Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Democracy and Elections

Campaign Finance Lessons from the 2008 Campaign, So Far

Democracy 21. Posted May 22, 2008.


Small and big donors increase as federal oversight creates loopholes.
Advertisement

As the country heads into the end game of the 2008 presidential primaries, and gets ready for an extended general election campaign, this is a good time to take stock of campaign finance lessons already learned from the 2008 election.

1. Senator Barack Obama Has Made an Extraordinary Breakthrough in Small Donor Internet Fundraising, But it's the Exception, Not the Rule; Larger Donations and Bundlers Continue to Play the Major Role in Funding the 2008 Presidential Primaries.

One of the most interesting developments in the financing of the 2008 presidential primaries has been the extraordinary success of Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) in raising small donations on the Internet.

As of March 31, 2008, Senator Obama had raised an unprecedented $101 million in small individual contributions of $200 or less, which represents 45 percent of his $225 million in total individual contributions raised for the primaries, according to the Campaign Finance Institute (CFI).

Furthermore, according to an article in The New York Times (May 19, 2008), Obama has received contributions from more that 1.5 million individual donors.

Successful small donor Internet fundraising provides a candidate with broad-based funding at virtually no cost to the candidate -- with almost no use of the candidate's time and without the danger of influence-buying that accompanies larger contributions and the bundlers who raise them.

The Obama Internet fundraising phenomenon, however, has been the exception not the rule in the 2008 presidential primary races, even though a few other candidates have had some success in fundraising on the Internet.

Overall, large donor fundraising continued to play the major role in financing the 2008 presidential primaries.

As of March 31, 2008, all presidential candidates combined had raised 51 percent, or $366 million, of their total individual contributions for the primaries in larger individual contributions of $1,000 or more. This included raising 30 percent, or $215 million, of their total individual contributions in maxed-out contributions of $2,300, according to CFI.

The presumptive Republican nominee, Senator John McCain (R-AZ), for example, raised 63 percent, or $45 million, of his total individual contributions for the primaries in larger donations of $1,000 or more, as of March 31, 2008, according to CFI.

The other Democratic candidate still in the race, Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY), raised 55 percent, or $82 million, of her total individual contributions for the primaries in larger donations of $1,000 or more during the same period.

Even Senator Obama had raised 37 percent, or $83 million, of his total individual contributions for the primaries in larger donations of $1,000 or more, as of March 31, 2008.

And for the year 2007, when he was raising the funds critical to his ability to compete as a serious presidential candidate in 2008, Senator Obama raised 54 percent, or $52 million, of his total individual contributions for the primaries in larger donations of $1,000 or more, according to CFI.

Bundlers, furthermore, have played a key role in raising the larger donations for 2008 presidential candidates in both parties.

2. Internet Fundraising, If Combined With Multiple Public Matching Funds Could Make Small Donors the Principal Source of Private Funds in Future Presidential Primaries.

The Obama breakthrough in Internet small donor fundraising, if combined with a major innovation contained in legislation pending in Congress to repair the presidential public financing system, would open the door to Internet small donors becoming the principal source of private funding for future presidential primary candidates.

"Revitalizing the presidential funding system is essential to protecting the integrity and credibility of the presidency and the interests of citizens in fair government decisions," according to Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer. "The successful track record of the presidential public financing system for most of its thirty-four year existence provides powerful evidence for why the system should be repaired," Wertheimer said.

Under the legislation to repair the presidential system introduced in the Senate and House, a presidential primary candidate would receive multiple public matching funds of $4 for every $1 raised, up to $200 of an individual contribution. Under current law presidential primary candidates who accept public financing receive a $1 public match for every $1 raised, up to $250 of an individual contribution.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: internet, clinton, voting, obama, mccain, funding, election 2008

Democracy 21 is a Washington-based nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to making democracy work for all Americans.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
First things first!
Posted by: Canute on May 25, 2008 9:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is heartening to read that there is some kind of movement towards public funding of national campaigns. Right now the wealthiest 1% act as a de facto nominating committee, choosing who the other 99% get to vote for. Campaign finance revolution (more than reform) is what we need to accomplish before any other efforts can succeed.

It is less heartening that mine is the first comment on this article three days after it was published. Campaign finance just doesn't bring out the spittle flecked rants the way those emotional issues do. What people miss is that the fate of those emotional issues is decided beforehand by the campaign finance system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]