Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Democracy and Elections

America's Democratic Collapse

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted June 3, 2008.


In a dramatic speech, Chris Hedges warns that the nation is on the verge of becoming a full-blown corporate state.
Advertisement

Note: Chris Hedges gave this keynote address on Wednesday, May 28, in Furman University's Younts Conference Center. The address was part of protests by faculty and students over the South Carolina college's decision to invite George W. Bush to give the May 31 commencement address.

When it was announced in May that Bush would deliver the commencement address, 222 students and faculty signed and posted on the school's Web site a statement titled "We Object." The statement cites the war in Iraq and the administration's "obstructing progress on reducing greenhouse gases while favoring billions in tax breaks and subsidies to oil companies that are earning record profits."

"We are ashamed of the actions of this administration. The war in Iraq has cost the lives of over 4,000 brave and honorable U.S. military personnel," the statement read. "Because we love this country and the ideals it stands for, we accept our civic responsibility to speak out against these actions that violate American values."

I used to live in a country called America. It was not a perfect country, God knows, especially if you were African American or Native American or of Japanese descent in World War II, or poor or gay or a woman or an immigrant, but it was a country I loved and honored. This country gave me hope that it could be better. It paid its workers wages that were envied around the world. It made sure these workers, thanks to labor unions and champions of the working class in the Democratic Party and the press, had health benefits and pensions. It offered good public education. It honored basic democratic values and held in regard the rule of law, including international law and respect for human rights. It had social programs from Head Start to welfare to Social Security to take care of the weakest among us, the mentally ill, the elderly and the destitute. It had a system of government that, however flawed, was dedicated to protecting the interests of its citizens. It offered the possibility of democratic change. It had a media that was diverse and endowed with the integrity to give a voice to all segments of society, including those beyond our borders, to impart to us unpleasant truths, to challenge the powerful, to explain ourselves to ourselves.

I am not blind to the imperfections of this America, or the failures to always meet these ideals at home and abroad. I spent 20 years of my life in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and the Balkans as a foreign correspondent reporting in countries where crimes and injustices were committed in our name, whether during the Contra war in Nicaragua or the brutalization of the Palestinians by Israeli occupation forces. But there was much that was good and decent and honorable in our country. And there was hope.

The country I live in today uses the same words to describe itself, the same patriotic symbols and iconography, the same national myths, but only the shell remains. America, the country of my birth, the country that formed and shaped me, the country of my father, my father's father and his father's father, stretching back to the generations of my family that were here for the country's founding, is so diminished as to be nearly unrecognizable. I do not know if this America will return, even as I pray and work and strive for its return. The "consent of the governed" has become an empty phrase. Our textbooks on political science are obsolete. Our state, our nation, has been hijacked by oligarchs, corporations and a narrow, selfish political elite, a small and privileged group which governs on behalf of moneyed interests. We are undergoing, as John Ralston Saul wrote, "a coup d'etat in slow motion." We are being impoverished -- legally, economically, spiritually and politically. And unless we soon reverse this tide, unless we wrest the state away from corporate hands, we will be sucked into the dark and turbulent world of globalization where there are only masters and serfs, where the American dream will be no more than that -- a dream, where those who work hard for a living can no longer earn a decent wage to sustain themselves or their families, whether in sweatshops in China or the decaying rust belt of Ohio, where democratic dissent is condemned as treason and ruthlessly silenced.

I single out no party. The Democratic Party has been as guilty as the Republicans. It was Bill Clinton who led the Democratic Party to the corporate watering trough. Clinton argued that the party had to ditch labor unions, no longer a source of votes or power, as a political ally. Workers, he insisted, would vote Democratic anyway. They had no choice. It was better, he argued, to take corporate money. By the 1990s, the Democratic Party, under Clinton's leadership, had virtual fundraising parity with the Republicans. Today the Democrats get more. In political terms, it was a success. In moral terms, it was a betrayal.

