Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democracy and Elections

States Fail to Offer Voter Registration to Millions of Low-Income Voters

By Art Levine, AlterNet. Posted July 29, 2008.


Another big election year and once again low-income voters are on the sidelines.
Advertisement

Millions of low-income and minority voters are being denied opportunities to register to vote by state agencies that are violating a federal voting law, according to members of Congress and voting rights groups.

The ongoing failure has led to a nearly 80 percent drop-off in registering low-income applicants at state social services agencies over a decade, according to a recent report by the non-partisan voter advocacy research groups Project Vote and Demos.

"This noncompliance means the disenfranchisement of millions of low-income citizens, and a widening of the gap between the registration rates of high and low-income individuals," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., the chairwoman of a House elections subcommittee that held hearings this spring on the widespread violations of Section 7 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).

The under-enforced 1993 law is better known the "motor voter" law. Minority citizens lag behind white voter registration by as much 10 percent for blacks, and roughly 20 percent for Hispanics and Asian-Americans, in part because they are disproportionately low-income.

If minorities voted at the same rate as whites, there would be 7.5 million more minority voters on Election Day, Project Vote reported last fall. Just as troubling, 40 percent of adults in households with less than $25,000 in annual incomes are unregistered, compared to only 20 percent from those with family incomes above $100,000.

These disparities are worsened by other state and federal actions that limit access to voter registration and voting.

Battleground states such as Florida also impose draconian restrictions on voter registration groups seeking to register low-income voters. VA hospitals bar on-site voter registration drives of wounded soldiers. And states have toughened voter ID requirements, led by Indiana's photo ID law that was upheld by the Supreme Court in April.

In addition, some states, including Louisiana, are facing challenges to their efforts to hastily purge many thousands of often minority voters from their rolls. In response to these alarming trends, Project Vote declared last week, "Voter purges are one of several problems in the administration of elections that could not only bar legal voters from the polls, but could potentially influence the outcome of close races," including the tight Presidential race.

Some Progress Made

Although there has been relatively little cause for optimism on voting rights, a few recent legal actions have offered some rays of hope amid a generally grim picture of widespread barriers to voting. Unfortunately, this pattern of vote suppression has too often been abetted by a partisan Department of Justice. Yet just two weeks ago, the grass-roots advocacy group ACORN, backed by Project Vote and the public policy research group Demos, won an important victory for disenfranchised poor voters. A federal court ordered Missouri's Department of Human Services to finally comply with the NVRA, that federal law requiring the state's social welfare offices to provide voter registration applications and assistance to their clients. "This order could lead to more than hundred thousand new voters from low-income communities that have historically been under represented in the political process," said Jeff Ordower, Missouri ACORN's head organizer.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: voting, registration, low-income voters

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
beanie
Posted by: beaniekidjacked on Jul 29, 2008 4:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They didn't bother to register people because there is no money in it for them.
They are not interested in families or voting, only in making money.
Social Services across the country has become a foster child mill taking kids from perfectly good families and placing them in foster care so the state can receive federal funding. That is why children are dying in their care - they don't care.
In the year 2000 the federal government gave $20 million in bonuses (above the other federal funding).
Federal Bonuses"
In 2002 Virginia received $922,000 in bonuses
Virginia
IN 2003, the federal government awarded Florida child welfare administrators a $3.5 million bonus for dramatically increasing the number of children adopted from foster care.
Florida
It is big business, but don't believe me, listen (or read) the report by Senator Nancy Schaefer (Georgia)

Then go to Kidjacked and read the horror stories.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm not who I appear to be............
Posted by: carbon-based on Jul 29, 2008 6:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm still not sure why democrats want to let people vote when they have no idea who those people are..

We have millions of illegal immigrants floating around in this country.. any terrorists could walk into a voting area.

Are they trying to just grab anyone who is breathing and demand the be allowed to vote..

I do not see how requiring voter ID, which is as great idea, would disenfranchise voters.. it seem a sure way to weed out illegals. But I guess dems figure those illegals would give them a edge!

Politics the democrat way!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing New
Posted by: weslen1 on Aug 4, 2008 4:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back when Motor Voter became law in Michigan, then Governor Engler did everything in his power to stop it. He even ordered state employees not to comply. He even had the nerve to go on national tv and state that his administration did not want a whole bunch of ignorant, unwashed, poor or homeless people on the roles.
I have no problem with having to have a picture I.D. to vote. You have to have one to open a bank account or cash a check or for just about anything. But I have a great deal of skepticism about this "National I.D." idea. Given the abuses of the Bush Administration so far, I think the "National I.D." is just a scam to add to the illegal information they have already collected from the telecoms in their data base. This is Nixon's "Enemies List" on a national level. And just like the HD TV law that goes into effect in February, it's another way to make poor people pay more than they can afford for one more item. It costs $13 in MI for an I.D., $13 for a copy of a birth certificate. In Colorado, I happen to know, it costs $17 for those things. Making it mandatory for the entire country to have ONE national I.D. card is too costly and a State I.D. is good enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hitler did not represent the Jews either
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Aug 4, 2008 5:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our elitist "NOT-SEE" GOVERNMENT, only represents themselves!!! The American Jews, are everyone without the proper "DEGREE" OF NOBILITY, granted through the universities, we have given our nation to the "BEAST" OF DIVISION!!! It's all about money, and power!!! Bob Barr, the Libert-Arian candidate for president, stated that myself, and the other candidates, excluded / "disenfranchised" from the party this year, were "non-entities" not of the "NEW" ruling "ELITE"!!!HITLER, WOULD BE PROUD!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]