registration drives could be undertaken for this year's presidential election.

Under the most optimistic scenario, even if the Congress passed legislation within a week of reconvening, which would be mid-September, the president would have two weeks to sign it into law. That timeline places the bill's potential adoption very close to the first week in October, when voter registration closes for the November election in 27 states. Moreover, at that time, state election officials would have little time to organize and implement voter registration drives, voting rights activists said.

"This is a bill you can't vote against," said Scott Rafferty, who sued the VA in 2004 when the agency blocked voter registration efforts by Democrats at its campus in Menlo Park, California, but allowed the Republican Party onto the campus to register voters. "But it is almost physically impossible to get it passed and implemented in time."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: voting, veterans affairs

Steven Rosenfeld is a Senior Fellow at AlterNet.org, where he reports on elections from a voting rights perspective. Previously, he was executive producer of RadioNation with Laura Flanders, a progressive talk show heard on more than 100 Air America Radio and public radio stations.

He is co-author of What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election (The New Press, 2006), and Making History in Vermont: The Election of a Socialist to Congress (Hollowbrook Publishing, 1992). An award-winning journalist, he has been a staff reporter at National Public Radio, Monitor Radio, TomPaine.com and at daily and weekly newspapers in Vermont.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Republicans believe in getting out the vote, but only if it goes for their candidates.
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 11, 2008 2:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2004, I "tabled" for John Kerry in a local shopping mall. "Table" means manning a small station in public view for registering voters, with emphasis on filing for absentee ballots.

The shopping mall had allowed two tables -- one at each end of the facility, one designated for Republicans, the other Democrats. On this particular occasion, an early Sunday morning, I was the first person to work the Democrat table.

When I got there, two Republican women had taken over the registration table and displayed their signs. Meanwhile, two other GOP ladies had occupied the remaining table, at the other end of the mall.

As politely as I could, I asked the women to leave. They refused, saying I should have gotten there first. When I pointed out the unfairness of having two Republican tables and none for Democrats, they just ignored me. So I called the mall's head of security and had the "ladies" removed from the facility.

That same selfish attitude -- an eagerness of Republicans to deny equal voting rights to their opponents -- is why veterans, whom the RNC suspects are largely Democrats and independents, have been prevented from registering to vote by absentee ballots in VA hospitals.

With love,

*Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, lifelong registered Republican and ardent Obama supporter.
Seven Reasons to Vote Against Unfit McCain

*For the benefit of first-time AlterNet visitors to give context to this comment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A devastating picture of McCain
Posted by: Christie on Aug 11, 2008 3:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some opinions of McCain from his own party and military comrades:

McCain - War You Can Believe in!
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Republicans

_and_miltary_men_on_John_McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks for the tip, Christie. Posted by: HughScott
The Single, Most Cynical Act...
Posted by: gazooks on Aug 11, 2008 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... of the worst administration in American history!

To deny Vets, wounded, maimed and crippled in wars, the opportunity of exercising THE most basic act of democracy for a political gain is an outrage and a measure of our decline to previously unimaginable depths.

For this administration, and for this Congress, this denial of rights is the obscene preamble to the absolute denial of decency and democracy.

CALL YOUR FUCKING SENATORS and REPS! If there's no public outcry about this travesty, we're a nation not worth saving.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FORGET YOUR CONGRESS; CONTACT VETS YOU KNOW "INSIDE THE WALLS"...
Posted by: wellaware lec on Aug 11, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i would also suggest that ANYONE who knows a vet in this position, because remember that they almost all have families who are NOT "locked up" in a government facility, contact them NOW and find out what needs to happen so they can be registered. Perfect opportunity for grass roots involvement.
Also, wonder how many of these people will be booted out of those same government facilities right after the election...
Will be interesting to see...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They're the first??
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 11, 2008 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thr Reagan/Bush era created the vast bulk of the homeless when the Savings and Loans fell apart. Veteran's have had a homeless crisis ever since there's been wars. Vietnam and Desert Storm added greatly. Fact is,if you don't have money to lay at the feet of the candidates you're unheard.Back in the 70"s Phil Donahue had a politician on and asked him about how they contact their constituants. His reply was 'If I get a $5 contribution form someone and then I get a $5,000 one and both call for help,who do you think I'll call first... The $5,000 one'. The first thought I had was 'Isn't it the $5 guy that really needs your help?'
Face it,if you're poor,homeless and a veteran
you get alot of 'do-gooders' yelping about how bad it is for you but they do nothing but point fingers. The government only cares about veterans that actually die for their country.
The disenfranchised are most of America and that's the problem. The government and their controllers ( big business) need to have a perminate underclass for they need us to point the finger at and say 'This is the problem with America'. It's the old shell game and we're the ones under the shell that never gets picked but are always talked about.
If you're homeless,you can't vote because you have no address. I they could and all the disenfranchised had their votes counted ( as if...) then there would be very few donkeys or elephants in DC.
Write-in Jeffrey7 for Prez '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anyone remember "Support the Troops"?
Posted by: madmax427 on Aug 11, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And THIS is how the GOP "Supports the Troops"? Oh, I FORGOT, These Troops didn't DIE for the GOP 'cause'!!