The North American Free Trade Agreement was sold to the country by the Clinton White House as an opportunity to raise the incomes and prosperity of the citizens of the United States, Canada and Mexico. NAFTA would also, we were told, staunch Mexican immigration into the United States.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: corporations, democracy, united states

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer prize-winning reporter, is a Senior Fellow at the Nation Institute. His latest book is Collateral Damage: America's War Against Iraqi Civilians.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A Brilliant Speech ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jun 3, 2008 12:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A speech that everyone should read. Chris Hedges has captured the destruction, destitution and duress that pervades the whole of our country. From the flailing economy, to our disappearing constitutional rights, to our neglect of the poor and the environment and to the very idea of government itself, Hedges enumerates America's sins of omission and commission with justified anger and the courage of a true patriot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» FDR got the message long ago Posted by: citizenjoe
» It's too late for voting. Posted by: LMNOP
» The ghost of FDR Posted by: 2dogarage
» Excellent post 2dogarage Posted by: Democratic Socialist
» RE: A Brilliant Speech ... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: A Brilliant Speech ... Posted by: Lauren
» Chris Hedges for VP!! Posted by: jreal
» RE: A Brilliant Speech ... Posted by: LetsSaveDemocracy
» send this story to everyone Posted by: Krain61
» RE: A Brilliant Speech ... Posted by: pangea
This should have been the commencement speech...
Posted by: radiomorning on Jun 3, 2008 1:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He touches on something puzzling that I have been hearing lately about how grateful we all need to be to the Clinton's for all the wonderful things they did for everyone in the 90's. When I hear that I always think "what exactly?"

He illustrates the real state of things, that as it stands today, there is no real choice. Clinton, Obama, McCain, whatever.

It is important not to lose sight of this fact as we go through this election process and all get sucked into the false, media-propagated storyline of these contests. If we watch CNN enough we start to imagine that this is the way things really are. Wolf would never lie to me... would he?

If a Dem wins the WH in November, everything will not suddenly be hunky-dory, because America is now owned by corporations, thanks in large part to Bill Clinton. Corporations like Hillary's former employer Wal-Mart, which have no conscience, no accountability, and no motivation but the bottom line. And guess who pays them to kill Iraqi's and listen to your phone calls? You do.

Chris hits the nail right on the head here. Something much bigger needs to happen.

And honestly, what douche booked Bush for the commencement address? I would seriously consider transfering out of that school after that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Clinton Posted by: paulaH
» RE: Clinton Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Why not? Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Why not? Posted by: radiomorning
NAFTA
Posted by: Dboy on Jun 3, 2008 2:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NAFTA was great if you were a corporation. It was a disaster if you were a worker.

What most people probably miss in this article is the implication of the above quote. If globalization is bad for workers and good for corporations...then stop being a worker! By that I mean stop holding on to the working slave mentality...you might keep a *job*, but use the income from that job to finance your own freedom (through gradual self-education|self-improvement, investment, creating a small business). Nobody is going to make you free. You have to create that state for yourself. And that's true regardless of what political structure you happen to be living in.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Shey
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: richholland
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: geographical outsider
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Self employment Posted by: Plexius2
» RE: Self employment Posted by: richholland
» RE: Self employment? Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Self employment Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Quit buying Chinese crap Posted by: richholland
» Better yet let start over Posted by: Krain61
» Freedom : Small Business? Posted by: Artkansas
» RE: Freedom : Small Business? Posted by: Richard House
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Joe
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Dboy
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: HelperMonkey
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Dboy
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: HelperMonkey
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Dboy
Me Ranting
Posted by: meranting on Jun 3, 2008 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the verge? It's like going into the desert and telling people we're soon going to be out of water. I'm all for speaking out, illustrating why this is the case, how Eisenhower warned us of this 50 years ago, etc etc etc. But telling people we're on the verge might support the notion that we can still wait a minute before it's actually the case. It's now, it's here and GE, GM and all the others are running YOUR life (mine too of course, hehehe).

I blog here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» stop waiting! Posted by: sirios
This may be
Posted by: Shey on Jun 3, 2008 3:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...... the single most brilliant and important article ever posted on AlterNet. I hope the length doesn't deter too many from reading it. It is actually, considering the amount of material it covers, marvelously succinct.

