Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democracy and Elections

McCain Camp Says It Will Scale Back GOP Voter Suppression Tactics

By Marc Ambinder, The Atlantic. Posted June 26, 2008.


But Obama’s top campaign lawyer is skeptical the GOP can break with its past.
Advertisement

John McCain's election strategists plan to tone down the Republicans' traditionally aggressive and public campaign against potential voter fraud, several Republicans familiar with the situation say.

The strategists and consultants all would speak only on the condition that their names and affiliations not be used because they were not permitted to divulge the information, they did not want to disclose internal deliberations, and because the issue is still being discussed within the party.

Sources with direct knowledge of the coordinated Republican effort this year say that high-ranking Republicans, including some within McCain's campaign, are convinced that GOP efforts in 2004 were damaging.

"Spreading 10,000 lawyers around the country and announcing a challenge to 40,000 new registrants in Ohio was counterproductive," a Republican familiar with the situation said. The Republican said that many within the party believed that then-Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell's efforts to tighten provisional ballot rules ahead of the 2004 may have increased Democratic turnout because it convinced Democrats that Republicans were trying to disenfranchise voters.

Because the RNC is prohibited by court order from directly participating in these types of efforts, the charge is generally taken up by groups with fewer political sensitivities. Democrats tend to oppose stricter voter identification provisions and Republicans support them; Republicans think that Democrats want to encourage non-voters to vote; Democrats think that Republicans want to intimidate black, Hispanic and poorer voters into not voting.

The emerging McCain-Republican view today is that with provisional ballots in wide use, the traditional Republican legal position can change to careful monitoring, rather than aggressive challenging. If there's evidence that the provisional ballots were somehow illegally cast, then those ballots can be challenged post-election.

"We would, of course, welcome an end to traditional Republican vote suppression activity, but we will believe it when we see it," said Robert Bauer, the Obama campaign's general counsel. "We will have a strong, comprehensive program to promote and protect the vote and need really no more from the McCain campaign and their allies than actions fully consistent with true respect for the voter and the voting process."

Another reason for the shift, Republicans say, is that McCain has not generally identified himself with the issue, and they say that McCain's campaign counsel, Trevor Potter, has expressed the view that previous Republican efforts have created a backlash.

Other high-ranking Republicans believe that is politically precarious to be so aggressive in the context of a presidential race against an African American.

"The Democrats will unfortunately try to bring race into play when this discussion happens, as they do every cycle," another top Republican who is advising the McCain campaign said. "It's unfortunate because illegally cast votes disenfranchise real voters by potentially canceling out their votes, and it's in everyone's best interest to have elections conducted fairly with no suspicion of foul play hanging over the winners."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: democrats, republicans, voter fraud, election 2008

Marc Ambinder is blogging about the 2008 presidential election from the road for TheAtlantic.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
USAF officer, ret.
Posted by: bflove on Jun 27, 2008 9:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article ignores the fact that every electronic voting and vote counting machine across the nation can be easily rigged in several ways. The easiest way is to load Microsoft Access into the machine's computer. Microsoft Access allows anyone (likely an insider) a "backdoor" access (even without a password) to the voter data. It takes less than a minute to switch the winner and looser votes (or names) and the change cannot be detected. Viewing the computer log would reveal that MS Access was run, but it doesn't show what was done. Another easy way to rig electronic machines is to exchange program cards in the machine with a card containing a different counting formula that favors the unscrupulous candidate.(Like X=2Y) We have outsourced our elections to unscrupulous corporations. They declare the vote data to be secret and do not allow access to the public for verification. The Diebold Corp counted over 80% of the national vote in 2004. Coincidently, the President of Diebold announced that Bush would win the election several days before the vote. Surprise; he did win the count.
Since there can be no proof of this tampering, it is urgent that laws be passed to allow Election Departments to print a paper ballot record of all votes and that a hand count audit be conducted of a random sample of the polling places to compare machine count with ballot count. This must be done before the final canvass is published.
Voting should be a private matter, but vote counting should be very public! Our Democracy depends on it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And we are supposed...
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jun 28, 2008 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to believe that the GOP is going to scale back their voter suppression tactics.
In a pigs eye. I'll believe it when I see it. Otherwise I'll never believe that scum. Dirty election tactics is how the Rethugs steal and win elections. Otherwise, they cannot win. Anyone who has so little respect for religion and God that they turn both to their political purposes have no scruples and live at the bottom of the barrel, mired in sin and degradation.

This is what they call Pro-Life and Family Values, as they slaughter our troops and innocent Iraqis and their families.

I can't believe that they are as Satanic as they are. The GOP will stop at nothing to win elections for their rich clients, the 8100 families who own 90% of the wealth of America.

The GOP are nothing but pimps and whores for the wealthy. And their right wing religions are nothing but exactly what they are, they all sell God for their politics and money.

And to think I believed all that religious stuff that they told me when I was growing up. Some man made religions have gone over to the dark side.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IF they are serious
Posted by: JSquercia on Jun 29, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they are serious which I doubt they can start with the recent Florida law involving
the fact that your name must match a STATE database . This law was sadly upheld by a Federal District Court .
I suspect that as John did with with 527 Groups, he will claim that he can't police every state and couch the suppression in terms of States Rights . Funny they didn't give a DAMN about States Rights in the 2000 Florida Election and were only too happy to
override the State Supreme Court . They had no problem attacking Florida's Laws again in the Terri Schiavo case .
I don't know about other states but in New York we sign a book when we vote and they have records going back several years which allow a comparison of Signatures . I would be very upset if I were told that I was not allowed to vote for some scurilous reason such as not having a state issued ID as happened to 90 year old NUNs in Indiana . On that note remember just because the state doesn't charge for the ID the fact that they DO charge for supporting Documents such Birth Certificates SHOULD be Considered .
It would be interesting to see how MANY cases of Voter Fraud there were in Florida compared to the number of legitimate voters who were purged as Felons . Didn't Ann Coulter vote in the Wrong District last election ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]