Yep, We had ALL better Vote for McSame so We can "Support the Troops" some more!!

The assininity of this is beyond comprehension: These Troops are LIVING with the injuries CAUSED by the Current Political base AND THAT is WHY They are being marginalized! They KNOW the TRUTH and the Current Political Regime CANNOT allow Their Voices to be heard! BULLSHIT!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is an abomination
Posted by: helenwheels on Aug 11, 2008 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What disgusts me nearly as much as how the current madministration treats our vets (like shit), is the under-reporting of it in the mainstream, corporate-owned media. They sit there with their yellow flagpins and yap about how great this country is. This country currently (and since Raygun's madministration) treats our Vets like trash. The only station I've seen report consistently on this is MSNBC, on Countdown. Other places just report jingoistic flag-humping bullshit.

I linked to this article on my blog & also the video mentioned above by commenter Christie. It's VERY important to disseminate this information. We cannot afford to have a monster like McLame in the WH.

I actually tried just now to go to the Veterans for Common Sense site and it wouldn't load. I hope it's from too many visits, and not being hacked or interfered with by the powers that be.

Thanks you, Steven Rosenfeld, for this insightful article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its time for a people Coup...De-charter all Corps ...Now....
Posted by: blueapples26 on Aug 11, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rich don't give a crap oabout us. They get richer and we like good lemmings give our wealth and labor to them without saying a peep. wake up, your in a trance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, that's it, huh?
Posted by: willymack on Aug 11, 2008 10:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bushies have dispensed with all pretense of democracy, and all our gutless congress can do is throw up their hands and say there isn't time to DO anything about it? The Constitution (I think it's in Article One) gives the House the power to eliminate any political party deemed harmful to the nation. They got rid of the Whigs that way, and can shitcan the neocon bastards as well. Let's face it, folks; the so-called republicans are that in name only, and are really a gang of greedy, sadistic, morally degenerate criminals that we'd be far better off without.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Congress is NOT gutless Posted by: Carl Street
Blah, blah, blah!!!!
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 11, 2008 2:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Veteran's always get the short shrift! While the GOP talks about "supporting the troops", the fact is that they don't. Not when it comes down to it. These people are going into this war of choice because of the lies of children! They are are coming home with all types of injuries, and if they are not being booted out (no one planned on having casualties that might need care), they are once again getting the shaft.

I SUPPORT THE TROOPS!!! I BELIEVE IT IS PAST TIME FOR THEM TO COME HOME!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Would The Republicans Care
Posted by: TruthBeTold on Aug 11, 2008 4:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about making it easy for wounded and homeless veterans to register to vote? Has anyone heard anything from the American Legion or the VFW protesting the fact that the VA is preventing efforts to register these veterans?

Groups like the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars continue to slavishly support John McCain, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. These people will stampede over their grandchildren trying to get photo-ops with the likes of Bush/Cheney, but not a word from them about the treatment of soldiers returing from Iraq and Afghanistan.

John McCain has a dismal record of actually supporting the troops where it counts, yet the people in these groups don't hesitate to dress up in their old uniforms just to appear on stage with McCain (Bush and Cheney) to have their photos taken shaking his hand. For the low-information readers, McCain Voted AGAINST:

- amendment providing $20 billion to the VA's medical facilities (5/4/06)
- providing $430 million to the VA for outpatient care and treatment for veterans (4/26/06)

- increasing VA funding by $1.5 billion by closing corporate loopholes (3/14/06)

- increasing VA funding by $1.8 billion by ending abusive tax loopholes (3/10/04)

Also, for the record McCain DID NOT SUPPORT the new 21st Century GI Bill and could not be bothered to even show up for the vote but that did not stop him, and George Bush, from taking credit for that bill. For McCain, Suport the troops meant spending that time in California on a campaign and fund-raising trip instead of showing up to vote on the new GI Bill.

Everyone who has even two brain cells knows Bush's military record and about Cheney's 5 deferments because he had better things to do but something compels groups like the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars to continue showing up for that photo op.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]