Kudos to Chris Hedges for reminding us of Bill Clinton's complicity in the ever escalating crumbling of our Democracy. Hopefully it will ring a warning bell for those still misguided enough to continue to support Hillary, because this is a two-headed beast if ever there was one.

As for Dubya, lets hope that enough courage and spirit of dissent remain alive on at least one college campus for the protesters (on paper) to walk the walk and boo the War-Criminal-in-Chief off the stage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This may be Posted by: Lauren
» RE: This may be Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: This may be Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: This may be Posted by: Lauren
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
if mr.Hedges is right...
Posted by: richholland on Jun 3, 2008 3:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the working people of the USA have nothing to expect from mrs.Hillary Clinton.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: if mr.Hedges is right... Posted by: Last Chance
» Wrong! Posted by: WhuThe?!?
Tom from New York
Posted by: disc golf on Jun 3, 2008 3:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article by Chris Hedges was absolutely brilliant. It dovetails well with the recent book (The End of America) by Naomi Wolf which details how America is, in fact, becoming a fascist state. The reason so many don't notice this fact is that we've become complacent! We're used to the constant erosion of our personal freedoms! Well do NOT get used to this state of affairs!

Americans need to wake up and this article is as strong a reminder as I've seen! Let's take back America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: Krain61
decline of American empire
Posted by: grmartin on Jun 3, 2008 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The USA has always been a corporate controlled state. If the economy and Iraq war were doing better, GWB wouldn't look so bad. Imperial America has passed its zenith and started its inevitable decline. Maybe, finally, people will start to examine the political structures that will no longer serve a diminished America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yup! Posted by: Dboy
oldfreedomdude
Posted by: oldfreedomdude on Jun 3, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A great editorial. Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

reality bites
Posted by: seazen on Jun 3, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we have a terrific effort to focus thought, discussion, and purposeful action on some core issues that we all must deal with - now. While Mr. Hedges justifiable outrage may have caused him to declare every foreign trade arrangement and many domestic programs harmful by design - rather than badly distorted by the current defense/corporate cabal - everything he describe is real.

What we need to do is push the substance of this thesis forward and seek to mobilize the public and responsible organizations to work toward constructive solutions and ignore those who will take this and use it as fodder for more nonsensical screaming about current political parties or individuals.

The internet has demonstrated it can really generate widespread activity very quickly. It has also demonstrated that if we allow it to happen, those who simply get their jollies through yelling, name calling and misguided chest thumping can overwhelm the discussion so thoroughly that those seeking to learn, to seek solutions, to actually communicate with others give up in frustration.

It would be great if an article like this could become an example of how best to make some progress in our collective thinking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: reality bites Posted by: Lauren
» RE: reality bites Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: reality bites Posted by: Lauren
» RE: reality bites Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: reality bites Posted by: Lauren
» RE: reality bites Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: reality bites Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: reality bites Posted by: Lauren
» We'd better take advantage Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: We'd better take advantage Posted by: HoboHomo
WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES
Posted by: Plexius2 on Jun 3, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At some point, this convergence of ugly realities will lead to a blowup in America. I keep thinking of the sixties riots, assasinations and near assasinations, bombings, and the creation of domestic armed freedom fighters (the Black Panthers and the Weathermen). I think about the tiny minority of extremely wealthy families in South America who must have armed bodyguards, and I noted for the first time ever in print, Chris's mention of a CEO whose company pays over $140,000 a year for security services for their head honcho.

What is in store for all those wealthy people when the Have Nots of America get fed up with poverty? Will we see a repeat of the Mansion family slaughter of wealthy Hollywood people? Will CEO's start having their families kidnapped for ransom?

And maybe most importantly, what will happen here if John McCain "wins" the presidency? I suspect that a lot of people are right on the borderline of losing it, and if McAnus manages to assume the mantle from Bush, you will see a repeat of the sixties times ten. Don't forget also that we have a growing crowd of Iraq vets who are coming back angry, mentally disturbed and dangerously well trained to kill. The destruction will be swift and vast. And if the rich in their gated communities with their bodyguards and panic rooms think they are safe, they need to think about how vulnerable Ronald Reagan was with the entire Secret Service to protect him. One mentally ill man living in his car with no organization backing him almost took out the president.

I fear that we are all looking at a very dangerous time if the Repugs manage to steal another election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: Addwaita
» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: ceraiteri
» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: HoboHomo
There is no center
Posted by: Urstrly on Jun 3, 2008 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over the week-end, I had a conversation with a Clinton supporter, who described her as a centrist. I wish I had had Hedges' speech to give to her. If the Clintons are centrists, then ordinary Americans, myself included, are screwed. All those white working class voters Clinton claims are hers are the same ones her husband put out of work and whose unions he turned a cold shoulder to.

A third woman chimed in that she supported Hillary because she works in a corporation and she knows how tough you have to be to survive in that world. She had not considered that the next president Clinton might be tough on her as she left her corporate privileges behind.

I've known from the start I wouldn't support Senator Clinton, and I'm appreciative for Hedges to articulating why. I don't know how much better Obama will be, but at least he doesn't have the Clinton's baggage. And he's certainly miles ahead of McCain.

You can't just divide things down the middle any more; a deliberate path must be set. Either you want to save our way of life or you're willing to go numbly into where the current path leads.

It's up to people like us to keep saying long and loud that corporations are not the government, that their interests and the people's are rarely synonymous, that our Constitution and, indeed, our planet, are must be rescued.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There is no center Posted by: Southern Gal
» RE: There is no center Posted by: Dboy
Mr. Hedges article is eloquent, BUT
Posted by: Last Chance on Jun 3, 2008 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't find a reference to the corporations' basic tool for taking over the World and crushing democracy -- the population explosion that pits worker against worker in the competition for jobs and floods the Earth with billions of people who cannot possibly support themsleves except to cut down the last rainforests, or turn to gangsterism and hire themselves out to the same corporate criminals who created their Hell on Earth.

So, why did Mr. Hedges fail to mention this, and the obvious solution, which is to grant all women everywhere the legally protected right to decide if and when to birth how many or few children? Because given that right, the human population would decline so there would be no growing economy to create the huge profits for predatory corporations. No growing population = no growing economy = no criminal corporations = democracy for a smaller human population on a vibrantly healthy planet Earth!

Without this essential fact, Mr. Hedges article is nothing more than a swan song, a dirge for America's democratic past, because he offers no remedial action! Does he assume that a million people will march on Washington demanding justice and reform? Does he envision corrupt Congresspersons suddenly agreeing to impeach Bush and Cheney and arrest Rove and whoever else is involved in their treasonous conspiracy? So what if they did? What then? Business as usual under the Democratic Party for a slightly more liberal New World Order (?!) With a growing population and growing pollution the Earth would be just as diseased and all of us just as dead! -- How To Save The Earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A very good point... Posted by: Plexius2
» RE: A very good point... Posted by: Last Chance
» Just too many people! Posted by: KeepsonTickn
» You're right. Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: You're right. Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Just too many people! Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Just too many people! Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: Just too many people! Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Just too many people! Posted by: Cybershaman
» Where I come from, we call Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» You Are Completely Right Posted by: bcgirl125
Only 222 students at Furman heard this speech?
Posted by: h bee on Jun 3, 2008 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and there are almost 650 in the graduating class...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» They were probably out Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» Shitty beer Posted by: Dboy
The Picture says it all
Posted by: modeler on Jun 3, 2008 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new Adolf raised his arm in the old salute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corruption
Posted by: US Citizen on Jun 3, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as it has happened in the past, it looks like the United States' corporate state will collapse under its own corruption. The housing industry has already collapsed, and with all the deregulation of the Bush administration, it won't be long before the United States' financial, retail, and industrial sectors will collapse, because of total corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Corruption Posted by: Last Chance
» Some Answers -- Posted by: Last Chance
» Change? Posted by: Dboy
HELLO ?!?!? America has already become a Korporatist state ever since RAYGUN took office in 1981 !
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 3, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
28 years and this author still doesn't think America is already in ?!?!? I mean come FUCKING on ! Both parties have allowed Corporate America to RAPE this country and in the last 15 years the planet !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh for much longer than that, Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Oh for much longer than that, Posted by: Last Chance
» Dude? Posted by: bornxeyed
Supporting Democrats is a serious political disorder
Posted by: chlamor on Jun 3, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like alcoholism or returning again & again to an abusive spouse who repeatedly lies to you. It's easy to fall off the wagon, to make excuses & rationalizations for it.

Even many whose views are developed enough to recognize such truths as the fundamental rottenness of the 2-party system & the complicity of Democrats in all of the Republicans' major crimes, are still unable to draw the logical consequences of these insights. (Those so naive that they still conceive of Democrats as being the "opponents" of Republicans are another case altogether.)

The central point is this: capitalist society permits the Democrats to be one of the 2 allowed parties for a very definite reason. It's not because the Democrats "serve the people." It's because in a subtle but effective way, they help the capitalists keep the populace under control by providing them with the illusion of possible change. TPTB don't want the people "served." They want them managed, or controlled.

It is the job, the central social function of the Democrats to always be dangling before the people's noses vague pseudo-hints of possible change, so as to keep them from bolting from bourgeois politics altogether. It is the Democrats' intention to never deliver meaningful change, but rather to keep dangling hints of it alluringly forever. This produces control -- a populace habituated to remain safely within the lines required by ruling class interests.

This is why the Democrats NEVER paint a picture of US history that's the slightest bit accurate -- they want a brainwashed population every bit as much as the Republicans do. This is why they NEVER are willing to set forth an honest socioeconomic analysis of why things are as they are -- they much prefer that people not understand such things.

As long as a large chunk of voters can be deceived by the seemingly "nicer guy" act of the Democrats, there is no hope whatever of coming to grips with the core problems of our society. The most dangerous trends -- a wasteful consumer society, environmental destruction, grotesque social inequality, and an uncontrollable propaganda/war machine -- cannot even be approached within the framework of bourgeois politics, because they all serve ruling class interests. This is what is really being protected, when people opt to support Democrats just because they seem less blatantly cruel on TV.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This is the problem with discussing class. Posted by: andabottleof_rum
Be your own government
Posted by: PaulK on Jun 3, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Set up a wiki, label it "our government".

When you're small, devise a government.

When you're a bit larger with more hits, propose bills. Pass them.

The larger the wiki grows, the more moral power it has.

Moral power will start to translate into actual power: the cooperative's power to buy things in bulk, the validator organization's power to either approve or red-flag ideas, candidates or businesses.

The second part of "democracy is broken" is "so fix it". Problems need solutions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Be your own government Posted by: mamakat
» RE: Be your own government Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Be your own government Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Be your own government Posted by: HoboHomo
» Sorry, no URL right now Posted by: PaulK
We the People
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jun 3, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We the people are the only ones who are going to address our failing democracy. We have to be eternally vigilant and hold our elected officials accountable. The deck is stacked against us, but we must fight on. We must work for public financing of campaigns for the White House, Congress, and state and local elected offices. If elected president Obama will not change this corporate way of doing business without our insistence. We must constantly communicate with the White House and our Congressional respresentatives. We must hold the new president accountable to implement the changes we asked. Hope is not enough. It takes hard work and persistence to change things. Are we up to the task as our lives crumble around us?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We the People Posted by: Lauren
» RE: We the People Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: We the People Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: We the People Posted by: Turiye
America 101
Posted by: s.duplantier on Jun 3, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This excellent speech is a short course in understanding how close the country is to the brink.

I am having a 1968 flashback! When pushed against the wall, you can give up or resist.

Maybe the pushing has been slow (pace, the slow motion fascism idea) and therefore the recognition of what is happening is slow. But when you finally realize it, survival means running, fighting back--anything but letting the thugs take you without a fight.

Think Warsaw Ghetto.

What will you do when the America's corporate version of the Waffen SS comes knocking? They are already on your street, walking toward your house.

It's past time to wake up, but how do you rouse an entire nation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: America 101: Blackwater Posted by: GrannyBgood
» RE: America 101 Posted by: Lauren
exporting American domestic policies...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 3, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm of two minds about this apparent changeFront:
-Should Canadians be grateful?
-Should Canadians be worried?

The US ReichWing dumps MILLIONS of dollars into 'special interest groups' in Canada (as well as developing nations) to harmonize culture into a ReichWing malleable mess.

If its ugly & American, its being funded:
-religious fundamentalism
-pro-Life fanaticism
-isolated LDS splinter group encampments of abused children
-pro-NRA fanaticism
-corporate domination
-privatization of resources, government & social processes (i.e., healthcare privatization movement)

the ONE thing the ReichWing hates? is anybody who can do anything differently & be observed doing it without catching a beatdown. Thus, they shut down the Mexican Border so Americans can't recognize their own neighbours & their oppression ... & vilify Canadian culture as 'communist' & requiring 'modification' to an American norm

There is always some shill who thinks that selling out their own culture to a foreign overlord is the path to personal prosperity... thus we end up with conditions that undermine sovereignty & personal liberty

1. Marc Emery - going to jail in Canada for 5 years to APPEASE American interests. Going to jail for activities which are not jail time in Canada, but because Americans initiated transactions which were illegal in the US. Of course he took the deal. why? because it meant avoiding extradition to the hell hole of privatized prisons in the US

2. KBR is currently taking Canada's Civil Rights to our Supreme Court... to undermine **off hours activities** because APPARENTLY EMPLOYEES DON'T HAVE PRIVATE TIME if it could be argued their PRIVATE & OFF-HOURS TIME adversely effects their WORK TIME

GET ENOUGH SLEEP? you could lose your job if you don't one day

Gee, KBR just loves their employees, don't they? if they're a raped female they're bad press to be covered up, but if they're Canadians who have a private life & exercise their rights to privacy? they're a potential employee to be fired or threatened by HR

NYC's Staggering Arrest Rate for Pot Achieved By Police Deception

Yeah, no POTENTIAL FOR CORRUPTION THERE

The Thieves of Virtue: in a culture without the Right to Privacy, criminalizing VICE by redefining morality functionally aborts representative government really, VICE is contextual:
* gender
* ethnicity
* age
* race

all pay a part in morals. but VICE, should never be *criminalized*, especially in a nation where PRIVACY has been abolished

Who is PERFECT ENOUGH to represent THE PEOPLE or a populist reform when there is neither privacy nor the Will to preserve privacy in society?
Who stands *for the People* when Money & Power exert corrosive controls to extend their oppression & corruption?

Nobody is immune to *vice* as VICE is about how ONE PERSON privately & personally determines *how to enjoy their own body*
but you CAN be immune to ReichWingers criminalizing how you enjoy it! JUST SAY NO!


BlueBerry Pick'n
ThisCanadian
┄┄
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very...Very...Sorry...Obama
Posted by: Captainmagic on Jun 3, 2008 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is bought and paid for and will no more change your landscape than Hillary could or Macain for that matter. It will only vary by small but largely painted, degrees (propaganda). You see Obama is the black man you have to have when you need the ultimate fall guy. Yes he will look OK but then there's the real stuff happening as you sleep. Just imagine if he should try and turn this behemouth around and actually work at ridding your country of the ills that afflict it so badly. He WILL have something in common with Martin Luther King,and at the end of the day, your nation will thrash around a bit, but hey, he was only a black man. You have the runs on the board and no one should consider anything other than this eventuality. Dead man walking. No ifs no buts if he tries to upset the status quo, he's gone and Hillary will be one of the dagger holders as well as the Macains of this, your reality world.

I said to the boys as the wall came down and the Russians realised (you didn't win any cold war)as the French and the British did so long ago you get to make a choice as to how you want to end up. You either continue down the festering slope or you get smart and pull your head in. The Russians withdrew to build for a better day but the Capitalist's in the repugs and demo's it seems will allow your ship to burn completely to the water line. We are watching with interest to see where your rats swim to.

George stood up on the deck and proclaimed victory (what an ass hole)and we said they just lost it. It won't matter who